Double Crush Syndrome - Features of Etiology, Pathogenesis and Clinical Course
Although carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a diagnosis, which has been known and treated for more than 50 years, nowadays this is a pathology with considerable influence over the quality of life of a large number of patients, having important socio-economic consequences for society. This is a suffering where the pain and the impaired sensation in the palm and wrist area are often accompanied by problems engaging the entire upper limb. Double crush syndrome results from the compression of the same peripheral nerve at two or more levels, which is the cause of a synergistic enhancement of compression-related symptoms. Very often, this syndrome may cause a "blurring" of the clinical picture, which may occur with less typical clinical symptoms, as well as cause insufficient satisfactory results both in the conservative and the operative treatment of CTS. The article is an overview of a number of reports concerning aetiology, pathogenesis, demographic characteristics, and some controversies about epidemiology, risk factors, and pathophysiology of double crush syndrome. The clinical manifestations of the syndrome, as well as the possibilities for functional and instrumental diagnosis are discussed. The uniqueness of the pathology and the symptoms of compression of median nerve at several levels suggest treatment should be conservative at first. Differentiation of double crush syndrome is of particular importance in the therapeutic approach. Although the question of a complete understanding of double crush syndrome remains incomplete, this is a real phenomenon that the therapists of different specialties should consider not only in the case of suspicion of proximal and distal compression of median nerve, but also in some systemic diseases and polyneuropathies. Exact history, correct interpretation of the results of the clinical study, selection of a suitable instrumental diagnostic test are a pledge to find the right approach in its treatment optimally satisfying the patient and the therapist with the outcome of therapy.
References
-
William J, Molinari JC (2013) The Double Crush Syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 38(4): 799-801.
-
Upton ARM, McComas AJ (1973) The double crush in nerve entrapment syndromes. The Lancet 2(7825): 359-361.
-
Nemoto K, Nemoto M (1987) An experimental study on the “double crush” hypothesis. Hand Surg Am 12(4): 552-559.
-
Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE (1991) Chronic nerve compression model for the double crush hypothesis. Ann Plast Surg 26(3): 259-264.
-
Kwon HK, Hwang M (2006) Frequency and severity of carpal tunnel syndrome according to level of cervical radiculopathy: Double crush syndrome? Clin Neurophysiol 117(6): 1256-1259.
-
Wilbourn AJ, Gilliatt RW (1997) Double-crush syndrome: A critical analysis. Neurology 49(1): 21-29.
-
Kane PM, Daniels AH, Akelman E (2015) Double Crush Syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 23(9): 558- 562.
-
Lo SF, Chou LW (2012) Clinical characteristics and electrodiagnostic features in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, double crush syndrome, and cervical radiculopathy. Rheumatol Int 32(5): 1257- 1263.
-
Atroshi I, Gummesson C (1999) Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 282(2): 153-158.
-
Osterman AL (1988) The double crush syndrome. Orthop Clin North Am 19(1): 147-155.
- Electrolyte Considerations for Athletes
- Comprehensive Rehabilitation in Adults with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Literature Review on Frequency, Intensity, and Duration Parameters
- Exercise Duration and Its Association with ADHD Symptom Severity in Children and Adolescents: A Parent-Reported Survey Study
- Adaptation of the Adult Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire for Use in Pediatrics
- A Non-Pharmacological Multidisciplinary Pain Program within a Hospital Wellness Program: A Mixed Methods Study
- The Effect of Frenkel's Exercise with PNF on Functional Reach in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Control Trial