Developing Improved Varieties of Bread Wheat and Registration of “Shaki” Variety
The wheat germplasm distributed globally by CIMMYT and ICARDA is the primary source of cultivars for developing countries and a highly valuable source of improved crossing parents for breeding programs and developing wide adaptable with high yielding, resistant to disease, and high-quality traits worldwide. Shaki (ETBW9089) variety was selected from the international nursery which was introduced from CIMMYT in 2015 and tested together with 50 other test genotypes including local and standard checks at a quarantine site in Ethiopia. The variety was mainly selected for best agronomic performance, wide adaptability, resistance to disease, and high yield potential. Shaki is adapted within the range of altitude 1900‒2780 masl with annual rainfall amount receiving from 640‒1290 mm. The new bread wheat variety Shaki is high yielding variety across wide environments. Shaki is a stable and adaptable wheat variety for different bread wheat-growing agro-ecologies of Ethiopia. Shaki variety produced 13.36% and 12.68% grain yield advantage over the standards checks Wane and Lemu, respectively. Shaki variety showed relative resistance to stem yellow and leaf rust as compared to wheat varieties under production at the medium to high land wheat-growing agro-ecologies. The genotype with pedigree name BABAX/LR42// BABAX/3/ER2000/4/BAVIS and selection history CMSA09M00434S-050ZTM-0NJ-099NJ-3RGY-0B was named Shaki after official release for commercial production by the national variety releasing committee in 2021. Replacement of susceptible bread wheat varieties and availing more alternatives bread wheat varieties to grow for resource-poor farmers is very crucial in the region.
Introduction
Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum. L) is the most common cultivated wheat species-taking up to 95% of the wheat and staple food for consumers worldwide [1]. Wheat constitutes a staple food worldwide, providing ~20% of the total calories and proteins in human diets globally [2]. Wheat is one of the major cereals grown for use as food and industrial raw materials in Ethiopia. Bread wheat in Ethiopia is used in different forms such as bread, porridge, soup, and roasted grain. In addition to the grain, the straw of bread wheat is used for animal feed, thatching roofs, and bed decking [3]. Wheat is also a strategic commodity that generates farm income and improves food security status [4]. Wheat is grown across a diverse range of agroecology and Ethiopia has huge potential and suitable agro ecology for growing wheat. Wheat is widely produced in the highlands and mid- altitudes of Ethiopia. In spite of the presence of wide agro- ecologies suitable for wheat production; elasticity of wheat to be grown from extreme lowlands to highlands; increased demand for wheat due to population growth, urbanization, and expansion of agro-industries; wheat production is left behind by 25 to 30% to its demand in Ethiopia [5].
According to Akcura et al., 2006 reports plant breeders are highly concerned with the development and release of high yielding, stable, and stresses resistant crop varieties. A stable genotype is one possessing constant performance irrespective of changes in environmental conditions [6, 7]. A fruitfully developed new variety should be stable and broadly adaptable over a wide range of environments on top of high yielding potential [8]. Dia [9] reported that to identify superior genotypes across multiple environments plant breeders conduct trials across locations and years during the final stages of cultivar development. Several studies of genotype by environment interactions (GxE) and yield stability have been reported on wheat grown under different locations and conditions in Ethiopia [10, 11, 12, 13]. Each variety has a genotype-specific ability to maintain performance over a wide range of environmental conditions [14].
Several varieties of bread wheat have been released for large-scale production in Ethiopia [5, 15]. However, their high-yielding potential and rusts resistance ability will not last long mainly due to the stem and yellow rusts epidemic [16, 17, 18]. Yellow and stem rust diseases continued as the major biotic threat to wheat production in Ethiopia. Nowadays, Ethiopia has reached on stage where bread wheat cannot be produced without the application of fungicides, especially in wheat belt Zones like Arsi, West Arsi, and Bale Zones [19]. Hence, the Ethiopian Wheat Research Program introduces thousands of bread wheat germplasms annually from CIMMYT and ICARDA and evaluates germplasms under quarantine blocks and in a series of yield trials over locations and years.
Different varieties with rust resistance and high yielder were released in Ethiopia which will help to boost the farmer income and food security. However, most of these cultivars were out of production due to their susceptibility to rust. Plant breeders evaluate and select breeding material empirically for adaptation to wider environments every year. To enhance farm profitability through using of improved bread wheat technologies in Ethiopia, there is a need to develop climate- smart varieties which are high yielding varieties, rust- resistant, high yielder, and suitable for different cropping systems prevalent in different agro-ecological in the country. Therefore, the objective of the present paper is to develop improved varieties of bread wheat and register the “Shaki” variety.
Materials and Methods
Initially, in 2015, 50 genotypes were introduced from CIMMYT under 23HRWYT and planted in Ethiopia under a quarantine site. Based on agronomic performance, yield data, and disease resistance Shaki was selected and planted in an observation nursery in 2016, in preliminary variety trials in 2017, and in national variety trials for two consecutive years (2018-2019) with twenty-three advanced bread wheat genotypes and two standard checks at Kulumsa, Asasa, Robe Arsi, Bekoji, Areka, Holeta, and Adet. The advanced genotypes were selected or screened from observation nurseries and preliminary variety trials in the preceding years. The genotypes were arranged in alpha lattice design with a plot size of 6 rows of 2.5 m by 1.2 m (3 m2) long and 0.2m inter-row spacing. Every plot was planted at a seed rate of 150 kg ha-1. Except for the genetic and other environmental variations, other agronomic management practices were applied uniformly to each plot. Fertilizer was applied at the recommended rate for the specific location. Finally, data were collected for days to heading, days to maturity, plant height, thousand seed weight, hectolitre weight, and grain yield; and diseases data (stem rust, leaf rust, yellow rust, and septoria). Agronomic traits for multi environments were combined and analyses were carried out. Finally, based on the results for agronomic performance and disease resistance two candidate genotypes viz. ETBW9606 and ETBW9089 were selected and verified on farmer’s fields along with two st. checks Hidase and Lemu in 2020. At the maturity stage, the National Variety Release Committee has evaluated the field with the farmers and proposed to release a candidate variety, ETBW9089 (Shaki) for official registration in the country as a commercial variety for the end-user.
Results and Discussion
Evaluations of Shaki variety
Shaki variety is high-yielding and resistant to diseases which allows it to thrive in a range of environments. This new variety development undergoes several stages of evaluation, before they’re officially released, registered, and commercialized. The genotype with pedigree name BABAX/ LR42//BABAX/3/ER2000/4/BAVIS and selection history CMSA09M00434S-050ZTM-0NJ-099NJ-3RGY-0B was named Shaki after official release for commercial production by the national variety releasing committee in 2021. Shaki variety was selected from the international nursery which was introduced from CIMMYT in 2015 and tested together with 50 other test genotypes including local and standard checks at a quarantine site in Ethiopia. As Shaki outshined many bread wheat lines obtained from ICARDA, CIMMTY, and local crossing in observation and preliminary yield trials, it had been advanced to a national variety trial to be tested across wide locations over years to further test its overall performances. Shaki was evaluated for two years (2018- 2019) at Kulumsa, Asasa, Robe Arsi, Bekoji, Areka, Holeta, and Adet stations and had a better mean grain yield than the standard check. The result of multi-location trials showed that Shaki had above-average grain yield performance across tested locations and years. Shaki consistently out- yielded other tested bread wheat genotypes over two years. Combined years over locations analysis revealed that it had produced a mean yield of 5.6 t/ha (Table 1). The candidate ETBW 9089 (Shaki) produced a 13.36% and 12.68% yield advantage over the standard check Wane and Lemu, respectively. Thus, ETBW 9089 (Shaki) was verified at ten locations (at on-station and two on-farms at each location) in 2020 for official release. Consequently, ETBW 9089 (Shaki) showed superior overall agronomic performances over the standard check Lemu and Hidasse. Likewise, it proved to be more resistant to stem yellow and leaf rust as compared to all or any currently produced varieties within the medium to high land a part of wheat growing agro-ecologies. Shaki is developed and released by the Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center for major wheat-growing areas of Ethiopia.
Agronomic and Morphological Characteristics of Shaki Variety
Shaki was adapted mid to high land-agro-ecologies of Ethiopia, within the range of altitude 1900‒2780 masl. It gives a high yield under the range of 640‒1290 mm annually. In an attempt to develop Shaki, higher yield, and resistance to major bread wheat diseases were important traits of consideration. Shaki was taken 67 days for heading and 127 days for maturing at the time of release (Table 2). The Shaki is comparatively taller than the standard varieties of Wane and Lemu varieties. . Shaki has better thousand kernel weight (48g) than standard check Wane (38 g), and Lemu (36 g) (Table 2). It possessed a 26.32% and 3.33% TKW advantage over Wane and Lemu variety at the time of release, respectively. Shaki has a better hectolitre weight than both Wane and Lemu varieties. It possessed a 6.2% and 3 % HLW advantage over Wane and Lemu variety at the time of release, respectively. Shaki is a stable, best-adapted variety with stable, high yield and good resistance to wheat rust in Ethiopia.

| Entry | Geno type | A.Robe- 2018 | Bekoji- 2018 | Kulumsa- 2018 | Adet- 2018 | Areka- 2018 | Holeta- 2018 | Holeta- 2019 | Asasa- 2019 | Bekoji- 2019 | Kulumsa- 2019 | A.Robe - 2019 | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WANE | 3.16 | 4.32 | 7.57 | 5.03 | 2.30 | 6.24 | 2.10 | 8.55 | 2.74 | 7.56 | 4.82 | 4.94 |
| 2 | ETBW 9185 | 4.40 | 5.73 | 7.15 | 4.81 | 3.18 | 4.89 | 2.56 | 6.04 | 3.70 | 7.84 | 4.50 | 4.98 |
| 3 | ETBW 9193 | 3.67 | 4.73 | 7.71 | 5.35 | 2.60 | 5.92 | 2.45 | 6.70 | 3.30 | 7.35 | 5.49 | 5.02 |
| 4 | ETBW 9086 | 3.61 | 4.74 | 7.90 | 5.01 | 2.59 | 6.65 | 2.79 | 7.54 | 4.76 | 7.22 | 5.47 | 5.30 |
| 5 | ETBW 9087 | 4.19 | 4.98 | 7.76 | 4.29 | 2.88 | 5.17 | 2.22 | 6.57 | 3.99 | 7.77 | 4.75 | 4.96 |
| 6 | ETBW 9089 | 2.37 | 5.66 | 8.01 | 6.08 | 2.98 | 6.15 | 2.85 | 8.37 | 6.20 | 9.03 | 3.93 | 5.60 |
| 7 | ETBW 9109 | 3.07 | 4.22 | 7.47 | 5.77 | 3.26 | 6.57 | 3.05 | 6.36 | 3.39 | 6.84 | 3.75 | 4.89 |
| 8 | ETBW 9284 | 2.74 | 4.52 | 7.69 | 5.85 | 2.88 | 7.55 | 3.58 | 7.28 | 1.08 | 7.62 | 3.43 | 4.93 |
| 9 | ETBW 9299 | 2.85 | 4.98 | 7.26 | 5.13 | 2.90 | 4.07 | 2.06 | 5.70 | 4.52 | 7.59 | 4.55 | 4.69 |
| 10 | ETBW 9304 | 3.24 | 5.08 | 7.42 | 5.51 | 2.80 | 7.23 | 2.42 | 7.87 | 5.85 | 7.80 | 4.72 | 5.45 |
| 11 | ETBW 9313 | 1.65 | 3.12 | 7.09 | 4.58 | 2.92 | 7.72 | 2.87 | 6.63 | 0.52 | 7.14 | 3.26 | 4.32 |
| 12 | ETBW 9094 | 2.90 | 4.59 | 7.52 | 4.87 | 2.11 | 5.59 | 3.33 | 7.87 | 4.94 | 8.02 | 5.01 | 5.16 |
| 13 | ETBW 9066 | 2.89 | 5.11 | 6.13 | 5.09 | 2.81 | 4.92 | 3.42 | 6.86 | 2.64 | 6.99 | 4.20 | 4.64 |
| 14 | ETBW 9102 | 3.88 | 5.26 | 7.41 | 5.82 | 2.63 | 5.69 | 4.18 | 7.80 | 6.05 | 7.91 | 4.13 | 5.52 |
| 15 | ETBW 9315 | 3.85 | 4.41 | 6.60 | 5.79 | 2.27 | 7.41 | 2.73 | 7.47 | 4.57 | 7.16 | 5.52 | 5.25 |
| 16 | BW174459 | 3.98 | 3.82 | 8.03 | 4.81 | 2.84 | 6.76 | 3.20 | 6.81 | 2.57 | 7.79 | 5.51 | 5.10 |
| 17 | BW174460 | 3.80 | 4.36 | 7.88 | 5.10 | 2.64 | 6.67 | 2.64 | 7.17 | 5.31 | 7.92 | 5.08 | 5.32 |
| 18 | BW174461 | 3.49 | 4.95 | 8.13 | 5.13 | 2.10 | 4.91 | 2.56 | 7.50 | 5.97 | 7.46 | 4.43 | 5.15 |
| 19 | BW174462 | 3.11 | 4.91 | 7.89 | 4.96 | 2.18 | 5.42 | 2.11 | 7.76 | 4.78 | 7.42 | 5.24 | 5.07 |
| 20 | BW174463 | 3.93 | 4.53 | 7.58 | 5.43 | 2.81 | 5.61 | 3.50 | 7.31 | 4.17 | 8.41 | 4.45 | 5.25 |
| 21 | BW174464 | 3.10 | 4.59 | 7.94 | 5.95 | 1.85 | 4.31 | 3.35 | 8.83 | 5.79 | 7.82 | 5.67 | 5.38 |
| 22 | BW174465 | 3.31 | 3.32 | 6.28 | 4.03 | 2.69 | 4.11 | 2.64 | 5.01 | 3.52 | 7.41 | 3.81 | 4.19 |
| 23 | BW174466 | 2.76 | 3.75 | 7.28 | 5.32 | 2.17 | 7.03 | 2.89 | 7.94 | 4.34 | 7.44 | 4.29 | 5.02 |
| 24 | BW174467 | 1.85 | 3.36 | 7.27 | 5.42 | 1.51 | 5.10 | 2.80 | 8.27 | 5.22 | 6.85 | 3.57 | 4.66 |
| 25 | LEMU | 3.27 | 4.09 | 6.44 | 5.08 | 3.13 | 7.54 | 3.67 | 6.05 | 3.20 | 7.85 | 4.36 | 4.97 |
| Ent. Mean | 3.24 | 4.53 | 7.42 | 5.21 | 2.60 | 5.97 | 2.88 | 7.21 | 4.13 | 7.61 | 4.56 | 5.03 | |
| CV (%) | 20.30 | 18.82 | 7.85 | 12.85 | 19.32 | 12.68 | 21.15 | 13.32 | 17.50 | 15.16 | 15.97 | 14.73 | |
| LSD (5%) | 1.08 | 1.40 | 0.96 | 1.10 | 0.82 | 1.24 | 1.00 | 1.58 | 1.19 | 1.52 | 1.20 | - | |
| R2 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.47 | 0.65 | 0.77 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.87 | 0.39 | 0.61 | 0.91 |
Table 1: Mean grain yield (t ha-1) of 25 genotypes tested across eleven locations in 2018 and 2019.
| S/No | Genotype | DTH (days) | DTM (days) | PHT (cm) | TKW (g) | HLW (hl/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WANE | 65 | 127 | 91 | 38 | 65 |
| 2 | ETBW 9185 | 70 | 128 | 90 | 37 | 67 |
| 3 | ETBW 9193 | 69 | 128 | 95 | 35 | 66 |
| 4 | ETBW 9086 | 71 | 130 | 93 | 39 | 68 |
| 5 | ETBW 9087 | 70 | 129 | 97 | 38 | 68 |
| 6 | ETBW 9089 | 67 | 127 | 95 | 48 | 69 |
| 7 | ETBW 9109 | 72 | 132 | 89 | 38 | 69 |
| 8 | ETBW 9284 | 67 | 129 | 96 | 40 | 65 |
| 9 | ETBW 9299 | 71 | 128 | 94 | 38 | 66 |
| 10 | ETBW 9304 | 67 | 127 | 95 | 40 | 68 |
| 11 | ETBW 9313 | 72 | 132 | 92 | 37 | 66 |
| 12 | ETBW 9094 | 64 | 125 | 90 | 41 | 67 |
| 13 | ETBW 9066 | 75 | 130 | 91 | 37 | 66 |
| 14 | ETBW 9102 | 66 | 128 | 93 | 38 | 67 |
| 15 | ETBW 9315 | 68 | 128 | 93 | 41 | 68 |
| 16 | BW174459 | 72 | 132 | 90 | 40 | 67 |
| 17 | BW174460 | 69 | 128 | 96 | 42 | 67 |
| 18 | BW174461 | 70 | 128 | 96 | 41 | 67 |
| 19 | BW174462 | 68 | 128 | 93 | 40 | 67 |
| 20 | BW174463 | 69 | 128 | 85 | 34 | 66 |
| 21 | BW174464 | 65 | 127 | 84 | 37 | 68 |
| 22 | BW174465 | 72 | 132 | 78 | 29 | 68 |
| 23 | BW174466 | 67 | 130 | 90 | 39 | 67 |
| 24 | BW174467 | 67 | 127 | 86 | 39 | 67 |
| 25 | LEMU | 75 | 132 | 93 | 36 | 67 |
| Mean | 69.1 | 128.87 | 91.39 | 38.47 | 67.15 | |
| LSD (5%) | 2.35 | 2.31 | 3.46 | 3.12 | 1.78 | |
| CV (%) | 4.93 | 2.03 | 4.42 | 7.7 | 2.04 |
Table 2: ** Mean performance of some important agronomic traits of 23 genotypes and 2 checks tested across 10 locations in the 20
Note: DH=Days to 50 heading; DM=Days to 95 % maturity; PHT=Plant height(cm); TKW=Thousand kernel weight(g); HLW=Hectoliter weight; YLD=Grain Yield(t/ha) Table 2: Mean performance of some important agronomic traits of 23 genotypes and 2 checks tested across 10 locations in the 2018/19 and 2019/20 cropping season.
Variety Maintenance
The variety is maintained under the responsibility of the wheat breeder at the Kulumsa agriculture research center.
Summary and Conclusion
Increasing the production of foodstuffs in developing countries against the background of rapid population growth, widespread food shortage, malnutrition and the destruction of the natural resource base remains important for the future. Therefore, there is a need to intensify crop production through the application of relevant innovations including better crop varieties adapted to varying agro- ecological conditions and socioeconomic set-ups. A successful variety must produce a high yield in favorable environments and still should produce an acceptable yield under less favorable ones. In general, both yield and stability of performance should be considered simultaneously to take advantage of the useful effect of GE interaction and to make a selection of the variety more precise and refined. Shaki was the best yielding bread wheat variety. It is stable ingrain yield performance over locations and years. It was resistant to major wheat rust diseases that prevailed in the growing areas. Farmers also preferred the variety for its superior performance over the existing local variety, which is manifested by better grain yield, and disease resistance. Likewise, the variety has white grain color and it has good general acceptance for bread with high quality. Hence, Shaki was verified and officially released for midland and Highland wheat-growing areas of Ethiopia in 2021.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) and Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center (KARC) and other collaborating centers to carry out this research.
References
-
Kasahun C (2020) Physicochemical and Techno-Functional Properties of Recently Released Ethiopian Bread Wheat Triticum aestivum. L Varieties Grown in Kulumsa, Arsi, Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation, Addis Ababa University).
-
Shiferaw B, Smale M, Braun HJ, Duveiller E, Reynolds M, et al. (2013) Crops that feed the world 10. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by wheat in global food security. Food Security 5: 291-317.
-
Bezabih Woldekiros (2020) Effects of Row Spacing and Seed Rate on Yield and Yield Components of Bread Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) in Mid Altitude of Sankura District, South Ethiopia. International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry 7(1): 10-13.
-
Amentae TK, Hamo TK, Gebresenbet G, Ljungberg D (2017) Exploring wheat value chain focusing on market performance, post-harvest loss, and supply chain management in Ethiopia: The case of Arsi to Finfinne market chain. Journal of Agricultura 9(8): 22-42.
-
Hodson DP, Jaleta M, Tesfaye K (2020) Ethiopia’s transforming wheat landscape: tracking variety use through DNA fingerprinting. Scientific Reports 10: 18532.
-
Fasahat P, Rajabi A, Mahmoudi SB (2015) An overview on the use of stability parameters in plant breeding. Biometrics and Biostatistics International Journal 2(5): 149-159.
-
Temesgen T, Keneni G, Sefera T, Jarso M (2015) Yield stability and relationships among stability parameters in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes. The Crop Journal 3(3): 258-268.
-
Akcura M, Kaya Y, Taner S, Ayranci R (2006) Parametric stability analyses for grain yield of durum wheat. Plant Soil Environment 52(6): 254-261.
-
Dia M, Wehner TC, Arellano C (2017) RGxE: An R Program for Genotype x Environment Interaction Analysis. American Journal of Plant Sciences 8(7): 1672-1698.
-
Ayalneh T, Letta T, Abinasa M (2012) Assessment of stability, adaptability, and yield performance of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars in southeastern Ethiopia. American-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 13(7): 885-890.
-
Dawit AT, Zerihun T, Habtemariam Z, Alemayehu A (2017) Seasonal variability and genetic response of elite bread wheat lines in drought-prone environments of Ethiopia. J Plant Breed Genet 5(1): 15-21.
-
Zerihun Tadesse, Habtemariam Zegeye, Dawit Asnake, Tafesse Solomon, Yewubdar Shewaye, et al. (2018) Identification of Stable Bread Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L) Genotypes using AMMI Analysis in Ethiopia. International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry 5(6): 6-14.
-
Gadisa A Wardofa, Hussein M Dawit A, Tesfahun A (2019) Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability of bread wheat genotypes in Central Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics 7(2): 87-94.
-
Hancock JF (2004) Plant Evolution and the Origin of Crop Species. CABI Publishing.
-
MoANR (Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resource) (2016) Plant variety release, protection, and quality control directorate. Crop Variety Register, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
-
Olivera P, Newcomb M, Szabo LJ, Rouse M (2015) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of race TKTTF of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici that caused a wheat stem rust epidemic in southern Ethiopia in 2013– 14. Phytopathology 105(7): 917-928.
-
Singh RP, Hodson DP, Jin Y (2015) Emergence and spread of new races of wheat stem rust fungus: continued threat to food security and prospects of genetic control. Phytopathology 105(7): 872-884.
-
Tolemariam A, Jaleta M, Hodson D, Alemayehu Y, Yirga C, et al. (2018) Wheat varietal change and adoption of rust-resistant wheat varieties in Ethiopia from 2009/10 to 2013/14. Socioeconomics Program Working Paper 12. Mexico, CDMX: CIMMYT.
-
Abebe Delesa, Gadisa.Alemu, Negash Geleta, Alemu Dabi, Habtemariam Zegeye, et al. (2022) Stability and Performance Evaluation of Advanced Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes in Optimum Areas of Ethiopia. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 13(1): 69-80.
- Lessons to Learn: Trees are More than the Lungs of the World
- Community Forestry Enterprises as a Model for Sustainable Forest Development: The Case Of The "Baja Tarahumara" in Chihuahua, Mexico
- Ecological and Socio-Economic Impacts of Chromolaena odorata and Mesosphaerum suaveolens, Two Invasive Alien Species in Central and Southern Benin, West Africa
- Epigenetic Sustainability: Modeling the Human Factor as a Natural Resource through Science 4.0 and the NR3C1 Biological Pilot
- Growth-at-Risk: A Framework for Assessing Economic Vulnerability
- The Rural Territory as a Socioecological System for the Management of Public Policy for Sustainable Rural Development