Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Philosophy International Journal Research Article 2 min read

Systemic Crises and Social Rationalization as Reification: A Reconstruction of Philosophical-Social Theories in Critical Theory

Pedroso de Siqueira DV*
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2641-9130  10.23880/phij-16000126  Received: August 21, 2019  Published: September 13, 2019
 — views
 26 references
PDF
Keywords
Philosophy Critical Theory Habermas Marx Mmodernity
Abstract

How can we understand the theoretical development and all the social-historical changes that drove the incoming recovery and the further alterations in the philosophical-social theories over the twentieth century? In spite of that, how would be still possible to recognize it on our contemporary society? Recovering Marxian social theory and Habermas’s critical reconstruction, which includes Weber’s rationalization paradoxes, Lukacs’s reification definition, and the Horkheimerian-Adornian theoretical reception, which has largely influenced twentieth social critic, the present paper intents to discuss (and show up) a possible reading

References

  1. Arauto A (1972) “Lukács’ Theory of Reification”. In: Telos, p: 11.
  2. Argüello K (1997) O Ícaro da Modernidade: Direito e Política em Max Weber. São Paulo: Acadêmica.
  3. Bernstein RJ (1991) Habermas and Modernity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  4. Braaten J (1991) Habermas’s Critical Theory of Society. Albany: State University of NY Press.
  5. Coutinho CN (1996) Lukács: A Ontologia e a Política. In: Antunes R, Rêgo WL (Eds.), Lukács: Um Galileu no Século XX. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.
  6. Giddens A (1991) “Reason without Revolution? Habermas’s Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns”. In: Bernstein R J, Habermas and Modernity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  7. Habermas J (1983) “Does Philosophy still have a purpose?”. In: Habermas J (Eds.), Philosophical- Political Profiles. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  8. Habermas J (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action. VI, Boston: Beacon Press.
  9. Habermas J (2014) Técnica e Ciência como “Ideologia”. São Paulo: Unesp.
  10. Honneth A (1997) The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  11. Horkheimer M (2002) Eclipse da Razão. São Paulo: Centauro Editora.
  12. Horkheimer M (1975) Teoria Tradicional e Teoria Crítica. São Paulo: Abril Cultural.
  13. HorkheimeR M, ADORNO TW (2006) Dialética do Esclarecimento. Jorge Zahar (Eds.), Rio de Janeiro.
  14. Leo Maar W (1996) “A reificação como realidade social: Práxis, Trabalho e Crítica Imanente em HCC”. In: Antunes R, Rêgo WL (Eds.), Lukács: Um Galileu no século XX. São Paulo: Boitempo.
  15. Lukács G (2016) História e Consciência de Classe: Estudos sobre a Dialética Marxista. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes.
  16. Marx K (2007) A Ideologia Alemã. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.
  17. Marx K (2011) Grundrisse: Manuscritos Econômicos de 1857-1858 & Esboços da Crítica da Economia Política. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.
  18. Melo R (2013) Marx e Habermas: Teoria Crítica e os Sentidos de Emancipação. São Paulo: Editora Saraiva.
  19. Menezes ABNT (2009) Habermas e a Modernidade: Uma “Metacrítica da Razão Instrumental”. Natal: EDUFRN.
  20. Netto JP (1996) “Lukács e o Marxismo Ocidental”. In: Antunes R, Rêgo WL (Eds.), Lukács: Um Galileu no Século XX. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.
  21. Nobre M (1998) A Dialética Negativa de Theodor W. Adorno: A Ontologia do Estado Falso. São Paulo: Iluminuras/FAPESP.
  22. Nobre M (2004) A Teoria Crítica. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editor.
  23. Pinzani A (2004) Habermas. São Paulo: Artmed.
  24. Repa L (2008) A transformação da Filosofia em Jürgen Habermas: Os papéis de Reconstrução, Interpretação e Crítica. São Paulo: Editora Singular.
  25. Teixeira M (2010) Razão e Reificação: Um estudo sobre Max Weber em “História e ConsciÊncia de Classe” de Georg Lukács. Campinas: Unicamp (in mimeo).
  26. Wellmer A (1991) “Reason, Utopia, and the Dialectic of Enlightenment”. In: Bernstein RJ (Ed.), Habermas and Modernity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
More from this journal

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{pedroso2019,
  title   = {Systemic Crises and Social Rationalization as Reification: A Reconstruction of Philosophical-Social Theories in Critical Theory},
  author  = {Pedroso de Siqueira DV},
  journal = {Philosophy International Journal},
  year    = {2019},
  volume  = {2},
  number  = {3},
  doi     = {10.23880/phij-16000126}
}
Pedroso de Siqueira DV (2019). Systemic Crises and Social Rationalization as Reification: A Reconstruction of Philosophical-Social Theories in Critical Theory. Philosophy International Journal, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.23880/phij-16000126
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Systemic Crises and Social Rationalization as Reification: A Reconstruction of Philosophical-Social Theories in Critical Theory
AU  - Pedroso de Siqueira DV
JO  - Philosophy International Journal
PY  - 2019
VL  - 2
IS  - 3
DO  - 10.23880/phij-16000126
ER  -