Hymenoptera Specimens from the Caño Negro Wetland, of the National Museum Collection, Costa Rica
Caño Negro is a Ramsar Wetland that has been extensively studied for botanical and vertebrate species, but with a significant deficiency in insect and other invertebrate taxonomy. To contribute to diminishing this important information gap, a rapid assessment was conducted to establish a baseline taxonomic inventory, referencing specimens housed in the collection of the National Museum of Costa Rica, as well as those collected during three field expeditions. A total of 415 species, across 37 families, were found. The ecological roles of many of these species are vital for assessing their conservation status, ranging from mutualistic interactions with plant species to their role in nutrient cycling. Hymenoptera constitute one of the most important faunal groups for consideration in ecosystem assessments, particularly in the context of a Ramsar wetland.
Abbreviations
GBIF: Global Biodiversity Information Facility; MNCR: National Museum of Costa Rica; MNCR-A: Arthropod specimen from the National Museum of Costa Rica collection; SINAC: National System of Conservation Areas.
Introduction
The Caño Negro National Wildlife Refuge (RNVSCN), located in northern Costa Rica (Caño Negro, San Carlos, Alajuela), constitutes one of Mesoamerica’s most critical wetland ecosystems. Designated as a Ramsar Site in 1991 (Site No. 540) due to its international importance, this complex of seasonal lagoons and Raphia taedigera palm swamps serves as a vital carbon sink and a sanctuary for exceptional biodiversity, harboring endangered species such as the tropical gar (Atractosteus tropicus) and the jabiru (Jabiru mycteria) [1, 2]. Its pulsatile hydrology, dictated by the Frío River, defines flood cycles that regulate the ecosystem’s trophic structure.
Recently, the scientific focus has expanded towards the wetland’s entomofauna, recognizing insects as bioindicators of environmental health. Recent entomological studies have revealed significant richness in key functional groups. For instance, research on the diversity of frugivorous butterflies (Nymphalidae) has demonstrated how surrounding habitat fragmentation impacts species composition within the refuge, highlighting the necessity of biological corridors [3]. Similarly, Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) inventories have been fundamental for assessing water quality, identifying species sensitive to agricultural eutrophication originating from adjacent pineapple crops [4], underscoring the wetland’s vulnerability to external anthropogenic pressures.
However, a substantial record to serve as a baseline for the study of various Hymenoptera groups is still lacking. Therefore, the present work was undertaken to generate such a record, which can then be used as a reference for subsequent studies of the site.
Methodology
Species List
To establish a reference baseline, a thorough search of the MNCR’s database was conducted to extract a list of Hymenoptera taxa originating from the Caño Negro Wetland, it can be accessed by the following link: https:// biodiversidad.museocostarica.go.cr/ Taxonomic data from the GBIF database for the area was also extracted to generate a comparison illustrating the representation percentage of taxa in the heritage collection.
SINAC Permits
Several field expeditions were carried out during which specimens were collected using various methods including traps, Malaise traps, sweep nets, light screens, and scent traps. Collections were conducted under collection permit SINAC-SE-DE-R-0154-2025 and scientific passport: SINAC- SE-DE-LC-0042-2025 for the expeditions from October 27- 31.
Results
A total of 415 species (Table 1), present in the National Museum of Costa Rica’s collection, were found, distributed across 37 families. However, with the exception of the recent addition of Centris festiva, all others correspond to records from between 1992 and 1994, without other recent samplings.
Among these records are 17 endemic species, one of which is the bee Melipona costarricensis, and the rest are parasitic wasps from the families Braconidae and Ichneumonidae.
| Familia | Identificación | Testigo | Endemismo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agaonidae | No Id | MNCR-A 2041789 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Apis (Apis) mellifera | MNCR-A 3971707 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Bombus (Fervidobombus) pullatus | MNCR-A 1976891 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Centris (Heterocentris) analis | MNCR-A 2216965 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Centris (Ptilocentris) festiva | Registro 2025 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Centris (Heterocentris) labrosa | MNCR-A 739313 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Centris (Heterocentris) vittata | MNCR-A 739317 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Centris (Trachina) longimana | MNCR-A 739265 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Epicharis (Hoplepicharis) lunulata | MNCR-A 2012436 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Euglossa ignita | MNCR-A 1706467 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Euglossa imperialis | MNCR-A 1302581 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Euglossa townsendi | MNCR-A 1745805 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Eulaema (Apeulaema) nigrita | MNCR-A 1985717 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Eulaema (Eulaema) meriana | MNCR-A 1302590 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Exaerete dentata | MNCR-A 2401008 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Exaerete frontalis | MNCR-A 1302585 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Exaerete smaragdina | MNCR-A 1302583 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Lestrimelitta danuncia | MNCR-A 902175 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Melipona (Melikerria) beecheii | MNCR-A 1706432 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Melipona (Michmelia) costaricensis | MNCR-A 1767851 | Endemic |
| Apidae | Nannotrigona perilampoides | MNCR-A 980350 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Partamona orizabaensis | MNCR-A 3973634 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Trigona (Frieseomelitta) paupera | MNCR-A 1335905 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Trigona (Tetragona) ziegleri | MNCR-A 1193301 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Trigona (Trigona) muzoensis | MNCR-A 3971616 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Trigona (Trigona) nigerrima | MNCR-A 1873944 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Trigona (Trigona) silvestriana | MNCR-A 988730 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Trigona corvina | MNCR-A 1333102 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Trigona fulviventris | MNCR-A 1980820 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Trigona fuscipennis | MNCR-A 3973737 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Exomalopsis sp. | MNCR-A 1335904 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Florilegus sp. | MNCR-A 882365 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Melissoptila sp. | MNCR-A 1980874 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Melitoma sp. | MNCR-A 980144 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Osiris sp. | MNCR-A 3973531 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Paratetrapedia sp. | MNCR-A 1976948 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Rathymus sp. | MNCR-A 1292404 | Non endemic |
| Apidae | Xylocopa sp. | MNCR-A 696725 | Non endemic |
| Argidae | Didymia unifasciata | MNCR-A 2116859 | Non endemic |
| Argidae | Eriglenum crudum | MNCR-A 1767826 | Non endemic |
| Argidae | Scobina lepida | MNCR-A 439391 | Non endemic |
| Argidae | Scobina notaticollis | MNCR-A 980215 | Non endemic |
| Bethylidae | Anisepyris bifidus | MNCR-A 2495774 | Non endemic |
| Bethylidae | Anisepyris franciscanus | MNCR-A 911706 | Non endemic |
| Bethylidae | Bakeriella sp. | MNCR-A 1706431 | Non endemic |
| Bethylidae | Goniozus sp. | MNCR-A 1803512 | Non endemic |
| Bethylidae | Rhabdepyris vesculus | MNCR-A 2334131 | Non endemic |
| Bethylidae | Apenesia sp. | MNCR-A 1704175 | Non endemic |
| Bethylidae | Dissomphalus sp. | MNCR-A 2495751 | Non endemic |
| Bethylidae | Epyris sp. | MNCR-A 1704182 | Non endemic |
| Bethylidae | Holepyris sp. | MNCR-A 1706540 | Non endemic |
| Bethylidae | Pseudisobrachium sp. | MNCR-A 911663 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Acanthorhogas costaricensis | MNCR-A 1980758 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Alabagrus albispina | MNCR-A 696957 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Alabagrus arawak | MNCR-A 902096 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Alabagrus maculipes | MNCR-A 2125388 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Alabagrus masneri | MNCR-A 897393 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Alabagrus watsoni | MNCR-A 1931972 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Aleiodes vaughani | MNCR-A 2167754 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Epsilogaster tico | MNCR-A 1746455 | Endemic |
| Braconidae | Hypomicrogaster zonaria | MNCR-A 1864054 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Masonbeckia towesi | MNCR-A 911701 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Semirhytus crassivena | MNCR-A 911674 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Stantonia pallidus | MNCR-A 943970 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Triraphis eumekes | MNCR-A 1745869 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Triraphis guarusa | MNCR-A 1745871 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Yelicones gavinbroadi | MNCR-A 2012394 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Yelicones nigrocaputus | MNCR-A 2012393 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Zelomorpha miza | MNCR-A 1176632 | Endemic |
| Braconidae | Zelomorpha petila | MNCR-A 1980816 | Endemic |
| Braconidae | Bassus sp. | MNCR-A 938720 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Bracon sp. | MNCR-A 897372 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Campsobracon sp. | MNCR-A 781521 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Campsobraconoides sp. | MNCR-A 1745862 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Chelonus sp. | MNCR-A 1980706 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Choreborogas sp. | MNCR-A 2109099 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Clinocentrus sp. | MNCR-A 1746641 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Cotesia sp. | MNCR-A 1746821 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Cystomastax sp. | MNCR-A 1762943 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Diachasmimorpha sp. | MNCR-A 2123948 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Digonogastra sp. | MNCR-A 696958 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Diospilus sp. | MNCR-A 1980768 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Dolichogenidea sp. | MNCR-A 1746867 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Exasticolus Sp. | MNCR-A 1980601 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Fornicia Sp. | MNCR-A 1746494 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Glyptapanteles sp. | MNCR-A 1746585 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Gnaptodon sp. | MNCR-A 1746562 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Helcon sp. | MNCR-A 1980799 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Hemibracon sp. | MNCR-A 1863671 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Heterospilus sp. | MNCR-A 2495763 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Hormius sp. | MNCR-A 897319 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Labagathis sp. | MNCR-A 739353 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Macrocentrus sp. | MNCR-A 1941718 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Myosoma sp. | MNCR-A 2334373 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Notiospathius sp. | MNCR-A 1704196 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Opius sp. | MNCR-A 1980691 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Orgilus sp. | MNCR-A 1746768 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Phanerotoma sp. | MNCR-A 1980626 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Prasmodon sp. | MNCR-A 1746432 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Pseudognaptodon sp. | MNCR-A 1864370 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Rhygoplitis sp. | MNCR-A 897387 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Rhysipolis sp | MNCR-A 980670 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Sacirema sp. | MNCR-A 696959 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Sendaphne sp. | MNCR-A 1746952 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Vipio sp. | MNCR-A 1980602 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Xanthomicrogaster sp. | MNCR-A 1746668 | Non endemic |
| Braconidae | Zacremnops sp. | MNCR-A 696850 | Non endemic |
| Ceraphronidae | No Id. | MNCR-A 897360 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura annulipes | MNCR-A 1863690 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura carinata | MNCR-A 1746676 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura carinifea | MNCR-A 1941695 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura contribula | MNCR-A 1746862 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura delicata | MNCR-A 2012367 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura dimidiata | MNCR-A 1302612 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura discolor | MNCR-A 911722 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura elongata | MNCR-A 1874417 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura flava | MNCR-A 739407 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura fulvovariegata | MNCR-A 2123938 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura maculipennis | MNCR-A 1746852 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura marcosensis | MNCR-A 1864359 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura nigriformis | MNCR-A 938676 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura rufodorsalis | MNCR-A 2117078 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura segoviae | MNCR-A 739447 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Conura transitira | MNCR-A 911675 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Haltichella sp. | MNCR-A 2495757 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Melanosmicra flavicollis | MNCR-A 2123902 | Non endemic |
| Chalcididae | Melanosmicra variventris | MNCR-A 1746861 | Non endemic |
| Chrysididae | Cleptidea panamensis | MNCR-A 1193300 | Non endemic |
| Chrysididae | Caenochrysis sp. | MNCR-A 1193303 | Non endemic |
| Colletidae | Ptiloglossa eximia | MNCR-A 2038286 | Non endemic |
| Colletidae | Ptiloglossa mexicana | MNCR-A 1754241 | Non endemic |
| Crabronidae | Cerceris sp. | MNCR-A 1943598 | Non endemic |
| Crabronidae | Liris sp. | MNCR-A 739288 | Non endemic |
| Crabronidae | Stigmus sp. | MNCR-A 2249396 | Non endemic |
| Crabronidae | Trypoxylon sp. | MNCR-A 781402 | Non endemic |
| Cynipidae | No Id | MNCR-A 1705950 | Non endemic |
| Diapriidae | Acanthopria sp. | MNCR-A 2334468 | Non endemic |
| Diapriidae | Basalys sp. | MNCR-A 897395 | Non endemic |
| Diapriidae | Coptera sp. | MNCR-A 2041812 | Non endemic |
| Diapriidae | Doliopria sp. | MNCR-A 1193186 | Non endemic |
| Diapriidae | Entomacis sp. | MNCR-A 1941669 | Non endemic |
| Diapriidae | Idiotypa sp. | MNCR-A 1746487 | Non endemic |
| Diapriidae | Monelata sp. | MNCR-A 2334460 | Non endemic |
| Diapriidae | Paramesius sp. | MNCR-A 897307 | Non endemic |
| Diapriidae | Spilomicrus sp. | MNCR-A 2334401 | Non endemic |
| Diapriidae | Trichopria sp. | MNCR-A 897300 | Non endemic |
| Dryinidae | No Id | MNCR-A 1746479 | Non endemic |
| Elasmidae | No Id | MNCR-A 1802967 | Non endemic |
| Encyrtidae | Ooencyrtus sp. | MNCR-A 1193217 | Non endemic |
| Encyrtidae | Syrphophagus sp. | MNCR-A 1762792 | Non endemic |
| Eucharitidae | Orasema costaricensis | MNCR-A 1746776 | Non endemic |
| Eulophidae | Elachertus complex | MNCR- 938724 | Non endemic |
| Eulophidae | Horismenus sp. | MNCR-A 2334386 | Non endemic |
| Eulophidae | Tetrastichus sp. | MNCR-A 1864090 | Non endemic |
| Eupelmidae | No Id | MNCR-A 1941706 | Non endemic |
| Eurytomidae | Conoaxima sp. | MNCR-A 2109101 | Non endemic |
| Eurytomidae | Eurytoma sp. | MNCR-A 938700 | Non endemic |
| Eurytomidae | Rileya sp. | MNCR-A 1803545 | Non endemic |
| Evaniidae | Evania sp. | MNCR-A 1704253 | Non endemic |
| Evaniidae | Evaniella sp. | MNCR-A 739390 | Non endemic |
| Evaniidae | Hyptia sp. | MNCR-A 1864123 | Non endemic |
| Evaniidae | Semaeomyia sp. | MNCR-A 911684 | Non endemic |
| Figitidae | Acantheucoela sp. | MNCR-A 2123924 | Non endemic |
| Figitidae | Balna sp. | MNCR-A 1980594 | Non endemic |
| Figitidae | Kleidotoma sp. | MNCR-A 1193181 | Non endemic |
| Figitidae | Penteucoila sp. | MNCR-A 1803521 | Non endemic |
| Figitidae | Prosaspicera sp. | MNCR-A 739497 | Non endemic |
| Figitidae | Rhabdeucoela sp. | MNCR-A 1762828 | Non endemic |
| Figitidae | Tropideucoila sp. | MNCR-A 1746674 | Non endemic |
| Figitidae | Zaeucoila sp. | MNCR-A 1980625 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Acanthoponera minor | MNCR-A 1704228 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Acromyrmex octospinosus | MNCR-A 1704227 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Apterostigma sp. | MNCR-A 2334143 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Atta cephalotes | MNCR-A 1333097 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Azteca sp. | MNCR-A 2334328 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Camponotus atriceps | MNCR-A 1728194 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Camponotus claviscapus | MNCR-A 944122 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Camponotus planatus | MNCR-A 2125208 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Camponotus trapezoideus | MNCR-A 897476 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Cephalotes minutus | MNCR-A 2193276 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Cephalotes multispinosus | MNCR-A 944075 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Cephalotes porrasi | MNCR-A 1295389 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Crematogaster carinata | MNCR-A 2400995 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Crematogaster crinosa | MNCR-A 897536 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Crematogaster curvispinosa | MNCR-A 1864023 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Crematogaster distans | MNCR-A 944136 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Crematogaster evallans | MNCR-A 1705976 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Crematogaster limata | MNCR-A 1863909 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Crematogaster sp. | MNCR-A 1706015 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Cyphomyrmex cornutus | MNCR-A 1706561 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Dolichoderus sp. | MNCR-A 2334341 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Eciton burchellii | MNCR-A 2041835 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Eciton dulcium | MNCR-A 1295332 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Ectatomma ruidum | MNCR-A 986470 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Gnamptogenys regularis | MNCR-A 2193326 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Gnamptogenys sulcata | MNCR-A 989070 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Hypoponera sp. | MNCR-A 2463764 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Labidus coecus | MNCR-A 2167745 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Lachnomyrmex scrobiculatus | MNCR-A 911872 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Leptothorax sp. | MNCR-A 1706504 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Myrmelachista sp. | MNCR-A 2334317 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Neivamyrmex pilosus | MNCR-A 1358448 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Nomamyrmex esenbeckii | MNCR-A 2012440 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Nomamyrmex hartigii | MNCR-A 1292748 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Odontomachus bauri | MNCR-A 2334150 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Odontomachus chelifer | MNCR-A 1295327 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Odontomachus laticeps | MNCR-A 1333152 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Pachycondyla obscuricornis | MNCR-A 1704224 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Pachycondyla villosa | MNCR-A 1706461 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Paraponera clavata | MNCR-A 1292744 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Paratrechina sp. | MNCR-A 2334350 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Pheidole sp. | MNCR-A 897608 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Procryptocerus belti | MNCR-A 2334199 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Procryptocerus pictipes | MNCR-A 897404 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Pseudomyrmex sp. | MNCR-A 2495732 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Pyramica sp. | MNCR-A 2125215 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Sericomyrmex amabilis | MNCR-A 1704213 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Solenopsis sp. | MNCR-A 2401006 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Stenamma sp. | MNCR-A 2123832 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Strumigenys ludia | MNCR-A 2193269 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Tapinoma sp. | MNCR-A 1874227 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Tetramorium bicarinatum | MNCR-A 1193132 | Non endemic |
| Formicidae | Wasmannia auropunctata | MNCR-A 2167679 | Non endemic |
| Halictidae | Augochlora sp. | MNCR-A 1980837 | Non endemic |
| Halictidae | Augochlorella sp. | MNCR-A 439385 | Non endemic |
| Halictidae | Augochloropsis sp. | MNCR-A 2012390 | Non endemic |
| Halictidae | Lasioglossum sp. | MNCR-A 739518 | Non endemic |
| Halictidae | Megalopta centralis | MNCR-A 1947526 | Non endemic |
| Halictidae | Neocorynura sp. | MNCR-A 2012401 | Non endemic |
| Halictidae | Pereirapis semiauratus | MNCR-A 988796 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Acrotaphus latifasciatus | MNCR-A 2422006 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Apechoneura valerieae | MNCR-A 2130456 | Endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Baryceros sp. | MNCR-A 2598817 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Brachycyrtus veriatrix | MNCR-A 2130309 | Endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Carinodes sp. | MNCR-A 781417 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Casinaria sp. | MNCR-A 2041829 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Castrosion renei | MNCR-A 2109258 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Cratichneumon sp. | MNCR-A 980734 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Cryptanura sp. | MNCR-A 3973529 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Diapetimorpha sp. | MNCR-A 980206 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Digonocryptus sp. | MNCR-A 2598822 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Diradops diora | MNCR-A 1980773 | Endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Dusona sp. | MNCR-A 1941717 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Eiphosoma dentator | MNCR-A 1706451 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Eiphosoma laphygmae | MNCR-A 1706434 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Eiphosoma macrum | MNCR-A 2130461 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Eiphosoma nigrovittatum | MNCR-A 1762948 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Eiphosoma tantalium | MNCR-A 2130462 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Eiphosoma vitticolle | MNCR-A 1762946 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Enicospilus chiriquensis | MNCR-A 1980843 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Enicospilus flavoscutellatus | MNCR-A 902306 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Enicospilus glabratus | MNCR-A 1745853 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Enicospilus trilineatus | MNCR-A 943763 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Enicospilus sp. | MNCR-A 902307 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Epirhyssa theloides | MNCR-A 1762925 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Eusterinx sp. | MNCR-A 1704167 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Grotea vanessae | MNCR-A 1762903 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Hyposoter sp. | MNCR-A 2598799 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Joppa sp. | MNCR-A 1358447 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Joppocryptus sp. | MNCR-A 911635 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Labena tarsata | MNCR-A 1980761 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Lathrolestes irenea | MNCR-A 1746436 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Lissaspis sp. | MNCR-A 1941705 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Listrodromus sp. | MNCR-A 2495778 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Lobaegis sp. | MNCR-A 781459 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Lymeon sp. | MNCR-A 2598810 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Megastylus sp. | MNCR-A 1980628 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Mesochorus sp. | MNCR-A 911596 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Neotheronia bostrandae | MNCR-A 1976913 | Endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Neotheronia lineata | MNCR-A 911630 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Neotheronia tacubaya | MNCR-A 1745894 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Neotheronia tolteca | MNCR-A 1704251 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Odontopimpla sp. | MNCR-A 781387 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Orthocentrus sp. | MNCR-A 2167697 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Pimpla azteca | MNCR-A 1746435 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Pimpla croceiventris | MNCR-A 2125443 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Pimpla perssoni | MNCR-A 1745877 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Pimpla sumichrasti | MNCR-A 1980719 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus acerbus | MNCR-A 943663 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus alexisi | MNCR-A 1704248 | Endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus areolaris | MNCR-A 2598819 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus condylobus | MNCR-A 1745848 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus duplaris | MNCR-A 2334174 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus eneyae | MNCR-A 781388 | Endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus erythrosternus | MNCR-A 3973448 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus furvus | MNCR-A 943765 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus josei | MNCR-A 980224 | Endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus juani | MNCR-A 911631 | Endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus maculatus | MNCR-A 781404 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus marcoi | MNCR-A 980203 | Endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus melanoleucus | MNCR-A 781365 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus semialbus | MNCR-A 781457 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus triangularis | MNCR-A 2444897 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus tubulifera | MNCR-A 1762951 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus univittatus | MNCR-A 1333091 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Polycyrtus wilsoni | MNCR-A 2598814 | Endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Sphelodon phoxopteridis | MNCR-A 1941711 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Tetragonochora sp. | MNCR-A 1746448 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Thyreodon rufothorax | MNCR-A 1176635 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Trathala sp. | MNCR-A 1980704 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Xiphosomella nigroornata | MNCR-A 2130453 | Non endemic |
| Ichneumonidae | Xiphosomella ozne | MNCR-A 2130308 | Endemic |
| Leucospidae | No Id | MNCR-A 943857 | Non endemic |
| Megachilidae | Coelioxys (Leuraspidia) azteca | MNCR-A 696966 | Non endemic |
| Megachilidae | Coelioxys (Rhinocoelioxys) zapoteca | MNCR-A 1704244 | Non endemic |
| Megachilidae | Megachile sp. | MNCR-A 739294 | Non endemic |
| Mutillidae | Ephuta championi | MNCR-A 1763003 | Non endemic |
| Mutillidae | Pseudomethoca sp. | MNCR-A 2600527 | Non endemic |
| Mutillidae | Timulla sp. | MNCR-A 2600521 | Non endemic |
| Mymaridae | No Id | MNCR-A 1803526 | Non endemic |
| Pergidae | No Id | MNCR-A 988839 | Non endemic |
| Perilampidae | Perilampus platigaster | MNCR-A 1193264 | Non endemic |
| Platygastridae | No Id | MNCR-A 911660 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Ageniella sp. | MNCR-A 1980510 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Allaporus sp. | MNCR-A 1746605 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Anoplius sp. | MNCR-A 1976921 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Aporus sp. | MNCR-A 938820 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Auplopus sp. | MNCR-A 902168 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Caliadurgus sp. | MNCR-A 1980599 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Epipompilus sp. | MNCR-A 1762918 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Hemipepsis sp. | MNCR-A 1168829 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Minagenia sp. | MNCR-A 1762919 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Notocyphus sp. | MNCR-A 1976915 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Paracyphononyx sp. | MNCR-A 911521 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Pepsis festiva | MNCR-A 1754251 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Pepsis grossa | MNCR-A 980698 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Poecilopompilus sp. | MNCR-A 1945745 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Priochilus sp. | MNCR-A 739243 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Priocnemella sp. | MNCR-A 1980700 | Non endemic |
| Pompilidae | Tachypompilus sp. | MNCR-A 1704229 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Alticornis sp. | MNCR-A 1864129 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Catolaccus sp. | MNCR-A 1803522 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Chrysoglyphe sp. | MNCR-A 1864128 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Erotolepsia sp. | MNCR-A 2334487 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Heteroschema sp. | MNCR-A 1864083 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Lelaps sp. | MNCR-A 2495770 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Lyrcus sp. | MNCR-A 980799 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Neocatolaccus sp. | MNCR-A 2495734 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Netomocera sp. | MNCR-A 2334470 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Parurios sp. | MNCR-A 1746634 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Propodeia sp. | MNCR-A 2193445 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Pteromalus sp. | MNCR-A 980843 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Spalangia cameroni | MNCR-A 2036608 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Spalangia chontalensis | MNCR-A 2041806 | Non endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Spalangia imitator | MNCR-A 1706557 | Endemic |
| Pteromalidae | Spalangia nigroaenea | MNCR-A 943997 | Non endemic |
| Rhopalosomatidae | No ID | MNCR-A 1176636 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Anteroides sp. | MNCR-A 938732 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Baryconus sp. | MNCR-A 943996 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Calliscelio sp. | MNCR-A 2334528 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Chromoteleia sp. | MNCR-A 911657 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Cremastobaeus sp. | MNCR-A 1803497 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Duta sp. | MNCR-A 911679 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Dyscritobaeus sp. | MNCR-A 2193433 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Grynoides sp. | MNCR-A 938694 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Gryon sp. | MNCR-A 2334422 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Idris spectabilis | MNCR-A 2125251 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Macroteleia sp. | MNCR-A 2334402 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Odontacolus sp. | MNCR-A 1193225 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Oethecoctonus sp. | MNCR-A 911691 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Opisthacantha sp. | MNCR-A 2334396 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Parascelio sp. | MNCR-A 1941650 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Probaryconus sp. | MNCR-A 1704171 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Psilanteris sp. | MNCR-A 2193394 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Scelio sp. | MNCR-A 2193413 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Telenomus sp. | MNCR-A 911711 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Trimorus sp. | MNCR-A 1980665 | Non endemic |
| Scelionidae | Triteleia sp. | MNCR-A 980828 | Non endemic |
| Scoliidae | Campsomeris dorsata | MNCR-A 1706460 | Non endemic |
| Sphecidae | Ammophila sp. | MNCR-A 1952987 | Non endemic |
| Sphecidae | Eremnophila opulenta | MNCR-A 1706474 | Non endemic |
| Sphecidae | Isodontia sp. | MNCR-A 1952981 | Non endemic |
| Sphecidae | Sceliphron sp. | MNCR-A 696851 | Non endemic |
| Sphecidae | Sphex dorsalis | MNCR-A 1976895 | Non endemic |
| Sphecidae | Sphex ichneumoneus | MNCR-A 1302594 | Non endemic |
| Tenthredinidae | Waldheimia amazonica | MNCR-A 1976972 | Non endemic |
| Tenthredinidae | Waldheimia ochra | MNCR-A 902147 | Non endemic |
| Tiphiidae | Krombeinia sp. | MNCR-A 1864386 | Non endemic |
| Tiphiidae | Myzinum sp. | MNCR-A 439406 | Non endemic |
| Tiphiidae | Paratiphia sp. | MNCR-A 988811 | Non endemic |
| Tiphiidae | Pterombrus sp. | MNCR-A 1704203 | Non endemic |
| Tiphiidae | Tiphia sp. | MNCR-A 781508 | Non endemic |
| Torymidae | Torymus sp. | MNCR-A 1980783 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Agelaia areata | MNCR-A 3374672 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Agelaia cajennensis | MNCR-A 781470 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Agelaia centralis | MNCR-A 3374673 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Agelaia melanopyga | MNCR-A 3373202 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Agelaia myrmecophila | MNCR-A 2167746 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Alphamenes sp. | MNCR-A 2012419 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Apoica pallens | MNCR-A 2217107 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Apoica pallida | MNCR-A 882304 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Apoica thoracica | MNCR-A 439409 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Brachygastra mellifica | MNCR-A 2216939 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Hypancistrocerus sp. | MNCR-A 2123887 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Mischocyttarus angulatus | MNCR-A 439404 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Mischocyttarus basimacula | MNCR-A 439400 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Mischocyttarus costaricensis | MNCR-A 882364 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Mischocyttarus basimacula | MNCR-A 439403 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Omicron sp. | MNCR-A 2334189 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Pachodynerus sp. | MNCR-A 980721 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Parachartergus apicalis | MNCR-A 1947520 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Parachartergus fraternus | MNCR-A 1333101 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Polistes erythrocephalus | MNCR-A 1767862 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Polistes major major | MNCR-A 1767854 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Polybia bribri | MNCR-A 739342 | Endemic |
| Vespidae | Polybia diguetana | MNCR-A 3374674 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Polybia emaciata | MNCR-A 2012386 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Polybia flavitincta | MNCR-A 1985696 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Polybia occidentalis | MNCR-A 739347 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Polybia occidentalis nigratella | MNCR-A 1980842 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Polybia rejecta | MNCR-A 696968 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Protopolybia chartergoides | MNCR-A 1976908 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Protopolybia exigua | MNCR-A 938863 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Stenodynerus sp. | MNCR-A 1754249 | Non endemic |
| Vespidae | Synoeca septentrionalis | MNCR-A 1333220 | Non endemic |
Table 1: Species from the National Museum of Costa Rica’s collection.
Discussion
As an internationally significant Ramsar site in Costa Rica, Caño Negro has been historically monitored. Official reports and management plans have focused their conservation efforts almost exclusively on charismatic vertebrates, highlighting exhaustive inventories of birds, reptiles, fish, and mammals.
However, a critical gap exists in the ecological information of this ecosystem: insects. Despite constituting the largest biomass and being fundamental for trophic webs and pollination, entomological groups are systematically overlooked in official assessments. This omission in Caño Negro reflects a concerning trend that limits our comprehensive understanding of wetland health.
Below are some of the most relevant data related to the reported species for the wetland: Impact of Orasema costaricensis on the Myrmecofauna of Galápagos:
The introduction of Orasema costaricensis (Eucharitidae) to the Galápagos Islands poses a considerable ecological challenge. This parasitoid wasp of the family Eucharitidae possesses a specialized life cycle obligatorily dependent on ants of the genus Pheidole. Taxonomic and ecological investigations have confirmed its presence in the archipelago and its direct association with the endemic ant Pheidole williamsi, acting as a pressure factor on its populations [5].
The parasitism mechanism is highly specific: the wasp’s planidium larvae utilize foraging workers as vehicles to infiltrate the colony, where they ultimately consume the host ant pupae. Studies on the interaction between formacids and their parasitoids in the islands suggest that the decline of P. williamsi due to this parasitism could create ecological vacuums. These empty niches are frequently exploited by more aggressive invasive species, such as the tropical fire ant (Solenopsis geminata), altering the structure of the native invertebrate community [6, 7]. The monitoring of O. costaricensis is, therefore, a key component in invasive species management plans of the Charles Darwin Foundation and the Galápagos National Park Directorate.
The Relevance of Ants in Site Conservation
Ants, members of the family Formicidae, represent a taxonomically and functionally dominant component in most terrestrial ecosystems, particularly in tropical regions [8]. Their omnipresence and the intricate ecological interactions they establish make them organisms of fundamental interest for biodiversity conservation, primarily in the following aspects:
Ecosystem Engineers and Key Regulators
A prominent group in terms of ecological impact are leaf-cutter ants of the genera Atta and Acromyrmex. Species such as Atta cephalotes and Acromyrmex octospinosus are recognized as ecosystem engineers due to their capacity to significantly modify the physical and biological environment [8, 9]. Their foraging and nest-building activity profoundly influences:
Nutrient cycling: They transport vast quantities of plant biomass underground, where the decomposition of organic matter in their fungal garden chambers enriches the soil with plant-available nutrients [10].
Soil structure: The excavation of their complex nests alters soil hydrology, aeration, and granular composition [11].
Vegetation dynamics: They act as significant herbivores, affecting vegetation composition, distribution, and regeneration [12]. Their presence and the integrity of their colonies are, therefore, indicators of the health and functionality of tropical ecosystems.
Army ants (Eciton burchellii, Eciton dulcium, Labidus coecus, Neivamyrmex pilosus, Nomamyrmex esenbeckii, Nomamyrmex hartigii) are apex predators with cascading trophic impacts [13, 14]. Their massive foraging columns exert considerable predatory pressure on other invertebrates, and occasionally small vertebrates, regulating their populations. Furthermore, their activity influences the behavior of other species, such as birds that follow the columns to capture fleeing prey [15]. The need for large extents of intact habitat to sustain their colonies makes them sensitive indicators of forest quality and extent [16].
Critical Mutualisms and Habitat Specialists
Several ant species establish obligate mutualistic relationships with plants, being essential for the latter’s persistence. The genera Azteca and Pseudomyrmex are paradigmatic examples. Azteca species form well- documented mutualisms with trees of the genus Cecropia, defending their host plants from herbivores and competing vines in exchange for shelter (domatia) and food (Müllerian bodies and nectar) [17, 18]. Similarly, many Pseudomyrmex species are obligate mutualists of acacias and other myrmecophytic plants, offering protection against herbivores and competitors [19]. The presence of Myrmelachista sp. on the list is also relevant, as some species are known for creating “devil’s gardens” by eliminating competing vegetation around their host plants, favoring their growth [20]. The conservation of these ants is intrinsically linked to that of their mutualistic plants, forming a complex of co-dependent species: Minor fungus- growing ants (Apterostigma sp., Cyphomyrmex cornutus, Lachnomyrmex scrobiculatus, Sericomyrmex amabilis) are essential components of nutrient cycling in leaf litter and soil. Unlike Atta and Acromyrmex, many of these species are more specialized in their fungal cultivation substrates and the microhabitats they occupy [21]. Their sensitivity to changes in leaf litter humidity and composition makes them potential bioindicators of understory integrity [22].
Turtle ants (Cephalotes minutus, Cephalotes multispinosus, Cephalotes porrasi, Procryptocerus belti, Procryptocerus pictipes) are highly specialized arboreal ants, both in their flattened morphology and habits [23]. They inhabit bark crevices, decaying wood, and domatia, contributing to canopy biodiversity. Their presence often denotes mature and well-structured forests, as they depend on specific resources and microhabitats associated with dead wood and arboreal architecture [24].
The bullet ant (Paraponera clavata) is a formidable forest floor predator, but its relevance is not limited to its trophic role. Its participation in the seed dispersal for certain plants has been documented, contributing to forest regeneration [25, 26]. Its dependence on primary and undisturbed forests makes it a habitat quality indicator.
Functional Diversity and Specialization
Genera with high species diversity and varied ecological roles, such as Camponotus, Pheidole, Odontomachus, Gnamptogenys, Strumigenys, Pyramica, and Hypoponera, are crucial for biodiversity:
Pheidole is one of the most diverse ant genera globally, with species occupying niches as granivores, scavengers, and predators [27]. High Pheidole diversity in an ecosystem is an indicator of species richness and complexity of trophic interactions.
Odontomachus (trap-jaw ants) and Gnamptogenys (specialized predators) are important for controlling populations of other invertebrates [28, 29].
Strumigenys ludia and other Pyramica sp. are microscopic and highly specialized predators of microarthropods in leaf litter, fundamental for decomposition processes and soil community maintenance [30]. The richness and abundance of these groups reflect the health of the invertebrate community and ecosystem integrity.
Invasive Species and Threats to Biodiversity
Finally, conservation relevance lies not only in beneficial native species but also in those that pose a significant threat. Species such as Wasmannia auropunctata (electric ant or little fire ant) are considered among the 100 most damaging invasive species globally [31]. Its presence on the list is of extreme conservation concern. Wasmannia auropunctata aggressively displaces native ant species and other invertebrates, reduces arthropod diversity, affects fruit production in some crops, and can sting small vertebrates, drastically altering community structure and ecological processes [32, 33]. Although Solenopsis sp. includes native species, the mention of Solenopsis invicta (red imported fire ant) or other invasive Solenopsis species would also indicate a critical threat to native biodiversity [34]. The management and control of these invasive species are crucial for protecting ecosystems and biological diversity.
Ecological Role of Present Bee Species
Melipona beecheii and Meliponiculture in the Caño Negro Biological Corridor
The presence of Melipona species, such as M. beecheii, in the region surrounding the Caño Negro Wetland underscores the importance of stingless bees for the pollination of native flora and local crops. Although M. beecheii is more associated with dry forests, the genus’s importance in pollinating humid forests and agroforestry systems near the wetland is undeniable. González et al. [35] point out that traditional meliponiculture in Costa Rica, including areas near natural reserves, is vital for the conservation of these bees, which face pressure from habitat loss due to agricultural expansion and agrochemical use in the areas adjacent to Caño Negro. The deforestation of riparian forests bordering the wetland reduces nesting sites and resource sources, compromising the viability of Melipona populations and, consequently, the resilience of pollination in this key ecosystem.
Euglossini (Euglossa & Eulaema) and Caño Negro Wetland Connectivity
Orchid bees are crucial pollinators in the humid tropical forests surrounding and comprising much of the Caño Negro ecosystem. Their ability to fly long distances, documented by Janzen [36], makes them essential “genetic connectors” for plants found dispersed or in habitat fragments. In a mosaic of wetlands, rivers, and forest patches like Caño Negro, these bees maintain the gene flow of vital plant species for the ecosystem’s structure, including lianas and trees with specialized flowers. Habitat degradation and loss of floral diversity in the wetland’s buffer zones directly threaten these intricate pollination networks, affecting not only orchids but also the overall health of the forest [37].
Trigona corvina and Resource Dynamics in Caño Negro
The genus Trigona, with species like Trigona corvina, is omnipresent and ecologically dominant in the Neotropics, including the Caño Negro Wetland. These stingless bees are known for their aggressive foraging strategies and their ability to monopolize nectar and pollen sources. In the rich environment of Caño Negro, where floral resources can fluctuate seasonally with water levels and mass flowering events, the presence of T. corvina significantly influences resource partitioning among the pollinator community [38]. Its dominance can displace smaller or less competitive bee species from abundant floral patches, thus shaping interactions and coexistence within the pollinator guild and potentially limiting effective pollination for some plants.
Centris Analis and Floral Specialization in the Wetland Margins
Bees of the genus Centris, such as Centris analis, are specialists in collecting floral oils, a vital resource for their reproduction. In the diverse habitats of Caño Negro’s margins, where plant species like Malpighiaceae exist, these bees play an irreplaceable role. The oils are not only a nutritive lipid source for larvae but are also used to line brood cells, protecting them from humidity and pathogens in a typically humid environment. Vinson, et al. [39] highlighted the specificity of this interaction. The conservation of Centris populations in Caño Negro is directly linked to the presence and health of their host oil-producing plants. The alteration of native flora along the wetland’s edges, either by drainage or invasive species, directly threatens this coevolved mutualism and, therefore, the reproduction of these key bees.
Nocturnal Pollination in the Canopy’s Gloom
The presence of Megalopta centralis in the Caño Negro
ecosystem reveals the sophistication of its pollination networks. This halictid bee is one of the few truly nocturnal bees, specialized in exploiting floral resources available during crepuscular and nocturnal hours. Its compound eyes, adapted for high light sensitivity, allow it to navigate and forage in the low light of the tropical understory [40]. In Caño Negro, M. centralis complements the activity of diurnal pollinators, ensuring the reproduction of plants that open their flowers at dusk, an ecological strategy to avoid diurnal competition. This temporal niche reduces pressure on resources and contributes to wetland resilience by expanding the pollination window, which is vital for maintaining the area’s high plant biodiversity.
Solitary Bees of Caño Negro
Unlike their social relatives, solitary bees constitute the vast majority of bee species and operate individually, with each female building and provisioning her own nest. In the Caño Negro Wetland, genera present in your list such as Megachile (leaf-cutter bees), Xylocopa (carpenter bees), Lasioglossum (sweat bees), and various species of Centris and Ptiloglossa play irreplaceable ecological roles.
These bees exhibit an impressive diversity of nesting strategies adapted to Caño Negro’s varied microhabitats. Xylocopa bees excavate galleries in dead or soft wood, common in flooded forest areas and river margins, efficiently pollinating plants with poricidal anthers via vibration (buzz pollination). Megachile nest in pre-existing cavities, using leaf or petal pieces to construct larval cells, being important pollinators of legumes. Many species of Lasioglossum, Exomalopsis, and Ptiloglossa nest in the ground, preferably in bare soils or with sparse vegetation, utilizing trail edges and forest clearings. The presence of Ptiloglossa eximia and P. mexicana suggests specialization in collecting pollen from plants like Malpighiaceae, often during crepuscular hours, complementing the work of other diurnal pollinators [41].
The importance of these solitary bees for Caño Negro’s ecological resilience lies in their pollination efficiency and their complementarity with social species. Their diversity ensures that a wide range of plants, from shrubs to canopy trees, are effectively pollinated. However, their nesting specificity makes them particularly vulnerable to habitat degradation. The removal of dead wood, soil alteration by surrounding agricultural activities, and pesticide use directly affect their populations by eliminating their nesting sites and food sources [42]. The conservation of landscape heterogeneity in Caño Negro, including patches of native vegetation and decaying wood, is crucial for maintaining the diversity and pollination services of these solitary bees.
Conclusions
Critical Information Gap on Hymenoptera
Despite being an internationally significant Ramsar Site and the crucial role of insects in trophic networks and pollination, a “critical gap” exists in the ecological information regarding Hymenoptera in Caño Negro. Current studies have disproportionately focused on charismatic vertebrates, leaving insects “systematically overlooked” in official assessments. This lack of current and comprehensive records (with most dating from 1992-1994) hinders a comprehensive understanding of wetland health and impedes the formulation of data-driven conservation strategies for this vital group.
Hymenoptera as Ecosystem Engineers and Pillars of the Trophic Network
The bees and ants of Caño Negro are not mere components but “fundamental” to the ecosystem’s structure and function. Bees act as irreplaceable pollinators (Meliponini, Euglossini, Centris, solitary bees), ensuring plant reproduction. Ants, for their part, are “ecosystem engineers” (e.g., Atta, Acromyrmex modifying soils and cycling nutrients), “apex predators” (e.g., Eciton regulating populations), and establish “critical mutualisms” with plants (e.g., Azteca, Pseudomyrmex). Their functional diversity is essential for wetland resilience.
Sensitive Bioindicators of Environmental Health and Anthropogenic Threats
Hymenoptera, along with other insects like Odonata, are “bioindicators of the environmental health” of the wetland. The presence and diversity of species such as fungus- growing ants (sensitive to leaf litter and humidity) or “turtle ants” (indicators of mature forests) reflect habitat integrity. Their vulnerability to “surrounding habitat fragmentation,” “agricultural eutrophication” from adjacent pineapple crops, and pesticide use demonstrates how the well-being of these insects is a direct thermometer of the “external anthropogenic pressures” impacting Caño Negro.
Extreme Vulnerability to Habitat Degradation and Microhabitat Loss
The specificity of Hymenoptera makes them particularly susceptible to environmental alteration. Solitary bees (Xylocopa, Megachile, Lasioglossum) depend on resources such as dead wood, pre-existing cavities, or specific soil types for nesting. Orchid bees (Euglossa, Eulaema) require habitat connectivity for their foraging flights. The “removal of dead wood” or “soil alteration” directly impacts these populations, highlighting the need to conserve “landscape heterogeneity” within and on the periphery of the wetland.
Critical Threat from Invasive Hymenoptera Species
The presence of invasive Hymenoptera represents a “conservation concern.” The case of Orasema costaricensis in Galápagos, though outside Caño Negro, illustrates the devastating potential of parasitoid species. More directly, the mention of species like Wasmannia auropunctata (electric ant) and potentially invasive Solenopsis species (fire ant) in the list of Hymenoptera found in Costa Rica, indicates an “extreme” threat. These species “aggressively displace” native species, “reduce arthropod diversity,” and “drastically alter community structure,” demanding rigorous “monitoring” and “management” in Caño Negro.
References
-
Ramsar Convention Secretariat (1991) Ficha informativa de los humedales de Ramsar (FIR)-versión 2009-2012: Caño Negro. Gland (Switzerland): Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
-
Sistema Nacional de Áreas de Conservación (SINAC) (2018) Plan general de manejo del Refugio Nacional de Vida Silvestre Caño Negro. San José (Costa Rica): Área de Conservación Arenal Huetar Norte; 2018.
-
Sánchez-Rodríguez J, Pineda E, Escobar F (2021) Diversity of fruit-feeding butterflies in a wetland- agriculture interface: implications for conservation in the Caño Negro National Wildlife Refuge, Costa Rica. J Insect Conserv 25(2): 345-359.
-
Esquivel C (2016) Libélulas de Mesoamérica y el Caribe: una guía de campo naturalista. San José (Costa Rica): Editorial INBio.
-
Heraty JM, Wojcik DP, Jouvenaz DP (1993) Species of Orasema parasitic on the Solenopsis saevissima complex in South America (Hymenoptera: Eucharitidae, Formicidae). J Hymenopt Res 2(1): 169-182.
-
Causton CE, Peck SB, Sinclair BJ, Roque-Albelo L, Hodgson CJ, et al. (2006) Alien insects: threats and implications for conservation of Galápagos Islands. Ann Entomol Soc Am 99(1): 121-143.
-
Herrera HW, Causton CE (2010) Distribution of fire ants Solenopsis geminata and Wasmannia auropunctata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Galapagos Islands. Galapagos Res 67: 9-14.
-
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Cambridge (MA): Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1990.
-
Fowler HG, Forti LC, Pereira JC, Saito FF (1991) Population dynamics and impact of foraging of Atta cephalotes and Atta sexdens rubropilosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a tropical rain forest. Rev Bras Entomol 35(2): 345-350.
-
Moutinho P, Nepstad DC, Schwartzman S (2003) Initial soil enrichment by newly founded Atta colonies in central Amazonia. Insectes Sociaux 50(4): 395-397.
-
Meyer ST, Leal MFC, Schultz TR, Antunes PMJ (2011) Nest architecture and microclimate of Acromyrmex subterraneus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in southern Brazil. Sociobiology 58(1): 221-236.
-
Wirth R, Herz H, Ryel RJ, Hartmann H, Leal IR (2003) Herbivory of leaf-cutting ants: a case study in tropical forest management. Berlin (Germany): Springer.
-
Schneirla TC (1971) Army ants: a study in social organization. San Francisco (CA). Freeman WH.
-
Gotelli NJ, Arnett AM (2000) The role of disturbance in ant community structure. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 31: 75-92.
-
Willis EO, Oniki Y (1978) Birds and army ants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 9: 243-263.
-
Rettenmeyer CW, Rettenmeyer ME, Akre RD (1983) The army ants. In: Hermann HR (Ed.), Social insects. New York (NY): Academic Press, USA 4: 245-300.
-
Janzen DH (1969) Allelopathy by myrmecophytes: the ant-plant Cecropia. Biotropica 1(2): 70-75.
-
Fonseca CR (1994) Herbivory and the distribution of Azteca ants on Cecropia. J Ecol 82(4): 847-852.
-
Janzen DH (1966) Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution 20(3): 249-275.
-
Frederickson ME, Greene MJ, Gordon DM (2005) “Devil’s gardens” bedevilled by ants. Nature 437(7056): 495- 496.
-
Schultz TR, Brady SG (2008) Major evolutionary transitions in ant fungus farming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA105(14): 5435-5440.
-
Wetterer JK (1999) Distribution and impact of the longlegged ant, Anoplolepis gracilipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 34(2): 333-352.
-
Dejean A, Schatz B, Orivel J, Beugnon G (2005) Predatory behavior of Cephalotes atratus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a primarily arboreal, and secondarily ground-foraging ant. Sociobiology 46(2): 273-281.
-
Powell S, Clark E (2000) The ant genus Cephalotes: ecology, behavior, and conservation. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, (Eds.), Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press pp: 147-158.
-
Davidson DW (1988) Ecological studies of neotropical ant-plants: Paraponera, Cephalotes, and Acacia. Biotropica 20(4): 346-347.
-
Frank SD (2011) The ecology of the bullet ant, Paraponera clavata. Bull Ecol Soc Am 92(2): 209-211.
-
Wilson EO (2003) Pheidole in the New World: a dominant, hyperdiverse ant genus. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
-
Larabee FJ, Suarez AV (2010) The fastest animal in the world. PLoS One 5(10): e13517.
-
Brown WL (1975) Contributions toward a reclassification of the Formicidae. V. Ponerinae, tribes Platythyreini, Cerapachyini, Cylindromyrmecini, Acanthostichini, and Aenictogitonini. Search: Agriculture (Ithaca) 5(1): 1-116.
-
Bolton B (2000) The ant genus Strumigenys Fred. Smith in the Ethiopian region (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Nat Hist 34(3): 447-493.
-
Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S (2000) 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database. Auckland (New Zealand): Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG).
-
Wetterer JK, Porter SD (2003) The little fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 42(3): 597-606.
-
Hoffmann BD, Graham LPC, Majer JD (1999) The impact of the introduced crazy ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes) on rainforest ant and invertebrate communities on Christmas Island (Indian Ocean). Ecography 22(1): 15- 21.
-
Holway DA, Lach L, Suarez AV, Tsutsui P, Case TJ (2002) The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 33: 181-233.
-
González VH, Lozada AI, Ospina-Torres R (2018) Stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) of Costa Rica: diversity, distribution, and new records. Zootaxa 4461(1): 1-49.
-
Janzen DH (1971) Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants. Science 171(3967): 203- 205.
-
Roubik DW, Hanson PE (2004) Orchid bees of tropical America: biology and field guide. New York, Springer, USA.
-
Johnson LK, Hubbell SP (1974) Aggression and competition among stingless bees: field studies. Ecology 55(1): 120-127.
-
Vinson SB, Williams HJ, Frankie GW, Shrum G (1997) Floral lipid chemistry of Byrsonima crassifolia (Malpighiaceae) and a use of floral lipids by Centris bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Biotropica 29(1): 76-83.
-
Greiner B, Ribi WA, Warrant EJ (2004) Retinal and optical adaptations for nocturnal vision in the halictid bee Megalopta genalis. Cell Tissue Res 317(3): 329-335.
-
Michener CD (2007) The bees of the world. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press.
-
Gathmann A, Tscharntke T (2002) Landscape effects on the abundance and diversity of bees, wasps and their parasitoids. Ecol Entomol 27(5): 605-614.
- Science 4.0: Comprehensive Architecture of the Biological Operating System (Bio-OS) A Framework for Systemic Resilience and Industrialized Bio-Governance
- Rabbit on, or Hare Back? Understanding Climate Change
- Clinical Validation of Science 4.0: Flow Steering and Epigenetic Drift Inversion on a 76-Year-Old Hybrid System
- Seeds Planted by another Mind
- Maladaptive Behaviours In Farm Animals-A Review Paper
- Animal Physiological and Behavioural Thermoregulatory Mechanisms: A Review