Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
International Journal of Forensic Sciences Research Article 12 min read

Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Torture Victims

Ozdemir M*
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2573-1734  10.23880/ijfsc-16000285  Received: November 22, 2022  Published: December 01, 2022
  views
 17 references
 2 tables
PDF
Keywords
Crime Victim Forensic Medicine Psychiatry Forensic Psychiatry Torture
Abstract

Torture is a word of Persian origin and is defined as “excessive physical or moral punishment to a person” Torture is one of the important subjects of forensic medicine. Forensic Medicine specialists are experts who detect the lesions on the bodies of torture cases, which are considered to be the most extreme points of violations of rights, who can interpret them, and also try to diagnose invisible psychiatric traces. This duty obliges Forensic Medicine to evaluate scientific truths impartially and in all details.

Mini Review

Medical Evaluation

The Istanbul Protocol, in which the standards are defined, has been accepted as the rules expected to be followed by international institutions in the medical evaluation of persons coming from and brought from places of detention [8]. These standards cover all stages from the moment the physician meets the patient to the preparation and delivery of the report [9].

Interview Environment

First of all, the physical and mental evaluations should be in a comfortable environment suitable for privacy, where the physician considers the conditions to be the most suitable, where the person can feel comfortable and safe. The room should be arranged in such a way that the person does not feel himself being questioned, water, toilet, handkerchief etc. needs must be met. A seating plan designed in a way that does not evoke a hierarchical order, allowing eye contact with the person, should be applied. If these conditions cannot be met within the limits of possibilities, the deficiencies should be recorded in the report [10].

Meeting

The physician should introduce himself, inform the person to be examined in terms of his/her responsibilities and limits, the purposes of this interview and examination, all limitations and possible consequences of the obligation to keep confidentiality, and obtain the informed consent of the person. Closed-ended questions should not be asked in the interview, the subject should proceed in parallel with the establishment of a trust relationship from general to specific. When the interview is completed, the person should be asked if there is anything else they want to add [9, 10]. The physician should tell the patient that he/she can pause the interview and skip the question he/she does not want to answer. The physician should be able to design the interview according to the patient’s needs, general condition and the conditions of the environment [10]. It should be ensured that police or other law enforcement officials are not present in the examination room. The handcuffs, if any, must be released. Upon the physician’s need and necessity, the identity information of the people in the room should be stated in the report [9, 10].

If the physical examination supports the allegations of torture, the detainee should not be sent back to the place of detention, and the Public Prosecutor should be contacted quickly. The story of the event should be reproduced in the report with the person’s own words. The chronological order of the event should be checked. A careful questioning of the person’s family history and background will make it easier to understand the findings that are incompatible with the torture claim.

General Body Examination

General body examination cannot be done while dressed. After the necessary information is given to the patient and his consent is obtained, a detailed examination is performed by ensuring that all of the clothes are removed piece by piece, not at the same time. In the meantime, if it is necessary to take photographs, photographs are made with a scaled ruler, with the consent of the person. The findings that can be encountered frequently in these examinations are summarized in (Table 1).

Soft Tissue InjuriesEcchymoses, lacerations, abrasions, hanging-ligament scars, electrical injuries, thermal wounds, stab wounds, cigarette burns...
Skeletal System InjuriesBone fractures, dislocations
Psychiatric DisordersAcute Stress Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Adjustment Disorders, Mood Disorders, PTSD...
OtherMetabolic Disorders (Hypoglycemia, hyperkalemia...), signs of sexual abuse, signs of neglect...

Table 1: Post Traumatic Victim Psychology.

Table1: Common Torture Findings.

Psychiatric Evidence of Torture

After traumatic experiences such as torture and persecution, various changes may develop in the behaviors and emotions of the victims. In this case, four stages are mentioned in the literature (Table 2). Even if these four stages are completed, victims may not forget the events they experienced [11].

ShockThe victim tends to deny the criminal act. His mind is complex.
ReactionThe confrontation with the incident has begun. Symptoms such as loss of appetite and insomnia may occur. Has difficulty making sound decision.
ProcessingTrying to cope with emotional distress. He is starting to move away from the victimization.
Re-AdjustmentNegative emotions begin to subside. He begins to subside. He begins to return to his daily life.

Table 2: Post Traumatic Victim Psychology.

All forms of torture may not lead to the same findings and results. Likewise, it is known that detention and torture do not affect adults and children in the same way. One of the main purposes of torture is to cause the person to deteriorate and dissolve by causing him extreme helplessness and discomfort. In addition, it should be known that not all torture victims may develop a diagnosable mental illness [9].

After the victimization, the victims often develop reactions such as shock, anger, sadness, helplessness and mourning. According to cross-cultural studies, it is recommended that psychiatric disorders should be evaluated most rationally by phenomenological or descriptive methods. A condition that is considered a disorder in one culture may not be considered pathological in another culture. The physician or psychologist making the assessment should evaluate mental suffering in the context of the person’s cultural norms. Considering the severity and consequences of torture, it should not be rushed to make a diagnosis, and an attitude open to learning should be developed [9].

  • Acute Stress Disorder: It is a mental disorder that manifests itself with anxiety symptoms, dissociative symptoms, re-experiencing and avoidance symptoms that cause intense fear, helplessness and horror, observed in the individual within a month after severe traumatic experiences such as torture, death threats, severe injury, and sexual assault [12, 13].
  • Depression: It is a mood disorder in which feelings of sadness, worthlessness and guilt intensify in the victim and cause problems in functioning. It can manifest itself with feelings of exhaustion, decrease in self-esteem, malaise, reluctance, loss of hope for the future, and thoughts of death [14].
  • Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): It is a mental disorder that manifests itself as anxiety, re-experiencing, feelings of helplessness, and avoidance according to DSM-5 criteria, compulsive ideas, cognitive variability, and hyperarousal state observed for longer than one month after a traumatic experience [13, 15].
  • Dissociative Disorders: It is called the disruption of the integrity of functions such as memory, perception, identity and environmental sensations that work as a whole in the individual. According to DSM-5, dissociative identity disorder is classified as dissociative amnesia, depersonalization, derealization and unspecified dissociative disorders [13].

Increase in alcohol and substance use, some psychotic reactions, and psychophysiological disturbances may also be seen in the victim due to the severe trauma experienced [16]. Psychotic symptoms may develop while the victim is in detention and torture, or they may develop later. Common psychotic findings: delusions, hallucinations, illusions of perception, paranoia and persecution delusions. With or without objective findings, symptoms such as pain, headache and other physical complaints are also common in torture survivors. These bodily findings may be seen as a direct physical consequence of torture, or as a result of psychiatric origin, or both.

Sexual dysfunction is common in people who have been subjected to sexual torture, abuse, and rape, although not every torture. Again, torture may include physical trauma involving the brain at different levels, and these traumas may lead to long-term neuropsychological problems that cannot be easily detected on examination [9].

Reviews

  • Radiological Imaging: According to the victim’s history and examination findings, the existing pathologies in soft tissue and bone structures can be made visible and recorded with direct X-ray, CT, MRI, USG, Scintigraphy.
  • EMG Examination: It becomes a valuable diagnostic method when neuropathies and musculopathies are suspected in the victim’s history or examination [17].
  • Blood Tests: It may be useful in demonstrating blood loss, if any, and rhabdomyolysis in common blunt traumas. Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, CK, LDH and other biochemical tests will be helpful.
  • Pee: if there is muscle destruction due to widespread blunt trauma, it will be able to reveal it.

Reporting

The physician who performs the examination and evaluations should carefully evaluate all the findings he has obtained and prepare an impartial, publicly understandable, clear report that reflects his opinion. Where it is necessary to use medical terminology, their meanings should be given in parentheses [8]. According to the Istanbul Protocol, this assessment is made only at the formal written request of public prosecutors and other appropriate officials. Evaluation requests of law enforcement officers without a written order from the prosecutor’s office are not valid. Again, according to the Istanbul Protocol, the person who claims to be a victim of torture himself, his lawyers and relatives can also request a medical evaluation in order to determine the evidence. These persons have the right to receive an alternative report from a physician during or after detention [9].

  • After the report is prepared, it should be kept confidential and given to the person or his/her official representative.
  • Statements of the victim himself or his official representative should be included in the report.
  • The original of the report should be delivered directly to the person requesting the report, to the institution.
  • A copy of the report should remain with the institution where the person was examined.

The entire examination process, starting from taking the history and ending with the examination results, should be stated in detail in the report, and all findings, if any, should be recorded completely. Where no finding can be detected, this should also be clearly stated in the report. The physician should express an opinion about the reason for the findings detected during the examination and whether it can be performed by the person himself or by someone else. Differential diagnoses should also be mentioned. The compatibility of the torture history with all the findings in the physical and mental evaluation of the victim should be evaluated [8, 9].

Conclusion

Psychiatric assessments and examinations can provide crucial evidence of abuse suffered by torture victims. Because torture methods are generally designed not to leave any physical marks, they often cause devastating psychological symptoms.

Psychiatric evaluation provides evidence in terms of testimony in forensic psychiatry investigations, investigating the conditions under which false confessions are taken, understanding regional torture practices, and most importantly, determining the treatment needs of victims and human rights investigations.

The purpose of psychiatric evaluations is to determine the degree of consistency between the story told by the person and the observed psychological findings, that is, to determine the causality. If appropriate symptoms are present, a psychiatric diagnosis should be made. It is essential and important that all torture assessments include a psychiatric examination.

References

  1. Turk Dil kurumu sozlukleri (2022).
  2. İnsan hakları evrensel beyannamesi (2022).
  3. Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi (2022).
  4. Cüneyd Er (2022) Işkenceye Karşi Birleşmiş Milletler Sözleşmesi. Pp: 169-188.
  5. Regulatory Information System (1982). 22(17863): 3.
  6. Birinci Kitap, Birinci Kisim, Birinci Bölüm (2004) Türk Ceza Kanunu.
  7. Turkish Medical Association (2022).
  8. Koç S, Can M (2010) Forensic Medicine in Primary Care. Istanbul, Istanbul Medical Chamber Publications pp: 278-286.
  9. (2009) Turkish Medical Association Istanbul Protocol Guidelines for the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, Degrading Treatment or Punishment, In: 2nd (Edn) United Nations Training Series No: 8, Turkey.
  10. Arıcan N, Baykal T, Fincancı ŞK, Gürpınar S, Özkalıpçı Ö, et al. (2009) Handbook of Medical Evaluation for Torture. In: Fincancı SK, Baykal T, (Eds.), Turkish Medical Association, Turkey.
  11. Sokullu- Akıncı F (1999) Viktimology. Beta Publishing, Turkey.
  12. Tamer İ (2018) Acute Stress Reaction. Turkiye Klinikleri J Fam Med-Special Topics 9(3): 220-223.
  13. Köroğlu E (2013) American psychiatric association, diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Physicians Publication Association.
  14. Senyuva G, Turkish B (2022) Victim Psychology from Forensic Sciences Perspective. Bulletin of Legal Medicine 27(2): 185-194.
  15. Boeschoten MA, Van DN, Bakker A, Ter Heide FJJ, Hoofwijk MC, et al. (2018) Development and Evaluation of the Dutch Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM- 5 (CAPS-5). Eur J Psychotraumatol 9(1): 1546085.
  16. Ng TWH, Sorensen KL, Zhang Y, Yim FHK (2019) Anger, Anxiety, Depression and Negative Affect: Convergent or Divergent?. Journal of Vocational Behavior 110: 186-202.
  17. Atar MÖ, Özgen ANK, Kamacı GK, Özcan F, Demir Y, et al. (2006) Traumatic Peripheral Nerve Injuries: Retrospective Analysis of 328 Cases. Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences.
More from this journal

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{ozdemir2022,
  title   = {Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Torture Victims},
  author  = {Ozdemir M},
  journal = {International Journal of Forensic Sciences},
  year    = {2022},
  volume  = {7},
  number  = {4},
  doi     = {10.23880/ijfsc-16000285}
}
Ozdemir M (2022). Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Torture Victims. International Journal of Forensic Sciences, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.23880/ijfsc-16000285
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Torture Victims
AU  - Ozdemir M
JO  - International Journal of Forensic Sciences
PY  - 2022
VL  - 7
IS  - 4
DO  - 10.23880/ijfsc-16000285
ER  -