Emergency Department Management of the Cancer Patient, what we must do?
Medical advances have allowed that in the emergency services are met more frequently patients over 65 years and patients with chronic and devastating diseases such as cerebrovascular diseases and cancer. Epidemiology studies have shown that currently, cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. The increased prevalence of cancer is explained by three main factors: changes in diagnostic tests, advances in therapies for cancer and advances in diagnosis and treatment of co morbid conditions of patients.
Introduction
Medical advances have allowed that in the emergency services are met more frequently patients over 65 years and patients with chronic and devastating diseases such as cerebrovascular diseases and cancer. Epidemiology studies have shown that currently, cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. The increased prevalence of cancer is explained by three main factors: changes in diagnostic tests, advances in therapies for cancer and advances in diagnosis and treatment of co morbid conditions of patients. Owing to the advent of preventive strategies and early detection of disabling symptoms, the management of classic oncological emergencies has moved from the outpatient to the inpatient approach. It is mandatory that the physicians working in the emergency department become familiar with oncological diseases: Why would consult cancer patients? How the disease occurs? What its symptoms are? What it is the most practical and adequate way to reach a timely diagnosis? What are the side effects and complications of treatment and how address the family? All physicians working at the medical emergency services must be aware of the current evidence on diagnosis and treatment of the cancer patient, and they must develop skills in their care. According to WHO (World Health Organization) there are 11 million new cancer cases every year, about 80% occurring in developing countries and are related to living conditions in these countries. Of those, 30% are preventable. From 2000 to 2006 there were in Colombia 32,316 cases of cancer in men and 38,571 in women. The incidence rate, i.e., the probability of occurrence of a new diagnostic of cancer was of 186.6 and 196.6 per 100,000 inhabitants, respectively. According to WHO, approximately 71,442 new cases of cancer are presented each year in Colombia? The most common are prostate, stomach, lung, breast, cervix and colon. Cancer incidence is estimated up to 33% in 2020 with an increasing prevalence [1]. Studies on cancer incidence in Colombia are based on three population groups: children, men and women. Leukaemia, tumors related to the central nervous system and lymphomas are the most common in children; prostate, stomach, lung, colon and rectum have the greatest incidence among men and breast, cervix, thyroid, stomach and colon are the most commonly found in women. It can be said that the cancers of stomach and colon are the most common throughout the whole population [2]. An emergency in a cancer patient usually is a severe life-threatening acute situation, directly or indirectly related to the tumour or its treatment and that can be prevented or effectively managed if promptly recognized and urgently treated. The differential diagnosis should include those emergencies that are unrelated to the cancer diagnosis. It must be remembered that an oncological emergency may be the first manifestation of a neoplasm. The subject will be develop by way of a series of questions with their answers. It will try to solve some of the questions arisen from the care of cancer patients who visit the emergency department taking into account the current evidence and the author’s experience as an emergency and critical care physician.
How should we deal with the cancer patient visiting the Emergency Department?
We should be able to carry a proper and specific management approach to oncological disease, taking into account emotional and spiritual needs of the patient and the family. We must be careful on expressing our ideas to the family and how we address it.
What are the emergencies posed by cancer patients?
Different approaches are found in the biomedical literature; nevertheless it must be proposed one that makes think of the most common emergencies and reminds those that could be overlooked:
- Classic: metabolic (tumorlysis syndrome, syndrome of inappropriate ant diuretic hormone secretion [SIADH], malignant hypercalcemia), hematologic (leukostasis, febrile neutropenia) and structural (superior vena cava syndrome, malignant spinal cord compression, intestinal obstruction and bile duct obstruction).
- Current: heart failure, respiratory failure, life- threatening bleeding, coagulopathy and sepsis.
Why the cancer patient develops dyspnea?
There are some diseases that put to the cancer patient at risk to develop acute lung injury / ARDS [4]: aspiration, pneumonia, sepsis, multiple transfusions or pancreatitis. An acute respiratory failure can be precipitated by the toxic effects of radiation therapy on the chest wall and by the damage caused by the chemotherapeutic agents to the lung parenchyma [5]. The main chemotherapeutic agents involved are bleomycin, bisulfan, carmustine, cyclophosphamide, gemcitabine, methotrexate, mitomycin C and paclitaxel.
What serious metabolic alterations could occur in critically-ill cancer patients?
- Hypercalcemia.
- Hypocalcaemia.
- Hyponatremia.
- Tumor lysis syndrome.
- Metabolic disturbances related to renal failure and lactic acidosis. The prognosis of these patients will depend on early diagnosis, cancer status or progression, co morbidities and the presence of organ dysfunction at the time of diagnosis. Encephalopathy is the main clinical manifestation of metabolic disorders and may vary from confusion to coma. The neurological examination rarely shows any neurological focal sign [6]. The clinical presentation of metabolic encephalopathy many times is unspecific. Lethargy, polydipsia, dyspnea, cyanosis, jaundice, abnormal respiratory rate, muscular weakness, hyporreflexia/hyporreflexia, heart rhythm disorders (related to hypokalaemia, hypercalcemia or hypomagnesaemia) would be always looked for; they could be paramount to identify the source of metabolic disorder. The definitive diagnosis is achieved by mean of the diagnostic tests. Hypercalcemia is the most common metabolic emergency in these patients; it occurs most often in the cancer of the lung (27.3%), breast (25.7%), myeloma (7.3%), and head and neck (6.9%) [7]. Hypercalcemia is due to increased mobilization of calcium from bone and to his tubular decreased excretion by the kidney. Immobilization, dehydration, anorexia, nausea and vomiting, replacement hormonal therapies and thiazide diuretics can strengthen these mechanisms. A low chlorine serum (<100 mEq/L) suggests hypercalcemia associated with cancer. Measurement of parathyroid hormone levels is not necessary for diagnosis, but it could be useful to understand the mechanism of hypercalcemia. High levels are associated with increased risk of recurrent hypercalcemia within 14 days [8]. Intravenous hydration, loop diuretics, bisphosphonate therapy, calcitonin and dialysis have been used to treat it. The tumorlysis syndrome occurs because of the lysis of a large number of malignant cells due to apoptosis or by the action of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The rapid release of intracellular elements in amounts that exceed the capacity of renal excretion causes metabolic disorders and organ dysfunction. Its rate incidence ranges from 33% to 42% on different series [9]. It is more frequently seen in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and Burkitt's lymphoma after initiation of chemotherapy, but it can also be spontaneous in other types of tumors with high proliferation rate, large or marked sensitivity to chemotherapy and in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, acute myeloid leukaemia and multiple myeloma. The severity of the syndrome is enhanced by extensive pre-existing disease and kidney disease. The signs and symptoms are nonspecific and can start spontaneously: generally, the patients have recently started chemotherapy (inside of 12 previous hours), urine output may decrease and the patient may show symptoms of uraemia or volume overload, seizures or arrhythmias. Are required two or more of the followings to the diagnosis: uric acid >8 mg/dL, potassium> 6.0 mEq/L, phosphorus >4.5 mg/dL and corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL [10]; increased creatinine, cardiac arrhythmias, seizures and death are common manifestations. Optimal treatment includes adequate hydration, administration of loop diuretics, allopurinol for 3 days before chemotherapy in patients at high risk (WBC> 100,000, lactate dehydrogenase> 2 times the reference value) and rasburicase [11]. Because hyperphosphatemia is harder to correct than hyperuricemia, alkalinisation of the urine should be avoided. Patients with tumorlysis syndrome should be admitted to hospital for cardiac monitoring.
Which cancer patients more likely will develop venous thromboembolism?
- Gastric cancer.
- Pancreatic cancer.
- Lung cancer.
- Acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Mucin-secreting tumors are associated with increased risk of blood clots.
Which are the cardiovascular and pulmonary emergencies in cancer patients?
The most common cardiac emergencies in cancer patients are those related to metastasis and toxicity associated with chemotherapeutic agents. Malignant pericardial effusion is a factor of poor prognosis, especially if it is greater than 350 mL. When it is present, the survival is usually less than one year [12]. Patients with lung cancer, hematologic cancer such as mediastinal lymphoma, melanoma or those who are being treated with chemotherapeutic agents such as cyclophosphamide and cytarabine are at risk of pericardial effusion. Malignant pericardial effusion is due mainly to metastatic cancers. Primary tumors of the pericardium are rare and mesothelioma is the most common. Chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin, epirubicin, bevacizumab and dasatinib have anwell known adverse effect on cardiac function, leading to cardiac dysfunction, impaired conduction and arrhythmias. Pericardial effusion can be asymptomatic. The classic findings of Beck's triad rarely are seen in a same patient. Most patients complain of dyspnea andchest discomfort.Tachycardia and paradoxical pulse may be present. As little as 100 mL of liquid in the pericardic sac can produce the clinical picture of pericardial tamponade. Pericardiocentesis with previous evaluation with ultrasonography of the pericardium is the treatment of choice. The superior vena cava syndrome is caused by an obstruction on the veins returning from the head, neck and upper extremities to the right atrium of the heart. Around 95% of cases is caused by primary or metastatic tumors. Clinical manifestations consist on dilation of superficial veins of the chest, facial plethora and oedema in the upper limbs. Stridor, hoarseness, dysphagia, syncope and headache at the base of the skull can suggest a critical condition. Cancers typically associated with superior vena cava syndrome are lung, breast, mediastinal lymphoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma, thymoma, and germinal cell tumour [13]. Diagnosis is typically achieved by means of a selective venography, but Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are preferred by their easy access and availability [14]. The superior vena cava syndrome requires prompt diagnosis for timely treatment that includes endovascular stents, radiation and chemotherapy directed at the underlying cause.
How to assess the death risk of cancer patients?
There is not an ideal tool to assess the risk or severity of the disease in cancer patients. Nevertheless, another scales extrapolated from another group of patients can be use [15]. APACHE-II scale underestimates mortality in patients with cancer. Its accuracy is lower in them. Groger et al. have proposed a probability of mortality model. It includes variables such as intracranial mass effect, allogeneicbone marrow transplantation and recurrence or disease progression. Its use is recommended by experts but has not yet been validated externally [16]. The cancer treatment may put the patient at risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and bone marrow suppression. Severe thrombocytopenia, decreased wound healing and perforated ulcer are mentioned effects owing to bevacizumab. There are three tools for predicting the probability of biochemical recurrence of the most prevalent cancer in men in Colombia, prostate cancer: the University of California and San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) [17], the nomogram of Kattan et al. [18] (1998) and nomogram of Stephenson et al. [19] (2006). All three have been validated in the United States, Europe and Asia. In the different studies they have achieved adequate performance, none superior to each other.
Which are the most common surgical emergencies in cancer patients?
- Mechanical obstruction [28].
- Organ perforation.
- Pathological fractures.
What neurological emergencies can be found in patients coming to the emergency department?
- Malignant compression of spinal cord.
- Increased intracranial pressure.
- Seizures. Compression of the spinal cord of cancer aetiology is considered an emergency. It needs to be treated quickly to obtain a prompt relief of pain and to preserve neurological function. As a rule, any tumor could generate compression of the spinal cord, but breast, prostate and lung tumors frequently cause this type of emergency. Near to 5 to 20% of patients come to the emergency department with compression of the spinal cord as the first manifestation of an oncological disease [29]. Timely detection of disease is the main prognostic factor of neurological recovery of the patients. Clinical presentation may vary depending on the severity, location and duration of compression [30]. The most common symptom is low back pain. Sometimes it can be the first sign of malignancy as in non-Hodgkin lymphomas or multiple myeloma. The diagnostic imaging of choice is MRI, which has a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 97%. Plain radiographs would not be used because they may have false negatives up to 17% [31]. The management of these patients requires the use of glucocorticoids, surgery and radiotherapy [32]. Increased intracranial pressure secondary to malignancy (cerebral herniation, carcinomatous meningitis) is a devastating picture, requires timely diagnosis and prompt treatment. Most intracranial lesions of malignant origin are met mainly as metastatic tumors secondary to lung (20%), kidney (10%), melanoma (7%) and breast (5%) cancer [33]. This type of metastases are the most common complications of all cancers [34]. Not treated patients have a survival rate of approximately 4 weeks [35]. MRI offers better diagnostic performance and with the newest techniques is useful for planning surgical approach when itbe considered appropriate. Glucocorticoids are first-line treatment as they reduce brain swelling around the tumor and decrease his mass effect [36].
Which are the most common hematologic emergencies?
Hyper viscosity syndrome: It refers to the clinical consequences derivated from an increased blood viscosity as a result of increased proteins, especially immunoglobulin’s (Macroglobulinemia Walderstrom, multiple myeloma). The classic triad consists on neurologic abnormalities, visual alterations and bleeding. Leukostasis: is a hyperleukocytosis with values greater than 100,000 cells/mL. It is associated with respiratory failure and intracranial hemorrhage. Mortality reaches 40% if is not recognized and treated early.
Which cancer patients should arrive at the Intensive Care Unit?
- Patients with specific aims in life (marriage, birth, graduation).
- Patients with good life expectancy and adequate oncological prognosis.
- Patients who consider or are comfortable with their quality of life (quality of life model Ferrell) [37, 38]. The ICU must be considered as a bridge to achieve these aims.
References
-
Moller H, Fairley L, Coupland V, Okello C, Green M, et al. (2007) The future burden of cancer in England: incidence and numbers of patients in 2020. Br J Cancer 96(9): 1484-1488.
-
Iván Camilo Ospina. Panorama general del cancer en Colombia. Institute nacional Cancerológico/Escuela de Comunicación Social y Periodismo Universidad Sergio Arboleda. http://www.usergioarboleda.edu.co/altus/articulo- panorama-generaldel-cancer-en-Colombia.htm.
-
Soares M, Salluh JIF, Spector N, Rocco JR (2005) Characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilator support for 24 hours. Crit Care Med 33(3): 520-526.
-
Rubenfeld GD, Herridge MS (2007) Epidemiology and outcomes of acute lung injury. Chest 131 (2): 554- 562.
-
Pastores SM, Voight L (2010) acute respiratory failure in the patient with cancer: diagnostic and management strategies. Crit Care Clin 26(1): 21-40.
-
Deftos LJ (2002) Hypercalcemia in malignant and inflammatory diseases. Endocrinal Metabolic North Am 31(1): 141-58.
-
Rottey S, Van Belle S (2005) Hypercalcemia. In Kosmidis P, Schrijvers D, Andre F, Rottey S, eds. ESMO Handbook of oncological emergencies. London, Taylor & Francis 68-75.
-
Gurney H, Grill V, Martin TJ (1993) Parathyroid hormone-related protein and response to pamidronate in tumour-induced hypercalcemia. Lancet 341(8861): 1611-1613.
-
Hande KR, Garrow GC (1993) acute tumor lysis syndrome in patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Am J Med 94(2): 133-139.
-
Cairo MS, Bishop M (2004) Tumourlysis syndrome: new therapeutic strategies and classification. Br J Haematol 127(1): 3-11.
-
Howard SC, Jones DP, Pui CH (2011) the tumor lysis syndrome. N Engl J Med 364(19): 1844-1854.
-
Colombo A, Olson HG, Egan J, Gardin JM (1988) Etiology and prognostic implications of a large pericardial effusion in men. Clin Cardiol 11(6): 389- 394.
-
Lewis MA, Hendrickson AW, Moynihan TJ (2011) Oncologic Emergencies: Path physiology, Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 61(5): 287-314.
-
Ganeshan A, Hon LQ, Warakaulle DR, Morgan R, Uberoi R (2009) Superior vena caval stenting for SVC obstruction: current status. Eur J Radiol 71(2): 343- 349.
-
Chang L, Horng CF, Huang YCT (2006) Prognostic accuracy of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores in critically ill cancer patients. Am J Crit Care 15(1): 47-53.
-
Groger JS, Lemeshow S, Price K (1998) Multicenter outcome study of cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a probability of mortality model. J Clin Oncol 16: 761-770.
-
Shelton BK (2010) Admission criteria and prognostication in patients with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin 6: 1-20.
-
Cooperberg MR, Pasta DJ, Elkin EP, Litwin MS, Latini DM, et al. (2005) The University of California, San Francisco, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straight forward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 173(6): 1938-1942.
-
Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Stapleton AM, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT (1998) A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(10): 766- 771.
-
Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, Bianco FJ, Dotan ZA, et al. (2006) Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(10): 715-717.
-
NCAG (2009) Department of Health (DH) 2012.
-
National Cancer Institute (2009) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0. US Department of Health and Human Services. tiny.cc/ CTCAE.
-
Richardson G, Dobish R (2007) Chemotherapy induced diarrhea. J Oncol Pharm Practice 13: 181- 198.
-
Benson AB, Ajani JA, Catalano RB, Engelking C, Kornblau SM, et al. (2004) Recommended Guidelines for the Treatment of Cancer. Treatment-Induced Diarrhea. J ClinOncol22 (14):2918-2926.
-
McCabe WR, Jackson GG (1962) Gram-negative bacteremia, II: clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic observations. Arch Intern Med 110(6):856-864.
-
Lyman GH, Kuderer NM, Crawford J, Wolff DA, Culakova E, et al. (2011) Predicting individual risk of neutropenic complications in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 117(9): 1917-1927.
-
Alison GF, Eric JB, Kent AS, Michael JB, James I, et al. (2011) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Antimicrobial Agents in Neutropenic Patients with Cancer: 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. IDSA Guidelines. Clinical Infectious Diseases 52(4):e56-e93.
-
Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein EJ, Boyer M, Elting L, et al. (2000) The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer Risk Index: A Multinational Scoring System for Identifying Low- Risk Febrile Neutropenic Cancer Patients. J Clin Oncol 18(16): 3038-3051.
-
Bosscher MR, Van Leeuwen BL, Hoekstra HJ (2014) Surgical emergencies in oncology. Cancer Treatment Reviews 40(8): 1028-1036.
-
Prasad D, Schiff D (2005) Malignant spinal-cord compression. Lancet Oncol. 6(1):15-24.
-
Martenson JA Jr, Evans RG, Lie MR, Ilstrup DM, Dinapoli RP, et al. (1985) Treatment outcome and complications in patients treated for malignant epidural spinal cord compression (SCC). J Neurooncol 3(1):77-84.
-
Cole JS, Patchell RA (2008) Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Lancet Neurol 7(5): 459-466.
-
Khan UA, Shanholtz CB, McCurdy MT (2014) Oncologic Mechanical Emergencies. Emerg Med Clin N Am 32(3): 495-508.
-
Wen PY, Black PM, Loeffler JS (2001) Treatment of metastatic cancer. In: De Vita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 6th (edn) Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2655-2670.
-
Arnold MS, Patchell RA (2001) Diagnosis and management of brain metastases. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 15(6): 1085-107.
-
Tosoni A, Ermani M, Brandes AA (2004) the pathogenesis and treatment of brain metastases: a comprehensive review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 52 (3): 199-215.
-
Peacock KH, Lesser GJ (2006) Current therapeutic approaches in patients with brain metastases. Curr Treat Options Oncol 7(6): 479-489.
-
Ferrell BR, Grant M (2000) Quality of Life Model. Duarte CA: City of Hope National Medical Center. http://www .prc.coh.org.
- Editorial on Multimodal Analgesia
- Surgical Incision Site Local Anaesthetic Infiltration and Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block in Total Abdominal Hysterectomy Under General Anaesthesia- A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial
- Supraglottic Airway Insertion in Semi Fowler Position Due to Severe Thoracic Hyperkyphosis: A Case Report
- Anaesthetic Management of Cardiac Myxoma Patient with Systemic Involvement: A Case Report
- Current Problems in Pulmonary Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Literature Review)
- Evolution of Perioperative Hemodynamic Monitoring from the Hand on Pulse to Hypotension Prediction Index