Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources Research Article 54 min read

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Collaborations Influences Ecology and Environmental Changes for Global Sustainable Development

Kamal Prasad*
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2578-4994  10.23880/jenr-16000231  Received: February 09, 2021  Published: March 26, 2021
 — views
 138 references
PDF
Keywords
AM Fungi Ecology Environment Global Sustainable Development
Abstract

Global environmental modification especially increasing atmospherical carbon dioxide concentration and temperature can have an effect on most ecosystems. The various responses of plants to those aspects of world environmental modification are well documented. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mediated plant play a vital roles in worldwide ecosystems, and protects host plants against environmental stress together with the uptake and transfer of macro and micro nutrients, modification of the physical soil surroundings and alteration of plant interactions with different ecology and environment systems. Numerous studies have incontestable the potential for variation in mycorrhizal fungal diversity to additionally have an effect on ecosystem functioning, in the main via effects on primary productivity. Diversity in these studies is sometimes characterised in terms of the quantity of species, distinctive organic process lineages or complementary mycorrhizal traits, also because the ability of plants to discriminate among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in area and time. However, the nascent outcomes of those relationships are sometimes indirect, and therefore context dependent, and difficult to predict with certainty. Central opinion of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal multifariousness, ecosystem function relationships that concentrate on the direct and specific links between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi fitness and consequences for their roles in ecosystems particularly highlight functional diversity in hyphal resource economics. In natural ecosystems, predict that world environmental modification effects on mycorrhizal fungal communities are going to be powerfully mediate by the impacts on plant communities to the extent that community level interactions can encourage be the key mechanism for determinative world environmental modification elicited changes in mycorrhizal fungal communities. It’s accepted that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi interdependency can cut back chemical fertiliser and pesticide inputs. Consequently, this may result in a reduction in harmful chemical substance impact on surroundings. The key effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi practical interdependency are often summarized as improving rooting and plant establishment, improving uptake of low mobile ions; improving nutrient cycling; enhancing plant tolerance to (biotic and abiotic) stress; improving quality of soil structure; enhancing plant community diversity and changes ecology and marginal/ novel environments. Present manuscript, the ecological and environmental characteristics of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on host plant, and ecologic significance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal biotechnology in agricultural system and globe sustainable development were reviewed.

Introduction

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AM fungi) offer varied services to their plant symbionts for ecology and environmental sustainable development. Understanding the consequences of global climate change on AM fungi, and also the ensuing plant responses, could be crucial factors in predicting ecosystem responses on a world scale. AM fungi form mutual dependent relationships with the bulk of terrestrial plants and supply a large vary of services containing improved macro and micro nutrients and water uptake [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], drought and diseases resistance, and amplified plant productivity, in exchange for carbon [5, 8, 9, 10]. AM fungi are a main supplier to global carbon and nutrient cycles and regarded a major link between above and below ground processes [11, 12]. AM fungi are consumed more than 20% of carbon made by their host plant and also the AM fungal hyphae network can occupy over hundred meters in total soil volume creating up around 30% of the entire microbic biomass in terrestrial ecosystems. Production of glycoproteins like glomalin that are concerned within the formation and stability of soil aggregates might have conjointly a very important influence on different microorganisms related to the AM fungal mycelium. The floristic diversity and productivity of plant community are shown to rely upon the presence of species wealthy assemblage of AM fungal species. Increasing fungal diversity resulted in larger species diversity and better productivity [5]. The mechanism behind these effects is probably going to be differential effects of specific plant fungus. AM fungi are sensitive to global climate change. Climate change is neutering the interactions among plants and soil organisms in ways in which alter the structure and performance of ecosystems [13]. AM fungi reply to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, environmental condition warming, and changes within the distribution of precipitation [9, 13]. Elevated carbon dioxide concentrations can indirectly have an effect on AM fungi through redoubled carbon allocation from the host plant to the fungus, though this impact may well be overestimated underneath abrupt compared to gradual increase of atmospheric carbon [9].

Important quantity of carbon flows through mycorrhizal mycelia to totally different elements of soils. The potential consequences of this on plant growth and carbon and nutrient cycling has led to a growing demand for his inclusion in global models. However, our understanding of their responses to environmental modification remains restricted. This includes rising atmospheric carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone levels, altered water accessibility, warming and nitrogen deposition. Changes detected are typically extremely variable and context dependent, however trends are emerging such as the similar responses of community composition to increased nitrogen deposition and atmospheric carbon dioxide, despite the doubtless contrastive effects of those environmental changes on carbon accessibility. AM fungi extraradical hyphae formation was extremely correlative with soil aggregation and C and N sequestration, suggesting that a decrease in each root and extraradical colonization in response to climate change may have major impacts on ecosystem functions. Interactions between plant vegetation, water accessibility, and soil characteristics ought to be thought-about once analysing the consequences of climate change on AM fungi. Correct management of AM fungi has the potential to boost the profitableness and sustainability of agricultural and climate change systems. AM fungi communities are reducing the uncertainty concerning the community characteristics and useful role of those vital AM fungi within the future sustainable development. Truthful management of AM fungi has the potential to boost the profitableness and sustainability of agricultural and ecological systems. During this assessment, the discussion is restricted to the mycorrhizal edges and their role in ecology and environments for worldwide sustainable development.

Physiology of AM Fungi

Presymbiosis of AM Fungi

The development of AM fungi before root colonisation, referred to as presymbiosis, consists of three stages such as AM fungal spore germination, hyphal growth, and host recognition and appressorium formation.

AM Fungal Spore Germination

AM fungal spores are thick walled, multinucleate resting structures. The germination of the mycorrhizal reproductive structure (spore) doesn’t rely upon the plant, as spores are germinated beneath experimental conditions in the absence of plants each in vitro (modified living roots) and in vivo. However, the speed of germination can be hyperbolic by host root exudates. In natural condition, mycorrhizal spores germinate with contact of living host. AM fungal spores germinate given appropriate conditions of the soil matrix, temperature, greenhouse gas concentration, pH, and phosphorus concentration.

AM Fungal Hyphal Growth

The growth of AM fungal hyphae through the soil is controlled by host root exudates called strigolactones, and therefore the soil phosphorus concentration. Low phosphorus concentrations within the soil increase hyphal growth and branching further as induce plant exudation of compounds that control hyphal branching intensity [14, 15]. The branching of AM fungal hyphae grownup in phosphorus media of 1 mM is considerably reduced, however the length of the germ tube and total hyphal growth weren’t affected.

A level of 10 mM phosphorus pent-up each hyphal growth and branching of mycorrhizal fungi. This phosphorus concentration happens in natural soil conditions and can therefore contribute to reduced mycorrhizal colonization [15].

AM fungal Host Recognition

Root exudates from AM fungal host plants grown during a liquid medium with and without phosphorus are shown to have an effect on hyphal growth. Spores of Gigaspora margarita and Glomus intraradices were grown in host plant exudates. Hyphae of AM fungi grown within the exudates from roots starved of phosphorus grew a lot of and created tertiary branches compared to those grown in exudates from plants given adequate phosphorus. Once the expansion promoting root exudates were superimposed in low concentration, the AM fungi created scattered long branches. Because the concentration of exudates was enlarged, the fungi created a lot of tightly clustered branches. At the highest concentration arbuscules, the AM fungal structures of phosphorus exchange were formed [15].

AM Fungal Appressorium Formation

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal hyphae encounter the root foundation of a host plant, an appressorium or ‘infection structure’ forms on the root cuticle. From this structure hyphae can penetrate into the host’s parenchyma cortex [16, 17]. AM would like no chemical signals from the plant to make the appressoria. AM fungi could form appressoria on the cell walls of “ghost” cells during which the protoplast had been removed to eliminate signaling between the fungi and also the plant host. However, the hyphae didn’t further penetrate the cells and grow in toward the root cortex, which indicates that signaling between symbionts is needed for further growth once appressoria are fashioned [14].

AM Fungal Cell Structure, Metabolism and Life Cycle

Mycorrhizal fungi are an obligate biotroph, meaning it requires a living photoautotropic host to complete their life cycle and produce the next generation of spores. Mycorrhizal species are also entirely asexual [5, 18]. AM fungi begin as a spore; spores can be produce outside or inside the host root. AM fungal spores are able to germinate without a host plant in vitro condition with contact of modified living roots. AM fungal spores are produced at the end of the hyphae. In absence of living root, spores germinate and formed a germination tube which grows through the soil until it finds a host root. AM fungal spores penetrate the root and grow between root cells or it penetrates the cell wall and grows within root cells. Once spores penetrates the root cells arbuscules are formed. The arbuscules are tree-shaped subcellular structures that form to connect plants to the hyphal network of the fungi. Arbuscules are the main site for nutrient exchange between AM fungi and its symbiotic plant partners. Soil may contain over hundred meters of hyphae per cubic centimeter [19]. This network of hyphae is designed to increase the plants uptake of important macro and micro nutrients such as phosphates, copper and water.

Mycorrhizae Ecology and Pathogenesis

AM fungi are not known to be pathogenic. As a fungi, mycorrhiza, contributes to fungal biomass dominance of soils. AM fungal spores penetrates the cell wall of it host plant. Within the cell wall the fungi forms arbuscules or haustoria like structures at the subcellular level. Arbuscular are the site of transfer of materials between host and fungi. Al most all AM fungi are obligate heterotrophs, that is they require a host to obtain organic nutrients [20]. In return the host plant acquires inorganic nutrients from the AM fungi. In this respect, mycorrhizas can an important role in the overall nutrient cycling of ecosystems. Estimates of host plant organic input to AM fungal species range from 1 to 20%. Host specificity in AM fungi has led to a link a positive correlation in AM fungal diversity and plant diversity; they may protect plant roots from pests, and increase overall fitness of their host. AM fungi may in habitat the roots of more than 90% of vascular plants. It is important ecologically by providing nutrients to host. Phosphorous, nitrogen and water may be provided to host plants through the intracellular interface [20]. Mycorrhizal hyphae network increases plants uptake of important macro and micro nutrients. In exchange for the nutrients and water the plants supply carbohydrates to mycorrhiza for survival.

AM Fungal Symbiosis

AM fungus forms extremely branched structures in parenchyma for nutrient exchange for the plant called arbuscules [4, 5, 16, 17]. These are the distinguishing characteristic structures of AM fungus. Arbuscules are the sites of exchange for phosphorus, carbon, water, and alternative nutrients [5, 21, 22]. There are two forms: Paris sort is characterised by the expansion of hyphae from one cell to the next; and Arum sort is characterised by the expansion of hyphae within the house between plant cells [5, 23] the selection between Paris sort and Arum sort is primarily determined by the host family, though some families or species are capable of either sort [24, 25]. The host plant exerts an effect over the intercellular hyphal proliferation and arbuscule formation [16]. There’s a decondensation of the body substance plant’s chromatin that indicates inflated transcription of the plant’s deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in arbuscule containing cells [17]. Major modifications are needed within the plant host cell to accommodate the arbuscules. The vacuoles shrink and different cellular organelles proliferate. The plant cell cytoskeleton structure is organized around the arbuscules. There are two different sorts of hyphae that originate from the colonised host plant root. Once colonization has occurred, transient runner hyphae grow from the plant root into the soil. These are the extracellular hyphae that take up phosphorus and micronutrients that are given to the plant. AM fungal hyphae have a high surface-to-volume quantitative relation, creating their assimilative ability larger than that of plant roots [26]. AM fungal hyphae also are finer than roots and may enter into pores of the soil that are inaccessible to roots [27]. The fourth kind of AM fungal hyphae grows from the roots and colonizes different host plant roots. The four sorts of hyphae are morphologically distinct [21].

Diversity of AM Fungi

A total 336 species of AM fungi, within which half dozen dominant genera such as Acaulospora, Glomus, Gigaspora, Scutellospora, Enterophospora are superabundant in cultivated than in non-cultivated lands (AM fungi species list on Gogle.com). Genus Glomus is dominant genera accessible in worldwide in land and it’s multiply for biostimulants

Ecological Significance of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi

Nutrient Uptake and Exchange Through AM Fungi

Soil Fertility and AM Fungi

Millions of experiments have shown that AM fungi can overcome nutrient limitation to plant growth by enhancing nutrient acquisition [5, 6, 16, 28, 29, 30]. AM fungi increase the uptake and mobilization of insoluble phosphate in soluble from and translocation from the soil and root cuticle parenchyma to xylem, phloem, beside different essential nutrient such as nitrogen, potassium, ion, manganese, magnesium, copper, zinc, boron , sulphur, and molybdenum additionally. The increase in inorganic nutrient uptake in mycorrhizal plants is especially as a result of fungal hyphae offer the big extent for nutrient acquisition to external root surface as compared to uninfected roots [16]. Because the AM fungus mycelium grows through soil, it scavenges for mineral nutrients and is in a position to create contact with mycelium roots, typically of various host species. The tiny extraradical mycelium compared to roots that permits penetration into some crystalline minerals, aggregates and organic matter with smaller pores than may be exploited by root alone.

Phosphorus Uptake and AM Fungi

Phosphorus could be a major plant nutrient needed in comparatively giant amounts and plays an important role altogether biological functions in energy transfer through the formation of energy wealthy phosphate esters and is additionally an important component of macromolecules like nucleotiodes, phospholipids and sugar phosphates [31]. The foremost vital advantages of mycorrhizae are the increase within the phosphorus uptake by the plant. The general method of phosphorus uptake consists of sub-processes such as phosphorus absorption from soil by AM fungal hyphae, translocation on the hyphae from external to internal (root cortex) mycelia, and the transfer of phosphate to cortical host root cells [32, 33, 34, 35, 36]. Uptake of phosphate by roots is way quicker than diffusion of ions to the absorption surfaces of the plant root [37]. This causes phosphate depletion zone round the roots. The in depth extrametrical hyphae of AM fungi extend out into the soil for many centimetres so it bridges the zone of nutrient depletion. Thus, the plant is in a position to use microhabitats on the far side the nutrient depleted area wherever rootlets and plant root hairs cannot thrive [38].

Nitrogen Translocation and AM Fungi

Well-known fact that nitrogen is required for the formation of amino acids, purines, pyrimidine’s and, is thus, indirectly concerned in protein and nucleic acid synthesis. AM fungi associated plants have accrued more N content in shoots. Variety of mechanisms are advised for this effects, specifically improvement of symbiotic N fixation; direct uptake of combined N by mycorrhizal fungi; expedited N transfer, a method by that a district of N fixed by leguminous plants edges the non-nodulated plants; accrued enzymatic activities involved in N metabolism such as pectinase, xyloglucanase and polysaccharide that are able to decompose soil organic matter [32]. The hyphae of AM fungi have the tendency to extract N and transport it from the soil to plants. An AM fungus improves growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation in legume-Rhizobium symbiosis. They conjointly impact of uptake of NH4 from soil that forms the larger fraction of accessible nitrogen in several natural ecosystems. AM fungal hyphae improve N transfer in communities, since the network of AM mycelia links totally different plant species growing nearby and helps overlap the pool of accessible nutrients for these plants. In line with McFarland, et al. [39] over 50% of plant N demand is provided by mycorrhizal association. Mycorrhizal vaccination increased activities of nitrate reductase, amino acid synthetase and amino acid synthase within the roots and shoots of mycorrhizal corn (Zea mays L.) as rumored by Subramanian and Charest [40]. Recently, a plant ammonia transporter, that is activated within the presence of AM fungi has been identified and indicated that the approach by that N is transferred in plant could also be the same as P transfer [41].

AM Fungi Supply of Organic Mineral Nutrients to the Host Plant

Although several mycorrhizal fungi can access inorganic styles of N and P, some litter-inhabiting mycorrhizal fungi manufacture proteases and distribute soluble amino compounds through AM fungal hyphal networks into the plant roots [42, 43]. Genus Glomus has been shown to transport the amino acids glycine and glutamine into wheat [44].

AM Fungi and Micronutrients Transfer

The extrametrical hyphae of AM fungi take up and transport K, Ca and sulphates and AM fungal colonization affects the concentration and amounts of K in shoots. AM fungal infected plants accumulating giant quantities of some micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Mg, Mn, Cu, Co) beneath conditions of low soil nutrient accessibility [5, 6, 45]. The absorption is attributed to the uptake and transport by external hyphae due to wider exploration of soil volume by extended AM fungal extrametrical hyphae. Uptake and concentration of Mn in plants might not be suffering from AM fungi and additional typically it’s going to be lower in AM fungal plants, therefore contributive to higher Mn tolerance in plants. The AM fungi improved Fe uptake could also be due to specific metallic Fe chelators. The uptake of Fe from low concentration solutions is due to the siderophores designed by AM fungi [46, 47].

Importance of AM Fungi in Ecology and Environment

Role of AM Fungal Diversity to Water Uptake

AM fungi play a vital role within the water economy in ecosystem. The AM fungi association improves the hydraulic physical conductivity of the roots and improves water uptake by the plants or otherwise alters the plant physiology to reduce the stress response to soil drought [5, 48]. Mycorrhizal plants show higher survival than non– mycorrhizal plants in extreme dry conditions. It reveals that AM fungal mycelial network extends deeper and wider within the soil in search of water and nutrients. The porousness of cytomembrane to water can also be altered by mycorrhizal colonization although the improved phosphorus nutrition and colonization by AM fungi can improve the drought resistance of plants [49, 50]. In drought stress conditions, AM fungi exert their influence by increasing the transpiration rate and lowering stomatal resistance or by neutering the balance of plant hormones [51]. The modification in leaf physical property because of AM fungal immunisation improves water and turgor potential of leaf and additionally increase root length and depth [52, 53] and can additionally influence water relations and so, the drought resistance of the plants. The probable reasons for the improved water and nutrient uptake rates by mycorrhizal plants which may flow from to better distribution of absorbing AM fungal hyphal network, additional favourable ratio of AM fungal hyphae as compared to roots, larger surface area and quicker extension rate, improved functional longevity, chemical alteration in soil rhizosphere, altered rhizosphere microorganism population, uptake kinetics, larger hydraulic conductivities, lower transportation rates per unit leaf area, extraction of water from soil to lower water potentials and additional fast recovery from water stress. Soil Aggregation and Soil Stabilization and AM Fungi Disruptions in ecosystem have an effect on the physical, chemical and biological processes within the soil. AM fungi facilitate within the binding of soil particles and increase soil aggregation and conservation [29, 54, 55]. AM fungi are famed to boost soil fertility, as they produce glomalin that upon accumulation in soil, beside the AM fungal hyphae forms micro aggregates and eventually macro aggregates and, thus, acts as a backbone for soil aggregation and soil stabilization directly. It conjointly releases exudates within the soil and therefore promotes combination stability and conjointly accelerates different microbial growth and development [56].

Role of AM Fungi in Wasteland Reclamation:

AM fungi having a good potential within the recovery of disturbed lands and these can be utilized in reclamation of wastelands [55, 57]. AM fungi can increase the expansion and survival of fascinating revegetation species. Plant infected with AM fungi can cause a useful physiological impact on host plant in increasing uptake of soil phosphorus [34, 58, 59, 60]. Nicoloson [61] advised that plant growth in wastelands can be effectively improved by incorporating AM fungi. It’s been advised that a lot of plants might need mycorrhizal infection so as to survive on disturbed land. The absorptive surface area contributed by soil AM fungal mycelium permits phosphorus uptake from a far bigger volume. Host growth is additionally increased notably in phosphorus-deficient soils [5, 6, 62]. AM fungi are once and for all shown to enhance revegetation of coal spoils, strip mines, waste areas, road sites and alternative disturbed areas [57, 63]. Addition of AM fungi provides a nutritional advantage to associated plants additionally to providing attainable resistance to low hydrogen ion concentration, significant metal toxicants and extreme temperature. Presence and utilization of AM fungi has markedly multiplied the successful of rehabilitation to those wetness deficient zones. Pre-inoculation of nursery seedlings with suitable mycorrhizal fungi would profit in revegetation of disturbed well-mined land. Rani, et al. [64, 65] suggested that the impact of Glomus mosseae, G. fasciculatum along with Rhizobium and Trichoderma on higher biomass yield of genus Prosopis cineraria and Acacia nilotica and rumored more that coinoculation with AM fungi and Rhizobium resulted in maximum growth and best nodulation [60, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71].

Role of AM Fungi in Agriculture Development and control Soil Erosion

The AM fungi mutualism has conjointly been shown to contribute considerably to soil conservation via its role within the formation of water stable soil aggregates by the fungal extrametrical hyphae. These aggregates are crucial for making and maintaining a macro porous, water permeable healthy soil structure, that is necessity for erosion resistance and conjointly necessary for economical nutrient cycling. The profuse use of phosphate fertilizers and chemicals causes pollution issues and health hazards. Therefore the use of AM fungi is being inspired in agriculture. The exploitation of mycorrhizal fungi isn’t straight forward as a result of giant scale production of AM fungi on field scale isn’t nevertheless attainable. However there’s a possibility of mass production of AM fungi by means that of acceptable crop and soil management practices. A lot of farm management practices can influence the kinds of AM fungi found in agriculture soils. Except effects of fertiliser utilization on AM fungi, alternative practices such as crop rotation, negligible cultivation, monoculture, tillage, organic amendments, and application of biocides affects the AM fungi [4, 5, 72, 73, 74, 75]. Mycorrhizal interdependency plays a vital role within the tropical agricultural crops as a result of in tropical region, the soil is phosphorus deficient. Mosse [62] reportable that 75% of the phosphorus applied to the crops isn’t used by them however get regenerate to forms unprocurable to plants.

Role of Mycorrhizal Fungi in Crop Dependency

The AM fungi interdependency has conjointly been shown to contribute healthy to conservation via its role within the formation of water stable soil aggregates by the AM fungal extrametrical hyphae. These aggregates are crucial for making and maintaining a macro porous, water porous healthy soil structure, that is requirement for erosion resistance and conjointly necessary for economical nutrient pool. The abundant use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides causes pollution problems and soil and human health hazards. Therefore the use of AM fungi is being inspired in agriculture for chemical free produce. The exploitation of mycorrhizal fungi isn’t simple as a result of giant scale production of AM fungi on field scale isn’t nonetheless doable. However there’s a chance of production of AM fungi by suggests that of applicable crop and soil management practices. Additional farm management practices can influence the categories of AM fungi found in agriculture soils.

Crop rotation and AM Fungi

A crop rotation may be a system of growing crop plants in an exceedingly recurrent outlined sequence. Crop rotation may be a tool for managing nutrient supply, weeds, pests and diseases. It’s renowned that the preceding crop can have an effect on the expansion of the following crop. This development, referred to as the ‘rotation effect’, cannot be explained entirely by nutritionary effects and different factors such as AM fungi could play a vital role within the success of crop rotation. It’s been well established that the AM fungi activity is described by non mycorrhizal fungi host plants and extremely mycorrhizal host crop increase AM fungi inoculum potential of the soil and colonization of the following crops [76]. An increase in AM fungi colonization and growth in maize occurred following sunflower when put next to corn following mustard (non– mycorrhizal). Here non mycorrhizal plants within the rotation scale back the speed of AM fungi colonization in following crops. Gavito and Miller [77] conjointly discovered delayed AM fungi colonization of corn (Zea mays) following canola (Brassica napus); a non– mycorrhizal host species, when put next to the colonization of corn following the AM fungi host species (Bromus spp.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa). The corn following canola had considerably lower AM fungi colonization for up to sixty two days once planting, once that the colonization was adequate that following an AM fungi host species. These observations recommend that AM fungi populations are often designed up and also the repressing impact of a non-mycorrhizal crop are often reversed once cropping with a mycorrhizal crop [77].

Increase Phosphorus fertility Through AM Fungi

The benefits of AM fungi are greatest in systems wherever P within the soil is low. Because the level of P obtainable to plants can increase, the plant tissue phosphorus additionally can increase and therefore the plant carbon investment in mycorrhizae isn’t economically useful to the plant [78]. Encouragement of mycorrhizal mutuality could increase early uptake of phosphorus, improving crop yield potential while not starter P fertilizer application [60, 79, 80, 81, 82].

Establishment of Seedling with AM Fungi

AM Fungi enjoying a crucial role in self-made re- afforestation and there are many reports of augmented establishment of the numerous of forest seedlings within the field, such as Quercus rubra [83]. During a study conducted by Ramos-Zapata, et al. [84] on establishment of Desmoncus orthacanthos together with immunisation of AM fungi resulted during a threefold increase in survival of seedlings within the disturb field condition.

Alleviation of Environmental Stress Through AM Fungi:

AM fungi are able to alter plant physiological and morphological properties during an approach by that plant can handle the stress [85]. AM fungi facilitate higher survival of plants below stress conditions through a boost up in uptake of nutrients notably P, Zn, Cu and H20. They create the host resilient to adverse conditions created by unfavourable factors associated with soil or climate. The role played by these fungi in assuaging the stress on the plant because of drought, metal pollution, salinity and grazing is shortly represented.

Water stress and AM Fungi

Water stress could be a major agricultural constraint within the semi-arid tropics in worldwide. It’s documented to own a substantial negative impact on nodule performs. It inhibits photosynthesis and disturbs the fragile mechanism of oxygen management in nodules. The latter is crucial for active organic process of nitrogen fixation. AM fungi interdependence can shield host plants against prejudicious effects caused by water stress. Quilambo [86] reported that immunization with endemic inoculants resulted in augmented leaf and root growth and prevented the expected increase in root to shoot magnitude relation and root–weight magnitude relation that’s unremarkably ascertained beneath phosphorus deficient and water stress conditions in peanut. AM fungi improve the uptake of nutrients like N and P in water stressed conditions [5, 87]. Water inadequacy in soil is conveyed to the shoots by suggests that of non–hydraulic chemical signal that’s relayed from the dehydrating roots to the aerial shoots by the transpiration system. The response is expressed by the leaves in terms of scrubby growth and weakened stomatal electrical phenomenon. An AM fungus alters this non–hydraulic root–to–shoot signaling of soil drying by eliminating the leaf response [88]. The AM fungi extraradical hyphae increase the absorptive surface area of the roots [5, 89] that in turns reduces the resistance to water uptake. Hence, the role vie by AM fungi in assuaging water stress of plants has been investigated and it appears that drought resistance is increased. An increase reliance on AM fungi for nutrient uptake can frequently be detected. Hence, AM fungi facilitate to alleviate the water stress conditions.

AM Fungi Improve Bioremediation

The activity of soil microorganisms and microbial processes is reduced by the pollution caused by heavy metals. The high toxicity of heavy metals to the soil microbes and microbiological processes, associated to the long run effects within the soil, are recognized as necessary facts. All microorganisms together with AM fungi show resistance to heavy metals by ‘tolerance’ once the organism survives within the presence of high internal metal concentrations, or by ‘avoidance’ once the organism is in a position to limit metal uptake. The employment of plants to get rid of harmful metals from soils (phytoremediation) is emerging as a possible strategy for efficient and environmentally sound remedy of contaminated soils. AM fungi are rumored to evolve methods which may alleviate heavy metal threats in mixed culture systems and so, from the food chains [57, 90], that involve immobilization of metal compounds, precipitation of polyphosphate granules within the soil, surface assimilation of polysaccharide within the fungal cell wall and eventually chelation of heavy metal within the AM fungi [55, 91]. Mycorrhizal colonisation of plant roots can scale back translocation of heavy metals to shoots by binding of the heavy metals to the cell walls of the fungal hyphae in roots. During this means, mycorrhizae can facilitate higher plants to adapt and survive in contaminated habitats. The existence of synergistic effects of saprophytic fungi such as Fusarium concolor and Trichoderma koningii on plant root colonisation by AM fungi and on the effectiveness of AM fungi on plant resistance to heavy metals in soil has been proved [92]. Kothamasi [93] recommended that the AM fungal hyphae, by sequestering the possibly harmful toxic elements into the polyphosphate granules, can be acting as metal filters within the plant. Completely different strains of AM fungi have different sensitivity to metal toxicity. Therefore, the AM fungal strain colonizing a plant determines its ability to resist toxicity [94]. The abundance of the external hyphae created by the AM fungi is also concerned in capturing the metal by the AM fungi and thereby resulting in plant protection. This would, however, rely upon the ecological variations of the AM fungal concerned to the presence of harmful metals [95]. Glomus caledonium looks to be a promising mycorrhizal fungus for bioremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil [96].

Plant Tolerate Salinity Stress with AM Fungi

Salinization of soil could be a major problem and is increasing steady in several parts of the globe, specifically in arid and semi-arid areas [97, 98]. AM fungi can facilitate to beat the matter of salinity stress. Plants growing in saline soils are subjected to physiological stresses. The hepatotoxic effects of specific ions such as sodium and Cl present in saline soils, that disrupt the structure of enzymes and different macromolecules, injury cell organelles, disrupt the photosynthesis and respiration, inhibit protein synthesis and induce ion deficiencies [99]. AM fungi are found to occur naturally in saline environments despite the relatively low mycorrhizal affinity of the various halophytic plants. AM fungi can shield some non– halophytic plants against yield losses in moderately saline soils. Potential mechanisms embrace the stimulation of root growth, improved plant nutrition [1, 100] and augmented synthesis of plant polyols in mycorrhizal plants. AM fungi facilitate in improved acquisition of phosphorus, nitrogen and different growth promoting nutrients that are useful for the traditional growth of plants in saline soil. Fungicide and AM Fungi A large range of fungicides are shown to possess damaging effects on AM fungi [101]. Fungicides might have an effect on AM fungi directly through the soil or indirectly through general responses within the plant. External hyphae can be expected to be additional sensitive to the direct effects of fungicides than internal hyphae because the root surface might shield the latter [102]. Sreenivasa and Bagyaraj [103] had studied the impact of a complete of nine fungicides on root colonization with AM fungi and discovered a discount from 10-20% of root infection percentages once the counselled level of fungicides was used. Mycorrhizal colonization, however, was reduced in field plots through applications of the fungicide benomyl as a soil drenches [104].

Herbivore Grazing and AM Fungi

Kothamasi [93] urged that grazing by herbivores may be a huge drain on the energies of the plant. As each mycorrhizae and herbivores are dependent on the plants for carbohydrates, they’re bound to interact. Catherine and Witham [105] reported that herbivore grazing reduced colonization by AM fungi. This might have an effect on the community structure AM Fungi Increased Resistance to Root Pathogens and Improve Plant AM fungi are intimately related to their host plants, notably the roots. Therefore, an interaction between the symbionts and plant pathogens is certain to occur. By making new environments in their zone of influence, AM fungi contribute to the proliferation of specific microorganisms; a number of them act with pathogens by antibiosis, competition and parasitism [106]. Plants are subject to attack by numerous organisms starting from fungi, bacteria, viruses and nematodes. Mycorrhizal plants sometimes suffer less harm from infection than non-mycorrhizal plants [16, 106, 107]. Soybean colonised with Glomus mosseae grown in soils infested with Macrophomina phaseolina, Fusarium solani and Rhizoctonia solani had growth larger or corresponding to plants grown in without AM fungi inoculated soils. Mycorrhizal mediated tobacco and alfalfa are rumored to be immune to be a resistant to plethora pathogens like fungus Phytophthora megasperma, Pyrenocheata terrestris, Fusarium oxysporum, Pythium ultimum etc. [8, 73, 74, 108, 109]. Various mechanisms are projected to clarify the protection extended by AM fungi to host plants against attack by pathogens. Mycorrhizal root tissues are additional lignified than non- mycorrhizal ones, notably within the vascular region. This restricts the endophyte to the cortex. Identical mechanism might wait and see the invasive organism too [108] increasing root thickenings, and inflicting chemical variations. Organic compound Amino acid content, notably essential arginine has been found to be high in AM fungal infected plants. AM fungi altered physiology of roots might stop penetration and retard the development of nematodes [109]. Some authors have recommended that improved nutrition might shield the plant against pathogens. Mycorrhizal fungi are believed to induce high activation of antimicrobial phenyl propanoid metabolism in roots. It’s been rumored that induced resistance of AM fungi sweet orange to fungus Phytophthora root–rot unwellness doesn’t seem to control unless a P nutritionary advantage is bestowed on the AM fungi plant [110].

Role of AM Fungi to Novel Ecosystem

The ecology of mycorrhizal fungi isn’t well documented [111, 112]. Hence, conclusions are principally drawn from short studies with a little vary of partnerships usually beneath experimental conditions. AM fungi still are necessary as recipients of carbon, mediators of carbon storage and as key fungi in terms of stoichiometric changes ensuing from human caused nutrient enrichment and imbalance. There are many varieties of novel environments to contemplate for calculating experiments within the current and future. These include invaded systems [113]; marginal soils spread out for agriculture with the increasing pressure to feed a growing population; degraded systems that are to be improved [1, 57, 114]; systems within which climate change facilitates vary expanse ion by AM fungi and their hosts [115, 116]; and green roofs and alternative urban/technological environments up to hi-tech glasshouses and horticultural settings. These latter instances can in all probability increase in importance, and knowledge on AM fungi practical contributions and variety in such human-made systems is usually untouchable. Additionally, there’ll even be the challenge display by understanding the consequences of novel environmental pollutants, e.g. micro plastics [117], or multiple, interacting artificial organic pollutants [118]. A knowledge-based, large-scale precision management of AM fungal communities in agro ecosystems would additionally produce novel assemblages and presumably combos of functions [117].

Role of AM Fungi in Future Ecosystems

Upcoming ecosystems may additionally embody those off-planet; this is often as a result of reaching and colonizing alternative bodies in the solar system may become technically and financially possible among a new generation. Though initial ecosystems could also be terribly easy, it’s may be worth considering whether they should include communities of AM fungi. Maybe it’ll be a helpful exercise in vital reflection for mycorrhizologist to reflect whether absolutely fully functional, sustainable artificial ecosystems built from the bottom up need these symbionts and, combination of traits would be needed to support each the survival and growth of AM fungi and to optimize outcomes for plant survival and nutrition. Understanding the complicated link between variety and stability, from each the perspective of AM fungal population/community stability which of the soundness of outcomes for ecosystem functioning [119], would be essential for such an endeavour, as opportunities to re-seed components of an artificial ecosystem, or perhaps to re-initiate it entirely, would be very restricted. At any rate, conditions could also be quite analogous to those encountered by early land plants, highlight the any utility of studies probing AM fungal functions during this context.

Role of Carbon Cycling Through AM Fungi

Significant quantity of carbon flows through mycorrhizal mycelia to completely different components of soils. Production of glycoproteins such as glomalin that are concerned within the formation and stability of soil aggregates could have additionally a crucial influence on different microorganisms related to the AM fungi mycelium [6, 120].

Improve Plant community Through AM Fungi The floristic diversity and productivity of plant community are shown to rely upon the presence of species wealthy assemblage of AM fungi species [121, 122]. Increasing fungal diversity resulted in larger species diversity and better productivity. The mechanism behind these effects is probably going to be differential effects of specific plant fungus.

Biohardening Tool and AM Fungi The technique of using AM fungi in micro propagation has been applied for clonal selection in woody plants [123]. The immunization of AM fungi to nursery plants has been established each necessary and possible and it’s been extended to micro propagated plants [124]. Salamanca, et al. [123] studied mycorrhizal immunization of micro propagated woody legumes employed in revegetation programmes for desertified Mediterranean ecosystem. Immunization of micro propagated plantlets with active culture of AM Fungi seemed to be vital for their survival and growth [125]. This avoids ‘transient transplant shock’ and scrubby growth on transfer within the field. Arbuscular mycorrhization can modify root design to convey a root system that is healthier tailored for uptake of mineral nutrients and water yet as increasing hormone production and resistance to pesticides and root pathogens. Micro propagated plantlets inoculated with AM fungal spores can increase the survival rate and growth in potted conditions

Role of AM Fungi in Physiological and Biochemical Strictures

AM Fungi Impact on Photosynthesis Activity

AM fungi could perform as a metabolic sink inflicting basipetal mobilization of photosynthate to roots so providing a stimulus for larger photosynthetic activity [126]. Increase in activity of hormones like cytokinins and plant hormone gibberellin may elevate photosynthetic rates by stomatal opening influencing ion transport and regulating chlorophyll levels [127]. AM fungi symbiosis need carbon source from symbiotic partner synthesized by the method of photosynthesis and up to 20% of the overall photoassimilates substances are often transferred to the fungal partner [128]. AM fungi are acknowledged to reinforce the uptake of phosphorus (P) from the soil that, in turn, has a vital role as energy carrier throughout photosynthesis.

Increase Production of Growth Hormones

Plants with mycorrhizal fungi exhibit higher content of growth regulators like cytokinins and auxins as compared to non-mycorrhizal ones. AM fungi colonised roots show changes in root morphology by obtaining abundant thicker and carry fewer root hairs. Hormones accumulation within the host tissue is tormented by mycorrhizal colonization with changes within the levels of cytokinins, abscissic acid, gibberellins like substances. The impact of AM fungi on photosynthesis and host morphology may even be hormonal.

AM Fungi Alters soil Enzyme Activity

Enzyme activity is commonly used as associate in nursing index of total microorganism activity within the soil also as its fertility [129] and is additionally helpful within the study of changes caused in soil due to land degradation. Xyloglucanases, a hydrolytic catalyst is concerned within the penetration and development of AM fungi in plant roots [130]; esterase indicates catabolic activity within the soil, directly related to with microorganism activity of soil; enzymes embrace acid also as alkaline phosphatase that helps in unharness of inorganic phosphorus from organically bound phosphorus came back to soil [131]; polysaccharideases are far famed to catalyses degradation of chitin, a significant component of most fungal semipermeable membrane and also are far-famed to reinforce psychoanalytic process, so helps in providing protection against diseases; trehalose catalyses the hydrolysis of trehalose that is understood to be a really common signal in plant mutualism [132]. Peroxidase catalyst activity can increase in diseases and injured plant tissue however AM fungal symbiosis is understood to retard this catalyst activity by enhancing root penetration and colonization. Immunisation with AM fungi G. vessiforme increased soil protease, polyphenol enzyme, urease enzyme and saccharase activities compares with control in watermelon [133]. AM fungi are far-famed to change the soil enzymes activity and, thus, increase plant establishment and transport issues.

AM Fungi Control Agricultural Weed

Sustainable system targeting Striga management may be achieved by the AM fungi immunization technique. Numerous reports have advised that AM fungi can modified the nature/ composition of weed communities in mixed culture system during a sort of ways that, together with dynamical the relative abundance of mycotrophic weeds species (colonized by AM fungi) and non-mycorrhizal species (no colonized). As associate example, Witch weeds i.e. Striga hermonthica (Del.) Bent. Scrophulariaceae are found to noticeably have an effect on cereal production in several tropical countries. Infection of Striga resulted during a vital reduction in cereal grain yield between 20-100%. AM fungi might give a brand new suggests that of ecologically based weed management by poignant the fruiting of weed communities. In line with Lendzemo [134], Striga performance within the presence of AM fungi was negatively wedged with reduced and/or delayed germination, attachment and emergence Opportunities and Future Prospects Appreciative the role of AM fungal communities in ecosystem functions is visibly a serious current and future focus in mycorrhizal research, notably given the effect of varied factors of worldwide modification and therefore the have to be compelled to sustainably manage agro ecosystems and environmental problem. Above all, ecosystem modeller’s are progressively wanting to mycorrhizal ecologists for methods to incorporate mycorrhizal parameters in their frameworks so as to capture major dynamics. As we’ve made outline above, a lot of progress has been created in recent decades, however a lot of fundamental work still remains to be administered. Withal these gaps, Scientist has a tendency to see major opportunities for future research. Particular, ecosystem modellers are progressively wanting to mycorrhizal ecologists for methods to incorporate mycorrhizal parameters in their frameworks so as to capture major dynamics. A very important thought is that the majority studies of the role of AM fungal biodiversity on ecosystem operate are conducted in or targeted on tract systems. More analysis can address this basis by specializing in understudied systems, such as temperate, Mediterranean [135] and tropical [136] forests. For pattern, the study of the responses of slower growing and/or longer lived species provides opportunities to characterize however temporal dimensions of AM fungal diversity [137] could contribute to temporal variation in ecosystem functions [138], and to focus on traits of hosts that have consequences for ecosystems at giant scales. It’s going to even be vital to beat psychological feature basis. The documentation and acceptance that AM fungi don’t have any noteworthy contribution to a given ecosystem operate during a given scenario is simply as valuable because the documentation of positive effects. This realization has already become paradigm at the level of individual host plant effects. Various opportunities to advance our understanding of however AM fungal diversity has contributed, and can still contribute, to the functioning of terrestrial and environmental ecosystems for sustainable development.

Conclusion

AM fungi are notably widespread and cogent symbionts in terrestrial ecosystems. With larger interests and an agreement on the requirement to encourage sustainable development, mycorrhizal fungi have a crucial role to play in reducing the harmful effects of agricultural inputs such as fertilizers for improving plant growth and pesticides, fungicides, insecticides in controlling numerous diseases and control various environmental problem. It’s an economical and non-destructive suggests that of achieving high productivity leading to establishment of a viable, low-input farming system. It’s extremely possible that, within the close to future, crop production constraints within the world are circumvented by technologies supported biological products like mycorrhizal fungal biofertilizer. Industrial mycorrhizal products are obtainable in several forms as well as tablets, granules, powder and liquid. By exploitation of AM fungi tend to might explore many ways within which it can give a lot of holistic approach to addressing completely different environmental problems, as well as ‘carbon-neutral’ energy, ecologically sustainable land management, disease sickness management and carbon dioxide sequestration. AM fungi in ecosystems and the consequent obvious need to include them in global change models, more research is therefore urgently required in these fields. In explicit, it advocates a lot of knowledge domain approaches, particularly synchronously characterising. AM fungal community structure and practicality while manipulating mechanisms by that AM fungi could also be littered with global amendment. Above all, we’ve a bent to argue that this could be achieved with work that addresses dimensions of diversity except for AM fungal richness, permits higher predictions of outcomes among co- occurring AM fungi and makes specific linkages between the throughout that AM fungi act with their atmosphere. As per above discussions, AM fungi have ability to control and change ecology and environmental damages for global sustainable development.

References

  1. Gautam SP, Prasad K (2001) VA mycorrhiza-Importance and biotechnological application. In: Maheshwari DK, Dubey RC (Eds.), Innovative Approaches in Microbiology. Bishon Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, India, pp: 83-114.
  2. Prasad K (2002) Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizae on biomass yield, uptake and translocation of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in Azadirachta indica L. In: Manoharachary C, Purohit DK, Ram Reedy S, Singaracharya MA, Girisham S (Eds.), Frontier of Microbial Biotechnology and Plant Pathology. Scientific Publishers (India) Jodhpur, India, pp: 187-191.
  3. Prasad K (1997) Improvement of biomass yield of Terminalia arjuna L. through vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus fasciculatum) under nursery and field condition. Journal of Phytological Research 10(1-2): 39-41.
  4. Prasad K (2015) Biofertilizers: A new dimension for agriculture and environmental development to improve production in sustainable manner. Journal of Basic and Applied Mycology 11(2): 5-13.
  5. Prasad K (2017) Biology, Diversity and Promising Role of Mycorrhizal Entophytes for Green Technology. In: Maheshwari DK (Ed), Endophytes: Biology and Biotechnology, Volume 1, Series Sustainable Development and Biodiversity 15. Springer International Publishing AG, Switzerland, pp: 267-301.
  6. Prasad K (2020) Positive Importance of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi for global Sustainable Agriculture and Environment Management for green technology. Current Investigations in Agriculture and Current Research 9(2): 1182-1184.
  7. Prasad K (2021) Effect of Dual Inoculation of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Fungus and Cultivar Specific Bradyrhizobium Japonnicum on the Growth, Yield, Chlorophyll, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Contents of Soybean (Glycine Max (L.) Merrill.) Grown on Alluvial Soil. Journal of Innovation in Applied Research 4(1): 1-12.
  8. Prasad K, Rajak RC (2002) Management of plant pests through biological entities: Possibilities and prospects. In: Trivedi PC (Ed). Plant Pest Management. Aavishkar Publishers, Distributors, Jaipur, India, pp: 75-99.
  9. Vicca S, Zavalloni C, Fu YSH, Voets L, Boulois HD, et al. (2009) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi may Mitigate the influence of a joint rise of temperature and atmospheric CO2 on soil respiration in Grasslands. Hindawi International Journal of Ecology 20: 1-10.
  10. Prasad K, Warke RV, Khadke K (2019) Management of soilborne pathogens to improve productivity of pulses using organic technologies for sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews 6(2): 82-101.
  11. IPCC, Climate Change (2013) the Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  12. Betts RA, Jones CD, Knight JR (2016) El Nino and a record CO2 rise. National Climate Change 6: 806-810.
  13. Lee, SY, Ramirez J, Franco M, Lectez B, Gonzalez M, et al. (2014) Ube3a, the E3 ubiquitin ligase causing Angelman syndrome and linked to autism, regulates protein homeostasis through the proteasomal shuttle Rpn10.  Journal Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 71(14): 2747-2758.
  14. Douds, DD, Nagahashi G (2000) Signalling and Recognition Events Prior to Colonisation of Roots by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. In: Podila, GK, Douds, DD (Eds.), Current Advances in Mycorrhizae Research. Minnesota: APS Press, pp: 11-18.
  15. Nagahashi G, Douds DD, Abney GD (1996) Phosphorus amendment inhibits hyphal branching of VAM fungus Gigaspora margarita directly and indirectly through its effect on root exudation. Mycorrhiza 6(5): 403-408.
  16. Prasad K (1993) Studies on ecological factors affecting vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in Sugarcane. Ph.D. Thesis, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India.
  17. Gianinazzi-Pearson V (1996) Plant Cell Responses to Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi: Getting to the Roots of the Symbiosis. The Plant Cell 8(10): 1871-1883.
  18. Modjo HS, Hendrix JW (1986) The mycorrhizal fungus Glomus macrocarpum as a cause of tobacco stunt disease. Phytopathology 76(7): 688-691.
  19. Parniske M (2008) Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nature Reviews Microbiology 6: 763-775.
  20. Schubler A, Schawrzott D, Walker C (2001) A new phylum, the Glomermycota: phylogeny and evolution. Mycological research 105(12): 1413-1421.
  21. Wright SF (2005) Management of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. In: Zobel RW, Wright SF (Eds.), Roots and Soil Management: Interactions between roots and the soil. USA: American Society of Agronomy, pp: 183- 197.
  22. Prasad K, Warke RV (2018) Biology, diversity and promising role of microbial inoculations specially mycorrhizae in agriculture and natural ecosystems to improve productivity for sustainable development In: Vishnoi VK (Ed.), Microbial inoculants for agriculture and environmental sustainability, National conference, GKV, Hardwar, India, pp: 7-8.
  23. Lara A, Peterson LR, Armstrong L, Peterson RL (2002) The Interface between the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Glomus intraradices and Root Cells of Panax quinquefolius: A Paris-Type Mycorrhizal Association. Mycologia 94(4): 587-595.
  24. Yamato M (2005) Morphological types of arbuscular mycorrhizas in pioneer woody plants growing in an oil palm farm in Sumatra, Indonesia. Mycoscience 46(1): 66-68.
  25. Matekwor AE, Nakata M, Nonaka M (2005) Arum- and Paris-type arbuscular mycorrhizas in a mixed pine forest on sand dune soil in Niigata Prefecture, central Honshu, Japan. Mycorrhiza 15(2): 129-136.
  26. Tuomi J, Kytoviita M, Hardling R (2001) Cost efficiency of nutrient acquisition of mycorrhizal symbiosis for the host plant. Oikos 92(1): 62-70.
  27. Bolan NS (1991) A critical review of the role of mycorrhizal fungi in the uptake of phosphorus by plants. Plant and Soil 134(2): 189-207.
  28. Prasad K, Pandey AK (2012) Mycorrhizal symbiosis: A new dimension for agriculture and environmental development to improve production in sustainable manner. In: Bagyaraj DJ, Tilak KVBR, Kehri HK (Eds.), Microbial Diversity and Function. New Delhi, New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, India, pp: 389- 402.
  29. Prasad K (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus plays a major role in agriculture and natural ecosystems to improve production in sustainable manner. In: Jamaluddin, Singh AK (Eds.), Microbes and Sustainable Plant Productivity. Scientific Publication (India) Jodhpur, India, pp: 113-138
  30. Clark RB, Zeto SK (2000) Mineral acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 23(7): 867-902.
  31. Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd (Edn.), Academic Press, London.
  32. Barea JM (1991) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae as modifiers of soil fertility. Advances in Soil Science 15: 1-40.
  33. Prasad K, Meghvansi MK, Harwani D, Mahna SK, Werner D (2005) Synergistic effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bradyrhizobium japonicum on growth, yield and nutrient status of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Anusandhan 1: 23-29.
  34. Prasad K, Meghavanshi MK, Chaudhari KK (2005) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: An overview of research and extension needs. In: Tiwari M, Sati SC (Eds.), The Mycorrhizae: Diversity, Ecology, and Application. Daya publishing House, New Delhi, India, pp: 87-101.
  35. Bhat PR, Kaveriappa KM (2007) Effect of AM fungi on the growth and nutrition uptake in some endemic Myristicaceae members of the Western ghats, India. In: Tiwari, M, Sati SC (Eds.), The Mycorrhizae: Diversity, Ecology and Application. Daya Pub. House, Delhi, pp: 295-309.
  36. O’ Keefe DM, Sylvia DM (1992) Chronology and mechanism of phosphorus uptake by mycorrhizal sweet potato plants. New Phytology 122(4): 651-659.
  37. McFarland J, Ruess R, Keilland K, Pregitzer K, Hendrick R, Allen M (2010) Cross-ecosystem comparisons of in situ plant uptake of amino acid-N and NH4 +. Ecosystems 13: 177-193.
  38. Subramanian KS, Charest C (1999) Acquisition of N by external hyphae of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and its impact on physiological responses in maize under drought-stressed and well watered condition. Mycorrhiza 9: 69-75.
  39. Guether M, Balestrini R, Hannah M, He J, Udvardi MK, et al. (2009) Genome-wide reprogramming of regulatory networks, transport, cell wall and membrane biogenesis during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in Lotus japonicus. New Phytologist 182(1): 200-212.
  40. Read DL, Leake JR, Langdale AR (1989) The nitrogen nutrition of mycorrhizal fungi and their host plants. In: Boddy L, Marchant R, Read DJ (Eds.), Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Sulphur Utilization by Fungi. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp: 181-204.
  41. Prasad K, Meghavanshi MK (2005) Interaction between indigenous Glomus fasciculatum (AM fungus) and Rhizobium and their stimulatory effect on growth, nutrient uptake and nodulation in Acacia nilotica (L.) Del. Flora and Fauna 11(1): 51-56.
  42. Hawkins HJ, Johansen A, George G (2000) Uptake and transport of organic and inorganic nitrogen by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant and Soil 226: 275-285.
  43. Feber BA, Zasoki RJ, Burau RG, Urio K (1990) Zinc uptake by corn as affected by vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae. Plant and Soil 129: 121-130.
  44. Szaniszlo PJ, Powell PE, Reid CPP, Cline GR (1981) Production of hydroxamate siderophore iron chelators by Ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycologia 73(6): 1158-117.
  45. Prasad K (2021) Effect of Dual Inoculation of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Fungus and Cultivar Specific Bradyrhizobium Japonnicum on the Growth, Yield, Chlorophyll, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Contents of Soybean (Glycine Max (L.) Merrill.) Grown on Alluvial Soil. Journal of Innovation in Applied Research 4(1): 1-12.
  46. Safir GR, Nelson CE (1985) VA-mycorrhizas plant and fungal water relations, In: Molina R, Corvallis (Eds.), Proceeding 6th North. Am. Conf. on Mycorrhiza, pp: 471.
  47. Osonubi O, Mulongoy K, Awotoye OO, Atayese MO, Okali DVV (1991) Effect of Ectomycorrhizal and vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on drought tolerance of four leguminous woody seedlings. Plant and soil 136: 131-143.
  48. Sylvia DM, Williams SE (1992) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and environmental stress. In: Lindermann RG, Bethlenflavay GJ (Eds.), Mycorrhizae in sustainable agriculture. American Society of Agronomy Madisn. Wisc. Special Publication No. 54. pp: 101-124.
  49. Huang RS, Smith WK, Yost RE (1985) Influence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on growth, water relation and leaf orientation in Leucaena leucocephala (Linn.) De wit. New Phytology 99(2): 229-243.
  50. Ellis JR, Lassen HJ, Boosalis MG (1985) Drought resistance of wheat plants incubated with vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae. Plant and Soil 86: 369-378.
  51. Kothari SK, Marschner H, Romheld V (1990) Direct and indirect effects of VA mycorrhizal fungi and rhizosphere microorganisms on acquisition of mineral nutrients by maize (Zea mays L.) in a calcareous soil. New Phytology 116(4): 637-645.
  52. Dodd JC (2000) The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in natural ecosystems. Outlook on Agriculture 29(1): 55- 62.
  53. Prasad K, Rajak RC (2000) Biotechnological application of mycorrhizae in reclamation of mined dumps. In: Rai MK, Varma A, Rajak RC (Eds.), Integrated Management of Plant Resources. Scientific Publishers (India) Jodhpur, India, pp: 283-292.
  54. Johnson D, Leake JR, Ostle N, Ineson P, Read DJ (2002) In situ 13 CO2 pulse-labeling of upland grasslands demonstrates a rapid pathway of carbon flux from arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelia to the soil. New Phytologist 153(2): 327-334.
  55. Prasad K, Rajak RC (2001) Microbes and wasteland management: Challenge ahead. In: Roy, AK, Varma SK (Eds.), Wasteland Management and Environment. Scientific Publishers (India) Jodhpur, India, pp: 27-39.
  56. Gerdemann JW (1975) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae. In: Torrey JG, Clarkson DT (Eds.), The Development and Function of Roots. Academic Press, London, pp: 575-591.
  57. Prasad K (1995) Physico chemical characteristics of soil in relation to vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal (Glomus fasciculatum) colonization in Saccharum officinarum L. Journal of Phytological Research 8(2): 201-205.
  58. Prasad K (1998) Effect of Glomus fasciculatum VAM form and Rhizobium on biomass yield and nutrient uptake of Dalbergia sissoo L. Journal of Tropical Forestry 14(111): 143-148.
  59. Nicolson TH (1967) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal: a universal plant symbiosis. Sci Prog (Oxford) 55: 561.
  60. Mosse FE (1973) Advance in the study of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae. Annual Review of Phytopathology 72: 1125- 1132.
  61. Jha DK, Sharma GD, Mishra RR (1994) Ecology of Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhiza. In: Prasad AB, Bilgrami RS (Eds.), Microbes and Environments. Narendra Publishing House, India, pp: 199-208.
  62. Rani P, Aggarwal A, Mehrotra RS (1999) Growth responses in Acacia nilotica inoculated with VAM fungi (Glomus mosseae), Rhizobium sp. and Trichoderma harzianum. Indian Phytopathology 52(2): 151-153.
  63. Rani P, Aggarwal A, Sharma D (2001) Improvement in biomass yield of Prosopis cineraria through VAM. Rhizobium sp. and Trichoderma harzianum. Advance Plant Science 14(2): 593-596.
  64. Prasad K (2000) Growth responses of Acacia nilotica (L.) Del. inoculated with Rhizobium and Glomus fasciculatum VAM fungi. Journal of Tropical Forestry 16(1): 22-27.
  65. Prasad K (2006) Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) and phosphate solubilizing bacterium (Pseudomonas striata) on growth and nutrient status of Azadirachta indica L. Mycorrhiza News 18(2): 10-12.
  66. Meghavanshi MK, Prasad K, Harwani D, Mahna SK (2008) Response of soybean cultivars towards inoculation with three Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Bradyrhizobium japonicum in alluvial soil. European Journal of Soil Biology 44: 316-323.
  67. Meghavanshi MK, Prasad K, Mahna SK (2010) Symbiotic potential, competitiveness and compatibility of indigenous Bradyrhizobium japonicum isolates to three soybean genotypes of two distinct agro-climatic regions of Rajasthan, India. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 17: 303-310.
  68. Prasad K (2011) Effect of Glomus intraradices AM fungi on the shoot dry matter, seed dry yield, and nitrogen and phosphorus uptake of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) inoculated with cultivar specific Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Mycorrhiza News 23(3): 13-18.
  69. Prasad K (2006) Influence of indigenous VAM fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) and Rhizobium on growth, nutrient uptake and nodulation in Acacia nilotica. In: Prakash A, Mehrotra VS (Eds.). Mycorrhiza. Scientific Publishers (India), Jodhpur, pp: 139-144.
  70. Kaur M, Mukerji KG (1999) The application of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in afforestation. In: Singh A, Aneja KR (Eds.), From Ethan mycology to Fungal Biotechnology. Plenum Press, New York, PP: 213-224.
  71. Prasad K (2011) Interaction between arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus fasciculatum) and rhizospheric fungi in Saccharum officinarum L. Amravati University Research Journal (5): 53-65.
  72. Prasad K, Warke RV (2018) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi pay a promising role towards green technology and soil health Management, In Plant and soil health management: New Challenges and Opportunity, ICAR- Indian Institute of Pules Research, Kanpur, India, pp: 191-192.
  73. Karasawa TY, Kasahara M, Takebe (2002) Differences in growth responses of maize to preceding cropping caused by fluctuation in the population of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34(6): 851-857.
  74. Gavito ME, Miller MH (1998) Early phosphorus nutrition, mycorrhizae development, dry matter partitioning and yield of maize. Plant and Soil 199: 177-186.
  75. Grant CA, Flaten DN, Tomasiewicz DJ, Sheppard SC (2001) The importance of early season phosphorus nutrition. Canadian journal of plant science 81: 211-224.
  76. Grant CA, Bittman S, Montreal M, Plenchette C, Morel C (2005) Soil and fertilizer phosphorus: Effects on plant P supply and mycorrhizal development. Canadian journal of plant science 85(1): 3-14.
  77. Prasad K (2002) Application of arbuscular mycorrhizae fungal biofertilizer on biomass yield and nutrient uptake of Azadirachta indica. In: Recent Trends in Biotechnology. Hari Kumar VS (Ed.) Agrobios (India) Publication, Jodhpur, India, pp: 73-78.
  78. Khan MH, Meghvansi MK, Gupta R, Choudhary KK, Prasad K, et al. (2015) Combining application of Vermiwash and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for effective plant disease suppression. In: Organic Amendments and Soil Suppressiveness in Plant Disease management, Springer Soil Biology 46. Mukesh K. Meghvansi and Ajit Varma (eds.), Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp: 479-493.
  79. Prasad K (2007) Improvement in in Bioavailability of Nutrition and Biomass production to Azadirachta indica (Neem) by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Journal of Basic and Applied Mycology (6): 96-101.
  80. Dickie IA, Koide RT, Fayish AC (2001) Vesicular- Arbuscular Mycorrhizal infection of Quercus rubra seedlings. New Phytologist 151(1): 257-264.
  81. Ramos-Zapata JA, Orellana R, Allen EB (2006) Establishment of Desmoncus orthacanthos Martius (Arecaceae): Effect of inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizae. Revista De Biologia Tropica 54(1): 65-72.
  82. Miransari M, Bahrami HA, Rejali F, Malakouti MJ (2008) Using arbuscular mycorrhiza to alleviate the stress of soil compaction on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth. Soil Biology Biochemistry 40(5): 1197-1206.
  83. Quilambo OA (2000) Functioning of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under nutrient deficiency and drought stress in relation to symbiotic associations. Ph.D. thesis. University of Groningen, the Netherlands.Van Denderen B.V., Groningen. ISBN 903671284X.
  84. Tobar RM, Azcon R, Barea JM (1994) Improved nitrogen uptake and transport from 15N-labelled nitrate by external hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhiza under water stressed conditions. New Phytologist 126(1): 119-122.
  85. Auge RM, Schekel KA, Wample RL (1986) Greater leaf conductance of well-watered VA mycorrhizal rose plants is not related to phosphorus nutrition. New Phytology 103: 107-116.
  86. Hampp R, Mertz A, Schaible R, Schwaigerer M, Nehls U (2000) Distinction of Araucaria angustifolia seeds from different locations in Brazil by a specific DNA sequence. Trees 14: 429-434.
  87. Kramer U (2005) Phytoremediation: novel approaches to cleaning up polluted soils. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 16(2): 133-141.
  88. Gaur A, Adholeya A (2004) Prospects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. Current Science 86(4): 528-534.
  89. Wang MY, Xiai RX, Wu QS, Liu IH, Hu LM (2007) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on microbes and enzymes of soils from different cultivated densities of red clover. Annals of Microbiology 57(1): 1-7.
  90. Kothamasi D, Kuhad RC, Babu CR (2001) Arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant survival strategies. International Society for Tropical Ecology 42(1): 1-13.
  91. Diaz GC, Azcon Aguilar, Honrubia M (1996) Influence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on heavy metal (Zn and Pb) uptake on growth of Lygeum spartum and Anthylis cystisoides. Plant and Soil 180: 241-249.
  92. Nelson CE, Safir GR (1982) The water relations of well watered mycorrhizal and non mycorrhizal onion plants. Journal Am Soc Mortc Sci 107(2): 271-276.
  93. Liao JP, Lin XG, Cao ZH, Shi YQ, Wong MH (2003) Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizae and heavy metals under sand culture experiment. Chemosphere 50(6): 847-853.
  94. Giri B, Kapoor K, Mukerji KG (2003) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and salinity on growth, biomass and mineral nutrition of Acacia auriculiformis. Biology and Fertility of Soils 38: 170-175.
  95. Al-Karaki GM (2006) Nursery inoculation of tomato with arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi and subsequent performance under irrigation with saline water. Scientia Horticulture 109(1): 1-7.
  96. Epstein E (1972) Physiological genetics of plant nutrition. In: Epstein E (Ed.), Mineral Nutrition of Plants. Principles and Prospectus, New York, pp: 325-344.
  97. Al-Karaki GN (2000) Growth of mycorrhizal tomato and mineral acquisition under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 10: 51- 54.
  98. Trappe JM, Molina R, Castellano M (1984) Reactions of mycorrhizal fungi and mycorrhiza formation to pesticides. Annual Review of Phytopathology 22: 331- 359.
  99. Kjoller R, Rosendahl S (2000) Effects of fungicides on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: differential responses in alkaline phosphatase activity of external and internal hyphae. Biology and Fertility of Soils 31: 361-365.
  100. Sreenivasa MN, Bagyaraj DJ (1989) Use of pesticide for mass production of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculum. Plant and Soil 119: 127-132.
  101. O’ Conner PJ, Smith SE, Smith EA (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizas influence plant diversity and community structure in semi-arid herb land. New Phytology 154(1): 209-218.
  102. Catherine AG, Witham TG (1994) Interactions between above ground herbivores and the mycorrhizal mutualists of plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 251-255.
  103. Filion MM, St. Arnaud and Fortin JA (1999) Direct interaction between the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices and different rhizosphere microorganisms. New Phytologist 141(3): 525-533.
  104. Dehne HW (1982) Interaction between vesicular mycorrhizal fungi and plant pathogens. Phytopathology 72(8): 1115-1119.
  105. Kaye JW, Pfleger FL, Stewart EL (1984) Interactions of Glomus fasciculatum and Pythium ultimumon greenhouse grown Poinsettia. Canadian Journal Botany 62: 1575-1579.
  106. Schenk NC (1981) Can mycorrhizae control root diseases? Plant diseases 65: 230-234.
  107. Graham JH, Egel DS (1988) Phytophthora root rot development on mycorrhizal and phosphorus fertilized on mycorrhizal Citrus under drought stress. New Phytologist 105: 411-419.
  108. Abbott LK, Gazey C (1994) An ecological view of the formation of VA mycorrhizas. Plant and Soil 159: 69-78.
  109. Francis R, Read DJ (1995) Mutualism and antagonism in the mycorrhizal symbiosis with special reference to impacts on plant community structure. Canadian Journal Botany 73(51): 1301-1309.
  110. Dickie M, Serrouya R, McNay RS, Boutin S (2017) Faster and farther: wolf movement on linear features. Journal of Applied Ecology 54: 253-263.
  111. Asmelash F, Bekele T, Birhane E (2016) The potential role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the restoration of degraded lands. Frontiers in Microbiology 7: 1095.
  112. Smith ADM (1994) Blue grenadier, Macruronus novaezelandiae.In: Tilzey RDJ (Ed.), The South East Fishery: a scientific review with particular reference to quota management. Bureau of Resource Sciences, Australian Government Print Service, Canberra, pp: 137- 148, 360.
  113. Newsham G, Brand J, Donnelly C, Veitch J, Aries M, et al. (2009) Linking indoor environment conditions to job satisfaction: a case study. Building Research and Information 37(2): 129-147.
  114. Rillig MC, Ziersch L, Hempel S (2017) Micro plastic transport in soil by earthworms. Science Reporter 7: 1362.
  115. Bernhardt J, Kathryn S, Hayward, Kwakkel G, Nick S, et al. (2017) Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce. International Journal of Stroke 12(5): 444-450.
  116. Tilman D (1996) Biodiversity: Population versus Ecosystem Stability. Ecology 77(2): 350-363.
  117. Johansson J, Paul L, Finlay RD (2004) Microbial interactions in the mycorrhizosphere and their significance for sustainable agriculture. Microbial Ecology 48(1): 1-13.
  118. Van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf- Engel RB, et al. (1998) Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396: 69-72.
  119. Prasad K, Deploey JJ (1999) Incidence of arbuscular mycorrhizae and their effect on certain species of trees. Journal of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science 73(3): 117-122.
  120. Salamanca CP, Heera MA, Barea JM (1992) Mycorrhizal inoculation of micro propagated woody legumes used in revegetation programmes for desertified Mediterranean ecosystems. Agronomie 12: 869-872.
  121. Adholeya A, Tiwari P, Singh R (2005) Commercial production of AMF inoculum and its inoculation strategies. In: Declerck S, Verma A (Eds.), Root-organ culture of mycorrhizal fungi. USA, pp: 5-7.
  122. Yadav K, Singh N, Aggarwal A (2011) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) fungi on survival and development of micro propagated Acorus calamus L. during acclimatization. Journal of Agricultural Technology 7(3): 775-781.
  123. Bevege, D.I., Bowen, G.D. and Skinner, M.F. (1975). Comparative carbohydrate physiology of ecto and endomycorrhizas. In: Sanders FE, Mosse B, Tinker PB (Eds.), Endomycorrhizas, Academic Press, New York, pp: 149-175.
  124. Allen MF, Moore TS, Christensen M (1982) Phytohormone changes in altered levels of gibberellin- like substances and abscisic acid in the as affected by vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae. Plant and Soil 60(4): 121-130.
  125. Graham JH (2000) Assessing cost of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in agrosystems. In: Podila GK, Donds DD (Eds.), Current Advances in Mycorrhizae Research. APS Press, St Paul, pp: 127-140.
  126. Dhruva Kumar JHA, Sharha GD, Mishra RR (1992) Soil microbial population numbers and enzyme activities in relation to altitude and forest degradation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 24(8): 761-767.
  127. Garcia-Garrido JM, Ocampo JA, Garcia-Romera I (2002) Enzymes in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. In: Burns R, Dick R (Eds.), Enzymes in the environment: activity, ecology and application. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp: 125- 151.
  128. Kumar DJHA, Shasha GD, Mishra RR (1992) Soil microbial population numbers and enzyme activities in relation to latitude and forest degradation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 24: 761-767.
  129. Mellor RB (1992) Is trehalose asymbiotic determinant in symbiosis between higher plants and microorganisms? Symbiosis 12(2): 113-129.
  130. Zhao M, Li M, Liu RJ (2010) Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizae on microbial population and enzyme activity in explant soil used for watermelon production. International Journal of Engineering, Sciences and Technology 2(7): 17-22.
  131. Lendzemo VW (2004) The tripartite interaction between sorghum, Striga hermonthica and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  132. Brundrett MC, Abbott LK (1991) Roots of jarrah forest plants. I. Mycorrhizal associations of shrubs and herbaceous plants. Australian Journal of Botany 39(5): 445-457.
  133. Janos DP (1980) Mycorrhizae influence tropical succession. Tropical Succession 12(2): 56-64.
  134. Husband R, Herre EA, Turner SL, Gallery R, Young JPW (2002) Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and patterns of host association over time and space in a tropical forest. Molecular Ecology 11(12): 2669-2678.
  135. Bardgett RD, Bowman WD, Kaufmann R, Schmidt SK (2005) A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20(11): 634-641.
  136. Powell BJ, Proctor EK, Glisson CA, Kohl PL, Raghavan R, et al. (2013) A mixed method multiple case study of implementation as usual in children’s social service organizations: study protocol. Implement Science 8: 92.
  137. Powell JR, Parrent JL, Hart MM (2017) Phylogenetic trait conservatism and the evolution of functional trade-offs in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Proceeding Research Society Lond Biology 276: 4237-4245.
  138. Johnson-Green PC, Kenkel NC, Booth T (1995) The distribution and phenology of arbuscular mycorrhizae along an inland salinity gradient. Canadian Journal of Botany 73(9): 1318-1327.
More from this journal

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{kamal2021,
  title   = {Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Collaborations
Influences Ecology and Environmental Changes for Global
Sustainable Development},
  author  = {Kamal Prasad},
  journal = {Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources},
  year    = {2021},
  volume  = {5},
  number  = {1},
  doi     = {10.23880/jenr-16000231}
}
Kamal Prasad (2021). Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Collaborations
Influences Ecology and Environmental Changes for Global
Sustainable Development. Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.23880/jenr-16000231
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Collaborations
Influences Ecology and Environmental Changes for Global
Sustainable Development
AU  - Kamal Prasad
JO  - Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources
PY  - 2021
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
DO  - 10.23880/jenr-16000231
ER  -