Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology Research Article 14 min read

Morphometric Variation as a Proxy for Dispersal in a Highly Dimorphic Reed Bird Specialist from an Isolated and Vulnerable Small Population in SE Spain

Peiro IG*
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2639-216X  10.23880/izab-16000352  Received: January 27, 2022  Published: February 08, 2022
  views
 51 references
 3 tables
PDF
Keywords
Intra and Inter Sexual Differences Morphometry Panurus biarrmicus Small Population Dispersal
Abstract

In this study, I gathered a comprehensive set of measures in a sample of 63 Bearded reedlings Panurus biarmicus, a small and highly dimorphic passerine bird vulnerable in Spain, ringed in the years 2003-2007 and 2009-2010 in an isolated population in “El Hondo Natural Park, SE Spain”. Most morphometric parameters were greater in adult males than adult females, irrespective of age groups and they were correlated with weight and size and this implicates that they are size and conditiondependent (most costly to produce) so enhances individual's quality or fitness to the bearer. GLMM’s models indicated that selective forces were stronger for wing-length than for tail-length, wing-length dependent by the age of juveniles and sex of males and determined by the weight. This suggests that both traits, especially wing-length, posses great individual fitness that could facilitate for quick movements for dispersal, probably started for juveniles. The earlier studied differences in the wing's shape in this species are probably the proxy factors to enhance dispersal started by juveniles, since they possess shorter drab tails. We need furthermore studies to evaluate if other populations of European plateau are intra and inter-sexual selected and if they are proxies or primers for dispersal and migration of this species.

Introduction

According to Fisher’s hypothesis [1] the exaggerated ornaments of males may deviate from the optimum because of females’ preferences. This joint evolution from the optimum is sexual selection [2, 3, 4]. If elongated ornaments develop because of females’ preferences and bear a relation to survival, the ornament is under natural selection [5, 6]. Sexual selection drives in an intra-sexual selection (e.g. sexual selection for traits within individuals of the same sex [7, 8, 9]) inter-sexual selection (e.g. sexual selection for traits between individuals of different sex: [10, 11]). Extreme ornaments may be seen as phenotypic indicators of quality of the bearer and they are hence costly to produce and it considers them condition-dependent [12, 13]. Morphometry of the ornaments as tail and wing can be subjected to these processes [14, 15, 16, 17].

The tail is ornament under sexual and natural selection [14, 16] and social selection [18]. Within the natural selection context, tail- length is very useful to develop in reed masses mainly as a balancing organ, playing an important role in habitat selection [15]. The ability to perform brief trips decreases with tail elongation, because the tail length results in a costly ornament [16]. Regarding the wing morphology, aspects such as wing size and wing-shape are also sexually selected [20]. For instance, rounded wing-shapes result in better performance in females, moving around crowded habitats with more maneuverability than males [20]. Tarsus- length is another morphological parameter sexually selected [21, 22].

Amongst the highly dimorphic Eurasian reed-dwelling passerines, the Bearded reedling Panurus biarmicus is a medium-small Parrotbill inhabiting scarce and fragmented wetlands from Eurasia [24]. In eastern Mediterranean Spain remains a small breeding population nucleus of 50-75 pp. The main nucleus in south-eastern Spain is located at the southernmost distribution limits in Europa [25, 26]. Probably this population is the surplus from a dispersal nucleus of a bigger ancient population of south-eastern France (Poulin pers com). Population of this man-made reservoir (pp. 50- 70) faces extinction risks mainly because of the poor water quality [26, 27]. In this population, high levels of inbreeding may occur, because of isolament degree from source drier and colder areas of centre of Spain, distant 500 km because of mountains barrier-effect that difficulty the short movements of this species in Spain [29] and corroborated by the absence of recaptures among areas [30].

Objectives

Based on the earlier assumptions, I aim to try to assess the following key features in the Berded reedling: 1.- Are the measuring data subject to measurement errors that might influence its variability?; 2.- Are the morphometric parameters under study size and condition-dependent, costly of produce, that supposes individual’s major quality or fitness to the bearer that might facult the capability for dispersal at short-medium distance of the population studied?; 3. Are there age and sex-dependent differences in the average parameters that implicates that them are sexual selected? and 4.- Is there any proxy effect of age and sex in the morphometric parameters that might involve this capability?.

Material and Methods

Study Area

In south-eastern Mediterranean Spain remains a lowlands plateau of about 2000-3000 Ha formed in the past centuries by the calcium-rich sediments of the river Segura on which “El Hondo” was constructed as an inland water reservoir at the beginnings of XX century at 38º16’N 00º41’W in the southwest of Alicante province (38º20’N 0º28’W) in the low limits of the arid semiarid region of middle Alicante province (20.127 Ha) and eastern of Murcia province (37º59’N 1º7’WM; 88.600 Ha). This site was categorized as RAMSAR site number14 as “El Hondo Swamp” in the year 1989 because it holds important numbers of threatened medium birds and supports a rich and complex community of small size reed birds species. It is a group of eutrophic lagoons surrounding a manmade-construction on the saline and freshwater marshlands. The local climate is temperate, wet and prone to high seasonality with great variability in winter (annual total rainfall is about 250 mm and annual temperature average about 19ºC in 1992-2009 [31]), which affects the evolution of some traits of through time in the species under study [31].

Data Recording

The first bulk sample of birds (N = 84) was mist- netted inside the core of the Park by the author and these birds were ringed with aluminum rings (Spanish Ministry of Environment- Madrid) and afterwards measured and released by the author in the same site in the years 2003 (N = 29), 2004 (16), 2005 (5), 2006 (10), 2007 (8), 2009 (11) and 2010 (5). The period of ringing and handling covered the breeding (March -October) and non-breeding (November- February) seasons, according to Robson C [24]. Since this first sample contained a non- breeding bird’s surplus (N = 21) of unknown origin, the first dataset was reduced to the native sub-sample (N = 63) corresponding to the individuals trapped during the breeding season (2003-2004, N = 34; 2005-2007, N = 17; 2009-2010, N =12).

The birds were sexed and aged as adults and juveniles according to the plumage key features [24]. I took the following measures following [32]: 1.- Maximum right wing- length (accuracy 0.5 mm); 2.- tail-length (to the base of the under-tail coverts, accuracy 0.5 mm), 3.- left and right tarsus- length (accuracy 0.1 mm). I measured body weight with a 50 g Pesola ® spring balance (accuracy 0.1 g). I estimated the body condition index (BCI) is weight, considered as an index of an individual’s quality [33, 34, 35]. Tarsus-length (averaging the measure of left and right tarsus) was considered as a measure of body size (BSI), because it contains a strong skeletal component and it is a good predictor of body size similarly to keel-length [36, 37].

Statistical Procedures

I gave the measurements variability as the percentage of the variation coefficient (CV) [38, 39]. This variability was statistically tested by Chi-squared test of all CV’s [40]. Repeatability of left and right tarsus was tested according to [41]. All morphological variables meet normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test: P = 0.200; N = 63) so parametric tests were used. Pearson’s correlation coefficient tested relations between BSI (tarsus-length) and BCI (weight). Means were tested by One-way ANOVA [39]. I expressed means with ± SD. All tests were two-tailed [42].

In order to detect the direction of the selective forces, I first performed a set of Pearson’s correlations among morphological variables with weight and average tarsus- length (Table 1). Second, I used two Generalized Linear Models (GLMs), with a linear error distribution, to assess the overall effect of sex (43 males; 20 females) and age (45 adults; 18 juveniles) on tail- length and wing-length. I used both morphological parameters as dependent variables in each model, sex (0 = male; 1 = female) and age (4 = adult; 3 = juvenile) as fixed continuous variables and weight and average tarsus-length included as covariates (Tables 2&3). For analysis, the IBM SPSS.v23 statistical package was used [42].

significant age differences in average tail- lengths between sexes, but juvenile females having longer tails than juvenile males (Table 1). Overall mean wing-length (58.14 mm ± 2.47; range: 53-66; N = 63) shows a very high variability between sexes and ages (X2 = 300; P < 0.0001). I found average longer wings in juvenile females than juvenile males (Table 1). Average mean tarsus length (19.64 mm ± 0.66; range: 18.4- 21.5; N = 63) as highly variable (X2 = 200; P < 0.0001) and I found inter- and intra-sexual differences (Table 1). In spite not accounting for reliable fat in this study, average weight (12.55 ± 0.84; range: 10.0-14-0; N = 63) shows highly significant variability (X2 = 300; P < 0.0001). Tarsus-length (BSI) and weight (BC) were not auto-correlated (r = 0.175; P = 0.169; N = 63) but positively correlated with tail-length and wing-length (Table 2). Repeatability of measures of left- right tarsus-length was high (R = 0.825; F1, 62 = 1.212; P < 0.0001). Selective forces were stronger for wing-length than for tail-length according to the Akaike’s Information Criteria (AIC) of the GLMM’s models, since AIC’s values for wing- length were minor than for tail-length (Table 3).

  • Results
  • Morphological Features
  • The tail-length of the Bearded reedling was on average
  • 77.53 mm ± 6.04 (range: 67- 90 mm; N= 63) and highly significant variable between sexes within ages (X2 = 200; P
  • < 0.0001). Probably due to the low sample sizes, there were
  • TRAIT
  • MEAN ± SD
  • N
  • RANGE
  • % CV
  • F d.f
  • P
  • F d.f
  • P
  • Wing-length (mm)
  • INTER-SEXUAL
  • INTRA-SEXUAL
  • Adult Male
  • 59.91 ± 1.69
  • 32
  • 56-66
  • 2,82
  • 23.24
  • 1.45
  • < 0.001
  • 61.93
  • 1.45
  • < 0.001
  • Adult Female
  • 57.31 ± 1.49
  • 13
  • 54-59
  • 2.6
  • Juvenile Male
  • 55.50 ± 1.28
  • 11
  • 53-58.5
  • 2.31
  • 0.156
  • 1.18
  • 0.699
  • 4.107
  • 1.18
  • 0.058
  • Juvenile Female
  • 55.78 ± 1.79
  • 7
  • 53-59
  • 3.21
  • Weight (gr)
  • Adult Male
  • 12.90 ± 0.72
  • 32
  • 11,3-14,3
  • 5.58
  • 1.79
  • 1.45
  • 0.189
  • 15.65
  • 1.41
  • < 0.0001
  • Adult Female
  • 12.56 ± 0.87
  • 13
  • 10.8-14.1
  • 6.93
  • Juvenile Male
  • 11.94 ± 0.65
  • 11
  • 10.9-13
  • 5.44
  • 0.41
  • 1,18
  • 0.843
  • 2.76
  • 1.18
  • 0.114
  • Juvenile Female
  • 11.87 ± 0.91
  • 7
  • 10.4-13.2
  • 7.67
  • Mean Tarsus (mm)
  • Adult Male
  • 19.96 ± 0.59
  • 32
  • 18.9-21.5
  • 2.96
  • 28.19
  • 1,45
  • < 0.0001
  • 28.19
  • 1.45
  • < 0.0001
  • Adult Female
  • 19.00 ± 0.41
  • 13
  • 18.4-19.6
  • 2.16
  • Juvenile Male
  • 19.74 ± 0.49
  • 11
  • 18.8-20.7
  • 2.48
  • 6.43
  • 1,18
  • 0.022
  • 6.43
  • 1.18
  • 0.022
  • Juvenile Female
  • 19.17 ± 0.42
  • 7
  • 18.7-20.7
  • 2.19
  • Tail-length (mm)
  • Adult Male
  • 82.30 ± 3.63
  • 32
  • 74-90
  • 4.41
  • 52.99
  • 1.45
  • < 0.0001
  • 52.99
  • 1.45
  • < 0.0001
  • Adult Female
  • 73.96 ± 3.05
  • 13
  • 69-80.5
  • 4.12
  • Juvenile Male
  • 70.82 ± 3.92
  • 11
  • 67-78.5
  • 5.54
  • 1.42
  • 1.18
  • 0.251
  • 1.42
  • 1.18
  • 0.251
  • Juvenile Female
  • 72.93 ± 3.22
  • 7
  • 70-79
  • 4.42

Table 1: Morphometry of the bearded reedling in SE Spain in relation to sex and age. Patterns of variation is expressed by the

VariablerBSIBCI
pNrPN
Wing-length (mm)0.3850.002630.611< 0.000163
Tail-Length (mm)0.476< 0.0001630.559< 0.000163

Table 2: Pearson’s correlations between and average left-right tarsus-length as body size index (BSI) and weigth as body conditio

WING-LENGTH
bSEWald Chi-squareddfp
INTERCEPT42.377.0636.071< 0.0001
AGE-2.570.4828.751< 0.0001
SEX1.280.516.2110.013
WEIGHT0.920.2811.0110.001
TARSUS-LENGTH0.210.40.2710.604
AIC242.11
Deviance142.27
TAIL-LENGTH
bSEWald Chi-squareddfp
INTERCEPT27.618.262.2910.131
AGE-6.31.1928.011< 0.0001
SEX-3.221.286.3810.012
WEIGHT1.540.694.9410.026
TARSUS-LENGTH1.710.992.9710.085
AIC356.74
Deviance877.66

Table 3: Generalized Linear Models (GLM’s) to the dependent variables (wing-length and tail- length) and sex and age as fixed fac

Discussion

Despite all measured morphological parameters showed high variability that might be due to biases of the measurer also noted in other traits measured in this species [43]. I claim to standardize and to take repeated measures of a same trait during field procedures (see [43]) although however measures of left-right tarsus-length were highly repeatable. This study reveals that the main morphometric parameters of the Bearded reedling were inter and intra- sexually selected in a small and isolated Mediterranean population. In captivity experiments, they show tail is inter- sexually selected after artificial elongation because females preferred longer tail males [14]. The tail trait serves as a signal of maneuverability [44] or for escaping abilities in cluttered habitats being a drag for speed accomplished by short and slow flights [4, 6]. Wing-length serves as an optimal organ to enhance speed ability, for long-faster trips [20]. All these features allow Bearded reedlings to perform for large movements as is shown elsewhere [45, 46].

This study finds that a flight-lift component (wing-length) and a flight-drab component (tail- length) are both dependent and directly related to condition and size. Then, they are indicators of an individual’s quality or fitness. Experiments by Malzer I, et al. [47] in this species corroborate some of these findings since tail-length is positively correlated with levels of IGF-1, a hormone related with the link between condition and the expression of elaborated traits, and also positively related with body weight. Some migrating marsh passerines do not show differences between sexes in some morphometrics and body condition during the molt [48] so is suggested that strong physiological changes during the breeding period could drive in age and sex differences in morphological parameters that are more susceptible during molt because of energetic demands.

Conclusion

This study reinforces the idea [50] that birds carrying bigger morphometric parameters (e.g wing-shapes and tail-lengths) are better predictors for dispersal ability. This is a key factor jointly with seasonality, heavily given in the population of Bearded reedlings in “El Hondo”, the key drivers for dispersal, especially in harsh and cold years [31]. Further, we need studies to explain if such morphological variability occurs in other areas of Spain to elucidate what are the causes and consequences of being fitness signals suitable for enhancing short- medium movements [45, 46, 51].

Acknowledgement

The author would like to acknowledge the Spanish private properties (Comunidad de Riegos de Levante) and regional authorities (Generalitat Valenciana) for providing to me with the authorizations to enter and ring at “El Hondo” Natural Park during the study years. This research was not fully or partially sponsored.

References

  1. Fisher RA (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press. Oxford, pp: 1419-1426.
  2. Winquist T, Lemon RE (1994) Sexual selection and exaggerated male tail length in birds. The American Naturalist 143: 95-116.
  3. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press. Princeton.
  4. Evans MR (2004) Limits on the evolution of tail ornamentation in birds. The American Naturalist 163: 341-357.
  5. Andersson M (1982b) Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 17: 375-393.
  6. Thomas AL, Balmford A (1995) How natural selection shapes birds’ tails. The American Naturalist 146: 848- 868.
  7. Andersson M (1982a) Female choice selects for extreme tail lengths in a widowbird. Nature 299: 818-820.
  8. Bańbura J (1986) Sexual dimorphism in wing and tail length as shown by the Swallow Hirundo rustica. Journal of Zoology 210(1): 131-136.
  9. Møller AP (1994) Sexual selection and the barn swallow. Oxford University Press.
  10. Regosin JV, Pruett-Jones S (2001) Sexual selection and tail-length dimorphism in Scissor- tailed Flycatchers. The Auk 118: 167-175.
  11. Laucht S, Dale J (2012) Correlations of condition, testosterone, and age with multiple ornaments in male house sparrows: patterns and implications. The Condor 114: 865-873.
  12. Anderson M (1986) Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40(4): 804-816.
  13. Blanco G, de la Puente J (2002) Multiple elements of the black-billed magpie’s tail correlate with variable honest information on quality in different age/sex classes. Animal Behaviour 63: 217-225.
  14. Romero Pujante MD (2000) La importancia de los procesos de selección sexual y selección natural en el Bigotudo Panurus biarmicus. PhD thesis, University of Granada.
  15. Hoi H, Hoi Ch (2001) Habitat selection and habitat use of the Bearded Tit (Panurus biarmicus). In: Hoi H (Ed.), The ecology of reed birds. Biosystematics and Ecology Series. 18: 73- 85.
  16. Romero Pujante M, Hoi H, Blomqvist D (2005) The importance of tail length for habitat use in the Bearded Tit Panurus biarmicus: an experimental study. Ibis 147: 464-470.
  17. Hoi H, Griggio M (2012) Bearded reedlings adjust their pair-bond behaviour in relation to the sex and attractiveness of unpaired conspecifics. PloS one 7: e32806.
  18. Tóth Z, Baldan D, Albert C, Hoi H, Griggio M (2016) Effect of ornament manipulations on following relations in male bearded reedlings. Ethology Ecology & Evolution 28: 175-187.
  19. Romero Pujante MD, Hoi H, Winkler H (2001) The role of tail length for flight performance in the Bearded Tit (Panurus biarmicus): a tail elongation experiment. The ecology of reed birds. Biosystematics and Ecology Series, pp: 151-159.
  20. Peiró IG, Robledano F, Esteve MA (2006) The effect of age and sex on wing morphology and body size of the Bearded Tit Panurus biarmicus in relation to complete moult. Ringing & Migration 23: 101-106.
  21. Swaddle JP, Witter MS (1998) Cluttered habitats reduce wing asymmetry and increase flight performance in European starlings. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 42: 281-287.
  22. Peiró IG (1994) Biometrics of the Bigotudo (Panurus biarmicus) in a locality in the Southeast of Spain. Butlletí del Grup Català d’Anellament 11: 51-55.
  23. Albaiceta E, Sanz J (2007) Biometrics, physical condition, reproductive phenology, wing coloration and tongue markings of the mustachioed (Panurus biarmicus) in Estanca de Escorón (Zaragoza). banding magazine 20: 2-11.
  24. Robson C (2007) Family Paradoxornithidae (Parrotbills). Handbook of the Birds of the World. 12: 308-309.
  25. Cramp S, Perrins CM (1993) The Birds of the Western Palearctic.Oxford University Press. Oxford 7.
  26. Gosler A, Mogyorósi D (1997) Bearded Tit. In: Hagenmeijer EJ, Blair MJ, et al. (Eds.), The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance, pp: 628-629.
  27. López G, Belenguer R, Castany J, Díes JI (2007) El. declive del bigotudo en la Comunidad Valenciana. Quercus 262: 14-18.
  28. Belenguer R, López G, Dies JI, Castany J (2016) Dramatic decline of the Bearded Reedling Paurus biarmicus in Spanish Mediterranean wetlands. Animal Biodiversity & Conservation 39: 19-27.
  29. Peiró IG (2013) Movements, sex-ratios, recovery rates and longevity of the Bearded Reedling Panurus biarmicus in Iberia. Ringing & Migration 28: 50-52.
  30. Peiró IG (2011) Sex-ratio variation in the Bearded Tit Panurus biarmicus in El Hondo Natural Park (SE Iberia). Revista Catalana d’Ornitologia 27: 40-44.
  31. Peiró IG (2019) Senescence and dispersal under local climatic variations of bearded reedlings Panurus biarmicus at the southwestern limit of their European distributional range. Biodiversity International Journal 3: 132-137.
  32. Svensson L (1992) Identification guide to European passerines. Lars Svensson. Stockholm.
  33. Jakob EM, Marshall SD, Uetz GW (1996) Estimating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices. Oikos 77: 61-67.
  34. Lehikoinen A, Jaatinen K, Öst M (2009) Do female ornaments indicate quality in eider ducks?. Biology letters 6: 225-228.
  35. Moller AP, Christe P, Erritzøe J, Mavarez J (1998) Condition, disease and immune defence. Oikos 83: 301- 306.
  36. Pascual J, Senar JC (1996) What are different biometric measurements of avian body size actually measuring?. Butlletí del Grup Català d’Anellament 13: 1-8.
  37. Senar JC, Pascual J (1997) Keel and tarsus length may provide a good predictor of avian body size. Ardea 85: 269-274.
  38. Lande R (1977) On comparing coefficients of variation. Systematic Zoology 26: 214-217.
  39. Sokal RR & Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry: the principles of statistics in biological research. In: Freeman, et al (Eds.), San Francisco.
  40. Van Valen L (2005) The statistics of variation. Evolutionary Theory 4: 33-43.
  41. Harper GCD (1994) Some comments on the repeatability of measurements. Ringing & Migration 15: 84-90.
  42. SPSS Inc (2015) SPSS Categories 23.0. Chicago.
  43. Peiró IG (2021) The size of melanin-based beard ornaments is not related to body condition in the Bearded Reedling Panurus biarmicus. Revista Catalana d’Ornitologia 37: 42-48.
  44. Møller AP, Swaddle JP (1997) Asymmetry, developmental stability and evolution. Oxford University Press.
  45. Dudley R (2002) Mechanisms and implications of animal flight maneuverability. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42: 135-140.
  46. Horák D, Procházka P, Cepák J, Zárybnický J (2003) Movements of bearded tits (Panurus biarmicus) in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Sylvia 39: 79-94.
  47. Malzer I (2017) Patterns in the space use of the Bearded Reedling,Panurus biarmicus, on the Tay Reedbeds, Scotland. PhD thesis. University of Glasgow.
  48. Mahr K, Vincze O, Tóth Z, Hoi H, Lendvai ÁZ (2019) Insulin-like growth factor 1 is related to the expression of plumage traits in a passerine species. BioRxiv pp: 645- 226.
  49. Kulaszewicz I, Jakubas D (2015) Factors affecting post-breeding moult in the Savi’s warbler Locustella luscinioides in northern Poland. Ardea 103: 61-69.
  50. Sheard C, Neate Clegg MH, Alioravainen N, Jones SE, Vincent C, et al. (2020) Ecological drivers of global gradients in avian dispersal inferred from wing morphology. Nature communications 11: 1-9.
  51. Peiró IG (2017) The Behavioural Ecology, Local Population Dynamics and Conservation of the Bearded Reedling Panurus biarmicus in “El Hondo Natural Park” (SE Spain). Ecology & Evolutionary Biology 2: 25-33.

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{peiro2022,
  title   = {Morphometric Variation as a Proxy for Dispersal in a Highly
Dimorphic Reed Bird Specialist from an Isolated and Vulnerable
Small Population in SE Spain},
  author  = {Peiro IG},
  journal = {International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology},
  year    = {2022},
  volume  = {5},
  number  = {1},
  doi     = {10.23880/izab-16000352}
}
Peiro IG (2022). Morphometric Variation as a Proxy for Dispersal in a Highly
Dimorphic Reed Bird Specialist from an Isolated and Vulnerable
Small Population in SE Spain. International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.23880/izab-16000352
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Morphometric Variation as a Proxy for Dispersal in a Highly
Dimorphic Reed Bird Specialist from an Isolated and Vulnerable
Small Population in SE Spain
AU  - Peiro IG
JO  - International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology
PY  - 2022
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
DO  - 10.23880/izab-16000352
ER  -