Dealing with Transitions Thanks to Janus
This article suggests a reflection on transitions through the lenses of depth analytical psychology and the representation of the mythic Roman god, Janus. Some transition-related factors and signs of being lost in transition will be explored as well as the implication of having an one-sided vision. Finally, the author proposes an interpretation of Janus’symbolic characteristics to help to understand and manage transitions.
Introduction
The first month of the year is dedicated to Janus, the two-faced Roman God. Janus comes from the Latin Ianus, which means the door; Ianito, the guardian of the gates; and Ianuarius, January. Janus is the god of transitions, passages, beginnings and ends; therefore, he is the guardian of the doors and passages. This mythic god can be easily recognized as he has two heads oriented in opposite directions enabling him to look forward and backward simultaneously. At the beginning of the year, our thoughts and attention focus on both the past and the coming year. Therefore, January can be considered as a month of transition and the door giving access to the New Year. Furthermore, the two faces of Janus are often depicted differently; one is older than the other. Janus has two other significant attributes: a staff in his right hand and a key in his left hand and thus, he is responsible for opening and closing doors and choosing the right moment. All these symbolic characteristics are relevant for understanding and managing a transition period. However, before dwelling on the symbolic meaning of the representation of Janus, it is worth recalling what a transition is and examining its related factors.
Lost in Transition: Yesterday Never Dies- Tomorrow Never Comes
Even though it seems, at first, easy to go through a transition, it does not always operate smoothly, and one may feel lost in transition. The shift can be quite abrupt, sudden and unexpected. A discontinuity is observed when extreme events occur. Furthermore, an introspective attitude related to transition is frequently overlooked. The ensuing issue of being stuck in an obsolete phase and not succeeding in engaging in the next stage can take different forms.
When yesterday never dies, individuals may have difficulty of:
- Letting go;
- Grieving a loss;
- Healing psychological wounds;
- Dealing with the reactivation of past traumas (e.g. flashbacks, nightmares).
And when tomorrow never comes, people may:
- Have difficulty making a decision;
- Procrastinate;
- Lack direction and guidance;
- Feel lost about the demands of a new role;
- Lack of engagement because of low intrinsic or external motivation
- Show low persistence in adversity
- Reach one’s breaking point As mentioned in Dr. Westerhof’s interview, growth through adversity can be complex. It implies emotional regulation, goal regulation, and thus being able to adjust it according to the circumstances, step back to do a life review, and have a supportive environment [2].
A One-Sided Vision? Backward or Forward?
What happens if someone’s focus is essentially turned toward the past? Nostalgia, bitterness, resentment, and regrets (e.g., “I should have...”, “I could have achieved..”), may prevail, along with an inability to find guidance and direction in developing new projects. As seen above, emotional regulation is essential. If needed, a practitioner will help to heal past wounds and traumas. Having difficulty leaving a stage may have other reasons, like feeling too comfortable in the current stage of life. For some young adults, it could be remaining an eternal student and not wanting to be confronted with the working world, or for others, being unwilling to leave their parent’s house despite having financial autonomy.
In contrast, the past may quickly be swept away by rushing forward, always looking for new experiences or opportunities. Dwelling mainly on the future can induce anticipatory anxiety, a sense of urgency, some restlessness, and constantly having the impression of running out of time. In both polarized attitudes, living in the present moment seems problematic. Therefore, reflecting on transitions opens up an introspective attitude on one’s journey and an awareness of one’s values, aspirations, and needs impacting relevant choices and decisions. Here the question to ask is how decisions are aligned with one’s values and needs.
Helpful Stance to Adopt in a Transition
As Janus is the god of transition, beginning and ending, understanding his symbolic characteristics will be helpful in adopting the right attitude to manage transitions. Janus, as the gatekeeper of doors and thanks to his two faces, watches the entrances and exits simultaneously. As a facilitator and initiator, he holds a key in his left hand. The key is a symbol of higher authority; whoever possesses the key is responsible for opening the way or giving access to a new state [5]. Janus can also use the key to lock doors. Symbolically, it means ending a previous stage or state or protecting oneself from intrusion. As a guide, Janus holds a staff in his right hand to show the direction and the way. The staff has several purposes. Pilgrims have one to support them in their long journey; shepherds use it to move the sheeps in the right direction, and others use it as a weapon to protect themselves. The staff symbolizes power and sovereignty, protection, support and direction [4]. In short, Janus decides not only to give access or not to a new stage but also provides guidance and support to manage it. In order to be able to do that, he possesses a strong asset, his two heads oriented in opposite directions.
Janus’ dual vision and the age difference between the two faces are key ideas in dealing with transitions. The representation of an older face suggests a greater accumulation of life experiences, whether constructive or deleterious, compared to the younger one. Opposite looks involve different perspectives and meanings. Viewing a situation from different angles will mitigate biases and stereotypes, and decisions will be more aligned with one’s values. At that stage, the questions raised are: What are the meaningful learning experiences, the level of satisfaction of past achievements, and what remains unlived? And then decide what needs to be addressed, pursued, or changed.
Moreover, the opposite of glances can be understood on both temporal and spatial levels. Looking backward means focusing on the past as well as looking behind. Having a rear vision could symbolically mean becoming aware of what comes up and is going through the inner gate of consciousness. Looking forward means focusing on the future and looking ahead. Based on Mitchell DJ, et al. [3] research on prospective hindsight that involves projecting oneself in the future and then looking back, some leaders conduct pre-mortem exercises to increase positive outcomes of their projects. Paradoxically, a leader may ask his team to imagine a negative result of an event or project and then generate all possible reasons for the project’s failure. This exercise increases the chance of making appropriate decisions, identifying potential pitfalls, considering what is at stake, developing a better course of action, and increasing the probability of success.
Finally, a third relevant dialectic dimension between the inner and outer world is observed. A look inward toward the inner world promotes the awareness of bodily sensations, feelings, intuitions, and inner self-talk. Conversely, looking toward the outer world focuses on current events, the environment, and the people one interacts with. Both inward and outward focus are essential; one does not go without the other. The inner world will impact the outer world, and the outer world will influence the inner world.
It is certainly not that easy to simultaneously maintain attention in opposite directions. One tends to favor one of the poles at the expense of the other. Plus, the society reinforces this attitude by valuing the future more than the past and productivity more than reflection. Hence, what are the benefits of focusing on both past and future?
Benefits of Focusing on Past and Future
The older face of Janus turned toward the past may emphasize on:
- Reflecting on one’s life journey by stepping back to have a life review. Learning from the past might prevent future mistakes and provide a better orientation of one’s life. Thus, the risk of regrets is mitigated, and the choices will be more aligned with one’s deep personality;
- Anchoring in one’s roots and resources to become more stable when a storm of a crisis occurs;
- Becoming aware of one’s personal values to prioritize what is essential;
- Healing past wounds and traumas in the here and now to move forward bravely.
As for the younger face of Janus, looking forward may mean:
- Staying connected to the inner, curious and creative child;
- Adopting the beginner mindset;
- Being open to new possibilities;
- Projecting oneself into the future by developing new projects;
- Approaching events and people with a new perspective without any biases.
Conclusion
In regard to what has been said, holding the focus on opposite directions and maintaining the dialectic between different perspectives will facilitate a transition and enhance a sense of continuity. Being Janus-like also refers to decision-making and seizing the right time to open and close the symbolic door. The Kairos is the opportune moment to take decisive and appropriate actions. Having such a comprehensive vision promotes new insight and the chance of getting the right key to open the door to the next stage of life. At last, it brings about a more meaningful life and more authentic way of being.
References
-
Pearlman K (2008) Changing to Consulting in Midcareer. In: Hedge JW, Borman WC, et al. (Eds.), The I/O consultant: Advice and insights for building a successful career. American Psychological Association, pp: 315- 325.
-
Diehl M, Wahl HW (2020) Risks and Potentials of Adult Development and Aging. In: Diehl M Wahl HW (Eds.), The Psychology of Later Life: A Contextual Perspective. American Psychological Association, pp: 153-180.
-
Mitchell DJ, Russo JE, Pennington N (1989) Back to the future: Temporal perspective in the explanation of events. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2(1): 25- 38.
-
Chevalier J, Gheerbrant A (1982) Dictionnaire des Symboles. Robert Laffont, Paris, France, pp: 1-1092.
-
Ronnberg A, Martin K (2010) The Book of Symbols: Reflections on Archetypal Images. Taschen, Cologne, Germany, pp: 1-807.
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Investigating the Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety, Loneliness and Help seeking among International Students
- Family Experiences and their Interpretations as a Source of Adaptive Behaviour in Young Adults: A Qualitative Model of Adaptive Behaviour
- The Development of Responsibility in Teenage Mothers: A Qualitative Model
- Post-Truth Reality: Worldwide Infodemia and Mental Health Concerns during and Post COVID-19 Pandemic Scenarios
- Psycho-Emotional Rehabilitating Means of Overcoming Extreme and Stressful Impact
- The Paradox of Humbleness, Arrogance and the Concept of Fluid Individuality