Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Nursing & Healthcare International Journal Research Article 17 min read

Nurses Performance Regarding Peripheral Cannulation among Neonate Khartoum State Hospitals (2020-2021)

Mokhtar KM* and Jabro AO*
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2575-9981  10.23880/nhij-16000275  Received: August 04, 2022  Published: December 09, 2022
  views
 23 references
 9 tables
PDF
Keywords
Nursing Cannulation Pediatric health
Abstract

Background: Peripheral intravenous cannula is most common vascular access device used to administer medication or fluid, cannulation may cause severe damage to small vein if the insertion not proper, therefore it need professional practitioner. The study aimed to assess nurses’ performance regarding peripheral cannulation for neonate in Khartoum state Hospitals, Sudan, in 2020. Material and Methods: Adescriptive cross sectional hospital based study design was used. Sample size consisted of 105 nurses; data collected using self- administered questionnaire and observational checklist, data analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) uses standard deviation, T test mean and percentage Spearman correlation coefficient p value was less than 0.05.Ratability and validity of the scale was test by Cronbach’s Alpha and Spearman-Brown Reliability Coefficients Performance total scores (n = 32) Results: Showed that, (54.3%) of nurses were between 21-30 years, (67.6%) of nurses were master holders, (55.2%) of them attended training courses regarding neonatology. The mean of nurses’ performance about hand hygiene was 90.0%. The mean of nurses’ performance about use of Personal protective equipment was 96.6%. The mean of nurses’ performance about skin preparation was 92.2%. (37.1%) of nurses succeed to insert cannula after more than 3 attempts, 31.4 insert it from the second time, 18.1% from the first time, (62.9%) of nurses did not recorded the data. The overall mean of nurses’ compliance about peripheral cannulation was 68% Conclusion: The studies concluded that nurse’s performance regarding cannulation is high and there was lacking practice toward peripheral intravenous cannulation in some pediatric health settings and there is positive correlation between nurse’s level of education and their performances. The study recommended more training courses.

Introduction and Background

The neonatal period is the first four weeks subsequent to birth [1]. Some newborns require observation and care that is beyond the scope of a normal newborn nursery, these are called high risk neonates [2]. Provides care to full spectrum of newborns ranging from extremely premature infants, to high-risk and critically ill babies, to less critically ill babies who are recovering and maturing with increased emphasis is being placed on the need for standards of care, as well as mechanisms which address the barriers to provision and use of quality care [3, 4]. Cannulation in neonate is very difficult to be success from time and repetitive cannulation can lead to neonatal complication, repeated needle insertion attempts subject children to pain, stress, increased infection risk, and impact negatively on child.

Despite the known of complications of peripheral intravenous cannulation, there are nurses still not practicing the correct way of applying them [4, 5, 6].

General Objectives

- To assess nurses’ performance regarding Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation of neonate in Khartoum state. - Specific objectives. - To assess nurses performance regarding hand hygiene and personal protective equipment. - To assess nurses performance regarding skin preparation. - To study nurses performance regarding cannula access and insertion.

Justification

- Repetitive cannulation can lead to adverse neonatal complication. - There is mal practice regarding correct way of applying cannulation and there are no enough studies conducted regarding cannulation - Thus this study will shed light on nursing performance regarding Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation.

Literature Review

Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC) are venous access devices commonly used for drug or fluid administration, monitoring, and diagnostics, in pediatric patients, in hospitals worldwide [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. It is estimated that nearly two billion peripheral intravenous catheters are used in hospitalized patients globally [11]. Despite the ubiquity and essential nature of PIVCs, they are not without complications. Rates of PIVC complications are reportedly high in studies in the pediatric population, ranging from 34 to 56% [12, 13, 14]. In comparison to PIVC complications in the adult population, which range from 20% to 32% [10, 15, 16].

Ensure the safety of infants is essential to providing quality care. However, if on one hand care interventions seek to improve such assistance, on the other, the combination of processes, technologies, and human resources related to health care can become a risk factor for the appearance of errors and adverse events. Thus, it is necessary for nurses to know the indications for the PICC therapy, as it requires technical expertise, clinical judgment, and conscious, safe, and effective decision-making [17].

Central Venous Catheter insertion requires both experienced staff and the necessary equipment; it also requires knowledge about the benefits and risks of potential sites, using full sterile technique, ability to monitor the neonate during and after CVC insertion and knowledge about managing potential complications. And final a full documentation of procedure and any complications [18].

Installation of the PICC brings many benefits to the therapy of newborns, and prevents numerous complications, such as unnecessary punches. This type of catheter has been suggested as the most suitable for low levels of infections and complications when compared to other central vascular devices in both the insertions of the act, such as during maintenance and removal. It is a procedure that guarantees the NB a safe venous access for the infusion of irritating and/ or vesicant medicaments, as previously stated, decreased pain caused by repeated venous punctures, and stress caused by excessive handling; therefore, this is imperative for the survival of the increasingly premature newborns [19].

PIVC complication and failure in pediatric patients is associated with increased morbidity. Re-insertion procedures are painful and anxiety-provoking for neonate as well as their parents [20]. Failure to obtain and maintain a patent peripheral intravenous access may also delay diagnostic and subsequent medical treatments [14]. Re-insertion attempts and premature PIVC removal consequently increase hospital costs, including not only expenses for PIVC devices but also for medical and/or nursing time.

PIVC related complications can also be costly for patients, not only in terms of patient experience and morbidity (e.g., pain, delayed treatment) but also for treatment-related out of pocket expenses in some healthcare systems [12]. Patients may need to stay in hospital for a longer period because of PIVC complications: this is particularly evident for catheter- related blood stream infections (CRBSI). Other studies have examined the incidence of PIVC failure and complications in the pediatric population [12, 13].

The nursing protocol for inserting, handling/ maintaining, and withdrawing the PICC becomes essential for the quality of care and the standard to be implemented in the health facility, preventing possible damage to the NB, and ensuring the safety of the procedure and the autonomy of the team regarding neonatal care throughout the care process involving the catheter.

In this sense, nurses highlight the need for a daily record of care for the handling, maintenance and possible post- puncture intercurrences, in order to prevent complications in the procedure, and also the construction of a specific protocol that can contribute to the everyday practice of those who are in charge of this procedure, directing nursing practice in terms of the use of this catheter, aiming primarily to standardize the conduct and improve the quality of care in the NICU, which becomes crucial for the success of this practice with the PICC [21].

Preparation of the newborn should be performed by the nurse before the procedure. These actions are performing a physical examination, analysis of laboratory exams and diagnostic imaging, cardiac and respiratory monitoring, restraining the newborn, analgesia and sedation.

Preparation of the nurse and material – include the priority of actions to be performed before the insertion procedure. (Hand washing, preparation of material, surgical field, nursing scrubs and preparation of the catheter). Measurement the correct measurement of the catheter to be inserted in the newborn according to the insertion site’s area. (Insertion in inferior limbs’ veins and the insertion of the catheter in superior limbs’ veins). Preparation of the catheter –the proper preparation of the catheter in relation to its withdrawal, lubrication and movement of the probe or guide wire inside the catheter. Skin asepsis recommended before inserting the central catheter in newborns. Manner of insertion –slow or fast [22]. Said S, et al. at the Neonatal Intensive Care Units of Obstetric & Gynecological Hospital, revealed that, nearly half of the studied nurses had poor knowledge regarding central venous catheters, and more than half of them had incompetent practice regarding central venous catheters. Concluded that, the nurses had poor knowledge, incompetent practice regarding central catheters, and had positive attitude regarding central venous catheter care [23].

Study performed by Abraham LM, et al. included total of 60 staff nurses working in child care areas, from selected hospital in North India. Found that the knowledge on care of peripheral intravenous line in children was excellent, good, and average and below average for 5%, 65%, 25%, 5% respectively among nurses working in child care areas. All the staff nurses had inadequate practices regarding care of peripheral intravenous line. No significant association was observed for knowledge and practice with socio-demographic variables like age, professional qualification, no. of years of experience and place of training, but there was a statistically significant association for knowledge and practice with place of work and in-service education attendance. There was a weak positive correlation between knowledge and practice of staff nurses related to care of peripheral intravenous line in children.

Chopra V, et al. to assess vascular access nursing experience, practice, knowledge, and beliefs related to PICC insertion and care in 47 Michigan hospitals. Found that more than half of respondents (58%) reported placing PICCs for ≥5 years, and 23% had obtained dedicated vascular access certification. The most common reported indications for PICC insertion included intravenous antibiotics, difficult venous access, and chemotherapy. Many respondents (46%) reported placing a PICC in a patient receiving dialysis; however, 91% of these respondents reported receiving approval from nephrology prior to insertion. Almost all respondents (91%) used ultrasound to find a suitable vein for PICC insertion, and 76% used electrocardiography guidance to place PICCs. PICC occlusion was reported as the most frequently encountered complication, followed by device migration and deep vein thrombosis. Although 94% of respondents noted that their hospitals tracked the number of PICCs placed, only 40% reported tracking duration of PICC use. Relatedly, 30% of nurses reported that their hospitals had a written policy to evaluate PICC necessity or appropriateness.

Souza RR, et al. to analyze the knowledge of nurses in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit on the entry, handling, maintenance and withdrawal of the peripherally inserted central catheter. Involving nine nurses from the Neonatal intensive care unit of the Antonio Pedro University Hospital, Fluminense Federal University, revealed that knowledge of nurses regarding, insertion, maintenance and removal of the catheter, Concluded that the use of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is important in neonatology for its benefits to the infant. So, nurses need to deepen their knowledge so that the care process in the NICU is guided by ethics and based on nursing protocols aiming to base and legitimize such assistance.

Study by Lourenço SA, et al. to determine and evaluated the theoretical and practical knowledge of nurses concerning aspects of PICC line insertion in the case of newborns included forty nurses who graduated on average ten years before and had approximately seven years of professional experience in an ICU investigated. Of these, 37.5% delivered direct care to patients and the remaining had more than one function in their sphere of work. 59.3% worked in pediatrics and neonatology. All of them were qualified to insert a PICC line, through courses provided by three different organizations, with an average workload of 24.9 hours: 13.7 hours of theory and 11.2 of practice. The nurses had an average of three years of experience in PICC line insertion in newborns.

Also Kleidon TM, et al. to evaluate nurses performance regarding neonates stated that pre-implementation audit (n = 102) and survey (n = 117) data described high rates of PIVC failure (n = 50; 49%), difficulty obtaining equipment (n = 64; 55%) and pressure to insert (n = 50; 43%). Parent interviews (n = 15) identified lack of communication, fear, appreciation of skilled technicians and technology and care giver roles as key to improving the experience. After implementation first- attempt insertion success (45 vs. 62%; risk ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.78), first-attempt escalation to senior clinicians (junior doctor 72 vs. 41%.

Methodology

Pilot Study for the Questionnaire

To investigate the measure properties of the items which evaluate Nurses Performance, when applied the questionnaire at the recent research population, the researcher applied it on a pilot sample, consisted of (32) subjects, selected randomly from recent research population. After scoring responses the researcher did the flowing:

Internal Consistency

The researcher applied Person correlation equation to get correlation coefficients between scores of each item to the total score of Performance (Table 1). The flowing table shows the results of these computations:

ItemsCorrected Item-Total
Correlation
Examination Gloves0.479
Use correct Hand0.472
Wear Gloves0.149
Gloves Single Use0.305
Septic by use alcohol0.209
Allow Drying0.34
Canola access0.446
Successful Insertion from0.52
Date of insertion recorded0.604

Table 1: Shows Person corrected Item-Total Person correlation coefficients for questionnaire items (n = 32).

Reliability Coefficients

The researcher computed both Cronbach’s Alpha and Spearman-Brown Coefficients for Performance total scores. The flowing table shows the results of these computations (Table 2):

No of ItemsReliability Coefficients
AlphaSpearman-Brown
Performance total scores90.670.68

Table 2: Shows results of Cronbach’s Alpha and Spearman-Brown Reliability Coefficients Performance total scores (n = 32).

Study design: A descriptive cross sectional study.

Study area: The study was conducted in Khartoum state hospital neonatal intensive care units.

Study duration: The study was carried out during the period from 2020 up to 2021.

Study population: The study population included all the staff of nurses whom working in neonatal NICU.

Sample size: Total coverage of all nurses (105 nurses).

Data Collections Tools

The check list included two parts, first part for the participants’ demographic data as age, gender and the second part for nurses’ performance evaluation. Observational check list.

Inclusion Criteria

All staff of nurses whom working in intensive care unit and agree to participate in the study. Data Analysis Data was entered using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 using. Descriptive statistics in term of frequency tables with percentages, graphs and P value set (0.05or less) is considered significant.

Data Presentation

Data was represented after analysis in form of tables, cross tabulation (bi variable tables).

Ethical Consideration

Approval from The Ministry of health research department, the hospital directors and from the participant. Research purpose and objectives were explained to participants in clear simple words so; Participant has right

Study Sample Descriptions

to voluntary informed consent, to withdraw at any time without any deprivation. (Privacy and confidentiality by using coded questionnaire. Also the Participants, to benefit from the researcher knowledge and skills and has a right not to harm (protect: during covid 19 Warring mask and spacing) (Table 3).

Descriptions VariableLevelsFrequency%
EducationBachelor2624.8
Master7167.6
Higher87.6
Total105100
Age Levels21 - 305754.3
31 - 404038.1
41 - 5076.7
Above 5011
Total105100
Attending Training in NeonatologyNo6057.1
Yes4038.1
Missing54.8
Total105100
Marital statusMarried4240
Single6360
Total105100
Experience LevelsLT 65855.2
10-Jun2422.9
15-Nov1413.3
16 - 2043.8
Above 2054.8
Total105100

Table 3: Shows study sample descriptions according to Gender and Other Demographic variables.

Results show (Table 3) that more than half (54.3%) of nurses between 21-30 years old Majority (60%) of them were single, have (67.6%) master degree, (55.2%) of them their experience less than 6 years (55.2%) of them attended training courses regarding neonatology.

Study Results

Performance Level

To determine level of Nurses Performance, at the recent research population (Table 4), the researcher applied it one sample (t) test, and the flowing table shows the results of these computations:

Subscales of PerformanceMeanSDTest ValueT valueP. (Sig)Statistical Inference
Hand Hygiene1.80.491.339.8620.001High
Personal Protective1.930.251.3324.6660.001High
Skin Preparation1.850.411.3312.9070.001High
Cannula Access2.751.392.51.8580.033Above Med
Date of insertion record0.370.490.5-2.7140.004Blow Med
Total core8.71.9883.6470.001High

Table 4: Shows results of One Sample T Test to determine Nurses Performance, at the recent research population (n = 105).

Most of the nurses their performance was high regarding the preparation for cannulation and above med for insertion of cannula and most of them did not recorded data of cannula insertion (Table 5).

AgeFrequencyPercent
More Than Third3937.1
Third Time1413.3
Second time3331.4
First time1918.1
Total105100

Table 5: Distribution of nurses according to Successful Insertion of cannula (n=105).

(37.1%) of nurses succeed to insert cannula after more than 3 attempts, 31.4 insert it from the second time, 18.1% from the first time and 13.3% from third time

The Correlations

Between performance & education level: To determine the significance of the relationship between Nurses Performance and their Educational level, at the recent research population, the researcher computed Spearman correlation coefficients, and the flowing table shows the results of these computations:

Table 6 shows results of Spearman correlation coefficients to explain the significance of relationship between Nurses Performance and their Educational level at the recent research population (n = 105) Subscales of Performance

Subscales of PerformanceCorrelation coefficientsP. (Sig)Statistical Inference
Hand Hygiene0.1960.023There is a positive correlation
Personal Protective-0.0970.164There is no correlation
Skin Preparation-0.0810.206There is no correlation
Cannula Access0.2150.014There is a positive correlation
Date of insertion record-0.0050.479There is no correlation
Total core0.20.02There is a positive correlation

Table 6: shows results that there significance of relationship between Nurses Performance regarding cannulation and their Educati

Table 6: shows results that there significance of relationship between Nurses Performance regarding cannulation and their Educational level. Between performance & experience level: To determine the significance of the relationship between Nurses Performance and their Experience level, at the recent research population, the researcher computed Spearman correlation coefficients, and the flowing table shows the results of these computations:

Table 7 shows results of Spearman correlation coefficients to explain the significance of relationship between Nurses Performance and their Experience level at the recent research population (n = 105).

Subscales of PerformanceCorrelation coefficientsP. (Sig)Statistical Inference
Hand Hygiene0.0430.33There is no correlation
Personal Protective0.1150.121There is no correlation
Skin Preparation0.0330.371There is no correlation
Canola Access0.0590.275There is no correlation
Date of insertion record-0.1020.151There is no correlation
Total core0.0290.384There is no correlation

Table 7: The results show that there is no significance of relationship between Nurses Performance and their Experience level.

  • Between performance & age level: To determine the significance of the relationship between Nurses Performance and their Age level, at the recent research population, the researcher computed Spearman correlation coefficients, and the flowing table shows the results of these computations:
  • Table 8 shows results of Spearman correlation coefficients to explain the significance of relationship between Nurses Performance and their Age level at the recent research population (n = 105).
  • The Differences these computations:
  • Table 9 shows results of two independent Samples T Test to explain the significance of differences in Nurses Performance according to their marital status, at the recent research population.
  • According to Marital status
  • To determine the significance of the differences in Nurses
  • Performance according to their marital status, at the recent research population, the researcher applied Independent
  • Samples (T) Test, and the flowing table shows the results of
  • Subscales of
  • Performance
  • Marital status
  • Mean
  • SD
  • T value df
  • P.
  • (Sig)
  • Statistical Inference
  • Hand Hygiene
  • Married
  • 1.79
  • 0.52
  • -0.244
  • 103
  • 0.808
  • There isn’t sig difference
  • Single
  • 1.81
  • 0.47
  • Personal Protective
  • Married
  • 1.95
  • 0.216
  • 0.634
  • 103
  • 0.527
  • There isn’t sig difference
  • Single
  • 1.92
  • 0.272
  • Skin Preparation
  • Married
  • 1.88
  • 0.395
  • 0.677
  • 103
  • 0.5
  • There isn’t sig difference
  • Single
  • 1.83
  • 0.423
  • Canola Access
  • Married
  • 2.6
  • 1.432
  • -0.944
  • 103
  • 0.347
  • There isn’t sig difference
  • Single
  • 2.86
  • 1.366
  • Date of insertion record
  • Married
  • 0.26
  • 0.445
  • -1.957
  • 95
  • 0.053
  • There isn’t sig difference
  • Single
  • 0.44
  • 0.501
  • Total Scores
  • Married
  • 8.48
  • 2.063
  • -0.965
  • 103
  • 0.337
  • There isn’t sig difference
  • Single
  • 8.86
  • 1.925
  • According to
  • Attending
  • Training in
  • Neonatology the results of these computations:
  • Table 10 shows results of two independent Samples
  • T Test to explain the significance of differences in Nurses
  • Performance according to attending Training in Neonatology, at the recent research population.
  • To determine the significance of the differences in Nurses
  • Performance according to attending Training in Neonatology, at the recent research population, the researcher applied
  • Independent Samples (T) Test, and the flowing table shows
  • Subscales of
  • Performance
  • Attending
  • Training
  • Mean
  • SD
  • T value df
  • P. (Sig)
  • Statistical Inference
  • Hand Hygiene
  • No
  • 1.8
  • 0.514
  • 0.245
  • 98
  • 0.807
  • There isn’t sig difference
  • Yes
  • 1.78
  • 0.48
  • Personal Protective
  • No
  • 1.93
  • 0.252
  • 0.158
  • 98
  • 0.874
  • There isn’t sig difference
  • Yes
  • 1.93
  • 0.267
  • Skin Preparation
  • No
  • 1.82
  • 0.469
  • -0.679
  • 98
  • 0.499
  • There isn’t sig difference
  • Yes
  • 1.88
  • 0.335
  • Canola Access
  • No
  • 2.58
  • 1.33
  • -1.12
  • 98
  • 0.266
  • There isn’t sig difference
  • Yes
  • 2.9
  • 1.46
  • Date of insertion record
  • No
  • 0.32
  • 0.469
  • -1.332
  • 80
  • 0.187
  • There isn’t sig difference
  • Yes
  • 0.45
  • 0.504
  • Total Scores
  • No
  • 8.45
  • 1.79
  • -1.176
  • 98
  • 0.242
  • There isn’t sig difference
  • Yes
  • 8.93
  • 2.24

Table 8: Shows results there is no significance of relationship between Nurses Performance and their marital status.

Subscales of PerformanceCorrelation coefficientsP. (Sig)Statistical Inference
Hand Hygiene0.1460.068There is no correlation
Personal Protective0.0320.373There is no correlation
Skin Preparation0.0220.412There is no correlation
Canola Access-0.0610.269There is no correlation
Date of insertion record-0.0840.197There is no correlation
Total core-0.0310.375There is no correlation

Table 9: Shows results there is no significance of relationship between Nurses Performance and their marital status.

Discussion

The procedures of inserting a peripheral intravenous cannula and blood sampling are carried out in most health care settings, but they can be among the most frustrating tasks encountered by nurses. Moreover, it considers one of the recognized challenges of pediatrics due to the veins of children are frequently small, embedded in subcutaneous fat tissue, or simply exhausted from previous blood sampling attempts (Andrews, 2011). Unsuccessful attempts may lead to frustration, anxiety, and loss of self-confidence and damage the trust relationship between the child and the nurse. Thus, this study aimed to assess nurses’ performance regarding to intravenous cannulation in pediatric health care setting.

In the current study, the characteristics of the studied nurses revealed that, More than half (54.3%) of nurses were between 21-30 years of age (Table 1). This finding was in an agreement with Essani and Ali, in their study about Knowledge And Practice Gaps Among Pediatric Nurses At A Tertiary Care Hospital Karachi Pakistan who revealed that the majority of nurses’ age was between 20-30 years with mean 25.9 years.These findings might be due to that, most of the nurses aged between 18-30 years..Concerning previous experiences of the studied nurses (Table 1), findings of the study showed that more than half of the nurses had experience for less than 6 years. This finding was not in an agreement with that of Perry, et al. who found that 43% of the studied nurses had 5<10 years of experience.

It was clear from Table 2 that almost two thirds of the studied nurses had a master of nursing sciences, while about a third of them had obtained a bachelor of nursing sciences. This finding was contradicting with those of Arbaee and Mohd Ghazali, who found in a similar study that 79% of nurses had a diploma of nursing. On the other side, Sriuapyo, et al. who studied Effectiveness of Peripheral Vascular Catheter Care Bundle in the Pediatric Nursing Service, Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand found that the majority of the studied nurses had a bachelor of nursing. In relation to the nurses’ attendance of training courses, Table 3 showed that more than half of the studied nurses had previously attended training courses. This finding was similar to those of the study conducted by Sriuapyo, et al. who found that more than half of the studied nurses had previous training or conference attendance regarding the PVC care bundle.

Concerning nurses’ performance regarding hand hygiene, the mean of nurses’ performance about hand hygiene was 74.4%, while great majority of them correctly use personal protective equipment (gloves). Great majority of nurses (59%) use 70% isopropyl alcohol as skin aseptic. Regarding cannula access, more than half of nurses (55.2%) use 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol and allow drying prior to accessing the cannula for administering fluids or injection. Only (37.1%) of nurses succeed to insert cannula from the first attempt. And only 37.1% recorded date of insertion of cannula.

Regarding to total nurses’ level of practice about peripheral intravenous cannulation the current study results showed that the great majority of the studied nurses had unsatisfactory practice. This finding was to some extent similar to that of Chang, et al. Johor Bahru, Chang, et al. stated that, measures were generally higher during preparation but low during the actual performance of venepuncture and intravenous cannulation in the pediatric unit in hospital. One possible explanation of these results that there was a knowledge-practice gap and lack of integration of theoretical knowledge into practice although nurses has good experience and most them receive training courses but there are no correlation between the nurses performance regarding cannulation and their experience, age or marital status, Just there is positive correlation between their performance and their educational level that is main the training courses not including practical insertion of cannulation , also these gaps were related to clinical knowledge that nurses perform in pediatric settings that are very essential for child care.

Conclusion

The studies concluded that nurses’ performance regarding cannulation is high but, there is lacking practice toward peripheral intravenous cannulation in some pediatric health settings and there are no correlation bet the performance of cannulation and their experience, age or marital status, Just there is positive correlation between their performance and their educational level.

Recommendation

The study recommended that - Continuing training, educational programs and workshops concern the care of children with peripheral intravenous cannulation to nursing staff working in pediatric health care setting. - More training practice for neonatal cannulation. - More studies on larger population to allow greater generalization of study. - Interventional study needed to treat the lacking of the practice, for competence and quality of the work.

References

  1. Ahlin C, Klang Soderkvist B, Johansson E, Bjorkholm M, Lofmark A (2017) Assessing Nursing Students’ Knowledge and Skills in Performing Venepuncture and Inserting Peripheral Venous Catheters. Nurse Education in Practice 23: 8-14.
  2. Alataa Ahmed SO (2016) Nurse’s Knowledge and Practice regarding Peripheral Cannulation Procedure in Almak Nemer Hospital in Shendi- Sudan. Published Thesis, Faculty Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, the National Ribat University, pp: 1-55.
  3. Andrews GJ (2011) Needle Phobic Encounter Space. Health and Place 17(4): 875-884.
  4. Arbaee I, Mohd Ghazali A (2013) Nurses‘ Knowledge and Practice towards Care and Maintenance of Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation in Pantai Hospital, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia. Published Thesis, Faculty of Nursing & Allied Health Sciences, Open University Malaysia, pp: 22- 26.
  5. Chang D, Lai N, Sqng NP, How Y, Tan T, et al. (2012) Adherence to Major Standard Precautions: An Audit of Venepuncture and Intravenous Cannula Insertion in the Pediatric Unit of Hospital Sultanah Aminah, Johor Bahru, Malaysian. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2(18): 1-11.
  6. Chanu N, Sagar D, Gandhi RA (2010) Study to Assess The Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Program regarding Knowledge on Intravenous Cannulation for Under Five Children among Staff Nurses in Selected Hospitals. Published Thesis, Dayananda Sagar College of Nursing, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, pp: 4-9.
  7. Duygu D, Mscand S (2017) Does the Use of a Vein Visualization Device for Peripheral Venous Catheter Placement Increase Success Rate in Pediatric Patients. Pediatric Emergency Care 35(7): 474-479.
  8. Dougherty L, Lister S (2015) The Royal Marsden Manual of Clinical Nursing Procedures. 9th(Edn.), UK: Willy Blackwell Co, pp: 1-30.
  9. Elshamy K, Mesbah M (2011) Effect of Peer Education Intervention and Procalcitonin Detection on Peripheral Intravenous Catheter- Related Blood Stream Infections and Associated Complications among Selected Patients at Mansoura University Hospitals. Egypt Journal of American Science 10(7): 362-372.
  10. Essani R, Ali T (2011) Knowledge and Practice Gaps among Pediatric Nurses at a Tertiary Care Hospital Karachi Pakistan. International Scholarly Research Network (ISRN) Pediatrics 2011: 460818.
  11. George K, Muninarayanappa B (2013) Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Program on Knowledge and Practices of Staff Nurses on Prevention of Intravenous Cannula Complications. Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences 1(2): 115-119.
  12. Green burg CS, Bowden VR (2016) Pediatric clinical skills. 4th ed., China: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp: 132-137.
  13. Groll D, Davies B, Donald JM, Nelson S, Virani T (2010) Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Phlebitis and Infiltration Scales for The Assessment of Complications of Peripheral Vascular Access Devices. Journal of Infusion Nursing 33(6): 385-390.
  14. Korenstein D, Falk R, Howell EA, Bishop T, Keyhani S (2012) Overuse of Health Care Services in The United States: an understudied problem. Archives of Internal Medicine 172(2): 171-178.
  15. Lund F, Schultz JH, Maatouk I, Krautter M, Moltner A, et al. (2012) Effectiveness of IV Cannulation Skills Laboratory Training and Its Transfer into Clinical Practice: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Plos One journal 7(3): 1-10.
  16. Mahmoud FS, Abd ElSadik BR (2013) Effect of Clinical Pathway Regarding Promoting Quality Nursing Care of Children with Meningitis Exposed to Invasive Procedures. Journal of American Science 9(8): 383-393.
  17. Perry A, Caviness A, Hsu D (2011) Efficacy of a Near-Infrared Light Device in Pediatric Intravenous Cannulation. Pediatric Emergency Care 27(1): 5-10.
  18. Phillips l, Gorski l, Evidence Phillips l, Gorski l (2014) Evidence Based Practice for Infusion Therapy. 6th(Edn.), Philadelphia: Davis Company, pp: 411-441.
  19. Phillips S, Collins M, Dougherty L (2011) Venepuncture and Cannulation. UK: John Wiley and Sons, pp: 91-100.
  20. Ricci SS, Kyle T (2009) Maternity and Pediatric Nursing. 22nd(Edn.), Wolters China: Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
  21. Sriupayo A, Inta N, Boonkongrat S, Kaphan K, Uttama J, et al. (2014) Effectiveness of Peripheral Vascular Catheter Care Bundle in The Pediatric Nursing Service, Chiang Mai University Hospital. Thailand Chiang Mai Medical Journal 53(2): 63-73.
  22. Yamazaki S, Tomita S, Watanabe M, Kawaai H, Shimamura K (2011) Effects of A Transmitted Light Device for Pediatric Peripheral Venipuncture and Intravenous Cannulation. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 4(1): 189-192.
  23. WHO (2007) Standard precautions in health care. In aide Memoir: Infection Control. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{mokhtar2022,
  title   = {Nurses Performance Regarding Peripheral Cannulation among
Neonate Khartoum State Hospitals (2020-2021)},
  author  = {Mokhtar KM* and Jabro AO},
  journal = {Nursing & Healthcare International Journal},
  year    = {2022},
  volume  = {6},
  number  = {6},
  doi     = {10.23880/nhij-16000275}
}
Mokhtar KM* and Jabro AO (2022). Nurses Performance Regarding Peripheral Cannulation among
Neonate Khartoum State Hospitals (2020-2021). Nursing & Healthcare International Journal, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.23880/nhij-16000275
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Nurses Performance Regarding Peripheral Cannulation among
Neonate Khartoum State Hospitals (2020-2021)
AU  - Mokhtar KM* and Jabro AO
JO  - Nursing & Healthcare International Journal
PY  - 2022
VL  - 6
IS  - 6
DO  - 10.23880/nhij-16000275
ER  -