Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Open Access Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Medicine Research Article 4 min read

The Need for a Dynamic Systems Approach in Kinesiology Research

D Ramirez and D Kinnunen*
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2995-0155  10.23880/oajksm-16000106  Received: October 16, 2023  Published: October 20, 2023
 — views
 23 references
PDF
Keywords
Dynamic Systems Theory Musculoskeletal system Central Nervous System Kinesiology
Abstract

Objective: This submission addresses the need for the use of Dynamic Systems Theory (DST) in Kinesiology research across the sub-disciplines. Materials and Methods: Theoretical discussion Results: there is a need for a shift in Kinesiology research paradigms.

Introduction

Dynamic systems theory is an attempt to understand and explain complex, nonlinear change over time [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Dynamic systems theory views human motor development as behavior that arises from the collective dynamics of contributing subsystems, including the central nervous system and the musculoskeletal system, and predicts that change may result when one or more control parameters are altered [1, 6, 7, 8]. For example, these systems are thought to be dynamic, relational, and multileveled in nature [9]. Systems theory proposes that any new organization, or reorganization, of a system can only come about from perturbations that disrupt the stability of an older system [3, 10]. These perturbations may include properties of the environment or the organism [11, 12, 13]. Specifically, they may include environmental surfaces and objects, gravity, the central nervous system, the musculoskeletal system, and the masses and length of the limbs [12, 14].

Commentary

The study of development from a dynamic systems perspective is still relatively [1, 2]. Although human growth and developmental achievements may not have changed significantly over recent years, further study of the factors influencing growth, development, and performance is needed [15, 16, 17]. Movement is made possible by the musculoskeletal system [18]. This system provides the strength and structural stability that allows the body to generate movement. These movements or patterns must be coordinated dynamically with a flow of environmental events, requiring coordination between action and environment [18]. These patterns are controlled by a complex interaction between the central nervous system and psychological processes [19, 20]. These patterns are achieved by combining conceptual information with perceptions regarding the environmental dynamics and the movements or patterns themselves [18]. Traditional approaches, such as information processing and maturational theories, have not satisfactorily explained the mechanisms of change underlying human development or performance [21]. While development tends to follow a sequential order, the timing and rate of development varies among individuals [16, 22]. A systems approach should allow researchers to look at how the many subsystems involved act together to impact performance and at the same time identify the subsystems where small changes may influence larger development or performance [1, 23].

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest associated with this submission. This work is the intellectual property of the co- authors alone.

Acknowledgement

There are no funding obligations/issues associated with this submission. No funding was sought/received.

Moral Guidelines for the Use of Human and Non-Human Animals in Research

No human or non-human participants were utilized in this submission.

References

  1. Ulrich BD (1989) Development of stepping patterns in human infants: A dynamical systems perspective. Journal of Motor Behavior 21: 392-408.
  2. Clark JE, Phillips SJ (1993) A longitudinal study of interlimb coordination in the first year of independent walking: A dynamic systems analysis. Child Development 64(4): 1143-1157.
  3. Thelen E, Ulrich BD (1991) Hidden Skills: Monographs of the society for research in child development. 56(23).
  4. Crutchfield JP, Farmer JD, Packard NH, Shaw RS (1987) Chaos. Scientific American 254: 46-57.
  5. Rosen R (1970) Dynamical system theory in biology.
  6. Peitgen HO, Jurgens H, Saupe D (1992) Chaos and fractals New frontiers of science.
  7. Thelen E (1985) Developmental origins of motor coordination: Leg movements in human infants. Developmental Psychobiology 18(1): 1-22.
  8. Kelso JAS, Tuller B (1984) Converging evidence in support of common dynamical principles for speech and movement coordination. American Journal of Physiology 246: 928-935.
  9. Fentress JC (1986) Development of coordinated movement: Dynamic, relational and multileveled perspectives. In: Wade M, Whiting HTA (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control pp: 77-105.
  10. Kelso JAS, Schroner G, Scholz JP, Haken H (1987) Phase-locked modes, phase transitions and component oscillators in biological motion. Physica Scripta 35: 79- 87.
  11. Hamilton ML, Pankey R Kinnunen DA (2003) Constraints of motor skill acquisition: Implications for teaching and learning. ERIC clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
  12. Goldfield EC, Kay BA, Warren WH (1993) Infant bouncing: The assembly and tuning of action systems. Child Development 64: 1128-1142.
  13. Newell K (1986) Constraints on the development of coordination. In: Wade MG, Whiting HTA (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control pp: 341-360.
  14. Kinnunen DA (2000) Anthropometric determinants of performance: A Dynamic Systems Perspective. Paper presented to the Missouri Association for Health.
  15. Halverson LE (1966) Development of motor patterns in young children. Quest 6: 44.
  16. Pipho A (1971) An investigation of the relationships between selected physical growth and developmental measures and performance in the standing long jump by five-year-old children.
  17. Wilson DJ (1993) An investigation of a developmental sequence of the standing long jump using multidimensional scaling Proquest pp: 9326786.
  18. Ford DH, Lerner M (1992) Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach.
  19. Garcia Ruiz JM, Louis E, Meakin P, Sander LM (1993) Growth patterns in physical sciences and biology. NATO ASI series B pp: 304.
  20. Kelso JAS, Holt KG, Rubin P, Kugler PN (1981) Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: Theory and data. Journal of Motor Behavior 13(4): 226- 261.
  21. Thelen E (1986) Development of coordinated movement: Implications for early human development. In: Wade MG, Whiting HTA (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control pp: 107-124.
  22. Garrison KC (1952) Growth and development.
  23. Haubenstricker JL, Branta CF (1997) The relationship between distance jumped and developmental level on the standing long jump in long children. In: Clark JE, Humphrey JH (Eds.), Motor Development: Research & Reviews 1: 64-85.
More from this journal

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{d2023,
  title   = {The Need for a Dynamic Systems Approach in Kinesiology Research},
  author  = {D Ramirez and D  Kinnunen},
  journal = {Open Access Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Medicine},
  year    = {2023},
  volume  = {1},
  number  = {1},
  doi     = {10.23880/oajksm-16000106}
}
D Ramirez and D  Kinnunen (2023). The Need for a Dynamic Systems Approach in Kinesiology Research. Open Access Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Medicine, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.23880/oajksm-16000106
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Need for a Dynamic Systems Approach in Kinesiology Research
AU  - D Ramirez and D  Kinnunen
JO  - Open Access Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Medicine
PY  - 2023
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
DO  - 10.23880/oajksm-16000106
ER  -