Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Advances in Pharmacology & Clinical Trials Research Article 19 min read

Etiology and Prescription Errors of Myocardial Infarction in Different Health Care Systems of Azad Kashmir

Kafauit F, Saleem N, Latif A, Khurshid A, Razzaq M, Zahir J*, Ullah I†
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2474-9214  10.23880/apct-16000254  Received: November 27, 2024  Published: December 25, 2024
  views
 10 references
 5 figures
 5 tables
PDF
Keywords
Myocardial Infarction (MI) Prescription Errors Drug-Drug Interactions Cardiovascular Risk Factors’ Public Health Interventions Resource-Limited Setting
Abstract

A heart attack (MI), is a serious medical disaster that arises when blood supply to the heart is abruptly obstructed mainly due to blood clots. Blockage damages the heart muscle. Common signs of heart attack are chest pain or discomfort, difficulty breathing, swelling in the legs or abdomen, fatigue, and a bluish tint to the skin (cyanosis). Risk factors e.g. smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, atherosclerosis & family history increase likelihood of MI. Early detection is critical, using diagnostic tools like (ECG, troponin tests & imaging techniques. Treatments include blood thinners, thrombolytics, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, and statins. In Azad Kashmir, MI is the most noteworthy etiological factor of illness and mortality in spite of advancements in heart care. The region faces unique challenges, including a high prevalence of risk factors, inconsistent healthcare practices, and frequent prescription errors. The study reviewed 100 MI prescriptions from regional public healthcare facilities, focusing on drug interactions, dosages, treatment frequency, and duration. The analysis revealed several issues, with the most common error being missing treatment frequency (31.25%), followed by missing doses (25%). Drug-drug interactions were also significant, with pharmacodynamic interactions being the most frequent (36.84%), followed by synergistic (33.08%), antagonistic (27.82%), and pharmacokinetic interactions (2.26%). These outcomes highlight the pressing need for directed interventions to reduce prescription errors and improve MI care. Addressing healthcare inconsistencies, resource limitations, and gaps in professional training can help enhance treatment outcomes. This study provides valuable insights for public health planning & policy-making to manage heart attacks better and reduce their impact in resource-limited settings like AJK.

Introduction

Myocardial Infarction (MI), generally recognized as a heart attack, occurs when blood flow to the heart is abruptly interrupted, typically due to a blood clot. This leads to ischemia, hypoxia, and necrosis of heart muscle cells due to imbalance between oxygen supply & demand. Symptoms comprises chest pain radiating to the shoulder, arm, back and neck. Types By anatomic site: Transmural Infarction Involves the entire heart muscle thickness due to complete blood supply blockage. Subtypes include Anterior wall MI [1], caused by left anterior descending artery (LAD) occlusion. Lateral wall MI: Due to occlusion of circumflex branches or diagonal LAD branches. Inferolateral or Inferior- Posterior wall MI: Result of posterior descending or wrapped LAD artery blockage. Subendocardial Infarction: Affects a localized area of the inner heart wall. By diagnostic basis: ST-Segment Elevation MI (STEMI): Characterized by ST elevation in ECG leads; indicates severe myocardial injury. Non-ST Segment Elevation MI (NSTEMI): Partial obstruction with ST depression or T-wave inversion; associated with cell damage.

Etiology Key factors: Atherosclerosis Plaque buildup leads to coronary obstruction, inflammation, and thrombosis. Lifestyle factors: Smoking [2], alcohol use, stress, obesity. Chronic conditions [3]: Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia. Demographic factors: Age, male gender, family history. Signs and Symptoms Chest pain (discomfort). Sweating, dyspnea fatigue, and dizziness. Cyanosis, swelling (edema), and weight gain. Palpitations or cough Complications [4]: Cardiogenic shock, break of the heart’s outer wall (ventricular septum), sudden mitral valve dysfunction, and damage to the right ventricle are potential complications. Additional issues include problems produced by reduced blood flow & abnormal heart rhythms e.g. cardiac arrest, blood clots, and inflammation of the heart lining (pericarditis). Depression and thromboembolism. Diagnosis ECG [5]: Detects ST elevation or depression. Biomarkers: Elevated troponins (T, I), CK-MB, and myoglobin. Imaging: Echocardiography, chest X-ray, CT, MRI, and PET scans [6]. Treatment Medications: Antiplatelets [7]: (e.g., aspirin, clopidogrel) prevent clot formation. Anticoagulants: (e.g., heparin) reduce thrombosis risk. Thrombolytics: Dissolve existing clots. Nitroglycerin: Dilates blood vessels. Beta-blockers & ACE inhibitors: Reduce heart workload and improve blood flow. Statins: Lower cholesterol and prevent plaque buildup. Diuretics: Manage fluid retention. Prevention Lifestyle modifications: Healthy diet, regular exercise, smoking cessation, and limited alcohol intake. Medical management: Controlling hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Patient education: Stress reduction and routine check-ups. Prevalence of Myocardial Infarction; In Developing Countries Over 80% of cardiovascular deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. High triglyceride levels, fasting hyperglycemia, and metabolic syndrome components are significant predictors of MI morbidity and mortality. Women and older adults are particularly affected, with metabolic syndrome increasing in-hospital fatality rates. In India, Indians are at a disproportionately high risk [8] for coronary artery disease (CAD), developing it 5–10 years earlier than other ethnic groups. CAD often presents in severe forms before 40 years of age, with elevated triglyceride levels being a unique risk factor. Premature CAD is common, with higher hospitalization and mortality rates compared to other populations. Globally, myocardial infarction (MI) is more common in males than females, primarily due to factors like lipid imbalances and smoking at younger ages. Although hospitalization rates for MI have decreased by 4-5% annually in developed nations, it continues to be a leading cause of premature death worldwide, largely driven by risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and diabetes. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents nearly half of all deaths from non-communicable diseases (NCDs), with an estimated 17.3 million deaths annually, expected to rise to more than 23.6 million by 2030. Major contributing factors include obesity [9], which has seen a global prevalence double from 1980 to 2008, causing 2.8 million deaths each year; hypertension [7], which affects around 40% of adults over the age of 25 and contributes to 51% of stroke deaths and 45% of coronary heart disease deaths; and smoking, which has decreased by half in the United States over the past 25 years but remains high in many OECD countries [2]. Drug Classes: Anticoagulants, insulin, opioid analgesics, oral hypoglycemic, and antineoplastic agents are the most implicated in adverse drug events requiring hospitalization. Efforts such as voluntary reporting systems (e.g., FDA and MEDMARX) and structured taxonomies aim to reduce medication errors and improve MI management outcomes. This study aims to investigate the etiological factors contributing to myocardial infarction and to identify and analyze prescription errors in various healthcare systems of Azad Kashmir. By comparing public, private, and informal healthcare settings, the study seeks to uncover gaps in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of myocardial infarction, with the ultimate goal of improving clinical outcomes and optimizing healthcare practices in the region.

Materials and Methods

Selection Criteria Population: Male and female patients visiting heart specialists and physicians. Inclusion Criteria: Age: Patients aged 40–80 years. Gender: Data from both male and female patients. Disease: Prescriptions of myocardial infarction (MI) patients, including those with comorbidities such as hypertension, Type II diabetes, COPD, bacterial/fungal infections, GERD, asthma, hemorrhoids, peptic ulcers, and anxiety disorders. Exclusion Criteria: Prescriptions unrelated to MI or outside the inclusion criteria were excluded to maintain focus on MI-related data. Sample and Sample Size Sample Size: 200 prescriptions were collected, of which 100 relevant to MI were selected. Data Collection Tools and Methods Tools: Researchers personally visited cardiology wards, OPDs at CMH Rawalakot, and doctors’ clinics. Mode: Prescriptions were directly collected from the above sources. Data Analysis Software: Medscape was used to analyze drug interactions. Interaction Types: Synergistic, Antagonistic Pharmacokinetic Statistical

Analysis: Interaction types and their frequency were expressed as percentages. Study Parameters Dose of drugs used for MI Prescription errors and their solutions Drug-drug interactions Diagnostic features Number and frequency of drugs prescribed Objectives Main Objective: To assess the etiology of MI and prescription errors in the Azad Kashmir healthcare system. Specific Objectives: Study the etiology of MI. Identify prescription errors in MI cases. Evaluate rational drug use based on WHO guidelines. Reduce drug-related problems through prescription analysis. Identify drug-drug interactions in MI prescriptions.

Medication Errors in MI Management: A Critical Issue

Medication errors were identified as a significant contributor to complications in MI management, emphasizing the importance of proper prescription and drug administration practices. Key findings included: Error Prevalence: Errors in inpatient medication practices were observed in 4.8% to 5.3% of cases, with prescription errors occurring at a rate of 12.3 per 1,000 hospitalizations. Frequent Errors: The most common errors involved omissions, such as failing to prescribe aspirin following an MI, despite established guidelines recommending its universal use for such patients. These omissions were reported in 6.6% to 47% of cases. Impact of Errors: Out of 10,000 medication orders reviewed, 5.3 errors were identified per 100 orders. However, only 0.9% of these errors resulted in adverse drug events. Drug-Drug Interactions: We have evaluated 100 prescriptions. The most common Drug-drug interactions were synergistic, antagonistic, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic interactions. Drug interactions can reduce a drug’s effectiveness, lead to unforeseen side effects, or enhance the effect of a specific medication.

Total Drug-Drug
Interactions
Synergistic
Interactions
Antagonistic
Interaction
Pharmacodynamic
Interactions
Pharmacokinetic
Interactions
66.50%33.08%27.819%36.84%2.265%

Table 1: Drug-drug interactions (66.50%), synergistic (33.08%) antagonistic (27.819%), pharmacokinetic (36.84%), and pharmacodyna

Total Drug-Drug interactions: Total Drug-drug interactions found are 66.50%. Synergistic interactions: Among all positive interactions, there were 33.08% of synergistic interactions. Pharmacokinetic Interactions: In our drug-drug interactions study, out of all positive interactions, we found that there were 2.265% of pharmacokinetic interactions (Metabolic interactions). Antagonistic interactions: Among all positive interactions, there were 27.819% of Antagonistic interactions. Pharmacodynamics Interactions: Among all positive interactions, there were 36.84% of Pharmacodynamic interactions. Among all these drug-drug interactions found, safe/beneficial were and toxic interactions were (33.08%) of synergistic interactions safe/beneficial 15.06% and toxic interactions were 18.02%. Out of 2.265% of pharmacokinetic interactions safe/beneficial were 0.35% and toxic interactions were 1.915%. Among 27.819% of Antagonistic interactions safe/beneficial were 10.819% and toxic interactions were

17%. Out of 36.84% of Pharmacodynamic interactions safe/ beneficial were 22.04% and toxic interactions were 14.8%. Results are depicted in Figures 1 and 2 respectively.

Figure 1: Drug-drug interactions depicts.
Click to enlarge
Figure 1: Drug-drug interactions depicts.
Figure 2: Drug-Drug interaction depicts. In graphs highest percentage is of pharmacodynamics interactions (36.84%), 2nd percentage of synergistic interactions (33.08%), 3rd percentage of antagonistic interactions (27.82%), 4th percentage of pharmacokinetic interactions (2.26%). Other prescription errors in the case of MI are listed in Table 2.
Click to enlarge
Figure 2: Drug-Drug interaction depicts. In graphs highest percentage is of pharmacodynamics interactions (36.84%), 2nd percentage of synergistic interactions (33.08%), 3rd percentage of antagonistic interactions (27.82%), 4th percentage of pharmacokinetic interactions (2.26%). Other prescription errors in the case of MI are listed in Table 2.
Disease NameMI
Overall ERRORS
(%age)
Yes32%Dose25%
Strength18.75%
Frequency31.25%
Duration18.75%
No68%

Table 2: [INLINE_TABLE:3:0]

This table represents the percentage error of missing dose, missing strength, missing frequency, and missing duration of therapy in the case of myocardial infarction prescriptions. The graph indicates the percentage error of missing dose, missing strength, missing frequency, and missing duration of therapy is 25%, 18.75%, 31.25%, and 18.75%, respectively. The result indicates that the highest percentage of medication error is missing frequency (31.25%). The second highest percentage is missing doses (25%). The least common error is missing duration and strength (18.75%). Results are presented in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Depicts frequency (31.25%), dose (25%), Strength (18.75%) & Duration (18.75%).
Click to enlarge
Figure 3: Depicts frequency (31.25%), dose (25%), Strength (18.75%) & Duration (18.75%).

Our study highlighted significant issues in the management of myocardial infarction (MI) patients due to prescription errors. A key finding was the 25% rate of missed medication doses, which severely disrupted treatment regimens. Missing doses often resulted in poor disease control and heightened the risk of serious health complications.

Private prescriptions reflected similar concerns, with 25% of patients missing doses. This lack of adherence frequently led to severe complications. Another notable issue was the omission of dosage strength, affecting 18.75% of prescriptions. In such cases, patients often adjusted their medication dosage on their own, either taking too much or too little. This self-regulation could lead to toxic effects or insufficient therapeutic responses, further undermining the effectiveness of treatment and contributing to non- compliance.

The most prevalent error, seen in 31.25% of prescriptions, was the omission of dosing frequency. Properly specifying how often a medication should be taken is essential for ensuring optimal therapeutic outcomes, enhancing patient adherence, and minimizing risks associated with under- dosing or overdosing. Without clear instructions, patients are less likely to follow their prescribed regimens correctly, which jeopardizes the success of treatment.

Another critical oversight was the failure to mention the duration of therapy, reported in 18.75% of prescriptions.

When the duration is not specified, patients may discontinue treatment prematurely, resulting in suboptimal therapeutic effects. Conversely, continuing medication beyond the required period can lead to unnecessary or harmful side effects.

We had selected 200 prescriptions, out of which 50 prescriptions were evaluated. The most common causes of myocardial infarction were hypertension, high cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, and stress. Results are tabulated in Table 3.

Etiology MI
HypertensionHigh cholesterolStressDM
29.27%28.05%19.51%23.17%

Table 3: [INLINE_TABLE:4:0]

Myocardial infarction (MI), or heart attack, occurs when blood flow to the heart is blocked by fatty plaques or blood clots in the coronary arteries. Major contributors to MI include: Hypertension (29.27%): High blood pressure leads to arteriosclerosis and plaque buildup, restricting blood flow and increasing the risk of clot formation. High Cholesterol (28.05%): Elevated LDL cholesterol promotes plaque accumulation in arteries, which can rupture and cause blockages. Stress (19.51%): Chronic stress raises blood pressure and heart rate, contributing to artery damage and unhealthy behaviors like smoking or overeating. Diabetes Mellitus (23.17%): Poorly controlled diabetes accelerates atherosclerosis and raises LDL cholesterol, increasing the risk of plaque rupture and clot formation Managing these factors through lifestyle changes and medications is essential to reduce the risk of MI. Myocardial infarction (MI) is caused by risk factors such as hypertension (29.27%), high cholesterol (28.05%), diabetes mellitus (23.17%), and stress (19.51%), all contributing to plaque buildup and artery damage. Managing these factors through lifestyle changes and medications can help reduce the risk of heart attacks and improve heart health. Results are depicted in Figure 4 and Figure 5.

Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the percentages of causes of myocardial infarction: hypertension (29.27%), high cholesterol (28.05%), diabetes mellitus (23.17%), and stress (19.51%).

Figure 4: Major causes (%).
Click to enlarge
Figure 4: Major causes (%).
Figure 5: Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the percentages of causes of myocardial infarction: hypertension (29.27%), high cholesterol (28.05%), diabetes mellitus (23.17%), and stress (19.51%).
Click to enlarge
Figure 5: Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the percentages of causes of myocardial infarction: hypertension (29.27%), high cholesterol (28.05%), diabetes mellitus (23.17%), and stress (19.51%).
Precipitant DrugsObject DrugsDDI TypeEffectsManagement
AspirinCaptopril/Benazepril/
ramipril/lisinopril
SevereThis may enhance the toxicity of other
drugs through pharmacodynamic
synergism, potentially leading to renal
damage, especially in individuals receiving
high doses of aspirin, the elderly, or those
who are volume-depleted
Avoid or use
alternative
VerapamilMetoprolol/Nebivolol/
bisoprolol
ModerateIncrease toxicicty of one another by
unspecified interaction.
Monitor risks of
bradycardia and
hypertension
AmilorideSpironolactoneSevereThey increases the effect of one another
by pharmacodynamic synergism.Both
increases k+ serum level.
Do not use the
combination, it is
contraindicated
due to severe
hyperkalemia.
OlmesartanCaptopril/liosinopril/
ramipril
Severeincreases risks of hypotension,
hyperkalemia and renal impairement.
Avoide or use
alternative drug.
Nitroglycerin POBenazepril/CaptoprilModerateBoth increase effect of other by
pharmacodynamic synergism.
Monitor,usecaution.
Monitor bp as both
lower bp.
BisoprololCarvedilol/Metoprolol/
Nebivolol
ModerateThese increase serum potassium level.Use caution,monitor
Bisoprolol/Carvedilol/
Metoprolol/Nebivolol
VerapamilModerateBoth increase antihypertensive channel
blocking and cause hypotension.
Modify therapy /
monitor closely.
Bisoprolol /Carvedilol/
Metoprolol/Nebivolol
Losartan/amiloride/
Spironolactone
ModerateBoth drugs enhance each other’s effects
through pharmacodynamic synergy. There
is a risk of fetal harm if administered
during pregnancy.
Use caution/monitor
Bisoprolol/Carvedilol/
Metoprolol/Nebivolol
AmlodipineModerateBoth drugs amplify each other’s effects
through pharmacodynamic synergy, with
both lowering blood pressure by acting on
antihypertensive channels.
Use caution/monitor
BisoprololAmiloride/
spironolactone/
Furosemide/
ModerateThey rise serum potassium level.Use caution/monitor
Bisoprolol /Carvedilol/DobutamineModerateBoth drugs amplify each other’s effects
through pharmacodynamic synergy, with
both lowering blood pressure by acting on
antihypertensive channels.
Use caution/monitor
Bisoprolol /Carvedilol/OlmesartanModerateBeta blockers elevated the effect of
olmesartan by pharmacodynamic
synergism.
Use caution/monitor
Bisoprolol /Carvedilol/Aspirin/Amiloride/
spironolactone/
ModerateThese rise serum potassium level.Use caution/monitor
VerapamilAtorvastatinSevereVerapamil elevates the effect or level of
atorvastatin by effecting hepatic/intestinal
enzyme CYP3A4 metabolism
Use caution/monitor
VerapamilClopidogrelSevereVerapamil decrease the effect or level of
clopidogrel by effecting hepatic/intestinal
enzyme CYP3A4 metabolism..
Use caution/monitor
VerapamilAmiodaronSevereVerapamil enhances the effect of
amiodarone by influencing the CYP3A4
enzyme involved in hepatic and intestinal
metabolism.
Adjust treatment or
exercise caution
Losartan/olmesartanAspirinSevereThese increase toxicity of one another and
cause renal deterioration in elderly and
volume depleted persons.
Use caution/monitor
LosartanFurosemide/
hydrochlorothiazide
ModerateLosartan increase and furosemide and
hydrochlorothiazide decline serum
potassium level
Adjust treatment or
exercise caution
HeparinAspirinModerateBoth elevates anticoagulation.Adjust treatment or
exercise caution
HeparinLosartanSevereHeparin can enhance the toxicity of
losartan by inhibiting adrenal aldosterone
secretion, which may lead to hyperkalemia
Adjust treatment or
exercise caution
HeparinClopidogrelSevereBoth drugs intensify each other’s effects
through pharmacodynamic enhancement,
increasing the risk of hemorrhage
Modify therapy/
monitor closely
HeparinBenazepril/captopril/
Ramipril/lisinopril/
olmesartan
SevereHeparin may increase the toxicity of
Benazepril/captopril/Ramipril/lisinopril/
olmesartan
Adjust treatment or
exercise caution
AmlodipineVerapamilSevereBoth increase the antihypertensive channel
blocking.
Adjust treatment or
exercise caution
AspirinBisoprolol /carvedilol /SevereAspirin decrease the effect of Bisoprolol /
carvedilol /nebivolol/ metoprolol/
Adjust treatment or
exercise caution
AspirinClopidogrel/
enoxaparin/heparin
ModerateThese drugs enhance each other’s toxicity
through pharmacodynamic synergy, leading
to increased anticoagulation
Monitor closely
AspirinFurosemide/
hydrochlorothiazide/
dobutamine
ModerateThese may increase the serum potassium
level.
Use caution/monitor
AspirinSpironolactoneModerateAspirin decrease the effect of
spironolactone by unspecified interaction.
spironolactone
maintenance dose
must be titrated to
higher dose
AspirinOlmesartanSevereAspirin decrease the effect of olmesartan by
pharmacodynamicantagonism.Long term
(<1 week)
Modify therapy/
monitor closely
AmilorideAspirinModerateBoth increase the serum potassium level.Use caution/monitor
AmilorideHydrochlorothiazide/
dobutamine
ModerateAmiloride increase the serum potassium
level and hydrochlorothiazide,
Modify therapy /
monitor
EnoxaparinLosartan/benazepril /
captopril /Ramipril /
lisinopril
SevereEnoxaparin increase the effect of Losartan/
benazepril by pharmacodynamic synergism
Modify therapy /
monitor closely
EnoxaparinAspirinSevereBoth drugs enhance anticoagulation. Their
combined effects are deliberate when
prescribed together for the treatment of
unstable angina
Modify therapy/
monitor closely
EnoxaparinClopidogrelSevereEither elevates effect of drugs by
pharmacodynamic enhanced risk of
haemorrhage,
Modify therapy /
monitor closely
EnoxaparinOlmesartanSevereincrease toxicity of olmesartan by
pharmacodynamics synergism
Modify therapy/
monitor closely
SpironolactoneFurosemide/
hydrochlorothiazide /
dobutamine
SevereSpironolactone increase and furosemide
decrease the serum potassium level.
Modify therapy /
monitor closely
Benazepril /Captopril/AspirinSevereIncreases toxicity of other and result in
renal function
Modify therapy /
monitor closely
BenazeprilAmiloride/
spironolactone
ModerateBoth increases the serum potassium level.
Risk of hyperkalemia and hypotension.
Use caution/ monitor
closely
Benazepril/lisinoprilFurosemideSevereIncrease the effect of each other by
pharmacodynamic synergism.
Use caution /monitor
closely
Captopril/RamiprilAmiloride/
Spironolactone
SevereEither increase toxicity of other by
pharmacodynamic synergism.
Monitor potassium &
hypertension
CaptoprilSpironolactoneSevereEither increase toxicity of other by
pharmacodynamic synergism..
Use caution/ monitor
closely
CaptoprilHydrochlorothiazideSevereEither increase effect of other by
pharmacodynamic synergism.
Monitor blood
pressure and renal
function.
FurosemideHydrochlorothiazideModerateBoth decline serum potassium level.Modify therapy /
monitor closely
DopamineDobutamineModerateBoth decrease sedation, increase
adrenergic (sympathetic) effect leads to
hypertension & rise heart rate.
Modify therapy /
monitor closely
HydrochlorothiazideMetoprololSevereBoth drugs may amplify each other’s
toxicity, potentially leading to an
idiosyncratic reaction such as acute
transient myopia
Modify therapy /
monitor closely
DobutamineFurosemide /
hydrochlorothiazide
ModerateBoth decrease serum potassium level.Use caution /monitor
closely
OlmesartanAspirin/
bisoprolol
ModerateThese increase the serum potassium level.Modify therapy /
monitor closely
AmiodaroneAtorvastatinModerateAmiodarone increase level or effect of
atorvastatin
Use caution /
monitor closely
AmiodaroneBisoprolol /metoprololModerateBoth increase the action of each other by
pharmacodynamic synergism.
Use caution /monitor
closely
AmiodaroneVerapamilModerateAmiodarone increase the effect or level of
verapamil by pharmacodynamic synergism
Use caution /monitor
closely
AmiodaroneCaptopril/benazeprilModerateBoth increase the effect of
pharmacodynamic synergism.
Use caution /monitor
closely
AmiodaroneHydrochlorothiazideModerateAmiodarone enhances the effect of
hydrochlorothiazide by competing with
it for renal tubular clearance due to their
basic cationic properties.
Use caution /monitor
closely
AmiodaroneLosartanModerateAmiodarone elevates the effect or
concentration of losartan by influencing the
hepatic enzymes CYP2C9/10, potentially
inhibiting the conversion of losartan into its
active metabolite, E-3174.
Monitor patient
therapeutic response
to determine dosage
of losartan.
AmiodaroneCarvedilol /nebivolol /
metoprolol
SevereAmiodarone enhances the effect of these
drugs by influencing the hepatic enzyme
CYP2D6. It should be used cautiously in
patients taking beta-adrenergic blockers,
especially if there is a suspected underlying
sinus node dysfunction, such as bradycardia
or sick sinus syndrome, or if partial AV
block is present.
Monitor for signs
of bradycardia or
heart lock when
amiodarone and beta
adrenergic blocker
are coadministered.

Table 4: “Drug-Drug Interactions: Precipitant Drugs, Object Drugs, Types, Effects, Management of (MI).

Drug combinations like Clopidogrel + Aspirin & Aspirin + Enoxaparin prevent clots, while Amiodarone + Beta- blockers regulate rhythms. ACE inhibitors + Statins control hypertension and cholesterol, improving heart health. Results are tabulated in Table 5.

Combination of DrugsOccurrences
Clopidogrel+Aspirin49
Aspirin+Enoxaparin46
Aspirin + ACEI45
Nitroglycerin+ACEI43
Amiodarone +B-blocker35
Bisoprolol+ Amlodipine20
Atorvastatin+Verapamil20
Olmesartan+ACEI15
Aspirin + Benazepril15

Table 5: [INLINE_TABLE:8:0]

Discussion

Myocardial Infarction (MI) is a critical and potentially fatal condition resulting from reduced or obstructed blood flow to the heart. It is the leading cause of death worldwide, responsible for approximately 17.3 million fatalities annually, a figure projected to rise to over 23.6 million by 2030. The current study was conducted on 100 MI patients of different genders (males and females) in district Poonch, combined military hospital (CMH) Rawalakot and then prescriptions are evaluated. Total Drug-Drug interactions found are 66.50%. Out of all positive interactions, there were 33.08% Synergistic interactions. In our drug-drug interactions study, out of all positive interactions, we found that there were 2.265% pharmacokinetic interactions. Out of all positive interactions, there were 27.819% of Antagonistic interactions. Out of all positive interactions, there were 36.84% of Pharmacodynamics interactions. The percentages of dose errors found were: The highest percentage of medication error is missing frequency (31.25%). The second highest percentage is missing doses (25%). The least common error is missing duration (18.75%) and strength (18.75%). High cholesterol level: Atherosclerosis is primarily driven by dyslipidemia, marked by high cholesterol levels, which is a key risk factor for cardiovascular conditions. Elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels and reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels are strongly linked to the onset of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. The leading cause of MI is the partial or total obstruction of the epicardial coronary arteries, usually caused by plaques that are vulnerable to rupture or breakdown [7]. This disease process generally starts in early adulthood and is characterized by lipid buildup in the arterial walls, accompanied by inflammation and vascular injury. Over time, certain plaques become more unstable and inflamed, increasing the likelihood of rupture. When rupture occurs, the exposed sub-endothelial matrix and plaque material come into contact with the blood, triggering the formation of occlusive blood clots. This chain of events manifests clinically as MI, with symptoms including chest pain (angina), damage to heart muscle cells, and impaired heart function. Additionally, other coronary artery disorders, such as plaque erosion or spontaneous coronary artery dissection, can also lead to MI. However, their prevalence compared to plaque rupture is unclear and remains a subject of debate, largely due to the limited availability of autopsy research [10]. Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 diabetes is a long-term condition marked by the body’s inability to produce enough insulin or efficiently use it. This disorder arises from a combination of hereditary factors and environmental influences. Several risk factors for type 2 diabetes overlap with those for coronary artery disease (CAD), such as advanced age, hypertension, abnormal lipid levels, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and stress. The growing prevalence of diabetes significantly increases the associated risk of CAD. Diabetes mellitus is a well-recognized contributor to cardiovascular diseases, raising the risk of coronary heart disease by two to four times. On average, people with diabetes have a shortened life expectancy of approximately eight years due to higher death rates. Over 80% of fatalities linked to coronary artery disease and 75% of hospitalizations in diabetic individuals are attributed to this condition. Diabetes heightens the risk of myocardial infarction by accelerating the progression of atherosclerosis, adversely impacting lipid levels, and fostering the formation of atherosclerotic plaques. Regarding myocardial infarction, diabetes is a significant risk factor and is frequently associated with a greater mortality rate in diabetic patients compared to those without diabetes [3]. Stress: Chronic stress, social isolation, and anxiety significantly elevate the risk of heart attack and stroke. Acute psychological stress is also strongly linked to an increased risk of coronary heart disease. Research has shown that intense grief, such as that experienced after losing a loved one, can trigger the onset of myocardial infarction. During periods of stress, the sympathetic nervous system becomes activated, leading to a rise in catecholamine levels. This, in turn, increases oxygen demand in the heart due to elevated blood pressure, heart rate, and myocardial contractility. The added strain on the heart may ultimately result in myocardial infarction. The causes of myocardial infarction have been quantified as follows: hypertension accounts for 29.27%, high cholesterol for 28.05%, diabetes mellitus for 23.17%, and stress for 19.51%. Hypertension: Both systolic and diastolic hypertension significantly increase the risk of myocardial infarction, with higher blood pressure levels correlating to greater risk. Elevated systolic and diastolic pressure contribute to the development of atherosclerosis in coronary arteries, which can lead to heart attacks. The relationship between hypertension and myocardial infarction is particularly strong, especially in older adults, where hypertension is responsible for nearly 70% of cardiac diseases and poses severe risks to heart health [7]. Adhering to prescribed medication regimens and adopting lifestyle changes, such as improved diet, regular exercise, and stress management, can effectively control hypertension and substantially lower the risk of myocardial infarction Future Prospects This study highlights key areas for improving myocardial infarction (MI) care in Azad Kashmir. Future efforts should focus on: Standardized Protocols to Developed uniform diagnostic and treatment guidelines to streamline MI management across healthcare systems. Education and Awareness Train healthcare professionals on MI etiology and error prevention. Raise public awareness about cardiovascular risk factors and preventive measures. Healthcare System Strengthening Enhance infrastructure and resource allocation, especially in rural areas. Establish efficient referral networks for timely MI diagnosis and treatment. Technological Integration Implement electronic prescribing systems to minimize medication errors. Use telemedicine to improve specialist care access in remote regions. Research and Policy Conduct ongoing studies to assess interventions and understand MI trends. Develop region-specific public health policies for prevention and improved care. By addressing these areas, the study can guide interventions to reduce MI-related morbidity and mortality, enhancing cardiovascular health in Azad Kashmir. Conclusion: This study highlights the multifactorial etiology and significant prescription errors contributing to the burden of myocardial infarction (MI) in different healthcare systems of Azad Kashmir. The key findings can be summarized as follows: Etiological Factors: Adjustable risk factors e.g. high blood pressure, diabetes, abnormal cholesterol levels, smoking, and inactivity, were the main contributors to myocardial infarction (MI). Inherited factors, including age, sex, and family history, also had a considerable influence on the risk. Additionally, socioeconomic disparities impacted people’s ability to access preventive healthcare and obtain timely treatment. Healthcare System Comparison: Significant differences in the quality of care were observed between public, private, and traditional healthcare systems. Public healthcare facilities often face resource limitations and a lack of skilled personnel, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Private healthcare offered better access but at a higher cost, limiting affordability. Traditional healthcare systems lacked scientific validation and were associated with delayed patient referrals. Recommendations for Improvement: Enhanced Education: Public awareness campaigns focusing on lifestyle modifications and risk factor control can help reduce MI incidence. Capacity Building:

Training healthcare providers on evidence-based treatment protocols and minimizing prescription errors is essential. Policy Development: Strengthening healthcare infrastructure, improving resource allocation, and integrating traditional medicine into evidence-based practices can address disparities. Monitoring Systems: Implementation of electronic health records and prescription monitoring tools can reduce errors and improve patient outcomes. This study underscores the need for a unified, multidisciplinary approach to prevent MI and improve treatment outcomes in Azad Kashmir. Addressing the systemic gaps in healthcare delivery and emphasizing preventive measures can significantly reduce the burden of MI in the region. Prescription errors; A notable frequency of prescription mistakes was found, especially related to incorrect drug choices, incorrect dosages, and the overuse of multiple medications (polypharmacy). Issues such as improper administration of antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications, inadequate lipid control, and non-compliance with clinical guidelines were widespread across different healthcare settings.

Conclusion

This study highlights the multifactorial etiology and significant prescription errors contributing to the burden of myocardial infarction (MI) in different healthcare systems of Azad Kashmir. The key findings can be summarized as follows: Etiological Factors: Adjustable risk factors e.g. high blood pressure, diabetes, abnormal cholesterol levels, smoking, and inactivity, were the main contributors to myocardial infarction (MI). Inherited factors, including age, sex, and family history, also had a considerable influence on the risk. Additionally, socioeconomic disparities impacted people’s ability to access preventive healthcare and obtain timely treatment. Healthcare System Comparison: Significant differences in the quality of care were observed between public, private, and traditional healthcare systems. Public healthcare facilities often face resource limitations and a lack of skilled personnel, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Private healthcare offered better access but at a higher cost, limiting affordability. Traditional healthcare systems lacked scientific validation and were associated with delayed patient referrals. Recommendations for Improvement: Enhanced Education: Public awareness campaigns focusing on lifestyle modifications and risk factor control can help reduce MI incidence. Capacity Building: Training healthcare providers on evidence- based treatment protocols and minimizing prescription errors is essential. Policy Development: Strengthening healthcare infrastructure, improving resource allocation, and integrating traditional medicine into evidence- based practices can address disparities. Monitoring Systems: Implementation of electronic health records and prescription monitoring tools can reduce errors and improve patient outcomes. This study underscores the need for a unified, multidisciplinary approach to prevent MI and improve treatment outcomes in Azad Kashmir. Addressing the systemic gaps in healthcare delivery and emphasizing preventive measures can significantly reduce the burden of MI in the region. Prescription errors; A notable frequency of prescription mistakes was found, especially related to incorrect drug choices, incorrect dosages, and the overuse of multiple medications (polypharmacy). Issues such as improper administration of antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications, inadequate lipid control, and non-compliance with clinical guidelines were widespread across different healthcare settings.

Recommendations

  • Raising public awareness about lifestyle changes and risk management.
  • Training healthcare professionals in evidence-based practices to reduce errors.
  • Strengthening healthcare infrastructure and resource allocation.
  • Integrating validated traditional practices into mainstream healthcare.
  • Utilizing electronic health records and prescription monitoring tools to enhance care quality. A unified, multidisciplinary strategy addressing healthcare gaps and focusing on prevention can significantly alleviate the MI burden in the region.

Conflict of Interest

The authors find no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vaisrub S (1976) Subendocardial infarction: a prognostic paradox. Jama 235(9): 943-944.
  2. Newby ED, Wright AR, Labinjoh C, Ludlam AC, Fox AAK, et al. (1999) Endothelial dysfunction, impaired endogenous fibrinolysis and cigarette smoking. Circulation 99(11): 1411-1415.
  3. Connor BE, Khaw KW (1988) Diabetes mellitus an independent risk factor for stroke. American journal of epidemiology 128(1): 116-123.
  4. Anurag B, Anukr S, Paru R (2015) Acute Complications of Myocardial Infarction the Current Erain. Journel of Investigting Medicine 844-855.
  5. Thygesen K, Alpert SJ, Chaitman RB, Bax JJ, Morrow AD, et al. (2018) Fourth universal definition of Myocardial infarction. Circulation 138.
  6. Timmis AD (1990) Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 301(6758): 941- 942.
  7. Pedrinelli R, Ballo P, Fiorentini C, Denti S, Galderisi M, et al. (2012) Hypertension and acute myocardial infarction. Journal of cardiovascular medicine 13(3): 194-202.
  8. Gangulay K, Goshal P, Saha S, De S (2015) Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Young. Indian Perspective, pp: 297-300.
  9. Laslett LJ, Alagona P, Clark BA, Drozda JP, Saldivar F, et al. (2012) The Worldwide Environment of Cardiovascular Disease: Prevalence, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Policy Issues. American College of Cardiology 60: 1-49.
  10. Healy B (1990) Endothelial cell dysfunction. Journal of the American college of Cardiology 16(2): 357-358.

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{kafauit2024,
  title   = {Etiology and Prescription Errors of Myocardial Infarction in
Different Health Care Systems of Azad Kashmir},
  author  = {Kafauit F, Saleem N, Latif A, Khurshid A, Razzaq M, Zahir J, Ullah I†},
  journal = {Advances in Pharmacology & Clinical Trials},
  year    = {2024},
  volume  = {9},
  number  = {4},
  doi     = {10.23880/apct-16000254}
}
Kafauit F, Saleem N, Latif A, Khurshid A, Razzaq M, Zahir J, Ullah I† (2024). Etiology and Prescription Errors of Myocardial Infarction in
Different Health Care Systems of Azad Kashmir. Advances in Pharmacology & Clinical Trials, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.23880/apct-16000254
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Etiology and Prescription Errors of Myocardial Infarction in
Different Health Care Systems of Azad Kashmir
AU  - Kafauit F, Saleem N, Latif A, Khurshid A, Razzaq M, Zahir J, Ullah I†
JO  - Advances in Pharmacology & Clinical Trials
PY  - 2024
VL  - 9
IS  - 4
DO  - 10.23880/apct-16000254
ER  -