Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Annals of Bioethics & Clinical Applications Research Article 25 min read

Level of Adherence to Covid-19 Preventive Measures: Case Study of FUTA Shuttle Bus

Akinsehinwa FO*, Adeniran AO, Olorunfemi SO and Aina OM
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2691-5774  10.23880/abca-16000219  Received: January 04, 2022  Published: January 31, 2022
  views
 46 references
 4 tables
PDF
Keywords
Adherence Covid-19 Preventive measures FUTA Shuttle Bus
Abstract

This study assessed the level of adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators and passengers to the covid-19 preventive measures suggested by the government, regarding the compulsory hand rinsing; physical distancing preventive measures; and wearing of a nose mask and or face mask in FUTA shuttle bus. Survey research design was employed through personal observation. The observation lasted for 7 days which entails a 7-day peak and off-peak hour count within the specified hours of 7-10 am 2-4 pm and 4-7 pm from Sunday to Saturday. Of the three hours designated for each morning, afternoon, and evening session, there seems to be no rinsing of hands by passengers, although there were provisions of veronica buckets in the Bus Park. Also, there seems to be a low level of adherence to nose masks and or face mask-wearing among the passengers, however, the FUTA shuttle bus operators were keen on ensuring physical distance in the sitting arrangement of passengers as this was discovered in all the shuttle buses that were studied. The study recommends the strict monitoring and enforcement of hand rinsing by passengers in FUTA before the departure of shuttle bus; the enforcement of nose mask and or face mask-wearing inside the shuttle bus.

Introduction

Since the beginning of the 20th century, the world has witnessed several crises which are epidemic and endemic. In the year 1918-1920, the Spanish Flu is popularly known as Influenza occurred and affected about one-third of the world population. In the 21st century, there were disruptive events such as the 9/11 terrorist attack that occurred at Pentagon, the SARS outbreak that occurred in the year 2003, the global economic and financial crisis that occurred between 2008-2009, the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreak that occurred in the year 2015, and the latest Covid-19 are known to have negatively affected the world economy.

The recent novel (2019-2020) Coronavirus (Covid-19) endemic was originated from Wuhan, China in December 2019. It is an acute respiratory infectious disease. Qiu Y, et al. [1] noted that it was confirmed an endemic by the World

Health Organization (WHO, 2019) [2] because of its rising human-to-human infection resulting in more than 200,000 deaths within three months ever since the beginning of the outbreak (WHO, 2020) [3]. As of 2nd September 2020, it has been reported in 213 countries and has resulted in approximately 862,234 deaths World meters (2020) [4]. Liu Z, et al. [5] noted that surprisingly, the Covid-19 infection and deaths recorded the highest rate when numerically compared to other coronavirus outbreaks like SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and Influenza.

Previous studies of Sohrabi C, et al. [6]; Chinazzi M, et al. [7] and others have disputed that movement restriction and control is the best method to managing and curbing the spread of such diseases. Therefore, many countries including Nigeria enforced social distancing, travel restrictions, and rescheduling of events (such as a wedding, burial) for at least 2 weeks in their respective countries. In many countries, the emergency unit also referred to as a quarantine unit was set up for curbing the spread of coronavirus. The aftermath of this order was felt on human psychology such as anxiety, stress, and depression and on socioeconomic activities such as the temporary shutting down of retail shops, retail premises, and interruption of product delivery Wilder-Smith A, et al. [8].

In Nigeria, the 14th day’s travel /movement restriction order which started from 30th March 2020 till 27th July, disrupted the operation of many small and medium enterprises including the agriculture, retails, food and beverages, construction, tourism, and transport sectors. Before focusing on the impact and strategies for reducing the impact of Covid-19 on the operations of the FUTA shuttle bus operation, it is pertinent to be aware and conscious of the explanation of the crisis. According to Booth SA, et al. [9], a crisis is a condition that is experienced by an individual, or group which they find difficult to cope with using normal habitual measures. Booth further identified three types of crises, which are: Gradual threat, Periodic threat, and sudden threat.

The Covid-19 crisis can be known to be a sudden threat because the crisis came up suddenly and affected all organizations and sectors of the economy including the bus operators. Hence, they must be able to manage the crisis. Nonetheless, little is acknowledged and evaluated about the adherence to Covid-19 safety rules and personal preventive measures, such as physical distancing, use of mask, hand and cough hygiene, in bus operation. Understanding the level of adherence is essential for the containment of the Covid-19 epidemic in the long term. On this note, this study assessed the level of adherence regarding the Covid-19 preventive measures suggested by the government.

The Covid-19 endemic has up till now had a significant impact on people’s mobility at the local, national, and international levels. As a result of the endemic, stringent interventions, such as travel restrictions, remote work, lockdowns, and sensitization were imposed, and have affected the operation of passenger transport. Research reveals that physical distancing policies are effective in minimizing the spread of the virus Islam JY, et al. [10]. Nonetheless, distancing has been established to be indeed challenging in some situations and for some groups of people. This is undeniably the case with public transport, especially the FUTA shuttle bus.

The brisk spread of the Covid-19 virus, which became a worldwide endemic as of the year 2020, was attributed to the hyper-mobility, globalization, recent lifestyles, and the accessibility and connectivity of citizens in Wuhan, the first epicenter Jandoc K, et al. [11]; Musselwhite C, et al. [12]. Since then, the Covid-19 endemic swiftly evolved into a condition that is labeled with profound effects on spatial interaction (mobility dynamics), lifestyle Javid B, et al. [13] and social integration. Most of the long, medium and short distant movements were minimized worldwide, leading to an unprecedented increase in tele-working.

These impacts emanated from governmental measures (majorly travel restrictions) as well as individual choices to refrain from traveling to minimize exposure to other people and the risk of contamination [14]. There is a drastic reduction in urban travel across the world, though not uniformly for all modes, as the hardest blow of the endemic was felt on public transportation [15]. Because of the unavoidability of public transportation especially for the low-income earners and the fact that it provides door-to-door service, there is a perception that public transportation has more risk than private means of transport.

In Nigeria, after the ease of lockdown and the provision of the necessary equipment that is necessary for preventing the spread of Covid-19, the tertiary education resumed activities and students travelled down from their respective locations. Also, shuttle bus operators resume operations on various campuses, but assessment level of adherence to and satisfaction of passengers to shuttle bus operations in the tertiary institutions regarding the Covid-19 preventive measures have not been well-researched, and none have been conducted on the campus shuttle of the Federal University of Akure (FUTA) [16].

FUTA shuttle bus operation’s purpose is to provide an affordable, accessible, and sustainable transport mode for most people in the FUTA community which be jeopardized by the need to guarantee physical distancing. In this context, FUTA shuttle bus authorities and operators face the unprecedented challenge of maintaining adequate levels of service while upholding the health of users and workers and, at the same time, dealing with harsh economic instability. This study assessed the level of adherence to the Covid-19 preventive measures suggested by the government on the campus shuttle of FUTA. It addressed these main questions: What is the level of adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators to compulsory hand rinsing, physical distancing preventive measures, and passengers’ wearing of a nose mask and or face mask in FUTA shuttle bus?.

There is no sureness that new waves of extensive infection will not emerge after the first crisis; hence, there is a need for proper management of preventive measures especially in the situation that involves gathering of a group of people. The study is pertinent because it gives room for a better understanding of the level of adherence regarding the covid-19 preventive measures suggested by the government on the campus shuttle of FUTA.

Furthermore, the study will reveal the extent to which the FUTA shuttle buses were able to adhere to the covid-19 measures after the movement lockdown due to the Covid-19 outbreak, and those strategies that will be impactful on the performance of the shuttle bus operation. The outcome of this study will enhance a basis for policy recommendation by the University authority regarding the covid-19 preventive measures on bus operations.

Literature Review

Public transport operations in Nigeria during the covid-19 endemic In Nigeria, bus services are the major means of transport for intercity travel while minicab services are the major means of transport for intra-city travel among the majority of commuters because of the relative affordability Adeniran AO, et al. [17]. These services which are run by the informal sector have seats between 15 and 21 passengers for bus services while 5 and 8 for minicab services, depending on the size of the bus or car, and several seats fabricated for a vehicle by local metal smiths Tetteh S, et al. [18].

The vehicles are nonetheless, usually overloaded, presenting a potential health hazard for the spread of infectious diseases Adeniran AO, et al. [17]; Goscé L, et al. [19] such as Covid-19. Minicabs, motorcycles, tricycle services, Acheampong RA, et al. [20]; Tuffour YA, et al. [21], and bus rapid transit services exist in most Nigeria cities, for intra- city movement because of their cheap fares [17], and large vehicle fleets that ply most roads.

As a result of their informal natures, operators of bus services and some minicab services are unionized under the National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW), a member of the Trade Union Congress. This enhances the commercial drivers to be able to represent their interest with the government, such that their services will be regulated through government directives, especially in times where public transport management requires a collaborative effort between the operators and government. The ministry of transport in conjunction with the ministry of health and ministry of information issue directives for intercity and intra-city bus operators during covid-19, which included the use of veronica buckets in bus terminal; compulsory rinsing of hands and regular washing of vehicles before boarding vehicles; reducing the number of occupants per vehicle; opening of windows for ventilation; and recording of passenger cell phone numbers for contact tracing.

Appropriate use of a nose mask and or face mask was also provided on the ministry’s website. According to FUTA (2020), intra-state travel is doable by public transport- buses, tricycles, and taxis. The covid-19 rules guiding the intra-state travel in Nigeria, which is applicable to shuttle bus operation in all the tertiary institutions, were related to the provision of hand sanitizers for hand washing; and the earlier points. This study focused on the level of adherence between passengers and bus operators to the covid-19 preventive measures as suggested by the government on the campus shuttle of FUTA.

Empirical Review

During the Covid-19 lockdown period, it was generally agreed that travel must be minimized, allowing only essential or unavoidable trips. As activities resume in the post-lockdown period, it gives rise to the question of physical distancing in public transport. The sparse empirical studies available hitherto do not provide conclusive evidence on the effect of physical distancing in closed environments such as public transportation facilities and vehicles.

There is, although limited, evidence depicting the significance of physical distancing in public transport can be wholly minimized if other non-pharmaceutical measures are enforced Ngonghala CN, et al. [22], such as the correct use of nose masks and or face masks, enhanced hygiene, or even a prohibition of talking (Singapore case) Cheng VC, et al. [23]; Morawska L, et al. [24], Prather KA, et al. [25]; Shen Y, et al. [26], then there is still a risk of the virus spreading without wearing a nose mask and or face mask.

In the presence of an infected passenger, physical distancing can help minimize the number of people infected but not prevent infection altogether when passengers do not wear masks. On the other hand, the latest epidemiological research shows that masks are effective in preventing or at least significantly reducing covid-19 virus spread [25, 27, 28].

There are public transportation systems currently running large occupancies with passenger spacing below the two- meter physical distance rule and no covid-19 outbreaks attributed to public transportation when everyone wears masks, as recently reported for Japan.

In that country, it was recently found that most covid-19 contagion clusters originated in places where people gather, eat, drink, chat, and sing, such as live music venues, gyms, pubs, and karaoke rooms. There is no link between clusters and commuter trains. The fact that close-range conversation among strangers in public transportation is infrequent has been hypothesized by virologist Hitoshi Oshitani as one of the explanations for these findings Normile D, et al. [29]. This type of result led Singapore to its decision of not enforcing strict physical distancing rules in public transportation but requiring passengers to wear nose masks and or face masks and not talk to each other.

Even though the safety gains from the universal adoption of a nose mask and or face masks are potentially large, it is unknown how much safer a public vehicle or station is if all passengers wear different types of masks (surgical, cloth, ₦95) at different stages of the endemic, versus if only a subset of them does it. This is a matter of utmost relevance because it can help in defining a “reasonable” occupancy level for public transport, an element that has significant economic, operational, and social implications. Put differently, if a physical distance of two meters does not properly work in public vehicles when people do not wear masks, what should be the maximum passenger capacity of vehicles if all people use masks properly?.

The current experience in large cities in Asia, such as Tokyo and Seoul, shows that a physical distance shorter than 1 meter in public transportation seems to work well under general usage of masks and high hygiene standards; however, the current prevalence of the virus in those places is unknown. The evolution of such a method to public transportation use, without setting strong physical distancing rules, should be closely followed shortly to understand the conditions that would allow for its replication in other cities around the world.

The problem of new maximum occupancy standards due to new physical distancing requirements is a multifaceted challenge that depends on the use of nose masks and or face masks, sanitization, and ventilation, among other factors. However, conditions are likely to be less clear-cut with some passengers that are not (properly) wearing masks. It is therefore assumed that some form of physical distancing may be needed, which is the current reality in many countries.

Name of AuthorYearTopicMethodology
Islam JY, et al. [10]2020Determinants of COVID-19
preventive behaviours among
adults with chronic diseases in the
USA: an analysis of the nationally-
representative COVID-19 impact
survey
The study employed data which was national
representation of covid 19 impact survey, and was
used to achieve the sample size of 10760 which
entails adults with CDs in different categories of
diseases. Respondents were contacted by mail,
telephone interview, online, and web platform.
Apanga PA, et al. [30]2021Adherence to COVID-19 preventive
measures and associated factors
among pregnant women in Ghana
527 pregnant women were randomly selected
across 16 health care facilities, both descriptive
and multivariable logistic regression were
adopted for the analyses.
Amodan BO, et al. [31]2020Level of adherence to COVID-19
Preventive Measures in the First
Stage of the Outbreak in Uganda
The study sampled 1726 respondents. Likert scale
was adopted to measures the preventive measure
variables
Bante A, et al. [32]2021Adherence with COVID-19
Preventive Measures and Associated
Factors Among Residents of Dirashe
District, Southern Ethiopia
648 inhabitants in Dirashe district from June 20
to July 5, 2020, were collated multistage sampling
technique was applied to select the participants.
The data were assorted electronically using Open
Data Kit (ODK)
Okon UA, et al. [33]2021Knowledge, risk perception, and
adherence to covid 19 prevention
advisory among police officers in
Makurdi Metropolis Benue State,
2020.
348 police officers across different carde were
sampled. The results of the study were presented
in frequencies and proportions. Chi-square test
was used for an association between variables at
p-value < 0.05
Handebo S, et al. [34]2021Determinants of COVID-19-
related knowledge and preventive
behaviours among students in
reopened secondary schools: a cross-
sectional study
A total of 370 secondary school students were
included. Bivariable and multivariable ordinal
logistic regression models were fitted to identify
the predictors of knowledge about COVID-19.
Simple and multiple linear regression analyses
were done to identify factors associated with
preventive behaviour.
Shah SU, et al. [35]2021Association between well-being
and compliance with COVID-19
preventive measures by healthcare
professionals: A cross-sectional
study
The multi-national survey was distributed across
36 countries through social media, word-of-
mouth, and electronic mail to Participants ≥21
years working in healthcare and non-healthcare
related professions.
Lavoie KL, et al. [36]2021Determinants of adherence to
COVID-19 preventive behaviours
in Canada: Results from the iCARE
Study
An online survey and structured questionnaire
were adopted for the study. Multivariate
regression models identified determinants of
adherence.
Indrayathi PA, et al. [37]2021Perceived Social Norms as
Determinants of Adherence to
Public Health Measures Related to
COVID-19 in Bali, Indonesia
Adherence was measured based on nine protocol
indicators that were rated using a four-point
Likert scale. A multiple linear regression analysis
was then conducted to determine the associated
factors of adherence to public health measures
Adedokun MO, et al. [38]2020COVID-19 and Compliance with
Awareness Programmes/ Preventive
Measures: A Case Study of Ibadan
North Local Government, Oyo State,
Nigeria
Descriptive statistics of mean and standard
deviation with appropriate remarks were used to
analyze the research questions.
Omemo P, et al. [39]2020Determinants of Adherence to the
Suggested COVID-19 Prevention and
Control Guidelines by Small Scale
Retail Shop Operators in Rural Parts
of Siaya County, Kenya
Systematic random sampling techniques were
used to identify SSSOs. 122 rural SSSOs were
requested to answer simple semi-structured
questions posed by the enumerators
Isere E, et al. [40]2021The outcome of Epidemiological
Investigation of COVID-19 Outbreak
in the South West State of Nigeria,
March to August 2020
Field epidemiology methods coordinated by the
State Public Health Emergency Operations Center
(PHEOC) were used in the outbreak investigation.
Suspected cases were reported through the
routine Integrated Disease Surveillance and
Response (IDSR) network in the State.
Okueso S, et al. [41]2020Adherence to COVID-19 Protocol:
Impact of Socioeconomic Status of
Market Men and Women in Ogun
State, Nigeria
The study adopted a descriptive survey
research design where structured and validated
questionnaires cum interview guides were used
as the instrument for data collection.
Nejc, and Bojan2020Modeling compliance with COVID-19
prevention guidelines: the critical
role of trust in science
A total of 525 attentive participants completed
the online survey.
Alshammari AS, et al.
[42]
2021Factors Associated With Adherence
to COVID-19 Preventive Measures
Among Saudi Arabians
1,568 participants were enrolled from WhatsApp
groups, aged 16 years and above from March to
April 2020 in Saudi Arabia. An online Arabic self-
administered questionnaire was adopted.

Table 1: ** Summary of Empirical Review.

Source: Authors’ compilation (2021). Table 1: Summary of Empirical Review.

From the empirical review shown in Table 1, there were not many related studies on the adherence of covid-19 preventive measures by public transport operators, and there were no related studies conducted in FUTA. This study focused on the level of adherence regarding the covid-19 preventive measures as suggested by the government on the FUTA campus shuttle bus operation.

Materials and Methods

This study adopts a survey research design through personal observation as a research instrument to collect primary data which was used to achieve descriptive statistics. The study is designed in such a way to assess the adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators to covid-19 preventive measures during operation. The observation lasted for one week in the FUTA bus park. The survey is a technique that involves the use of other trained observers to categorize respondents’ behavior. This survey enhanced a fair appraisal of passengers’ and operators’ compliance in real-time [43].

The most suitable study populations were the shuttle bus operators and the passengers that were observed during the bus operation; passengers were selected because they do patronize the shuttle bus for departure. The assessment was best conducted at the bus park and the bus operators together with passengers are best to assess the adherence of shuttle bus operators to covid-19 preventive measures based on the indicators set by the Federal Ministry of Health.

Primary data were collected through a structured survey of personal observations. The observation was conducted on shuttle bus passengers in the FUTA shuttle park using research assistants before takeoff. The three variables of frequent hand rinsing, wearing nose masks and or face masks and physical distancing was considered the most effective covid-19 prevention measures in FUTA shuttle bus operation. To determine the level of adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators to compulsory hand rinsing, personal observation was conducted by the researcher within the period of study.

To assess the level of adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators to physical distancing preventive measures, the category of buses (whether 18-passengers bus or 14-passengers bus) were identified, and the number of passengers that occupied each of these shuttle buses from Sunday (04/07/21) to Saturday (10/07/21) between the specific hours of 7-10 am, 2-4 pm, and 4-7 pm were numerically identified and summed. To assess the level of adherence of passengers to nose mask and or face mask- wearing in FUTA shuttle bus, the number of passengers that wear nose mask and or face mask in each of these shuttle buses from Sunday (04/07/21) to Saturday (10/07/21) between the specific hours of 7-10 am, 2-4 pm, and 4-7 pm were numerically identified and summed.

Results And Discussion

From the sample size calculated to seven hundred (700) which equals to the total number of passengers that were interviewed by the researcher and assistants in FUTA shuttle bus, only six hundred and eighty-seven (687) which is about 98.14 percent respondents provided valid responses for data analysis and reporting (Table 2).

LocationQuestionnaireFrequencyPercentage
FUTA shuttle bus passengersAdministered700
Returned68798.14

Table 2: ** A response rate of respondents.

Source: Field Survey (2021). Table 2: A response rate of respondents.

Adherence of FUTA Shuttle Bus Operators to Compulsory Hand Rinsing

To assess the adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators to compulsory hand rinsing by passengers, personal observations were carried out in the Bus Park from Sunday (04/07/21) to Saturday (10/07/21) between the specific hours of 7-10 am, 2-4 pm, and 4-7 pm. It was revealed that there was the presence of Veronica buckets, but the passengers did not make use of it.

Adherence of FUTA Shuttle Bus Operators to Physical Distancing

From the observations that were carried out regarding the adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators to the covid-19 measures from Sunday (04/07/21) to Saturday (10/07/21) between the specific hours of 7-10 am, 2-4 pm, and 4-7 pm, it was revealed that all the shuttle bus operators adhered strictly to physical distancing measures by reducing the number of passengers apportioned to the seats. In the 18-passengers shuttle buses, the passengers were minimized to 14 as a result of physical distancing. Also in the 14-passenger shuttle buses, the passengers were minimized to 10 as a result of physical distancing (Table 3).

No of Passengers ObservedPeriods
7-10 am2-4 pm4-7 pmTotal
Sunday (04/07/21)318196134648
Monday (05/07/21)374202158734
Tuesday (06/07/21)388240192820
Wednesday (07/07/21)346192148686
Thursday (08/07/21)344216124684
Friday (09/07/21)322168138628
Saturday (10/07/21)286144134564

Table 3: Adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators to physical distancing.

Source: Author’s survey (2021). Table 3: Adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators to physical distancing.

Adherence of Passengers to Wearing of Nose Mask and or Face Mask in FUTA Shuttle Bus

From the observations that were carried out regarding the adherence of passengers to the wearing of a nose mask and or face mask in FUTA shuttle bus from Sunday (04/07/21) to Saturday (10/07/21) between the specific hours of 7-10 am 2-4 pm, and 4-7 pm, it was revealed that fewer passengers adhered to the nose mask and or face mask-wearing in FUTA shuttle bus. When comparing table 3 with table 4, it was discovered that among 648 passengers that were examined, only 29 passengers wear nose masks and or face mask on Sunday which implies 4.48 percent. Among 734 passengers that were examined, only 23 passengers wear a nose mask and or face mask on Monday which implies 3.13 percent.

Among 820 passengers that were examined, only 29 passengers wear a nose mask and or face mask on Tuesday which implies 3.54 percent. Among 686 passengers that were examined, only 30 passengers wear a nose mask and or face mask on Wednesday which implies 4.37 percent. Among 684 passengers that were examined, only 15 passengers wear nose masks and or face masks on Thursday which implies 2.19 percent. Among 628 that were examined, only 25 passengers wear a nose mask and or face mask on Friday which implies 3.82 percent. Among 564 passengers that were examined only 20 passengers wear a nose mask and or face mask on Saturday which implies 3.55 percent. Despite the fact the all the shuttle bus operators adhered strictly to physical distancing measures, the majority of the passengers did not adhere strictly to the nose mask and or face mask- wearing in the FUTA shuttle bus (Table 4).

PeriodsWearing nose masks and or face masks
7-10 am2-4 pm4-7 pmTotalPercentage
Sunday (04/07/21)11711294.48
Monday (05/07/21)1337233.13
Tuesday (06/07/21)1973293.54
Wednesday (07/07/21)1497304.37
Thursday (08/07/21)735152.19
Friday (09/07/21)1356243.82
Saturday (10/07/21)1082203.55

Table 4: Adherence of Passengers to Wearing of Nose mask and or face mask in FUTA Shuttle Bus Periods Wearing nose masks and or f

Source: Author’s survey (2021). Table 4: Adherence of Passengers to Wearing of Nose mask and or face mask in FUTA Shuttle Bus Periods Wearing nose masks and or face masks.

Discussion

Regarding the adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators to compulsory hand rinsing, the study found that there was the presence of Veronica buckets, but the passengers did not make use of it. This corroborates the findings of Bonful HA, et al. [44] in Ghana which found that majority of bus stations in Accra have at least one Veronica Bucket, but few passengers make use of it. This implies that the practice of hand washing was either not observed.

Regarding the adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators to physical distancing; it was revealed that all the shuttle bus operators adhered strictly to physical distancing measures by reducing the number of passengers apportioned to the seats. This agrees with the findings of Emmanuel KJD, et al. [45] which found that there was physical distancing in paratransit (trotro) buses in Kumasi, Ghana. However, this does not agree with the findings of Bonful HA, et al. [44] in Ghana which found that social/physical distancing was rarely practiced in Ghana.

Regarding the adherence of passengers to wearing of a nose mask and or face mask in FUTA shuttle bus, it was revealed that fewer passengers adhered to the nose mask and or face mask-wearing in FUTA shuttle bus. The adherence to nose mask and or face mask was dominant on Sunday. This finding is similar to the findings of Bonful HA, et al. [44] in Ghana which found that face masks were either not worn or only worn by a few passengers in the selected bus stations, but not similar to that findings of Emmanuel KJD, et al. [45] which found that passengers wear nose mask in paratransit (trotro) buses in Kumasi, Ghana.

Lack of hand washing practice, and failure to use nose mask and or face mask at the FUTA bus stations could be as a result of many factors. It could be as a result of inadequate relevant public sensitization about the pertinence of hand washing to guide against the spread of Covid-19 infection. Another likely factor could be as a result of socio-cultural factor that may influence people not be used to wearing of face and or nose mask and washing of hands regularly in public, especially at bus stations. Lack of adequate communication by transport operators could be another factor that influences people not to wear face and or nose mask and not to wash hands regularly in bus stations [46].

Conclusion

This study assessed the level of adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators and passengers to the covid-19 preventive measures suggested by the government, regarding assessing the level of adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators to compulsory hand rinsing; assessing the level of adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators to physical distancing preventive measures; and assessing the level of adherence of passengers to wearing of a nose mask and or face mask in FUTA shuttle bus.

This study adopts a survey research design through personal observation as research instruments to collect primary data which was used to achieve descriptive statistics. The study is designed in such a way to assess the adherence of FUTA shuttle bus operators to covid-19 preventive measures during operation. The observation lasted seven which entails a seven-day peak and off-peak hour count within the specified hours of 7-10am, 2-4pm and 4-7pm from Sunday to Saturday of the three hours designated for each of morning, afternoon, and evening sessions, there seems to be no rinsing of hands by passengers, although there were provisions of veronica buckets in the Bus Park. Also, there seems to be a low level of adherence to nose mask and or face mask- wearing among the passengers, however, the FUTA shuttle bus operators were keen on ensuring physical distance in the sitting arrangement of passengers as this was discovered in all the shuttle buses that were studied. Based on the specific findings, it was suggested that there should be a strict monitoring and enforcement of hand rinsing by passengers in FUTA before the departure of shuttle bus; and the enforcement of nose mask and or face mask- wearing was a bit relaxed; hence the university management should be more strict in her enforcement of nose mask and or face mask-wearing especially in the FUTA shuttle bus.

Acknowledgement

The writers appreciate the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and laudable suggestions to improve the paper quality. Finally, the editorial committees are highly appreciated for their efforts during the assessment procedure.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript. In addition, the ethical issues, including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, and redundancy has been completely observed by the authors.

References

  1. Qiu Y, Chen X, Shi W (2020) Impacts of social and economic factors on the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. J Popul Econ 33: 1127-1172.
  2. (2019) Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard: World Health Organization.
  3. (2020) Ethical standards for research during public health emergencies: Distilling existing guidance to support COVID-19 R & D. World Health Organization, pp: 4.
  4. (2020) COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Worldometer.
  5. Liu Z, Xu J, Han B (2013) Small-and medium-sized enterprise post-disaster reconstruction management patterns and application. Natural Hazards 68(2): 809- 835.
  6. Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O’Neill N, Khan M, Kerwan A, et al. (2020) World Health Organization Declares Gobal Emergency: A Review of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surg 76: 71-76.
  7. Chinazzi M, Davis JT, Ajelli M, Gioannini C, Litvinova M, et al. (2020) The effect of travel restrictions on the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, Science 368(6489): 395-400.
  8. Wilder-Smith A, Freedman DO (2020) Isolation, Quarantine, Social Distancing and Community Containment: Pivotal Role for Old-Style Public Health Measures in the Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Outbreak. Journal of Travel Medicine 27(2).
  9. Booth SA (1993) Crisis Management Strategy: Competition and change in modern enterprises. Routledge, London and New York.
  10. Islam JY, Vidot DC, Camacho-Rivera M (2020) Determinants of COVID-19 preventive behaviors among adults with chronic diseases in the USA: an analysis of the nationally-representative COVID-19 impact survey. BMJ Open 11(2): e044600.
  11. Jandoc K, Mendoza A, Quimboet LS (2020) Vulnerable to the virus: Globally-oriented manufacturing firms at risk from the spread of COVID-19. University of the Philippines, UP School of Economics.
  12. Musselwhite C, Avineri E, Susilo Y (2020) Editorial JTH 16-The Coronavirus Disease COVID-19 and implications for transport and health. J Transp Health 16: 100853.
  13. Javid B, Weekes MP, Matheson NJ (2020) Covid-19 : should the public wear face masks ?. BMJ 369: m1442.
  14. Jianyun L, Jieni G, Kuibiao L, Conghui X, Wenzhe S, et al. (2020) COVID-19 Outbreak Associated with Air Conditioning in Restaurant, Guangzhou, China. Emerg Infect Dis 26(7): 1628-1631.
  15. Greenhalgh T, Schmid MB, Czypionka T, Bassler D, Gruer L (2020) Nose masks and or face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis. BMJ 369: m1435.
  16. (2020) COVID-19 Preventive Measures: FUTA Deepens Social Distancing Mechanism asks some Members of Staff to Work from Home.
  17. Adeniran AO, Olorunfemi SO, Aipoh A (2020) Factors Influencing Passengers’ Satisfaction of Minicab Services in Akure Nigeria. International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Traffic System 6(2): 10-18.
  18. Tetteh S, Bowen-Dodoo L, Kwofie SK (2017) Ergonomics assessment of locally fabricated passenger seats in trotro vehicles in Accra, Ghana. Journal of Transport and Health 6: 167-176.
  19. Goscé L, Johansson A (2018) Analyzing the link between public transport use and airborne transmission: Mobility and contagion in the London underground. Environmental Health 17(1): 1-11.
  20. Acheampong RA, Siiba A, Okyere D, Tuffour P (2020) Mobility-on-demand: An empirical study of internet- based ride-hailing adoption factors, travel characteristics, and mode substitution effects. Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies 115.
  21. Tuffour YA, Daniel KNA (2014) Motorcycle Taxis in Public Transportation Services within the Accra Metropolis. American Journal of Civil Engineering 2(4): 117-122.
  22. Ngonghala CN, Iboi E, Eikenberry S, Scotch M, MacIntyre CR, et al. (2020) Mathematical assessment of the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on curtailing the 2019 novel Coronavirus. Math Biosci 325: 108364.
  23. Cheng VC, Wong S, Chuang VW, Chan KK, Hung JF, et al. (2020) The role of community-wide wearing of nose mask and or face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2. J Infect 8(1): 107-114.
  24. Morawska L, Cao J (2020) Airborne transmission of SARS- CoV-2: The world should face the reality. Environment International 139: 105730
  25. Prather KA, Wang CC, Schooley RT (2020) Reducing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Science 368(6498): 1422- 14224.
  26. Shen Y, Li C, Dong H, Wang Z, Martinez L, et al. (2020) Airborne transmission of COVID-19: epidemiologic evidence from two outbreak investigations. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  27. Leung NHL, Chu DKW, Shiu EYC, Chan KH, McDevitt JJ, et al. (2020) Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of nose mask and or face masks. Nat Med 26(5): 676-680.
  28. Chu DK, Aki EA, Duda S, Solo K, Yaacoub S, et al. (2020) Physical distancing, face mask and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 395(10242): 1973-1987.
  29. Normile D (2020) Japan ends its COVID-19 state of emergency. Science.
  30. Apanga PA, Kumbeni MT (2021) Adherence to COVID-19 preventive measures and associated factors among pregnant women in Ghana. Tropical Medicine and International Health 26(6): 656-663.
  31. Amodan BO, Bulage L, Katana E, Ario AR, Fodjo JNS, et al. (2020) Level of adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Measures in the First Stage of the Outbreak in Uganda. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(23): 8810.
  32. Bante A, Mersha A, Tesfaye A, Tsegaye B, Shibiru S, et al. (2021) Adherence with COVID-19 Preventive Measures and Associated Factors Among Residents of Dirashe District, Southern Ethiopia. Patient Preference and Adherence 15: 237-249.
  33. Okon UA, Onche C, Ajisegiri SW, Katchy U, Onyema P, et al. (2021) Knowledge, risk perception, and adherence to covid 19 prevention advisory among police officers in Makurdi Metropolis Benue State, 2020. Pan Afr Med J 38(199).
  34. Handebo S, Adugna A, Kassie A, Shitu K (2021) Determinants of COVID-19-related knowledge and preventive behaviors among students in reopened secondary schools: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 11(4): e050189.
  35. Shah SU, Ling Loo XE, En Chua C, Sen Kew G, Demutska A, et al. (2021) Association between well-being and compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures by healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 16(6): e0252835.
  36. Lavoie KL, Gosselin-Boucher V, Stojannovic J, Voisard B, Szczepanik G, et al. (2021) Determinants of adherence to COVID-19 preventive behaviours in Canada: Results from the iCARE Study.
  37. Indrayathi PA, Januraga PP, Pradnyani PE, Gesesew HA, Ward PR (2021) Perceived Social Norms as Determinants of Adherence to Public Health Measures Related to COVID-19 in Bali, Indonesia. Front Public Health 9: 646764.
  38. Adedokun MO (2020) COVID-19 and Compliance with Awareness Programmes/ Preventive Measures: A Case Study of Ibadan North Local Government, Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Management and Sustainability 10(2): 21-30.
  39. Omemo P, Wasonga J (2020) Determinants of Adherence to the Recommended COVID-19 Prevention and Control Guidelines by Small Scale Retail Shop Operators in Rural Parts of Siaya County, Kenya. Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health Reviews 5(3).
  40. Isere E, Adejugbabge A, Fagbemi A, Fagbemi S, Omoju T, et al. (2021) Outcome of Epidemiological Investigation of COVID-19 Outbreak in a South West State of Nigeria, March to August 2020. Open Journal of Epidemiology 11(2): 163-177.
  41. Okueso S, Buraimo O, Adekoya FA (2020) Adherence to COVID-19 Protocol: Impact of Socioeconomic Status of Market Men and Women in Ogun State, Nigeria. SSRN: 21.
  42. Alshammari AS, Alshammari H, Alshammari S (2021) Factors Associated With Adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Measures Among Saudi Arabians. Cureus 13(4): e14623.
  43. Beutel V, Chretien A, Daigle M, Morlock M (2017) A Roadside Observation Study for Measuring Seat Belt and Child Restraint Use, pp: 43.
  44. Bonful HA, Addo-Lartey A, Aheto JMK, Ganle JK, Sarfo B, et al. (2020) Limiting spread of COVID-19 in Ghana: Compliance audit of selected transportation stations in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. PLoS One 15(9): e0238971.
  45. Emmanuel KJD, Oscar AD (2020) Adherence to social distancing and wearing of masks within public transportation during the COVID 19 pandemic. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 7: 100191.
  46. (2020) Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): How to Protect Yourself & Others. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{akinsehinwa2022,
  title   = {Level of Adherence to Covid-19 Preventive Measures: Case Study
of FUTA Shuttle Bus},
  author  = {Akinsehinwa FO, Adeniran AO, Olorunfemi SO and Aina OM},
  journal = {Annals of Bioethics & Clinical Applications},
  year    = {2022},
  volume  = {5},
  number  = {1},
  doi     = {10.23880/abca-16000219}
}
Akinsehinwa FO, Adeniran AO, Olorunfemi SO and Aina OM (2022). Level of Adherence to Covid-19 Preventive Measures: Case Study
of FUTA Shuttle Bus. Annals of Bioethics & Clinical Applications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.23880/abca-16000219
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Level of Adherence to Covid-19 Preventive Measures: Case Study
of FUTA Shuttle Bus
AU  - Akinsehinwa FO, Adeniran AO, Olorunfemi SO and Aina OM
JO  - Annals of Bioethics & Clinical Applications
PY  - 2022
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
DO  - 10.23880/abca-16000219
ER  -