Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine Journal Research Article 9 min read

Risk Factors and Prevention Measures for Specific Shoulder Pain in Laparoscopic Surgery

Ammari Smail*, Tibiche A and Taieb M
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2577-4301  10.23880/accmj-16000238  Received: April 24, 2024  Published: May 06, 2024
  views
 17 references
 3 tables
PDF
Keywords
CO2 Laparoscopy Postoperative Pain Shoulder Pain
Abstract

Introduction: Shoulder pain is a specific discomfort associated with laparoscopic procedures. Its pathophysiology remains poorly understood and hypothetical. Several factors have been suggested as potential triggers for this pain. The aim of our study is to assess post-laparoscopic surgery shoulder pain and investigate the risk factors for its occurrence and methods of prevention. Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive and prospective study involving 337 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for acute non-traumatic abdominal emergencies between February 2018 and October 2021. Results: Among the 337 operated patients, 190 were females (56.4%), with a mean age of 38 years ± 15 years. Shoulder pain was present in 73 patients (21.6%). Its intensity was low in the majority of cases. The average duration of pain was 1.99 ± 1.09 days. The operative time threshold at which pain began to appear was 34.5 minutes. Pain was less intense in patients who underwent drainage at the end of the procedure (p-value = 0.026 on postoperative day 1). Moreover, there was no correlation between the duration of postoperative shoulder pain and drainage (P= 0.482). Conclusion: The insufflation of CO2 to create pneumoperitoneum and the tensioning of the nerves in the abdominal wall were the factors responsible for shoulder pain in our study. Drainage at the end of the procedure reduced the intensity of the pain but did not prevent its occurrence.

Introduction

In laparoscopic surgery, there are fewer skin incisions and less parietal trauma, resulting in fewer sections of cutaneous nerves and thus less postoperative pain compared to conventional surgery [1]. However, a criticism of laparoscopic approach is the presence of postoperative shoulder pain, with an incidence estimated between 35% and 80% [1, 2, 3]. It is a pain of moderate intensity and short duration, but in some cases, it persists for more than 72 hours [4, 5], and its intensity is sometimes greater than that of the surgical sites [2]. This pain unique to the laparoscopic approach is still poorly understood [6, 7]. Thus, the pathophysiology of this pain, the factors implicated in its occurrence, and the means of its prevention remain hypothetical. Several factors have been cited as the origin of this pain, such as CO2 used for pneumoperitoneum creation [8], abdominal distension resulting from pneumoperitoneum creation [7], and the low temperature (below body temperature) of the insufflated gas [7]. The objective of our study is to evaluate post-laparoscopic surgery shoulder pain and to study the risk factors for its occurrence, and the means of its prevention.

Material and Methods

Conducted at the university department of general surgery of Ain Taya Hospital (CHU Alger EST, Algeria), our descriptive and prospective study included 337 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for acute non-traumatic abdominal emergencies between February 2018 and October 2021. We included in this study all adult patients aged 15 years and older presenting only acute non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergencies. We excluded from this study traumatic emergencies, patients classified as ASA IV, and patients in hypovolemic or septic shock. Postoperative pain was assessed at postoperative day 0 (POD0) and postoperative day 1 (POD1) using the visual analog scale (VAS) and categorized into four modalities: No pain = VAS 0, Mild pain = (VAS 0 - 3), Moderate pain = (VAS 4 - 6), Severe pain = (VAS > 6).

In our study, first-line analgesics such as paracetamol were used as the initial treatment. The majority of our patients were discharged on POD1; therefore, pain intensity assessment was conducted at both POD0 and POD1. The evaluation of postoperative pain duration was performed during follow-up consultations.

Results

Out of the 337 operated patients, 190 were females (56.4%) and 147 were males (43.6%). The mean age was 38 years ± 15 years, with a range from 15 to 82 years. The body mass index (BMI) was above 25 in 179 patients (53.11%). Comorbidities were present in 109 patients (32.3%), and abdominal scarring was observed in 90 patients (26.7%). According to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, our patients were categorized as ASA I in 74.8% (252 patients), ASA II in 22% (74 patients), and ASA III in 3.3% (11 patients). Pregnant women represented 4.2% (8 patients) of our sample, with a mean gestational age of 15 weeks ± 7.29 weeks, ranging from 7 to 29 weeks. The pathologies operated on in our study are summarized in Table 1.

Preoperative DiagnosisPeroperative Diagnosis
PathologiesN%PathologiesN%
Acute appendicitis17752,6Acute appendicitis17853
(simple and complicated)(simple and complicated)
Acute lithiasic cholecystitis8825,9Acute lithiasic cholecystitis8825,9
Ovarian cyst torsion2404,5Ovarian cyst torsion2707,5
Ectopic pregnancy2306,9Ectopic pregnancy2306,9
Péritonites par perforation d’ulcère103Peritonitis due to peptic ulcer perforation92,7
Ileal perforation10,3
Occlusions intestinales aigues sur brides82,4Acute intestinal obstruction due to adhesions72,1
Obstruction due to stromal tumor10,3
Acute nonspecific abdominal pain72,1Acute appendicitis30,89
Ruptured right ovarian cyst10,3
Retrocecal internal hernia10,3
No specific etiology20,6

Table 1: Operated Pathologies.

The mean operative time across all pathologies was 52.09 minutes ± 24.14 minutes (range: 14 to 178 minutes). The overall anesthesia duration (surgical intervention time) was 75.35 minutes ± 25.17 minutes (range: 29 to 203 minutes). The mean overall hospitalization duration was 1.5 days (range: 1 day to 8.5 days), with a mean postoperative hospitalization duration of 1 day (range: 1 day to 7.5 days).

The postoperative morbidity rate was 6.2% (n = 21 patients). Shoulder pain specific to laparoscopic approach was found in 73 patients (21.6%). Postoperative pain in our patients was predominantly mild, with 73% (n = 246 patients) reporting mild pain at postoperative Day 0 (POD0) and 68.5% (n = 231 patients) at PO D1. The pain evolved progressively, with 73% of patients reporting mild pain at POD0 compared to 68.5% at POD1. Additionally, there was a decrease in the percentage of patients reporting moderate and severe pain from POD0 to POD1.

The mean duration of postoperative pain was 1.99 days ± 1.09 days, ranging from 0 to 6 days. The threshold operative time for the onset of pain was 34.5 minutes (calculated using the Youden test). Correlation analysis between the occurrence and duration of postoperative shoulder pain and various parameters such as sex, age, BMI, ASA stage, timing of surgical interventions, location of the operated organ (above or below the mesocolon), operative time, and drainage, using chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Spearman’s Rho test, showed no significant relationship between these parameters and the occurrence of shoulder pain Table 2.

Postoperative painParametersP
Survenue de la douleur scapulaireAge0,333
Gender0,469
Body Mass Index0,501
ASA Status0,910
Timing of Surgical Procedures0,157
Operated Pathology0,287
Location of Operated Target Organ0,511
Operative Time0,616
Drainage0,199
Day of Resumption of Intestinal Transit0,760

Table 2: Risk Factors for the Occurrence of Postoperative Shoulder Pain.

Similarly, correlation analysis between the intensity of postoperative shoulder pain and various parameters using chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, or Spearman’s Rho test, revealed a significant relationship between the intensity of shoulder pain at POD1 and drainage (p-value = 0.026 at POD1) Table 3. However, there was no correlation between the duration of postoperative shoulder pain and drainage (P = 0.482, Fisher’s exact test).

Postoperative painParametersP at D0P at D1
Survenue de la douleur scapulaireÂge0,4250,419
Sexe0,9440,785
Body Mass Index0,501430
ASA Status0,910720
Operated Pathology0,5400,234
Location of Operated Target Organ0,4560,132
Operative Time0,0560,053
Drainage0,1570,026
Day of Resumption of Intestinal Transit0,7600,333

Table 3: Factors correlated with the intensity of shoulder pain at postoperative day 0 and day 1.

Discussion

Criticism often arises regarding laparoscopic procedures due to the incidence of postoperative shoulder pain, estimated to range from 35% to 80% [1, 2, 3]. This pain typically presents as moderate in intensity and short in duration, though in certain cases, it can persist beyond 72 hours and surpass the intensity of incisional pain [4, 5]. In our study, laparoscopy- specific shoulder pain was observed in 73 patients (21.6%). Predominantly, it was of low intensity (VAS = 0-3) in most patients (73% at POD0 and 68.5% at POD1) [6]. This pain exhibited a regressive pattern, with a mean duration of 1.99 days (range: 0 to 6 days) [6]. These findings corroborate existing literature, where shoulder pain is often described as moderate and typically resolves within seven postoperative days, barring exceptional cases. The etiology of laparoscopy- specific shoulder pain remains elusive. Various factors have been postulated to elucidate its origin, including peritoneal cavity distension by insufflated CO2 and tension on nerves and blood vessels, culminating in the release of inflammatory mediators and neuropraxia of the phrenic nerve due to CO2’s acidic effect [2, 4, 7, 9].

The alleged algogenic role of CO2 in precipitating post-laparoscopic shoulder pain is frequently discussed, possibly mediated by local acidosis [8]. Notably, a significant correlation exists between postoperative pain and residual carbon dioxide volume in the peritoneal cavity following parietal closure [2, 4, 10]. Studies have suggested that active aspiration of residual CO2, as opposed to passive evacuation, substantially mitigates post-laparoscopy pain [11, 12]. Our study unveiled a significant association between shoulder pain intensity at POD1 and the placement of a drain at the procedure’s conclusion (p-value = 0.026 at POD1 per chi- square test) [6]. Shoulder pain intensity diminished at POD1 in patients with drainage, attributed to residual CO2 evacuation through the drain. Nonetheless, drainage neither prevents the onset of this pain nor curtails its duration. For some authors, it has been demonstrated that drainage does not reduce postoperative shoulder pain [13].

Inflammatory phenomena surrounding the drains could potentially induce pain, negating any advantage conferred by the expulsion of residual gases through the drain [7]. Thus, it is suggested that intraperitoneal gas be actively evacuated at the end of the laparoscopic procedure by instrumental aspiration under direct vision without the use of drains [7]. Some authors even advocate for placing the patient in a Trendelenburg position at 30° with a pulmonary recruitment maneuver consisting of five manual lung inflations. This maneuver helps push the diaphragm upward, facilitating the evacuation of residual gas from the subphrenic space [1]. Some authors suggest that post-laparoscopy pain is partly due to abdominal distension during pneumoperitoneum creation. This distension leads to stretching of the phrenic nerves and the anterior abdominal wall [7]. A nerve extension of 20% results in complete occlusion of endoneural vessels and total nerve ischemia [7, 14]. This observation was noted in our study; indeed, our results showed that pain onset occurs intraoperatively once the phrenic nerves are irritated by CO2 (from the threshold of 34.5 minutes according to the Youden test). Once the phrenic nerves are irritated and pain is triggered, even complete evacuation of residual CO2 through a drain will not completely eliminate postoperative pain, as evidenced by the absence of a relationship between drainage and the duration of postoperative shoulder pain. For other authors, the nerve has time to adapt to stretching, making it less likely for distension injury to occur. It is rather the intraoperative pressure spikes >15 cm/Hg that have a greater nociceptive influence on the phrenic nerves than the pneumoperitoneum plateau pressure [7]. Finally, a last category of authors suggests that the low temperature (below body temperature) of insufflated gas may be responsible for the pain. Two studies compared pain in two groups of patients. The first group was insufflated with gas at a low temperature (20°C), and the second group was insufflated with gas at physiological temperature (37°C). The results of these studies showed that patients in the second group insufflated with warm gas had less postoperative shoulder pain [7, 15, 16]. However, rigorously controlled studies on animals have determined that the impact of insufflation of warm gas on postoperative shoulder pain is minimal [7, 17].

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that CO2 used to create pneumoperitoneum and the tensioning of nerves in the abdominal wall resulting from abdominal distension are two main factors involved in the genesis of shoulder pain. Our study also showed that the volume of residual gas is directly related to the intensity of the pain. Moreover, the use of a drain at the end of the procedure would not prevent the occurrence of this pain, but would reduce its intensity. Thus, CO2 desufflation at the end of the procedure or the placement of a drain would reduce the intensity of postoperative pain.

References

  1. Phelps P, Cakmakkaya OS, Apfel CC, Radke OC (2008) A simple clinical maneuver to reduce laparoscopy-induced shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 111(5): 1155-1160.
  2. Dijk JV, Dedden SJ, Geomini P, Kuijk SV, Hanegem NV, et al. (2018) Randomised controlled trial to estimate reduction in pain after laparoscopic surgery when using a combination therapy of intraperitoneal normal saline and the pulmonary recruitment manoeuvre. BJOG 125(11): 1469-1476.
  3. Chang SH, Lee HW, Kim HK, Kim SH, Kim DK, et al. (2009) An evaluation of perioperative pregabalin for prevention and attenuation of postoperative shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 109(4): 1284-1286.
  4. Alexander Jl (1997) Pain after laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 79(3): 369-378.
  5. Dixon JB, Reuben Y, Halket C, O’Brien PE (2005) Shoulder pain is a common problem following laparoscopic adjustable gastric band surgery. Obes Surg 15(8): 1111- 1117.
  6. Byrne J, Saleh F, Ambrosini L, Quereshy F, Jackson TD, et al. (2015) Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes. Surg Endosc 29(9): 2525-2532.
  7. Mouton WG, Bessell JR, Otten KT, Maddern GJ (1999) Pain after laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13(5): 445-8.
  8. Perry CP, Tombrello R (1993) Effect of fluid instillation on postlaparoscopy pain. J Reprod Med 38(10): 768-770.
  9. Donatsky AM, Bjerrum F, Gögenur I (2013) Surgical techniques to minimize shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A systematic review. Surg Endosc 27(7): 2275-2282.
  10. Jackson SA, Laurence AS, Hill JC (1996) Does post- laparoscopy pain relate to residual carbon dioxide? Anaesthesia 51(5): 485-487.
  11. Leelasuwattanakul N, Bunyavehchevin S, Sriprachittichai P (2016) Active gas aspiration versus simple gas evacuation to reduce shoulder pain after diagnostic laparoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 42(2): 190-194.
  12. Haghgoo A, Chaichian S, Ghahremani M, Nooriardebili S, Akbaian A, et al. (2016) The Use of Peritoneal Suction Drainage to Reduce Shoulder Pain Caused by Gynecological Laparoscopy. Arch Iran Med 19(3): 173- 178.
  13. Asgari Z, Hosseini R, Rastad H, Hosseini L (2018) Does Peritoneal Suction Drainage Reduce Pain After Gynecologic Laparoscopy? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28(2): 73-76.
  14. Tiel RL, Kline DG (1996) Peripheral nerve trauma. In: Bradley WG (Ed.), Neurology in clinical practice. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, USA, pp 980-981.
  15. Korell M, Schmaus F, Strowitzki T, Schneeweiss SG, Hepp H (1996) Pain intensity following laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6(5): 375-379.
  16. Pier A, Benedic M, Mann B, Buck V (1994) Postlaparoscopic pain syndrome. Results of a prospective, randomized study. Chirurg 65(3): 200-208.
  17. Bessell JR, Maddern GJ (1997) Influence of gas temperature during laparoscopic procedures. In: Rosenthal PJ, et al. (Eds.), The pathophysiology of the pneumoperitoneum. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp : 18-27.

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{ammari2024,
  title   = {Risk Factors and Prevention Measures for Specific Shoulder Pain in Laparoscopic Surgery},
  author  = {Ammari Smail, Tibiche A and Taieb M},
  journal = {Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine Journal},
  year    = {2024},
  volume  = {9},
  number  = {1},
  doi     = {10.23880/accmj-16000238}
}
Ammari Smail, Tibiche A and Taieb M (2024). Risk Factors and Prevention Measures for Specific Shoulder Pain in Laparoscopic Surgery. Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine Journal, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.23880/accmj-16000238
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Risk Factors and Prevention Measures for Specific Shoulder Pain in Laparoscopic Surgery
AU  - Ammari Smail, Tibiche A and Taieb M
JO  - Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine Journal
PY  - 2024
VL  - 9
IS  - 1
DO  - 10.23880/accmj-16000238
ER  -