Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Open Access Journal of Mycology & Mycological Sciences Research Article 10 min read

Evaluation of Various Extracellular Enzymes of Ectomycorrhizal Mushrooms

Sood S*, Singh R and Upadhyay RC
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2689-7822  10.23880/oajmms-16000189  Received: June 04, 2024  Published: July 23, 2024
  views
 20 references
 1 table
PDF
Keywords
Ectomycorrhizal Mushrooms Extracellular Enzyme Acid Phosphatase Protease Chitinase
Abstract

Fungi are characterized by their abilities to secrete enzymes to the external environment known as extracellular enzymes. In ectomycorrhizal fungi these extracellular enzymes plays an important role in nitrogen and phosphorus uptake. In the present investigation protease, acid phosphatase, chitinase and β-glucosidase activity was estimated by using standard protocols. Maximum acid phosphatase (69.2 ± 4.64 µM g-1h-1) and protease (2.34 ± 0.15 µM g-1min-1) activities were exhibited by Suillus triacicularis isolate DMRX-1625, whereas minimum acid phosphatase (16.99 ± 1.97 µM g-1h-1) and protease activities (0.94 ± 0.23 µM g-1min-1) were found in Lyophyllum decastes isolate DMRX-1593 and Cortinarius sp. isolate DMRX 1628, respectively. In case of chitinase, Rhizopogon sp. isolate DMRX-1627 showed maximum activity (6.31 ± 0.67 mM g-1min-1) and Suillus triacicularis isolate DMRX-1600 exhibited minimum activity (1.30 ± 0.14 mM g-1min-1). α-glucosidase activity was found maximum in Suillus sibricus isolate DMRX-1626 (10.49 ± 0.68 µM g-1min-1), whereas β-glucosidase activity was found maximum in Suillus triacicularis isolate DMRX-1625 (10.99 ± 3.44 µM g-1min-1). Suillus triacicularis isolate DMRX-1600 showed the minimum α-glucosidase activity (3.8 ± 0.28 µM g-1min-1) as well as β-glucosidase activity (5.54 ± 1.08 µM g-1min-1). Present study concludes that ectomycorrhizal mushrooms are potent source of extracellular enzymes.

Introduction

Fine roots are important compartments of the trees, especially in terms of nutrient and water uptake. Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi symbiotically colonise in these fine roots. Ectomycorrhizal roots are mostly located in nutrient rich top soil upto 20 cm [1]. Ectomycorrhizal fungi also empower nutrient utilization from complex organic sources, which the plant does not have direct access [2, 3]. These fungi are able to mobilize nutrients from organic substrates (proteins, amino acids, chitin, phosphomonoesters and phosphodiesters) or nutrients linked to organic residues by secreting extra-cellular enzymes [4, 5, 6, 7]. Enzymatic activities of ECM roots play a key role in nutrient mobilisation and transfer them from forest soil and litter via ECM hyphae to their plant host. The extracellular enzymes present in them directly interact with the environment to which they are released. In forest soils, decaying plant material and humus is the main nutrient source for all soil organisms and the fungi are the most important organisms involved in turnover, degradation and mineralisation of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous and other mineral elements, making these nutrients available for plants and the soil microflora [8]. The ability to secrete extra-cellular enzymes differs within ECM fungal isolates. Bue´e M, et al. [9] and Courty PE, et al. [10] have also reported such activities in winter, when deciduous trees are leafless. Higher the extracellular enzymes more nutrients are available to trees and better the growth. Considering the above facts, this study was aimed to screen extracellular enzyme production by isolates of different ectomycorrhizal mushrooms.

Materials and Methods

Culture Source and Growth Conditions

Five strains of ectomycorrhizal mushroom Suillus sibiricus (Singer) Singer, S triacicularis B. Verma & M.S. Reddy, Rhizopogon sp., Lyophyllum decastes (Fr.) Singer and Cortinarius sp. isolated from wild mushrooms collected from the forests of Himachal Pradesh. All the cultures have been deposited in the gene bank of ICAR-DMR Solan under the Acc. No. S. triacicularis (DMRX-1625), S. sibiricus (DMRX-1626), Rhizopogon sp. (DMRX-1627), Cortinarius sp. (DMRX-1628), L. decastes (DMRX-1593). All the strains were maintained on Modified Melins Nokran’s medium with a single mycelial bit and maintained at 25°C in dark for 20 days. After 20 days mycelial mats were collected on preweighed filter paper and dried in hot air oven to obtain a constant weight. The filtrate part was used for enzyme assay using Perkin Elmer- UV/VIS spectrophotometer Lambda 12. Enzyme activity was expressed as µMolg-1min-1 except phosphatase µMolg-1h-1 chitinase in mMolg-1min-1.

Enzyme Activity Estimation

Acid Phosphatase (ACPase) (EC 3.1.3.2) Acid phosphatase activity was measured by following the method of Tibbett M [11]. Reaction mixture contained 1 ml culture filtrate and 4 ml of modified universal buffer. These were incubated at 37°C for 5 min prior to the addition of 1 ml substrate [0.115 M disodium p-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) in modified universal buffer (pH 5.5 ± 5)]. Control contained the same volume of buffer without culture filtrate. Assays mixture were incubated for 1 h in water bath at 37°C, after which reactions were stopped by addition of 4 ml of 1 N NaOH to bring the final test tube volumes to 10 ml. The absorbance of liberated p-nitrophenol (pNP), yellow coloured, was measured at 410 nm, against standards made from 0 to 10 mg.

Acid Protease (EC 3.4.23.18) Protease activity was measured by degradation of casein, 1ml of filtrate was added to 1 ml of 1% (w/v) casein (pH- 5.5) and incubated for 1 hour at 30°C. The reaction was stopped by adding protein precipitating agent, 3 ml of 0.5 M trichloroacetic acid (TCA). Solutions were centrifuged at speed of 5000 rpm for 10 minutes and absorption of filtrate was measured at 275 nm [12].

Chitinase (EC 3.2.1.14) Colloidal Chitin Preparation: Ten gram of commercial chitin was grounded in a mortar and pestle and sieved through a # 40 mesh. The obtained powder was added to 100 ml of 85% phosphoric acid and kept in a refrigerator (5°C) for 24 h. Thereafter, 2 l of tap water was added and the gelatinous white material formed was separated by filtration. The retained cake was washed with tap water until the filtrate had a pH of 6.5. The colloidal chitin obtained had a soft, pasty consistency, with 90–95% moisture [13].

For chitinase estimation, the reaction mixture contained 0.1 ml of culture filtrate and 2.9 ml of a 2% (w/v) suspension of colloidal chitin, in 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.5) incubated at 30°C for 10 min. 3 ml of DNS reagent was added to the reaction mixture and incubated at 90°C for 15 min. After incubation, 1 ml of 40% (w/v) potassium sodium tartrate solution was added immediately to stabilize the colour. The mixture was cooled to room temperature, centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min. to remove insoluble chitin, and the colour intensity of resulting supernatant was estimated spectrophotometrically at 575 nm [14].

α- Glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.20) α- glucosidase activity was done following the method of Bramono K, et al. [15]. Reaction mixture consists of 125 µl of culture filtrate, 500 µl 5 mM pNPG prepared in 1 ml of 0.1M phosphate citrate buffer, incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The reaction was terminated by addition of 2 ml of 0.1 M Na2CO3. The colour formed as the result of pNP liberation was measured at 410 nm.

β-Glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21) Determination of β-glucosidase activity was done using the method of Cai YJ, et al. [16]. Reaction mixture consists of 0.125 ml of culture filtrate, 0.5 ml pNPG, Incubated at 45°C for 30 min. Reaction was stopped by addition of 1.25 ml sodium carbonate solution. The colour librated was measured at 410 nm.

Statistical Analysis

Three replicates were used for each experiment. The data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the means were compared with Tukey’s test at p < 0.05. All the analyses were performed using Microsoft excel.

Results

Acid Phosphatase Activity: Acid phosphatase activity of different ECM isolates ranged from 16.99 ± 1.97 to 69.2 ± 4.64 µM pNPg-1h-1 (Figure 1 & Table 1). Suillus triacicularis isolate DMRX-1625 (69.2 ± 4.64 µM pNPg-1h-1) showed Phosphatase activity

significantly higher level of ACPase activity followed by Rhizopogon sp. isolate DMRX-1627 (52.8 ± 3.86 µM pNPg-

1h-1), S. triacicularis isolate DMRX-1600 (40.55 ± 1.92 µM pNPg-1h-1) and S. sibiricus isolate DMRX 1626 (39.97 ± 2.78 µM pNPg-1h-1). Cortinarius sp. isolate DMRX-1628 (17.47 ± 1.74 µM pNPg-1h-1) and L. decastes isolate DMRX-1593 (16.99 ± 1.97 µM pNPg-1h-1) showed significantly lower ACPase activity.

a bc bcd Figure1: Acid phosphatase activity of different ectomycorrhizal fungi in Melin Nokran’s broth medium.

IsolateAcid phosphatase
(µMolg-1h-1)
Protease
(µMolg-1 min-1)
Chitinase
(mMolg-1 min-1)
α-glucosidase
(µMolg-1 min-1)
β-glucosidase
(µMolg-1 min-1)
DMRX-162817.47±0.87d0.94±0.23d2.77±0.47b8.98±1.81ab6.29±0.72bc
DMRX-159316.99±1.97cd1.1±0.18c2.27±0.45b5.8±0.82cd6.03±1.03bc
DMRX-162752.8±3.86ab1.87±0.29b6.31±0.67a6.29±1.39bcd7.44±0.37abc
DMRX-162639.97±2.78bcd1.46±0.24c2.52±0.42b10.49±0.68a9.44±1.68ab
DMRX-162569.2±4.64a2.34±0.15a2.46±0.2b8.24±0.6abc10.99±3.44a
DMRX-160040.55±1.92bc1.53±0.11c1.3±0.14b3.8±0.28d5.54±1.08c

Table 1: Extracellular enzyme activities of different ectomycorrhizal isolates.

Protease: Protease activity varied form 0.94 ± 0.23 to 2.34 ± 0.15 µM g-1min-1 (Figure 2 & Table 1). Protease activity was significantly higher in S. triacicularis isolate DMRX-1625 (2.34 ± 0.15 µM g-1min-1) followed by Rhizopogon sp. isolate DMRX-1627 (1.87 ± 0.29 µM g-1min-1) and S. triacicularis isolate DMRX-1600 (1.53 ± 0.11 µM g-1min-1). Suillus sibiricus isolate DMRX-1626 (1.46 ± 0.24 µM g-1min-1) and L. decastes isolate DMRX-1593 (1.1 ± 0.18 µM g-1min-1) exhibit intermediate protease activity. Significantly lower activity was observed in Cortinarius sp. isolate DMRX-1628 (0.94 ± 0.23 µM g-1min-1).

Protease activity

1 $$ = = $$ $$ = \frac {1}{2} $$

0.5

0 ECM isolates

a c c Figure 2: Acid protease activity of different ectomycorrhizal fungi in Melin Nokran’s broth medium.

Chitinase Activity: Chitinase activity ranged from 1.3 ± 0.14 mM g-1min-1 in S. triacicularis isolate DMRX-1600 to 6.31 ± 0.67 mM g-1min-1 in Rhizopogon sp. isolate DMRX- 1627 (Figure 3&Table 1). Among the Suillus spp., S. sibiricus isolate DMRX-1626 showed maximum activity (2.52 ± 0.42 mM g-1min-1) followed by S. triacicularis isolate DMRX- 1625 Chitinase activity

8 a

3 $$ \square $$ $$ = \frac {1}{2} $$

2 $$ = \frac {1}{2} $$

1

0 ECM isolates

(2.46±0.20 mM g-1min-1) and minimum in S. triacicularis isolate DMRX-1600 (1.3 ± 0.14 mM g-1min-1). Cortinarius sp. isolate DMRX 1628 and L. decastes isolate DMRX-1593 showed 2.77 ± 0.47 mM g-1min-1 and 2.27 ± 0.45 mM g-1min-1 chitinase activity, respectively.

α-Glucosidase Activity: α-glucosidase activity ranged from 3.8 ± 0.28 to 10.49 ± 0.68 µM pNPg-1min-1 (Figure 4 & Table 1). The significantly higher activity was observed in S. sibiricus isolate DMRX 1626 (10.49 ± 0.68 µM pNPg-1min-1) followed by Cortinarius sp. isolate DMRX 1628 (8.98 ± 1.81 µM pNPg-1min-1), S. triacicularis isolate DMRX- 1625 (8.24 ± 0.6 µM pNPg-1min-1), Rhizopogon sp. isolate DMRX-1627 (6.29 ± 1.39 µM pNPg-1min-1) and L. decastes isolate DMRX- 1593 (5.8 ± 0.82 µM pNPg-1min-1). The significantly least activity was observed in S. triacicularis isolate DMRX-1600 (3.8 ± 0.28 µM pNPg-1min-1).

β-Glucosidase: Activity of β-glucosidase varied form 6.03 ± 1.03 µM pNPg-1min-1 to 10.99 ± 3.44 µM pNPg-1min-1 (Figure 5 & Table 1). Suillus triacicularis isolate DMRX-1625 exhibited significantly higher activity (10.99 ± 3.44 µM pNPg-1min-1) followed by S. sibiricus isolate DMRX-1626 (9.44 ± 1.68 µM pNPg-1min-1) and Rhizopogon sp. isolate DMRX-1627 (7.44 ± 0.37 µM pNPg-1min-1). Cortinarius sp. isolate DMRX-1628 β-glucosidase activity

(6.29 ± 0.72 µM pNPg-1min-1) and L. decastes isolate DMRX- 1593 (6.03 ± 1.03 µM pNPg-1min-1) showed intermediate β-glucosidase activity. Least β-glucosidase activity was observed in S. triacicularis isolate DMRX-1600 (5.54 ± 1.08 µM pNPg-1min-1).

a c $$ \square $$ Figure 5: β-glucosidase activity of different ectomycorrhizal fungi in Melin Nokran’s broth medium.

Discussion

The findings on the enzymatic activity not always concur because the enzymes were analyzed using different type of samples (fruit bodies, spores, vegetative mycelium, and cultural filtrate) experimental conditions (use of substrate, solid or liquid culture media, incubation temperature, incubation period, indicators, and different pH range) and different means of determination. The highest phosphatase, protease and β-glucosidase activity was observed in S. triacicularis isolate DMRX-1625 while Rhizopogon sp. showed maximum activity of chitinase. S. sibiricus produced maximum α-glucosidase activity. Ho I, et al. [17] showed the acid phosphatase activity in Rhizopogon vinicolor which was 51.7 µmol/g dry weight. Pérez-de-Mora A, et al. [18] worked with enzyme activity of three ECM fungi Rhizopogon roseolus, Paxillus involutus and Piloderma croceum using different concentration of phosphorus and activity was observed after 15 days. The activity of phosphatase ranged from 92.9 to 112 µmol/g dry weight for different concentrations. Ho I, et al. [19,] observed the acid and alkaline phosphatase activity on six isolates of Laccaria laccata and showed that the acid phosphatase activity is (36–406 µmol/g dry weight) much higher than alkaline phosphatase activity (2–14µmol/g dry weight) in all the isolates [20].

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express sincere thanks to Directorate of Mushroom Research, Chambaghat, Solan for providing laboratory facilities to carry out present research work.

References

  1. Schenk HJ, Jackson RB (2002) The global biogeography of roots. Ecological Monographs 72(3): 311-328.
  2. Smith SE, Read DJ (1997) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. 2nd (Edn.), Academic Press, London.
  3. Chalot M, Brun A (1998) Physiology of organic nitrogen acquisition by ectomycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizas. FEMS Microbiology Review 22(1): 21- 44.
  4. Dighton J (1983) Phosphatase production by mycorrhizal fungi. Plant and Soil 71(1-3): 455-462.
  5. Abuzinadah RA, Read DJ (1986) The role of proteins in the nitrogen nutrition of ectomycorrhizal plants. I. Utilization of peptides and proteins by ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 103(3): 481-493.
  6. Leake JR, Read DJ (1990) Proteinase activity in mycorrhizal fungi. II. The effects of mineral and organic nitrogen sources on induction of extracellular proteinase in Hymenoscyphus ericae (Read) Korf & Kernan. New Phytologist 116(1): 123-128.
  7. Guttenberger M, Compart U, Spagele S, Hampp R (1994) Proteolytic activity in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Amanita muscaria and its mycorrhizas on Betula pendula. Plant Physiology (Supplement) 105: 869.
  8. Kjoller A, Struwe S (2002) Fungal communities, succession, enzymes, and decomposition. In: Burns RG, et al. (Eds.), Enzymes in the Environment. Activity, Ecology, and Applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp: 267-284.
  9. Bue´e M, Vairelles D, Garbaye J (2005) Year-round monitoring of diversity and potential metabolic activity of the ectomycorrhizal community in a beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest subjected to two thinning regimes. Mycorrhiza 15: 235-245.
  10. Courty PE, Pouysegur R, Bue´e M, Garbaye J (2006) Laccase and phosphatase activities of the dominant ectomycorrhizal types in a lowland Oak forest. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 38(6): 1219-1222.
  11. Tibbett M, Sanders FE, Cairney JWG (1998) The effect of temperature and inorganic phosphorus supply on growth and acid phosphatase production in arctic and temperate strains of ectomycorrhizal Hebeloma spp. in axenic culture. Mycological Research 102(2): 129-135.
  12. Kunitz N (1965) Methods of enzymatic analysis. 2nd(Edn.), Velag, Chenie. Academic Press New York, London, pp: 807-814.
  13. Avelizapa LIR, Camarillo RC, Guerrero MI, Va´zquez RR, Ibarra JE (1999) Selection and characterization of a proteo-chitinolytic strain of Bacillus thuringiensis, able to grow in shrimp waste media. World Jourbnal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 15: 299-308.
  14. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31(3): 426- 428.
  15. Bramono K, Tsuboi R, Ogawa H (1995) A carbohydrate- degrading enzyme from Candida albicans: correlation between α-glucosidase activity and fungal growth. Mycoses 38(9-10): 349-353.
  16. Cai YJ, Buswell JA, Chang ST (1998) β-Glucosidase component of the cellulolytic system of the edible straw mushroom, Volvariella volvacea. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 22(2): 122-129.
  17. Ho I, Zak B (1979) Acid phosphatase activity of six ectomycorrhizal fungi. Canadian Journal of Botany 57(11): 1203-1205.
  18. Pérez-de-Mora A, Reuter B, Lucio M, Ahne A, Schloter M (2013) Activity of native hydrolytic enzymes and their association with the cell wall of three ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 23(3): 185-197.
  19. Ho I, trappe JM (1984) Enzyme and phytohormone activity of six isolates of Laccaria laccata. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Corvallis, Oregon. pp: 34.
  20. Abuzinadah RA, Read DJ (1986) The role of proteins in the nitrogen nutrition of ectomycorrhizal plants. III. Protein utilization by Betula, Picea and Pinus in mycorrhizal association with Hebeloma crustuliniforme. New Phytologist 103(3): 507-514.

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{sood2024,
  title   = {Evaluation of Various Extracellular Enzymes of Ectomycorrhizal 
Mushrooms},
  author  = {Sood S, Singh R and Upadhyay RC},
  journal = {Open Access Journal of Mycology & Mycological Sciences},
  year    = {2024},
  volume  = {7},
  number  = {2},
  doi     = {10.23880/oajmms-16000189}
}
Sood S, Singh R and Upadhyay RC (2024). Evaluation of Various Extracellular Enzymes of Ectomycorrhizal 
Mushrooms. Open Access Journal of Mycology & Mycological Sciences, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.23880/oajmms-16000189
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluation of Various Extracellular Enzymes of Ectomycorrhizal 
Mushrooms
AU  - Sood S, Singh R and Upadhyay RC
JO  - Open Access Journal of Mycology & Mycological Sciences
PY  - 2024
VL  - 7
IS  - 2
DO  - 10.23880/oajmms-16000189
ER  -