Genomic Activities of Mixed Lineage Leukemia Proteins
<p>MLL is one of the most aggressive leukemias which mostly targets pediatric patients. Genetic rearrangement of the 11q23 location is the main reason for this type of acute leukemia. MLL gene and its fusion proteins have produced a core complex which leads to abnormal hematopoesis. Although many clinical and lab studies have been done to show the prominent role of MLL in leukemogenesis since its discovery in 1992, large-scale genomic data seems to be the most effective way to analyse the hematologic malignancies extensively. Gene expression, methylation, mutation, RNA-seq, and SNP arrays have updated the understanding of the transformation oncohematologic disorder mechanism. As a result of the genomic data analysis, new biomarkers may have been detected as therapy target genes and used for personalized medicine. The genomics-bioinformatics studies and novel technical advances provide some precious knowledge to discover novel therapeutic strategies and better treatment outcomes in the future.</p>
MLL (Mixed Lineage Leukemia)
MLL is represented by KMT2 lysine (K)-specific methyltransferase 2A gene which consists of 90.156 bases and encodes histone-lysine N-methyltransferase protein [1]. The gene which was firstly defined in 1970 from an ALL patient and named MLL (mixed-lineage leukemia) is located in the 11q23 chromosome. Since the location is very sensitive and active for chromosomal translocation, it is observed in both myelogenous and lymphoblastic lineages of leukemia [2]. The gene is responsible for transmitting the memory of active genes to daughter cells through interactions with Trithorax Response Elements Opinion (TREs) which regulates gene expression of hematopoiesis as an encoding a transcriptional coactivator [3]. The Trithorax and Polycomb families keep the right genes on or off. While TREs keep the genes active, Polycomb proteins generally bind to the heterochromatin structure to freeze the genes in a repressed state [4]. MLL is directly or indirectly responsible for regulating the expression of target genes, epigenetic regulation of transcription, embryonic development, and hematopoiesis [5].
MLL Leukemia
MLL gene is a frequently repeated translocation target that shows distinguished genomic-clinical characteristics, and it is often correlated with poor prognosis, very low overall survival in 70% of infants with leukemia, and not Bioinformatics & Proteomics Open Access Journal
effective target treatment. The gene and its associated fusion proteins regulates hematopoietic development by altering epigenetic profiles which deregulate transcription activity globally. The target therapeutic chemicals disrupt the MLL fusion protein super complex and inhibit the growth of MLL-associated leukemic and show differences between adults and children [6]. Since MLL type leukemia is very aggressive and 90% of the time it is observed in infant aged < 1 year old, (2-5%) children- it is hardly ever observed in older patients (aged 60 and up) [7]. The infant or age-group around 1 year old (70% of ALL and 35%-50% AML) involve 11q23 translocation [8]. While the five-year survival rate among older patients is 30%, a pediatric patient varies between 40% to 65% [9]. Since MLL patients present very bad prognostic factor, they are diagnosed with high-risk protocols and a very poor outcome [10]. Although cytogenetics often diagnose the leukemia type, risk stratification, and therapeutic implications, genomic analysis of leukemia subtypes is needed to guide clinicians and hematologists for predicting the risk of treatment and developing novel and targeted therapies [11].
MLL Re-arrangements
Chromosomal rearrangement is one of the major causes of genetic diseases or abnormalities. E2A/PBX1, BCR/ABL, ETV6, RUNX1, and MLL chromosomal rearrangements are the mostly observed examples in leukemia. The rearrangements do not only change transcriptional profile and cellular pathways, such as cell cycle, apoptosis, cell differentiation and tumor suppression, but also affect prognosis and therapy methods [12]. While other rearrangements need additional hits to cause a problem, MLL type rearrangement is enough itself to stimulate a leukemic transformation. The main MLL type rearrangements are (4;11), t(6;11), t(9;11), t(11;19) which are clustered within a 9-kb BamHI genomic region and 5-kb region and diagnosis, overall survival rate and therapy methods are arranged depending on the type rearrangements. For example, while t(6;11)(q27;q23) and t(10;11)(p12;q23) are correlated with a poor prognosis, t(9;11)(p22;q23) type survival rate is significantly longer than others [13, 14].
Fusion Proteins and Their Functions
MLL protein is cleaved by Taspase 1 enzyme into MLL- N and MLL-C terminals which consist of 2718 a.a and 1250 a.a respectively but it is generally fused with at least four main proteins, around 100 different MLL fusion proteins detection [15]. The MLL-protein complex regulates gene expression by modifying chromatin structure during early development, hematopoiesis process, methylation and acetylation of histone protein. The complex is suspected to form and transform hematopoietic cells into leukemia cells successively [16]. Here are the fusion proteins and their functions:
- MOF protein loosens up chromatin by histone charge neutralization [17].
- WDR5 protein recognizes the histone H3 lysine 4 methyl-mark and ensures the progression of histone modification [18].
- AT-hook is a DNA binding domain [19].
- CxxC motif recognizes unmethylated CpG dinucleotides [20, 21, 22]. PHD is transcriptional co- activators [23].
- SET is histone methyltransferase active site [24].
MLL Protein and Its Complex Formation
The two MLL parts come together after being delivered to the nucleus, including 8 functional domains Ala/Gyl/Ser-rich, Poly/Gly, three AT-hooks, Zinc finger CXXC type, three zinc fingers PHD type, Bromodomain, FYR N-term, MLL-C part has 5 functional domains TAD, FYRC-term, SET, 4post SET and S-adenosyl-L-methionine binding sites [25]. The complex regulates 3 main chromatin modifications; acetylation, methylation and nucleosome remodeling. Those epigenetic modifications affect transcription factors acccession to the active genes and direct RNA synthesis.
MLL Breaking Point
MLL breakpoint occurs within a 4kb region exon8 to exon12 which is the most sensitive part among MLL introns and exons. The core breakpoint is a very fragile fragment and important pioneer to rearrangement with mostly correlated infant acute and therapy-related leukemia [26, 27]. Since it is abnormally expected to occur in a gene coding region, the oncogenic gene fusion is produced by broken of both DNA strands which are most frequently observed within an intron. Thus, an exclusive work and mysterious promoter was identified within intron11, the border of exon12 [28]. It has already been understood that to poisomerase II consensus sequence locates within exon12, which is the target of etoposide application. This suggests that etopside stimulation of the cleavage is expressed at the distal site of the enzyme binding consensus sequence [29, 30, 31, 32].
Bioinformatics & Proteomics Open Access Journal
References
-
Rowley JD (1998) “The critical role of chromosome translocations in human leukemias. Annu Rev Genet 32(1): 495-519.
-
Cimino G, Moir DT, Canaani O, Williams K, Crist WM, et al. (1991) Cloning of ALL-1, the locus involved in leukemias with the t (4; 11)(q21; q23), t (9; 11)(p22; q23), and t (11; 19)(q23; p13) chromosome translocations. Cancer Res 51(24): 6712-6714.
-
Bina Minou, Phillip Wyss, Elise Novorolsky, Noorfatin Zulkelfi, Jing Xue, et al. (2013) Discovery of MLL1 binding units, their localization to CpG Islands, and their potential function in mitotic chromatin. BMC Genomics 14(1): 927.
-
Gilbert SF (2014) Developmental Biology. 10th (Edn.), Sinauer Association.
-
Hess JL, Benjamin DY, Li B, Hanson R, Korsmeyer SJ (1997) Defects in yolk sac hematopoiesis in Mll-null embryos. Blood 90(5): 1799-1806.
-
Chiaretti S, Zini G, Bassan R (2014) “Diagnosis and Sub classification of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 6(1): 2014073.
-
Schoch C, Schnittger S, Klaus M, Kern W, Hiddemann W, et al. (2003) AML with 11q23/MLL abnormalities as defined by the WHO classification: incidence, partner chromosomes, FAB subtype, age distribution, and prognostic impact in an unselected series of 1897 cytogenetically analyzed AML cases. Blood 102(7): 2395-2402.
-
Rubnitz JE, Link M, Shuster J, Andrew JC, Hakami N, et al. (1994) Frequency and Prognostic Significance of HRX Rearrangements in Infant.pdf. Blood 84(2): 570- 573.
-
Kaspers GJL, Zwaan CM (2007) Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: towards high-quality cure of all patients. Haematologica 92(11): 1519-1532.
-
Pui CH, Sandlund JT, Pei D, Campana D, Rivera GK, et al. (2004) Improved outcome for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of Total Therapy Study XIIIB at St Jude Children’s Research Hospital. Blood 104(9): 2690-2696.
-
Ross ME (2003) Classification of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia by gene expression profiling. Blood 102(8): 2951-2959.
-
Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M, et al. (1999) Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring, Science 286(5439): 531-537.
-
Cox MC, Panetta P, Lo-Coco F, Del Poeta G, Venditti A, et al. (2004) Chromosomal Aberration of the 11q23 Locus in Acute Leukemia and Frequency of MLL Gene Translocation Results in 378 Adult Patients. Am J Clin Pathol 122(2): 298-306.
-
Dogan S, Kurtovic-Kozaric A, Hajrovic A, Lisic M, Gokgoz E (2016) Comparison of MLL Fusion Genes Expression among the Cytogenetics Abnormalities of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Their Clinical Effects. J Biom Biostat 7: 312.
-
Meyer C, Kowarz E, Hofmann J, Renneville A, Zuna J, et al. (2009) New insights to the MLL recombinome of acute leukemias. Leukemia 23(8): 1490-1499.
-
Ilencikova D, Kolenov A (2013) MLL Gene Alterations in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (11q23/MLL+ AML) in Oncogene and Cancer- From Bench to Clinic. In: Siregar Y, (Ed.), In Tech.
-
Dou Y, Milne TA, Tackett AJ, Smith ER, Fukuda A, et al. (2005) Physical Association and Coordinate Function of the H3 K4 Methyl transferase MLL1 and the H4 K16 Acetyl transferase MOF. Cell 121(6): 873-885.
-
Schuetz A, Allali-Hassani A, Martín F, Loppnau P, Vedadi M, et al. (2006 Structural basis for molecular recognition and presentation of histone H3 by WDR5. EMBO J 25(18): 4245-4252.
-
Rodríguez J, Mosquera J, Couceiro JR, Vázquez ME, Mascareñas JL (2015) The AT-Hook motif as a versatile minor groove anchor for promoting DNA binding of transcription factor fragments. Chem Sci 6(8): 4767-4771.
-
Mark D Allen, Charles G Grummitt, Christine Hilcenko, Sandra Young Min, et al. (2002)“Solution structure of the nonmethyl-CpG-binding CXXC domain.pdf. EMBO J 25(19): 4503-4512.
-
Dogan S, Cilic, A, Marjanovic D, Kurtovic-Kozaric A (2017) Detection of cytosine and CpG density in proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in promoter sequences of acute myeloid leukemia. Nucleosides, Nucleotides and Nucleic Acids 36(4): Bioinformatics & Proteomics Open Access Journal 302-316.
-
Senol Dogan, Anis Cilic, Amina Kurtovic-Kozaric, Fatih Ozturk (2015) Detection of G-type density in promoter sequence of colon cancer oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Bioinformation 11(6): 290- 295.
-
Chang PY, Hom RA, Musselman CA, Zhu L, Kuo A, et al. (2010) Binding of the MLL PHD3 Finger to Histone H3K4me3 Is Required for MLL-Dependent Gene Transcription. J Mol Biol 400(2): 137-144.
-
Milne TA, Briggs SD, Brock HW, Martin ME, Gibbs D, et al. (2002) MLL targets SET domain methyltransferase activity to Hox gene promoters. Mol Cell 10(5): 1107-1117.
-
Jean-Loup Huret, Mohammad Ahmad, Mélanie Arsaban, Alain Bernheim, Jérémy Cigna, et al. (2013) Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology. Nucleic Acids Res 41: D920-D924.
-
Strissel PL, Strick R, Rowley JD, Zeleznik-Le NJ (1998) An in vivo topoisomerase II cleavage site and a DNase I hypersensitive site colocalize near exon 9 in the MLL breakpoint cluster region. Blood 92(10): 3793-3803.
-
Dogan S (2017) New Possible Targetable Genes for Future Treatment of Mixed Lineage Leukemia. J Biom Biostat 8: 349.
-
Scharf S, Zech J, Bursen A, Schraets D, Oliver PL, et al. (2007) Transcription linked to recombination: a gene-internal promoter coincides with the recombination hot spot II of the human MLL gene. Oncogene 26(10): 1361-1371.
-
Broeker PL, Super HG, Thirman MJ, Pomykala H, Yonebayashi Y, et al. (1996) Distribution of 11q23 breakpoints within the MLL breakpoint cluster. Blood 87(5): 1912-1922.
-
Dogan S, Kurtovic-Kozaric A (2015) Changes of Molecular, Cellular and Biological Activities According to microRNA-mRNA Interactions in Ovarian Cancer. Computational Molecular Biology 5(4): 1-8.
-
Dogan S, Kurtovic-Kozaric A, Karli G (2016) The Detection of Extremely High and Low Expressed Genes by EGEF Algorithm in Invasive Breast Cancer. J Biom Biostat 7: 286.
-
Mesut Karatas, Yusuf Turan, Kurtovic-Kozaric A, Senol Dogan (2016) Analysis of Gaucher Disease Responsible Genes in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma. J Biom Biostat 7: 314.
- Carbon Code for Analysis of Protein Stability in Protein Mutation
- Number of Contiguous Amino Acids in Nanon of 16A Diameter
- Identification of Hub Genes and Pathways in Cervical Cancer by Statistical and Bioinformatics Analysis
- Effect of Dietary Inclusion Levels of Moringa Olerifera Oil on the Growth Performance and Nutrient Retention of Broiler Starter Chicks
- Proteomics Loans in Kinetoplastids during the Last Decade
- “Identification of SARS-CoV-2 in Human Genome based on Protein Dynamics Conversion and Target Genes Marking via Bioinformatics Approaches”