Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Open Access Journal of Cancer & Oncology Commentary 2 min read

Cost Matters

Guirgis H*
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2578-4625  10.23880/oajco-16000184  Received: March 31, 2023  Published: April 19, 2023
  views
 13 references
PDF

References

  1. Guirgis HM (2022) The Impact of The Immune Check Point on Cost in Lung Cancer: Duration of use. ESMED 10(6).
  2. Helmy MG (2023) Target Therapy vs the Immune Check Point Inhibitors in Lung Cancer: Costs and Caps Platform 11(2).
  3. Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, Felip E, Perez GJL, et al. (2016) Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-postive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE -010): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387(10027): 1540-1550.
  4. Garon EB, Rizvi NA, Hui R, Leighl N, Ani SB, et al. (2015) Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 372: 2018-2028.
  5. Reck M, Rodriguez AD, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csoszi T, et al. (2016) Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD- L1-positive nonsmall-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 375: 823-1833.
  6. Herbst RS, Giaccone G, de Marinis F, Reinmuth N, Vergnenegre A, et al. (2020) Atezolizumab for First-Line Treatment of PD-L1–Selected Patients with NSCLC. N Engl J Med 383: 1328-1339.
  7. Sezer A, Kilickap S, Gumus M, Bondarenko I, Ozguroglu M, et al. (2021) Cemiplimab monotherapy for first- line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 of at least 50%: a multicentre, open-label, global, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 397(10274): 592-604.
  8. Kline RK (2021) Bundled Payment Models in Oncology: Learning to Think in New Ways. JCO Oncol Pract 17(4): 169-172.
  9. Forde PM, Spicer J, Lu S, Provencio M, Mitsudomi T, et al. (2022) Neoadjuvant Nivolumab plus chemotherapy in resectable lung cancer. N Engl J Med 386: 1973-1985.
  10. Schnipper LE, Davidson NE, Wollins DS, Tyne C, Blayney DW, et al. (2015) American Society of Clinical Oncology statement: A framework to assess the value of cancer treatment options. J Clin Oncol 33(23): 2563-2577.
  11. Cherny NI, Sullivan R, Dafni U, Kerst JM, Sobrero A, et al. (2015) A standardized, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies. The European Society for Medical Oncology: magnitude of clinical benefit scale (ESM-MCBS): Ann Oncol 28(11): 2901- 2905.
  12. Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR, Kamlet MS (1996) Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Recommendations for reporting cost effectiveness analyses. JAMA. 276(15): 1253-1258.
  13. Li M, Liao K, Pan IW, Shih YT (2022) Growing Financial burden from high cost targeted oral anticancer medicines among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer. JCO oncology practice 18(11): 1739-1749.

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{guirgis2023,
  title   = {Cost Matters},
  author  = {Guirgis H},
  journal = {Open Access Journal of Cancer & Oncology},
  year    = {2023},
  volume  = {7},
  number  = {1},
  doi     = {10.23880/oajco-16000184}
}
Guirgis H (2023). Cost Matters. Open Access Journal of Cancer & Oncology, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.23880/oajco-16000184
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cost Matters
AU  - Guirgis H
JO  - Open Access Journal of Cancer & Oncology
PY  - 2023
VL  - 7
IS  - 1
DO  - 10.23880/oajco-16000184
ER  -
BETA

Full Text Preview

This feature is under active development

We are still refining this page. Occasional formatting inconsistencies may appear in tables, figures, or text layout. Your patience is appreciated.