Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Advances in Clinical Toxicology Research Article 7 min read

Evaluation the Safety and Quality of Ready-to-Eat Sandwiches: Short Communication

Al-Bulushi IM*
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2577-4328  10.23880/act-16000263  Received: March 25, 2023  Published: May 10, 2023
  views
 15 references
 3 tables
PDF
Keywords
Sandwiches Food Safety Microbial Quality Total Bacteria Enterobacteriaceae Salmonella
Abstract

Increase in the consumption of ready-to-eat foods such as sandwiches, raises concerns about its microbial safety and quality. The aim of the study was to evaluate the microbial safety and quality of different type of sandwiches. In total 60 of chicken shawarma (15), normal chicken (15), eggs (15) and meat (15) sandwiches were purchased from different cafes and evaluated microbiologically for total bacterial and Enterobacteriaceae counts and incidence of Salmonella sp. The results showed that the total bacterial counts were 5.48±1.01, 5.53±1.11, 5.58±0.97 and 6.72±0.77 log10 CFU g−1 in the chicken shawarma, normal chicken, eggs and meat sandwiches respectively, whereas, the counts of Enterobacteriaceae in chicken shawarma, normal chicken, eggs and meat sandwiches were 3.56±1.02, 1.63±1.30, 2.48±1.76 and 3.64±1.81 log10 CFU g−1 respectively. Salmonella sp. was suspected in 10% of the sandwiches. In conclusion, all most sandwich types were found at satisfactory level except meat sandwiches which were found at marginal level. Microbial contamination and hygiene handling status indicated that almost all sandwich types were at marginal level except normal chicken sandwiches which were found at satisfactory level. Strictly implementation of food safety laws and further studies were recommended to clarify the safety and quality of the sandwiches.

Introduction

One of the consequences of the lifestyle changes now days is the interaction between people and their foods which shows increases trends in eating of ready-to-eat foods (RTE) such as sandwiches [1]. Shawarma is a Middle Eastern Arabic typical style sandwiches or a kabab fast food that is popular worldwide, and it’s it is usually prepared from meat or chicken with bread and other ingredients of sandwiches such as salad. Due to its content of bread, certain microorganisms such as Bacillus sp. and several genera types of molds such as Rhizopus stolonifer, Neurospora sitophilie could be commonly found [2].

Sandwich ingredients, processing, handling and storage significantly contribute to sandwiches normal microbiological load which could risk its safety. It is quite accepted that food handlers might be carrying some pathogenic bacteria during the preparation of the sandwiches, besides improper cooking and storage temperatures which allow the growth of foodborne pathogens which that could lead to food poisoning outbreak similarly to any other food [3]. In fact, several bacterial species that normally causes foodborne diseases such as Salmonella sp., Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria sp., Shigella sp., Clostridium sp., and Campylobacter sp. were found in meat shawarma sandwiches [4].

Moreover, according to El-Fakhrany, et al. [5], found that out of 66 samples, chicken shawarma sandwiches were found with the highest mean values of mesophilic count e.g. 10.37 log10 CFU g−1 whereas, burger sandwiches were heavily loaded by with Enterobacteriaceae count e.g. 6.67 log10 CFU g−1. As it was reported by Jang, et al. [6], 0.2% of 1120 samples were tested positive for Salmonella sp. The aim of the study was to evaluate the microbial safety and quality of different type of sandwiches served different cafes.

Materials and Methods

Sandwich Samples

Sixty sandwich samples as: 15 of chicken shawarma (grilled chicken), 15 of normal chicken (boiled chicken), 15 of meat (beef) and 15 of egg sandwiches were purchased from different cafes, Oman from June, 2022 to October, 2022 during sandwiches preparation and serving at the sites and brought for analyzing within 2 hours.

Microbial Analyses

Total aerobic bacteria were enumerated according to the USFDA Standard Manual [7]. Briefly, 25g of sandwich was mixed with 225 ml of maximum recovery diluent (HI Media, India) and blender blended for 1 min. After serial dilutions, 0.1 ml was plated on tryptone soya agar (Oxoid, UK) and the plates were incubated at 37± 2 for 48 hours. Similarly, Enterobacteriaceae were enumerated on violet red bile glucose agar (Oxoid, UK) and plates were incubated at 37± 2 Table 1: Total bacterial count in different sandwiches.

for 24 hours according to the ISO Standard [8].

Salmonella sp. was enumerated according to the ISO Standard [9]. Briefly, 25g of sandwiches were blended with 225 ml of buffer peptone water (Oxoid, UK) and the mixture was incubates incubated at 37± 2, for 18-24 hours. After that, 0.1 ml of the sample was inoculated into 10 ml of Rappaport vassiliadis (Oxoid, UK) and incubated at 42± 2 for 48 hours. Finally, 0.1 ml of inoculated Rappaport vassiliadis broth was plated on xylose lysine deoxy cholate agar (Oxoid, UK) and the plates were incubated at 37± 2 for 24 hours. The black- centered colonies were presumably considered as salmonella colonies as per Oxoid instruction.

Results and Discussion

Table 1 shows the mean values of total aerobic bacterial count in different sandwiches types which could be considered as an indicator of microbial quality of foods. Meat sandwiches showed the highest total bacterial count while the chicken shawarma sandwiches showed the lowest total microbial count. Table 2 shows the mean values of Enterobacteriaceae counts. As it can be seen, the highest Enterobacteriaceae count was found in meat sandwiches and the lowest was found in chicken sandwiches. According to the Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) [10], which limits a total bacterial count for fully cooked sandwiches with salads to be < 6.0 log10 CFU g−1 as satisfactory and a count of > 6.0 log10 CFU g−1 - < 7.0 log10 CFU g−1 as marginal limit, most of sandwich types were found at satisfactory level in the current study except meat sandwiches which were found to be the in a marginal level. This high microbial count could be attributed to the microbial contamination of different ingredients of the sandwiches such as salads as well as the degree of sandwiches handling.

Sandwich TypeMean, Log CFU/g
10
Max, Log CFU/g
10
Min, Log CFU/g
10
Chicken shawarma (15)5.48±1.017.483
Normal chicken (15)5.53±1.116.983.74
Eggs (15)5.58±0.977.234.02
Meat (15)6.72±0.777.484.74

Table 1: _Enterobacteriaceae_ count in different sandwiches.

Sandwich TypeMean, Log CFU/g
10
Max, Log CFU/g
10
Min, Log CFU/g
10
Chicken shawarma (15)3.56±1.025.051.70
Normal chicken (15)1.63±1.303.730.00
Eggs (15)2.48±1.765.260.00
Meat (15)3.64±1.815.480.00

Table 2: Detection of _Salmonella_ sp. in different sandwiches.

Enterobacteriaceae count is considered as a good indicator of microbial to evaluate the hygienic status in food preparation. Moreover, the presence of Enterobacteriaceae is an indicator for intestinal and fecal contaminations either directly or indirectly from food handlers or sandwich ingredients and some the Enterobacteriaceae groups are pathogenic that might cause severe foodborne diseases (El-Fakhrany, et al., 2019). According to FSANZ, Enterobacteriaceae count > 4.0 log10 CFU g−1 is considered as unsatisfactory, > 2.0 log10 CFU g−1 < 4.0 log10 CFU g−1 as marginal and < 2.0 log10 CFU g−1 as satisfactory. Based on these criteria, almost all sandwich types in the current study were found at marginal level except normal chicken sandwiches which were found at satisfactory level from Table 2. It could be understood from these results that most of the sandwiches were either exposed to the microbial contamination prior to preparation or cooked and handled at improper temperature and handled at unhygienic practices. In comparison with other studies, the total bacterial count Table 3: Detection of Salmonella sp. in different sandwiches.

in chicken shawarma sandwiches in the current study was higher than that was found in Saudi Arabia study by Alharbi, et al. [11] and Ahmed, et al. [12]. However, our findings of chicken shawarma total bacterial count closely agreed with that were found in Egypt by El Zekaty, et al. [13]. In other sandwich types, total bacterial count in normal chicken sandwiches was lower than that was found in Bangladesh by Hasan [14]. The discrepancy in total bacterial count among studies could be attributed mainly to the initial bacterial count in sandwich raw materials, cooking temperature and hygienic status of sandwiches handling after preparation. For instance, sandwiches raw chicken and salads possibly contributed to vary the bacterial count among the sandwiches in the previous studies. Salmonella sp. was suspected in meat sandwiches which represented 10% of the total sandwiches (Table 3). Although, Salmonella sp. was not confirmed, vehicles such as food handlers could contribute to this pathogen incidence in foods [15].

Sandwich typeSalmonella sp.Remark
Chicken shawarma (15)0/15
Normal chicken (15)0/15
Eggs (15)0/15
Meat (15)6/15Suspected based on colonies morphology

Conclusion

In general, most of the sandwiches were found at the satisfactory microbial quality level with an exception of meat sandwiches. Moreover, most of the sandwiches were found at the marginal level of contamination and hygienic status with an exception of normal sandwiches. Salmonella sp. was suspected in 10% of the total sandwiches. This study showed the need for more studies to clarify the microbial safety and quality and urged to strictly implement of food safety laws.

References

  1. Loukieh M, Mouannes E, Jaoudeh AC, Wakim L, Fancello F, et al. (2018) Street Foods in Beirut City: An Assessment of the Food Safety Practices and of the Microbiological Quality. Journal food safety 38(3): e12455.
  2. Odu N, Akano U (2012) The Microbiological Assessment of Ready-to-Eat-Food (Shawarma) in Port Harcourt City Nigeria. Nat Sci 10(8): 1-8.
  3. Morshdy A, Hussein M, Fakhry A (2018) Microbial Profile of Ready to Eat Meat Sandwiches. 5th International Food Safety Conference, Egypt.
  4. Nimri L, Al-Dahab F, Batchoun R (2014) Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens Recovered from Contaminated Shawarma Meat in Northern Jordan. J Infect Dev Ctries 8(11): 1407-1414.
  5. El-Fakhrany A, Elewa N, Moawad A, El-Saidi N (2019) Microbiological Evaluation of Some Fast Food Sandwiches in Fayoum. Egypt. J Food Sci 47(1): 27-38.
  6. Jang H, Kim N, Choi Y, Rhee M (2013) Microbiological Quality and Risk Factors Related to Sandwiches Served in Bakeries, Cafés, and Sandwich Bars in South Korea. J food Prot 76(2): 231-238.
  7. Maturin L, Peeler JT (2001) Bacteriological Analytical Manual Chapter 3: Aerobic Plate Count. US Food and Drug Administration, USA.
  8. Yassa HA (2023) Evaluation the Safety and Quality of Ready-to-Eat Sandwiches: Short Communication. Adv Clin Toxicol 8(1): 000263.
  9. ISO (2017) Microbiology of the Food Chain-Horizontal Method for the Detection, Enumeration and Serotyping of Salmonella-part 1: Detection of _Salmonella_ spp. ISO, Switzerland.
  10. Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (2018) Compendium of Microbiological Criteria for Foods. FSANZ, New Zealand.
  11. Alharbi S, Abdel-Ghaffar M, Kadher N (2019) Isolation and Identification of Pathogenic Bacteria from Ready- to-Eat Fast Foods in Al-Quwayiyah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev 19(3): 14739-14751.
  12. Ahmed A, El-Hakem N, Ibrahim G (2015) Chemical and Microbial Assessment of Beef and Chicken Shawarma Sandwiches in Ismailia Governorate and Its Impact on Consumer Health. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry and Environmental Health 1(1): 686-693.
  13. El zekaty A, Nossair M, Samaha I, Khalifa E (2016) Microbial Evaluation of Selected Ready to Eat Street Vended Meat Products Sandwiches with Emphasis on Public Health Importance of E. Coli Isolates. AJVS 51(2): 27-32.
  14. Hasan T (2014) Microbial Quality of Selected Sandwiches Sold at Fast Food Shops in Dhaka City. BRAC University, Bangladesh.
  15. Darwish A (2018) Foodborne pathogens of Fast Food and Ready-to-Eat Foods in Tabuk City and Evaluating Hazard for Food Quality. International J of Healthcare and Biomedical Research 6(2): 149-158.

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{albulushi2023,
  title   = {Evaluation the Safety and Quality of Ready-to-Eat Sandwiches:
Short Communication},
  author  = {Al-Bulushi IM},
  journal = {Advances in Clinical Toxicology},
  year    = {2023},
  volume  = {8},
  number  = {2},
  doi     = {10.23880/act-16000263}
}
Al-Bulushi IM (2023). Evaluation the Safety and Quality of Ready-to-Eat Sandwiches:
Short Communication. Advances in Clinical Toxicology, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.23880/act-16000263
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluation the Safety and Quality of Ready-to-Eat Sandwiches:
Short Communication
AU  - Al-Bulushi IM
JO  - Advances in Clinical Toxicology
PY  - 2023
VL  - 8
IS  - 2
DO  - 10.23880/act-16000263
ER  -