Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
International Journal of Forensic Sciences Research Article 17 min read

Population Genetic Analysis of 12 X-STRs in a Bahraini Population Sample

Al Snan NR*, Messaoudi SA, Mansoor LA and Bakhiet M
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2573-1734  10.23880/ijfsc-16000177  Received: February 05, 2020  Published: March 04, 2020
  views
 28 references
 3 figures
 10 tables
PDF
Keywords
Bahraini population Investigator Argus X-12 QS Kit Forensic parameters Population genetics X-STR
Abstract

To date, there are very limited genetic studies conducted on the Kingdom of Bahrain and this is one of the first studies directed to evaluate the 12 X-STRs included in the Investigator X-12 QS kit. Bahrain is a small archipelago positioned in the Arabian Gulf. X-STRs are very informative in population genetics studies, human identification and complex kinship analysis. One hundred and fifty-six (156) buccal swabs were collected using cotton swabs from non-relatives’ Bahraini males from four different regions of Bahrain. Genomic DNAs were extracted and purified using QIAsymphony SP instrument following quantification with Investigator Quantiplex HYres Kit in the 7500 Real-Time PCR System and detected in ABI 3500xl Genetic Analyzer. Analysis was done using various statistical software to obtain allele and haplotypes’ frequencies based upon the available four clusters of Linkage Groups (LGs) as well as different forensic and population parameters. Results indicated the diversity of the Bahraini population in terms of high Power of Discrimination (PD) and Probability of Match (PM) values. The combined values of each forensic parameter such as cPDM, Mean exclusion chance (cMEC) Krüger, CMEC Kishida, and CMEC Desmarais as well as CMEC Desmarais Duo, were 0.9999983, 9999979, 0.9999939, 0.9999996 and 0.9999514 respectively based on the allele and haplotype frequencies. No shared profiles were observed. Number of non-standard alleles and null alleles were obtained, and more profoundly in locus DXS10148. We have constructed phylogenetic tree as well as multidimensional scale to analyze the interpopulation diversity between Bahraini population and other neighboring populations and our findings reflected the geographical and social background of the region. Overall, the results confirmed the importance of X-STRs in discriminating between individuals among Bahraini population and in establishing DNA databases for forensic and kinship studies.

Introduction

The Investigator Argus X-12 QS Kit (Qiagen, Germany) is a multiplex solution that amplifies 12 segments of DNA located in the chromosomal X short tandem repeats (X-STRs). This solution is used for human identification, paternity testing, forensic cases and population genetic studies [1]. X-STR markers are very informative for some cases where autosomal STRs fail to provide crucial answers such as in kinship testing involving female offspring sharing the same father [2]. In this kit, the 12 X-STR markers are clustered into four distinct linkage groups (LG), each cluster includes three markers: LG1 (DX8378-DXS10135- DXS10148), LG2 (DXS7132-DXS100740-DXS10079), LG3 (DXS10101-DXS10103-HPRTB), LG4 (DXS7423-DXS10134- DXS10146) [3]. The dependency between markers is known as linkage and is the physical proximity of two loci on the same chromosome [2].

To date, there are few population genetic studies conducted on the Kingdom of Bahrain as well as in the Arabian Peninsula region. Knowledge of any such structure is crucial in the interpretation of DNA-based forensic evidence and in the construction of applicable databases. Recent studies were done using autosomal STR and YSTR kits [4, 5].

Kingdom of Bahrain is a small archipelago located in the Arabian Gulf with a total landmass of 760 square kilometers [6] consisting of 33 islands, only the five largest are inhabited. These islands are consisting of Bahrain, Muharraq, Umm and Nasan and Sitra. To the southeast of Bahrain is the State of Qatar, and to its west stands the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, with which it is connected by a 25-kilometer causeway. To the north and east of Bahrain is the Islamic Republic of Iran [7].

Because of the geographical location of Bahrain, the diversity of the population had been affected which is generally divided into four main ethnic groups: Arabs, Baharna and Persians (Huwala and Ajam) [8, 9, 10]. This geographical and social association might be anticipated to have an effect on the patterns of the genetic variations [11]. Currently, the geographical distribution of Bahrain is included into 4 governorates: Northern, Muharraq, Capital and Southern Governorates.

This present study is to genetically characterize the Bahraini population, using Investigator Argus X-12 QS Kit (Qiagen, Germany). We present a database of 12 X-STRs allele and haplotype frequencies for Bahraini population sample including the high combined forensic statistical parameters of these loci, and collectively as haplotypes, illustrate that they are informative and discriminatory. The comparison with worldwide populations demonstrate that they generally reflect biogeography and historical relationships.

Twelve X-STRs were studied to characterize different genetic population and forensic parameters in 156 Bahraini males. These includes the following primers to co-amplify the Amelogenin (AM) used for gender determination, DXS7132, DXS7423, DXS8378, DXS10074, DXS10079, DXS10101, DXS10103, DXS10134, DXS10135, DXS10146, DXS10148 and HPRTB which have been proven to offer consistent DNA typing results and boost the power of discrimination (PD). Furthermore, the autosomal STR marker D21S11 is included as a reliable marker for common database kits and prevents sample mixup and was excluded from the genetic analysis for this study. In addition, the Kit Primer comprises of an internal PCR control (Quality Sensor QS1) to provide support about the efficacy of the PCR. The Quality Sensor is amplified along with the polymorphic X-STRs’ markers and was excluded from all the genetic analysis for this study.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection

One hundred and fifty-six (156) buccal swabs were assembled using cotton swabs (SceneSafe, UK) from healthy unrelatives’ Bahraini males. The research study was publicized through different media platforms. Participants who wished to contribute their samples communicated with the corresponding author and presented at the General Directorate of Criminal investigation and Forensic Science – Kingdom of Bahrain to liver their buccal swabs for the research after obtaining informed consent. The age of the participants varied from 19 to 58 years old.

In each case, males with ancestry (to the level of paternal grandfather) from four different geographical subdivisions of the country (Capital Governorate, Muharraq Governorate, Northern Governorate and Southern Governorate) were sampled. Ethical review for conducting tests was obtained and approved by the Research and Research Ethics Committee (RREC) (E007-PI-10/17) in the Arabian Gulf University. All participants provided informed consent prior to contribution their buccal swab samples. DNA Processing Genomic DNAs were extracted using QIAsymphony SP instrument (Qiagen, Germany) following magnetic beads principal. Subsequently the extracted DNAs were quantified using Investigator Quantiplex HYres Kit (Qiagen, Germany) in the 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) according to manufacturer’s recommendation. About 0.5 ng of the extracted DNA was amplified using Investigator Argus-X12 QS kit (Qiagen, Germany) with half-volume reactions (12.5µl) following manufacturer’s protocol in 27 cycles conditions via MicroAmp Optical 96-Well Reaction Plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) along with the provided positive control and DNA grade water as a negative control.

The PCR products (1µl) were separated by capillary electrophoresis in an ABI 3500xl Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Company, Carlsbad, USA) with reference to the BTO size standard (Qiagen, Germany) in total of 12 µl master mix consisting of BTO size standard and Hi-Di formamide (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). GeneMapper® ID-X Software v1.4 (Thermo Fisher

Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was used for genotype assignment.

Statistical Analysis

Allele and haplotype frequencies were calculated using StatsX v1.0 software [12]. Also, Linkage groups (LG) were designated as 3 loci in each LG in total of 4 LGs in StatsX v1.0 software [12]. Forensic parameters such as power of discrimination (PD), random matching probability (PM), power of exclusion (PE), polymorphism information content (PIC), number of alleles (Nall) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) between pair of loci were estimated using STRAF [13]. Mean exclusion chance in Duos (MECD), PD for females (PDf), and PD in males (PDm) were estimated using ChrX-STR.org 2.0 website [14]. It should be noted that all of the samples were compromised of males, so it was impossible to calculate the Hardy-Weinberg (HW) equilibrium.

Interpopulation pairwise genetic distances based on Fst between the population of Bahrain and the rest of populations extracted from the literature which included Saudi [15], Filipino [16], Emiratis [17], Bengali [18], Egyptian [19], Turkish [20], Indian [21], Algerian [22] and Jewish [23] were calculated using POPTREE2 software [24] and represented by a nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NM-MDS) analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics v21.0 Software to investigate the populations structure between Bahraini population and the abovementioned populations based on Fst’s genetic distances. Phylogenetic tree was constructed from allele frequency data by using the neighbor-joining method [25] via MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis [26]. The tree is used to compare between different genetic structures of the populations with Bahraini population using the minimum available loci for different populations. The tree was constructed with allele frequency data of twelve STR loci (DXS7132, DXS7423, DXS8378, DXS10074, DXS10079, DXS10101, DXS10103, DXS10134, DXS10135, DXS10146, DXS10148 and HPRTB) for all populations in corrected fixation index (Fst) using neighbor joining for phylogeny in 1000 permutations.

Results

Allele Frequencies, Forensic Parameters and Efficiency: As for the allele frequency score, some alleles show very high frequencies in the Bahrain population such as allele 14 in DXS7423 with highest frequency of 0.462, followed by allele 19 in DXS10103 with frequency of 0.447 (Tables 1-4). The least frequent was 0.0064 for 12 different alleles. The probability that two randomly chosen person have the same unspecified genotype at a locus is the sum squares of the frequencies of all genotypes at that locus. The full set of Bahrain data is available in Table S1. No shared profiles were observed.

In this studied population, number of alleles per locus (Nall) was ranged from 5 for marker DXS8378 to 27 for DXS10135 with an average Nall per locus with 13.66, and a total number of alleles observed was 164. The most polymorphic locus was DXS10135 (Tables 1-4).

The highest gene diversity (GD) was observed for locus DXS10135 with 0.9467 while the smallest observed was for locus DXS7423 with 0.6693 (Tables 1-4).

Based on allele frequencies, we further determined the statistical parameters of forensic interest. Generally, the polymorphism degree of a specific locus can be measured by the Polymorphism Information Content (PIC) which indicates the degree of genetic polymorphism. We have found out that PIC values for all STR loci were highly informative (PIC≥0.6) with an average of 78.9% (Tables 1-4). PM was ranged from 0.0594 for DXS10135 to 0.3403 for DXS7423.

Allele/N*DXS8378DXS10135DXS10148DXS7132DXS10074DXS10079DXS10101DXS10103HPRTBDXS7423DXS10134DXS10146
N156154151156156156156150156156155155
70.077
80.160
90.006
100.2690.006
110.3970.0190.0060.122
120.3080.1920.0060.3850.013
130.0190.2370.0130.2560.026
13.30.020
140.0060.2560.0260.1790.462
150.2310.0960.0130.0380.327
160.0580.1350.0130.0670.135
170.0190.0070.0060.1860.1090.1000.0130.038
17.10.006
180.0450.1520.1790.1540.220
18.10.013
190.0650.0330.0830.2500.447
19.10.013
200.0650.0200.0260.2120.140
20.10.0320.007
210.1170.0070.1350.020
21.10.019
220.0710.0130.1090.007
22.10.0060.013
230.0520.0130.006
23.10.0130.013
240.0580.0070.013
24.10.0060.152
24.20.006

Table 1: Allele frequency and forensic efficiency parameters of (156) samples from population of Bahrain.

Allele/NDXS8378DXS10135DXS10148DXS7132DXS10074DXS10079DXS10101DXS10103HPRTBDXS7423DXS10134DXS10146
N156154151156156156156150156156155155
250.0320.0070.0060.052
25.10.166
260.0710.0060.084
26.10.0060.126
26.20.026
270.0710.0130.0060.103
27.10.099
27.20.026
280.0710.0070.0190.161
28.10.060
28.20.0070.141
290.0320.0070.0190.187
29.10.033
29.20.141
300.0710.0070.0510.0060.077
30.20.167
310.0130.0770.0060.052
31.10.007
31.20.096
320.0060.0900.0320.013
32.20.045
330.0130.0450.084
33.20.006
340.0060.0130.1480.006
34.20.013
350.0130.219
360.200
370.168
37.20.0060.013

Table 2: Allele frequency and forensic efficiency parameters of (156) samples from population of Bahrain.

Allele/NDXS8378DXS10135DXS10148DXS7132DXS10074DXS10079DXS10101DXS10103HPRTBDXS7423DXS10134DXS10146
N156154151156156156156150156156155155
250.0320.0070.0060.052
25.10.166
260.0710.0060.084
26.10.0060.126
26.20.026
270.0710.0130.0060.103
27.10.099
27.20.026
280.0710.0070.0190.161
28.10.060
28.20.0070.141
290.0320.0070.0190.187
29.10.033
29.20.141
300.0710.0070.0510.0060.077
30.20.167
310.0130.0770.0060.052
31.10.007
31.20.096
320.0060.0900.0320.013
32.20.045
330.0130.0450.084
33.20.006
340.0060.0130.1480.006
34.20.013
350.0130.219
360.200
370.168
37.20.0060.013
Allele/NDXS8378DXS10135DXS10148DXS7132DXS10074DXS10079DXS10101DXS10103HPRTBDXS7423DXS10134DXS10146
N156154151156156156156150156156155155
380.045
38.10.007
38.20.006
38.30.006
390.026
39.20.019
39.30.019
40.20.032
41.20.013
41.30.019
42.20.026
42.30.013
43.20.045
44.20.032
45.20.019
46.20.019
47.20.013
Forensic Statistics
PIC0.6077330.9362210.8832740.749060.8510580.8039670.6838260.7071990.6962070.6010680.8328560.895932
H0.3254840.0604880.1073860.2159920.1342970.1731340.2795580.2610930.2624010.3402640.1499050.09681
HET0.6745160.9395120.8926140.7840080.8657030.8268660.7204420.7389070.7375990.6597360.8500950.90319
PE0.3899490.8766150.7803570.5697050.7260390.6498140.4605880.4909810.4887910.3687580.6950520.801942
Power of Discrimination
PD female0.8272770.993050.9791280.9183990.9673190.9471260.8852310.9001230.8897540.8255520.9602890.98337
PD male0.6745160.9395120.8926140.7840080.8657030.826866O.7204420.7389070.7375990.6597360.8500950.90319
Mean paternity exclusion change
MEC Krüger0.3932950.8774990.7847050.5718670.7293620.6544320.5013050.4908520.5086740.4021890.6987980.80587
MEC Kishida0.6076110.9361150.8827270.749060.8509470.8038530.6834730.66220.6962070.6009470.8294880.893765
MEC Desmarais0.6077330.9362210.8832740.749060.8510580.8039670.6838260.7071990.6962070.6010680.8328560.895932
MEC Desmarais
Duo
0.460440.8834780.800120.6178230.7521320.6874880.5427310.5701050.5565930.4552110.7274280.819724

Table 3: Allele frequency and forensic efficiency parameters of (156) samples from population of Bahrain.

cPD_Male
cMEC_Krüger
cMEC_Kishida
cMEC_Desmarais
cMEC_Desmarais_duo
0.9999983
0.9999979
0.9999939
0.9999996
0.9999514

Table 4: Allele frequency and forensic efficiency parameters of (156) samples from population of Bahrain.

*N: Number of samples; PIC: Polymorphism information content; h: Homozygotie; HET: Heterozygotie; PE: Power of Exclusion; PD: Power of discrimination; cMEC: Combined Mean paternity exclusion change The PM was ranged from 0.0594 for DXS10135 to 0.3403 for DXS7423. The power of discrimination (PD) explains level of discriminating between members. As higher the discriminating power of a locus, the more efficient it can be used to discriminate between members. DXS10135 showed the greatest (PD) in Bahraini population with value of 0.9406, whereas DXS7423 gave the lowest value of (PD) with only 0.6597. The average (PD) of the tested loci was 0.815. The combined PD (CPD) and combined MP (CMP) for all the 12 X-STR loci were 99.99999997% and 3.02583E- 10 respectively. The combined values of each forensic parameter, cPDM, cMEC Krüger, cMEC Kishida, and cMEC Desmarais as well as cMEC Desmarais Duo, were 0.9999983, 0.9999979, 0.9999939, 0.9999996 and 0.9999514

respectively (Tables 1-4). The high values of the above- mentioned parameters indicated the usefulness of using the 12-XTRs markers included in the Investigator Argus X-12 QS Kit as a discrimination tool in complement with autosomal STRs [4] and can be utilized for genetic characterization of the Bahraini population to differentiate between individuals for forensic and kinship purposes.

Linkage Disequilibrium Analysis: As shown in Table 5, the study showed no significant deviation from linkage disequilibrium (LD) between pairwise STR loci after Bonferroni’s correction in Bahraini population except when plotting the following loci; DXS10074 - DXS10135, DXS10148 - DXS10148, DXS10134 - DXS10148, DXS7132 - DXS10146, DXS7132 - DXS7132 and DXS10103 – HPRTB. The highest pairwise LD was 0.999 when plotting DXS10101 with DXS10148 and also when plotting DXS10103 with DXS10146 and the lowest pairwise LD was 3.62E-07 when plotting DXS10148 with DXS10148.

The significance in LD was obtained between different loci in different LGs and within same LGs.

DXS8378DXS10135DXS10148DXS7132DXS10074DXS10079DXS10101DXS10103HPRTBDXS7423DXS10134DXS10146
DXS101460.4344360.8345260.0001140.771730.6236020.6177660.9998790.7622720.7987290.7782090.460807
DXS101340.8565720.000140.9741590.8903840.0098920.9780750.910260.1192970.994560.198766
DXS74230.129090.7123950.8560280.589430.6336120.7885130.8744810.0466610.929244
HPRTB0.0310250.3608250.8383510.6606230.7194820.863496.88E-060.115648
DXS101030.6002940.1739260.2364350.7624660.6591870.7508170.005649
DXS101010.9402130.9999540.8033550.8116440.8709090.472515
DXS100790.2458880.0142170.9824190.4911720.879475
DXS100740.0018050.933210.9632310.254482
DXS71320.7184620.8395860.000477
DXS101480.5173612.94E-06
DXS101350.498013
DXS8378

Table 5: Haplotype diversities of four X-Chromosomal linkage groups in Bahraini male individuals.

Haplotype Allele Frequencies: Haplotype allele frequencies were determined using the four LG clusters as shown in Tables 6-9. The numbers of observed haplotypes in each of the 4 linkage groups-LG1, LG2, LG3, LG4- were 148, 156, 149 and 153, respectively, while the Haplotype Diversity (HD) values were equal to 1.0000. The three most common haplotype for LG1 was 11-21-25.1 displaying 1.99% of haplotype frequency, in LG2 three sets of haplotypes 14-17-19, 14-7-20 and 15-8-19 were observed each with a frequency of 2.56 % LG3 presented haplotypes 29.2-19-12 4.46% and LG4 14-33- 29 and 15-37-27 with haplotype frequency 2.63%.

As for LG1, most of haplotype frequencies counted as 1 or 2 which gave very diverse combinations of haplotypes. Unique haplotypes, which were observed once, accounted for 55.9% of all LGs haplotype observed (339/606).

LG1
Haplotype
CountFrequencyLG2
Haplotype
CountFrequencyLG3
Haplotype
CountFrequencyLG4
Haplotype
CountFrequency
10 17 1810.006811 15 2110.006424.2 20 1210.006712 37 2610.0065
10 17.1 13.310.006811 16 1710.006425 19 1310.006712 39.3 2810.0065
10 19 25.110.006811 16 2210.006426 20 1510.006713 33 42.210.0065
10 19 26.110.006812 15 1810.006426.2 16 1210.006713 34 2910.0065
10 19.1 26.110.006812 15 1910.006426.2 18 1210.006713 37 2810.0065
10 20 24.110.006812 15 2010.006426.2 18 1310.006713 39 3010.0065
10 20 25.110.006812 15 2210.006426.2 20 1210.006714 31 3210.0065
10 20 26.110.006812 16 1920.012827 19 1310.006714 32 2820.0131
10 20 27.110.006812 16 2010.006427.2 18 1210.006714 32 2910.0065
10 20.1 27.120.013512 16 2110.006427.2 21 1210.006714 32 3110.0065
10 21 1810.006812 17 1720.012827.2 22 1210.006714 33 2610.0065
10 21 24.120.013512 17 1810.006428 18 1210.006714 33 2940.0261
10 21 26.110.006812 17 1920.012828 19 1210.006714 34 2510.0065
10 22 27.110.006812 17 2110.006428 20 1410.006714 34 2630.0196
10 23 25.110.006812 18 1910.006428.2 16 1010.006714 34 2810.0065
10 24 26.110.006812 18 2020.012828.2 16 1210.006714 34 2910.0065
10 24 28.110.006812 18 2120.012828.2 18 1110.006714 34 3020.0131
10 24 29.110.006812 19 1810.006428.2 18 1210.006714 34 3110.0065
10 24.1 29.110.006812 19 2210.006428.2 18 1330.020114 34 41.220.0131
10 25 24.110.006812 7 1710.006428.2 19 1150.033614 34 44.210.0065
10 25 27.110.006812 7 1810.006428.2 19 1230.020114 35 2410.0065
10 26 1920.013512 7 1910.006428.2 19 1340.026814 35 2530.0196
10 26 28.110.006812 7 2010.006428.2 20 1210.006714 35 2610.0065
10 27 1710.006812 8 1820.012828.2 20 1320.013414 35 2710.0065
10 27 24.110.006812 8 1910.006429 16 1410.006714 35 2830.0196
10 27 25.110.006812 8 2010.006429 19 1210.006714 35 2910.0065
10 27 26.110.006812 9 1810.006429.2 16 1310.006714 35 3030.0196
10 27 31.110.006813 11 2210.006429.2 17 1210.006714 35 3120.0131
10 28 1810.006813 12 2010.006429.2 18 1110.006714 35 34.210.0065
10 28 2310.006813 14 1910.006429.2 18 1220.013414 35 37.210.0065
10 28 28.110.006813 15 1710.006429.2 18 1310.006714 35 43.210.0065
10 29 24.110.006813 15 1810.006429.2 19 1270.047014 35 44.210.0065
10 29 25.120.013513 15 1920.012829.2 19 1330.020114 35 47.210.0065
10 29 27.110.006813 15 2010.006429.2 19 1420.013414 36 2610.0065

Table 6: Haplotype diversities of four X-Chromosomal linkage groups in Bahraini male individuals.

LG1
Haplotype
CountFrequencyLG2
Haplotype
CountFrequencyLG3
Haplotype
CountFrequencyLG4
Haplotype
CountFrequency
10 30 1910.006813 15 2210.006429.2 19 1510.006714 36 2710.0065
10 30 1910.006813 15 2210.006429.2 19 1510.006714 36 2710.0065
10 30 25.110.006813 16 1510.006429.2 20 1210.006714 36 2820.0131
10 30 26.110.006813 16 1810.006430 16 1410.006714 36 2920.0131
10 31 25.110.006813 16 2010.006430 17 1210.006714 36 3010.0065
11 17 2720.013513 16 2110.006430 18 1210.006714 36 37.210.0065
11 18 13.310.006813 17 1910.006430 19 1220.013414 36 42.220.0131
11 18 25.120.013513 17 2010.006430 19 1310.006714 36 43.210.0065
11 18.1 1820.013513 17 2130.019230 19 1410.006714 36 45.210.0065
11 19 1810.006813 17 2210.006430.2 18 1140.026814 37 2710.0065
11 19 25.120.013513 17 2310.006430.2 18 1210.006714 37 2810.0065
11 20 1810.006813 18 1510.006430.2 18 1310.006714 37 2930.0196
11 20 26.110.006813 18 1810.006430.2 18 1410.006714 37 3010.0065
11 20.1 24.110.006813 18 1930.019230.2 18 1520.013414 37 42.210.0065
11 21 1820.013513 18 2020.012830.2 19 1130.020114 37 46.210.0065
11 21 1910.006813 18 2110.006430.2 19 1240.026814 37.2 2910.0065
11 21 2010.006813 18 2210.006430.2 19 1330.020114 38 2810.0065
11 21 24.120.013513 19 1710.006430.2 19 1510.006714 38 46.210.0065
11 21 25.130.020313 19 2110.006430.2 20 1120.013414 38.3 2610.0065
11 21 26.110.006813 19 2210.006430.2 20 1210.006714 39 2820.0131
11 21 28.210.006813 8 1710.006430.2 20 1420.013414 39.3 3110.0065
11 21 29.110.006813 8 1810.006430.2 21 1210.006714 41.3 2710.0065
11 21.1 27.110.006813 8 2010.006431 16 1310.006714 42.3 2710.0065
11 22 1810.006813 8 2110.006431 17 1230.020115 30 3010.0065
11 22 2210.006813 8 2210.006431 17 1310.006715 33 2810.0065
11 22 24.120.013514 13 2210.006431 18 1220.013415 33 2920.0131
11 22 26.110.006814 15 2010.006431 18 1310.006715 33 3110.0065
11 22 3010.006814 16 1610.006431 19 1310.006715 33 43.210.0065
11 22.1 1910.006814 16 1810.006431 19 1410.006715 34 2820.0131
11 23 2310.006814 16 1930.019231 20 1210.006715 34 2910.0065
11 23 24.110.006814 16 2010.006431 20 1310.006715 34 40.210.0065
11 23 25.110.006814 16 2220.012831.2 16 1210.006715 35 2520.0131
11 23 26.110.006814 17 1810.006431.2 17 1410.006715 35 2610.0065

Table 7: Haplotype diversities of four X-Chromosomal linkage groups in Bahraini male individuals.

LG1
Haplotype
CountFrequencyLG2
Haplotype
CountFrequencyLG3
Haplotype
CountFrequencyLG4
Haplotype
CountFrequency
11 23 2810.006814 17 1940.025631.2 18 1210.006715 35 2810.0065
11 23.1 25.110.006814 17 2110.006431.2 19 1230.020115 35 3110.0065
11 24 1810.006814 18 1710.006431.2 19 1340.026815 35 3410.0065
11 24 2010.006814 18 1820.012831.2 19 1430.020115 35 39.210.0065
11 24 23.110.006814 18 1920.012831.2 20 1410.006715 35 43.210.0065
11 24 24.110.006814 18 2020.012831.2 21 1310.006715 35 44.210.0065
11 24 25.110.006814 18 2210.006432 16 1410.006715 36 2410.0065
11 25 27.110.006814 19 1820.012832 17 1230.020115 36 2610.0065
11 26 24.110.006814 19 2210.006432 17 1430.020115 36 2830.0196
11 26 25.110.006814 20 2010.006432 18 1320.013415 36 2920.0131
11 26.1 2410.006814 20 2210.006432 19 1430.020115 36 3010.0065
11 27 1810.006814 7 1710.006432 20 1420.013415 36 40.230.0196
11 27 25.110.006814 7 2040.025632.2 18 1310.006715 36 46.210.0065
11 28 24.110.006814 8 1810.006432.2 19 1210.006715 37 2620.0131
11 28 26.110.006814 8 1930.019232.2 19 1420.013415 37 2740.0261
11 28 29.110.006814 8 2010.006432.2 20 1220.013415 37 2810.0065
11 30 24.110.006814 8 2110.006432.2 20 1310.006715 37 2920.0131
11 30 27.110.006815 13 1910.006433 16 1320.013415 37 39.210.0065
11 30 28.110.006815 14 1710.006433 17 1210.006715 37 47.210.0065
11 31 28.110.006815 14 2020.012833 17 1410.006715 38 2720.0131
11 32 2210.006815 15 1810.006433 19 1410.006715 38 2910.0065
11 34 26.110.006815 16 1810.006433 19 1720.013415 38 34.210.0065
12 18 1810.006815 16 1910.006433.2 19 1210.006715 38 39.210.0065
12 18 2510.006815 17 1610.006434 18 1110.006715 39 2710.0065
12 18 26.110.006815 17 1710.006434 19 1310.006715 39.3 3010.0065
12 19 1820.013515 17 1920.012815 42.3 2810.0065
12 19 20.110.006815 17 2030.019216 33 2710.0065
12 19 38.110.006815 17 2120.012816 34 2910.0065
12 19.1 28.110.006815 17 2210.006416 34 3010.0065
12 20 1810.006815 18 1710.006416 34 43.210.0065
12 20 24.120.013515 18 1920.012816 35 2920.0131
12 20 27.110.006815 18 2010.006416 35 3210.0065

Table 8: Haplotype diversities of four X-Chromosomal linkage groups in Bahraini male individuals.

LG1
Haplotype
CountFrequencyLG2
Haplotype
CountFrequencyLG3
Haplotype
CountFrequencyLG4
Haplotype
CountFrequency
12 20.1 1810.006815 19 1810.006416 35 38.210.0065
12 20.1 22.110.006815 19 1910.006416 35 45.210.0065
12 21 26.110.006815 19 2120.012816 36 2610.0065
12 21 27.110.006815 7 1710.006416 36 2820.0131
12 21.1 1810.006815 7 1910.006416 36 2920.0131
12 22 13.310.006815 7 2210.006416 36 3110.0065
12 22 24.110.006815 8 1820.012816 37 2510.0065
12 23 27.110.006815 8 1940.025616 37 2720.0131
12 24 27.110.006815 8 2120.012816 37 2910.0065
12 24 2910.006816 15 1810.006416 37 44.210.0065
12 25 26.120.013516 16 2010.006417 32 44.210.0065
12 26 1820.013516 18 1720.012817 33 2510.0065
12 26 24.110.006816 19 2010.006417 34 43.220.0131
12 26 25.110.006816 20 1720.012817 34 45.210.0065
12 26 27.110.006816 8 2010.006417 41.3 40.210.0065
12 26 28.110.006816 8 2110.0064
12 27 1810.006817 15 2010.0064
12 27 24.120.0135
12 28 25.120.0135
12 28 27.110.0068
12 28 28.120.0135
12 29 25.110.0068
12 29 29.110.0068
12 30 1810.0068
12 30 2110.0068
12 30 25.110.0068
12 30 26.110.0068
12 33 22.110.0068
12 33 26.110.0068
13 23 1810.0068

Table 9: Haplotype diversities of four X-Chromosomal linkage groups in Bahraini male individuals.

Rare Variants, Off-ladder and Null Alleles: Several cases showed off ladder (OL) in various loci; two allelic ladder variants were detected at the DXS10146; Sample#12 indicated OL in 223.05 bp and sample#34 showed OL in 243.87 bp. Four allelic ladder variants were detected at DXS10148; Sample#29 showed OL in 312.62 bp, sample#49 and sample#50 showed OL in 312.57, and sample#123 showed OL in 280.19 bp. One allelic ladder variants were detected with OL in DXS10134; Sample#72 showed OL with 325.61 bp. Null alleles were also observed in two loci; DXS10148 in sample#105 and in DXS10103 showed drop out allele in sample#135 and sample#119 (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Non-standard and null cases observed in some samples.
Click to enlarge
Figure 1: Non-standard and null cases observed in some samples.

High frequent cases of non-standard ladders (OL) and null alleles were at DXS10148, which gave an indication that the Investigator Argus X-12 QS kit provided standard ladder which lacked significant coverage of bins at DXS10148 as it was confirmed in previous literature [17].

More than half of the samples (103/156) showed 0.1 variant in DXS10148 and 18 samples gave the same variant in DXS10135.

More than half of the samples (102/156) also showed 0.2 variant in DXS10101, 39 samples in DXS10146, one sample in DXS10134 and one in DXS10148. As for 0.3 variant; 9 samples were detected in DXS10134 and 3 samples in DXS10148.

Interpopulation Diversity: To measure the diversity between Bahraini population and other populations previously reported, we have constructed the phylogenetic tree from allelic frequencies data by using the neighbor- joining (NJ) method via MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (Figure 2).

We have used 9 populations including: Saudi [15], Filipino [16], Emiratis [17], Bengali [18], Egyptian [19], Turkish [20], Indian [21], Algerian [22] and Jewish [23]. Fst and p-values for allele frequency distribution between Bahraini population and the published groups are shown in (Table 10). It is shown that Bahraini and Emirati populations shared the most genetic relatedness than other populations, as the Saudi population considers being the most geographically close population, however gave more genetic relatedness with Egyptian population than with Bahraini population. The rest of populations stood distant of genetic association with the Bahraini population. We have also constructed the MDS plot using IBM SPSS Statistics v21.0 Software, and it gave correlating results with the phylogenetic tree. As Bahraini, Emirati and Algerian populations gave the same clusters and Saudi, Egyptian and Jewish in another cluster (Figure 3).

Figure 2: Phylogenetic tree using based on Nei’s DA Distances for the 12 X-STR loci estimated among 10 populations.
Click to enlarge
Figure 2: Phylogenetic tree using based on Nei’s DA Distances for the 12 X-STR loci estimated among 10 populations.
Figure 3: MDS plot constructed between Bahraini population and other populations.
Click to enlarge
Figure 3: MDS plot constructed between Bahraini population and other populations.
SaudiEmiratiEgyptianTurkishAlgerianJewishFilipinoBengaliIndianBahraini
Saudi00.0010.0030.0320.0010.0070.0180.0060.0020.001
Emirati0.00900.0040.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.003
Egyptian0.0040.01100.0090.0030.0040.0020.0040.0040.012
Turkish0.0520.0480.05500.0090.0020.0020.0030.0030.006
Algerian0.0130.010.0150.04200.0030.0180.0020.0020.006
Jewish0.0120.0080.0170.0590.01300.0020.0020.0020.002
Filipino0.0230.0250.0270.0660.0270.0300.0020.0020
Bengali0.0220.0130.020.0510.0080.0240.02900.0020.041
Indian0.0170.0090.0140.050.0130.0190.020.00800.018
Bahraini0.00900.0120.0510.0120.0070.0270.0160.0120

Table 10: Nei genetic distance matrix between Bahraini population and other populations. Above the diagonal are p values while bel

Discussion

The observed deviation from LD (neglecting the Bonferroni’s correction) could be a result of the high diversity of the Bahraini population or caused by high polymorphism at the same loci investigated loci. This observation are likely to reflect the high level of inbreeding with consanguinity rates in Bahrain, with intra-familial unions accounting for 20–50% of all marriages compared to other Arab countries [27]. The PD in correlation with PM supports the high degree of polymorphism between Bahraini individuals.

As shown the significance of LD provided of loci in different LGs, suggesting of using individual allele frequency as well as haplotype allele frequencies for population database and likelihood studies.

We have compared Bahraini population data with other populations according to the available data using the accessible loci (Table S2).

It is shown that the Bahraini population shares similar results with the study conducted of Emirati populations using the X-STRs loci. Allele 14 in locus DXS7423 scored the highest frequency for Bahraini, Emirati, Egyptian and Indians populations [17, 19, 21] whereas allele 15 in same locus were the highest frequency for Filipino and Algerian populations [16, 22]. Turkish population gave the highest allele frequency in allele 13 (HPRTB) [20]. Jewish and the Saudi populations shared the highest frequency with allele 19 (DXS10103) [15, 23]. Bengali population showed the highest allele frequency in allele 11(DXS8378) [18].

Regarding the Interpopulation diversity, the phylogenetic tree was constructed based upon the data from the nine populations which were consistent with other population data from the region based upon the Fst values obtained. The obtained Fst value of Bahrain is <0.0000 which is less than the recommended value for casework statistics of Fst < 0.01 [28].

As shown, Bahraini and Emirati populations were more genetically related in terms of phylogenetic tree and MDS plot in contrary of Saudi population which was shown in previous papers published being more genetically related to Bahrain [4, 5]. This can be explained by studying the origins of the mothers of participants as it wildly affects the X-STRs results.

Once more studies of Arab populations in the region become accessible, it may be more probable to develop a greater understanding of the genetic associations between the different populations for the Arabian Peninsula. Further linkage studies must be conducted to determine if the loci are physically linked.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this is first study to report the allele frequencies and forensic statistical parameters of the X chromosomal STRs included in the Investigator Argus X-12 QS Kit in a sample population of Bahrain. X-STRs panels can be used for some cases for forensics investigations such as human identification and paternity testing.

It is shown that X-STRs included in the Investigator Argus X-12 kit can be utilized for forensic practice in Bahraini population. Our results demonstrate the importance of analyzing diverse populations using X-STRs markers.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank the authorities in General Directorate of Criminal Investigation and forensic Science in Bahrain, namely Mr. Abdulaziz Mayoof Alrumaihi, Mr. Raed Ali Almaeeli and Mr. Mohammed Abdulla Ghayyath for allowing us to utilize the Bahrain forensic Science Laboratory. Also, many thanks to Sabah Nazir and Meshael Ahmed Alqerainees for their technical support. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  1. Edelmann J, Lutz-Bonengel S, Naue J, Hering S (2012) X-chromosomal haplotype frequencies of four linkage groups using the Investigator Argus X-12 Kit. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6(1): e24-e34.
  2. Kling D, Dell’Amico B, Haddeland PJ, Tillmar AO (2014) Population genetic analysis of 12 X-STRs in a Somali population sample. Forensic Sci Int Genet 11: e7-e8.
  3. Nothnagel M, Szibor R, Vollrath O, Augustin C, Edelmann J, et al. (2012) Collaborative genetic mapping of 12 forensic short tandem repeat (STR) loci on the human X chromosome. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6(6): 778- 784.
  4. Al-Snan NR, Messaoudi S, R Babu S, Bakhiet M (2019) Population genetic data of the 21 autosomal STRs included in GlobalFiler kit of a population sample from the Kingdom of Bahrain. PLoS One 14(8): e0220620.
  5. Al-Snan NR, Messaoudi SA, Khubrani YM, Wetton JH, Jobling MA, et al. (2019) Genetic Variation At 27 Y-STRs In Four Regions Of Bahrain. bioRxiv 787341.
  6. CIO (2015) The estimates of population growth are based on the results of 2010 census and on the population register’s records.
  7. Abdulla MAZa-A, Bashir (2009) Modern History of Bahrain (1500–2002). Bahrain: Historical Studies Centre, University of Bahrain.
  8. Lawson FH (1989) Bahrain: The modernization of autocracy. 1st(Edn.), Westview Press, USA, pp: 146.
  9. Khuri FI (1980) Tribe and state in Bahrain: The transformation of social and political authority in an Arab state: University of Chicago press, USA.
  10. Fuccaro N (2009) Histories of city and state in the Persian Gulf: Manama since 1800: Cambridge University Press, UK.
  11. P Bearman, Th Bianquis, CE Bosworth, E van Donzel, WP Heinrichs (2014) Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd (Edn), Brill Publishers, Netherlands.
  12. Guo F (2017) Population genetic data for 12 X-STR loci in the Northern Han Chinese and StatsX package as tools for population statistics on X-STR. Sci Int Genet 26: e1- e8.
  13. Gouy A, Zieger M (2017) STRAF—A convenient online tool for STR data evaluation in forensic genetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet 30: 148-51.
  14. ChrX-STR.org 2.0.
  15. Messaoudi SA, Babu SR, Alsaleh AB, Albajjah M, AlSnan N (2019) Genetic diversity and haplotypic structure of a Saudi population sample using Investigator Argus X-12 amplification kit. bioRxiv, pp: 1-18.
  16. Salvador JM, Apaga DLT, Delfin FC, Calacal GC, Dennis SE, et al. (2018) Filipino DNA variation at 12 X-chromosome short tandem repeat markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet 36: e8-e12.
  17. Almarri MA, Lootah RA (2018) Allelic and haplotype diversity of 12 X-STRs in the United Arab Emirates. Forensic Sci Int Genet 33: e4-e6.
  18. Sufian A, Hosen MI, Fatema K, Hossain T, Hasan MM, et al. (2017) Genetic diversity study on 12 X-STR loci of investigator® Argus X STR kit in Bangladeshi population. Int J Legal Med 131(4): 963-965.
  19. Elakkary S, Hoffmeister-Ullerich S, Schulze C, Seif E, Sheta A, et al. (2014) Genetic polymorphisms of twelve X-STRs of the investigator Argus X-12 kit and additional six X-STR centromere region loci in an Egyptian population sample. Forensic Sci Int Genet 11: 26-30.
  20. Poulsen L, Tomas C, Drobnič K, Ivanova V, Mogensen HS, Kondili A, et al. (2016) NGMSElect™ and Investigator® Argus X-12 analysis in population samples from Albania, Iraq, Lithuania, Slovenia, and Turkey. Forensic Sci Int Genet 22: 110-112.
  21. Shrivastava P, Jain T, Gupta U, Trivedi VB (2015) Genetic polymorphism study on 12 X STR loci of investigator Argus X STR kit in Bhil tribal population of Madhya Pradesh, India. Leg Med (Tokyo) 17(3): 214-217.
  22. Tomas C, Pereira V, Morling N (2012) Analysis of 12 X-STRs in greenlanders, danes and somalis using argus X-12. Int J Legal Med 126(1): 121-128.
  23. Ferragut J, Castro J, Ramon C, Picornell A (2015) Genetic diversity of 12 X-chromosomal short tandem repeats in Jewish populations. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 5: e327-e9.
  24. Takezaki N, Nei M, Tamura K (2010) POPTREE2: Software for constructing population trees from allele frequency data and computing other population statistics with Windows interface. Mol Biol Evol 27(4): 747-752.
  25. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4(4): 406-425.
  26. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35(6): 1547-1549.
  27. Al-Arrayed S, Hamamy H (2012) The changing profile of consanguinity rates in Bahrain, 1990–2009. Journal of biosocial science 44(3): 313-319.
  28. Council NR (1996) The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, pp: 272.
More from this journal

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{al2020,
  title   = {Population Genetic Analysis of 12 X-STRs in a Bahraini Population
Sample},
  author  = {Al Snan NR, Messaoudi SA, Mansoor LA and Bakhiet M},
  journal = {International Journal of Forensic Sciences},
  year    = {2020},
  volume  = {5},
  number  = {1},
  doi     = {10.23880/ijfsc-16000177}
}
Al Snan NR, Messaoudi SA, Mansoor LA and Bakhiet M (2020). Population Genetic Analysis of 12 X-STRs in a Bahraini Population
Sample. International Journal of Forensic Sciences, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.23880/ijfsc-16000177
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Population Genetic Analysis of 12 X-STRs in a Bahraini Population
Sample
AU  - Al Snan NR, Messaoudi SA, Mansoor LA and Bakhiet M
JO  - International Journal of Forensic Sciences
PY  - 2020
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
DO  - 10.23880/ijfsc-16000177
ER  -