Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal Research Article 12 min read

Hydroxyapatite-Based Materials for Heavy Metal Removal in Wastewater Treatment

Al Bazedi GA* and Abdel-Fatah MA*
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2578-4846  10.23880/ppej-16000227  Received: May 01, 2020  Published: June 15, 2020
  views
 49 references
PDF
Keywords
Hydroxyapatite Heavy metal removal Wastewater Nano hydroxyapatite Adsorption
Abstract

Nowadays, undisputable environmental pollution requests endeavors to treat wastewater, particularly containing heavy metal, where wastewater treatment technologies are improving hastily. Hydroxyapatite with micro-porous structure and the large surface area turns into an intense research topic as of its high adsorption capacity. Environmentally friendly Hydroxyapatite powder with the large specific surface is a promising cost-effective precipitation method, for the removal of heavy metals (Al, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn) from wastewater. Different studies have revealed the efficient removal of all metals using hydroxyapatite or by modified HA using zeolite or chitosan. The increase of Ca2+ ions content in the treated water suggests an ion exchange mechanism.

Introduction

Different conventional technologies are used for the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution, such as “chemical precipitation”, “electrochemical treatment”, “ion exchange”, “reverse osmosis and electrodialysis” [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Recently, significant attention has been given to unconventional alternatives, one of the most encouraging approaches is the use of environmental friendly-cheap materials as a prospective sorbent for heavy metals removal from wastewater solutions [10]. The most prevalent materials used as sorbents have been carbons, zeolites, clays, biomass, and polymeric materials [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9].

However, these reported materials exhibit low adsorption capacities towards heavy metals ions and suffer from separation troublesomeness. Therefore, broad endeavors are as yet required for the improvement of new materials that can be utilized as adsorbents in wastewater treatment applications. Several investigations were conducted in recent years have reported the utilization of mineral materials in the treatment of heavy metals contaminated wastewaters [11, 12]. Materials such as zeolite [13, 14], clay minerals [4, 6, 8] and other organo-derived clay materials [have been accounted for being excellent challengers in the treatment of wastewater because of their amazing surface qualities.

Recent studies have reported that phosphate minerals represent promising materials in the treatment of wastewaters for the removal of heavy metals [15, 16, 17, 18]. Promising results have been reported on the effectiveness of phosphate minerals for the activity of hydroxyapatite (HAp) with the chemical formula Ca10(PO4)6(OH)+ as a remarkable material for removing long-term pollutants from contaminated water. The results showed that hydroxyapatite (HAp) has a high affinity for heavy metals, low water solubility, high stability, and low cost compared to other conventional methods [19, 20].

Hydroxyapatite Properties and Characteristics

Hydroxyapatite (HAp) is a naturally occurring and non-toxic inorganic compound with the formula of Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2. Hydroxyapatite has a robust hexagonal atomic framework based on two distinct metal-cation sites (Ca(I), Ca(II)), a tetrahedral-phosphate site, and an anion column along four edges of the unit cell. The Ca(II), ion in the HA crystal lattice can be substituted by other metallic cations (e.g., Pb(II), Cd(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), Fe(III), etc.) by an ion exchange reaction [21, 22, 23, 24]. The interaction between nano- hydroxyapatite and other conventional materials e.g. zeolite showed higher efficiencies than conventional materials alone. The metal-substituted nano-hydroxyapatite powder can effectively interact with chitosan structures, resulting in the augmentation of properties of the new nano-composites aiming to be applied in various applications [23].

Nevertheless, the most important characteristic of HAp is existing in the form of white powder. Consequently, separating the suspended fine solids from solutions after adsorption of heavy metal ions is challenging [25], therefore, bind HAp with a polymer to resolve this problem. There are quite a lot of polymers available in nature which can be utilized as a binding material for HAP. Hydroxyapatite– chitosan (HAp-C) composite was studied for the removal of heavy metals such as lead, cobalt, and nickel from aqueous solution [25, 26, 27]. Chitosan was selected as a binding material for HAP due to its availability in nature and the special characteristics of hydrophilicity, biodegradability, non- toxicity, biocompatibility, adsorption properties, as well as the existence of amino and hydroxyl groups in chitosan can function as the active sites for adsorption [26, 27].

HAP has been broadly applied for the removal of various pollutants from aqueous solutions owing to their high sorption capacity, availability, porous nature, low cost, high stability under oxidizing and reducing environments, as well as low water solubility [28]. These properties permit strong interaction between the hydroxyapatite particles and pollutants. Various experimental studies have been reported on the adsorption of heavy metal ions [29], dye molecules [30], antibiotics [31] and others [32] on different Haps.

The adsorption properties of hydroxyapatite depend on their surface functional groups, surface area, and low water solubility [28]. Similarly, the photo-catalytic activities of hydroxyapatite-based nano-ceramics have been reported [33]. Mobasherpour, et al. had synthesized nano- hydroxyapatite to remove Ni2 + from Aqueous Solutions. The results showed that the efficiency of Ni2+ adsorption is shown to be increased with the increase in the adsorbent dosage. Isotherm studies indicate that the Langmuir model is better than Freundlich [28].

Different parameters affect the adsorption capacity of hydroxyapatite; this includes the concentration of HAP ions in aqueous media as it has an impact on the “functional groups” of mHAP. Also the initial pH, the temperature and heavy metal concentration.

Synthesis of Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles (HAP)

The solution–precipitation method presented by Mobasherpour, et al. [34], using (NH4)2HPO4, and Ca(NO3)2.4H2O as starting materials, while ammonia solution as agents for pH adjustment. Another study performed for the adsorption of heavy metal ions on various low-cost minerals modified natural phosphate as mesoporous synthetic apatite as discussed by El Asri, et al [35]. Different synthesis methods using oyster shells, pig bones, and eggshells [35].

Some studies have tried to enhance the properties of hydroxyapatite (mechanical porosity, porosity, specific surface area, etc.) through the addition of gelatin, carboxymethyl cellulose chitosan, and alginate [25, 26, 36, 37, 38].

Heavy Metal Removal

The heavy metals presence in agricultural, industrial, or drinking water is a serious environmental hassle due to many health problems caused by these metal. Environmental policies have led to the establishment of strict standards regarding the emission of heavy metals. However, at trace aspect concentrations, these pollution are nevertheless dangerous, and for its elimination, adsorption is the most common method used [39]. HAp-related materials have been reported for the removal of metal ions from water; nevertheless some effort must be performed in order to allow their utilization at field conditions.

There are several reports about the removal of lead [39, 40, 41, 42, 43], copper [40, 41], cadmium [41], chromium [41] manganese, and iron [44] and cobalt [45]. The mostly reported is the removal of lead, as some reports focused on the morphology and shape of HAp particlesas well as separtion effeciency.

Milonji´c SK [46] studied the factors affecting the use of hydroxyapatite sorption through sorption reactions. Suzuki Y, et al. [47] as well as [48] Babel S and Kurniawan TA [48] studied the uptake of divalent heavy metals using a fixed bed of hydroxyapatiteIn order to achieve a scalable application, a high sorption capability and a short equilibrium contact time are desirables; in this regard, Ahmed and co-workers reached a high sorption capacity and achieve a complete removal for lead ions at (pH = 5.6) containing 100 ppm lead ions, a sorbent dosage of 0.4 g HAp [49].

The removal efficiency varies according to the pH used (4-7), heavy metal concentration and the initial concentration of the Hap used.

Environmental Impact

Heavy metal water contamination could be adequately diminished and the beneficial outcome is reflected in regular effluents and the ensuing chain of every single living thing. In the other side, apatite is a consumable material with a restricted time uses, until it achieves saturation, as per this is important to treat the residual apatite material.

HAP as best candidates for application in adsorption of pollutants from the environment. Bio-adsorbent was successfully synthesized and studied with different characteristics for the application of the removal of heavy metals from contaminated water. Through continuous research, efforts will help in the production of economic synthesis approaches and can be applied in future research for different applications. In the end, the positive impact of using HAP is improving the quality of life, as well as decreasing the environmental impact.

Conclusion

Our study has evidenced that low crystallinity HAP can be successfully used in heavy metal removal from mine wastewater. For all the 10 metals reported (Al, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn), their content was rapidly reduced by contact with hydroxyapatite within and under the permissible limits for wastewater discharge characteristics into the natural environment. The application of hydroxyapatite advances the effective utilization of biocompatible and non- harmful nonmaterial’s for ecological remediation.

References

  1. Liu SX (2014) Food and Agricultural Wastewater Utilization and Treatment. Biological wastewater treatment processes, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp: 103- 132.
  2. Budak TB (2013) Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater Using Synthetic Ion Exchange Resin. Asian Journal of Chemistry 25(8): 4207-4210.
  3. Gopinath A, Krishna K, Karthik C (2019) Adsorptive Removal and Recovery of Heavy Metal Ions from Aqueous Solution/Effluents Using Conventional and Non-conventional Materials.  Modern Age Waste Water Problems. Springer International Publishing, pp: 309- 328.
  4. Kubilay S, Gurkan R, Savran A, Şahan T (2007) Removal of Cu(II), Zn(II) and Co(II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto natural bentonite. Adsorption 13(1): 41-51.
  5. Mobasherpour I, Salahi E, Pazouki M (2012) Comparative of the removal of Pb2+, Cd2+ and Ni2+ by nano crystallite hydroxyapatite from aqueous solutions: Adsorption isotherm study. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 5(4): 439- 446.
  6. Pare S (2012) Heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions by sorption using natural clays from Burkina Faso. African Journal of Biotechnology 11(45): 10395- 10406.
  7. Sezgin N, Balkaya N (2017) Removal of heavy metal ions from electroplating wastewater. Desalination and Water Treatment 93: 257-266.
  8. Tripathi A, Ranjan  MR (2015) Heavy Metal Removal from Wastewater Using Low Cost Adsorbents. Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation 6: 315.
  9. Thomas S, Currie A (2006) Heavy metal removal from electroplatng wastewater using HA 216: Popular absorbent media reduces effluent volumes, cuts costs. Metal Finishing 104(11): 29-31.
  10. Feng  Y, Gong  J, Zeng G, Niu  Q, Zhang  H, et al. (2010) Adsorption of Cd (II) and Zn (II) from aqueous solutions using magnetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as adsorbents. Chemical Engineering Journal 162(2): 487- 494.
  11. Crini G (2006) Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: A review. Bioresource Technology 97(9): 1061-1085.
  12. Malkoc E (2012) Natural Materials as Low Cost Adsorbents for Water Treatment. In: Bhatnagar A (Ed.), Application of Adsorbents for Water Pollution Control. Bentham Science Publishers pp: 347-362.
  13. Aprianti T, Miskah S, Selpiana, Komala R, Hatina S (2018) Heavy metal ions adsorption from pulp and paper industry wastewater using zeolite/activated carbon- ceramic composite adsorbent 2014(1).
  14. Cabrera C, Gabaldón  C, Marzal  P (2005) Sorption characteristics of heavy metal ions by a natural zeolite. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology 80(4): 477-481.
  15. Abo-El-Enein S, Gedamy Y, Ecresh A (2017) Nitrate Removal from Groundwater Using Sodium Alginate Doped with Nano-Hydroxyapatite. Advances in Materials 6(6): 102-114.
  16. Vahdat A, Ghasemi B, Yousefpour M (2019) Synthesis of hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite/ Fe3O4 nanocomposite for removal of heavy metals. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management 12: 100233.
  17. Melidis P (2015) Fluoride Removal from Aluminium Finishing Wastewater by Hydroxyapatite. Environmental Processes 2: 205-213.
  18. Pazourková L, Kupková J, Hundáková M, Seidlerová J, Martynková GS (2016) Sorption of Cd2+ on Clay Mineral/Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposites. Journ/al of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 16(8): 7788-7791.
  19. Shalini B, Kumar AR, Saral AM (2018) Synthesis of Pure Hydroxyapatite (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) by the Sol–Gel Method and the Antibiotic Loaded in the Presence of Natural Polymer for the Application of Drug Delivery. Advanced Science Letters 24(8): 5523-5526.
  20. Yusoff YM, Salimi MN, Anuar A (2015) Preparation of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles by sol-gel method with optimum processing parameters. AIP Conference Proceedings 1660(1).
  21. Kramer ER, Morey AM, Staruch M, Suib SL, Jain M, et al. (2012) Synthesis and characterization of iron- substituted hydroxyapatite via a simple ion-exchange procedure. Journal of Materials Science 48(2): 665-673.
  22. Stötzel C, Müller F, Reinert F, Niederdraenk F, Barralet J, et al. (2009) Ion adsorption behaviour of hydroxyapatite with different crystallinities. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 74(1): 91-95.
  23. Gupta N, Kushwaha AK, Chattopadhyaya MC (2011) Adsorption Of Cobalt(II) From Aqueous Solution Onto Hydroxyapatite/zeolite Composite. Advanced Materials Letters 2(4): 309-312.
  24. Nakahira A, Horimoto M, Nakamura S, Ihshihara S, Nagata H, et al. (2007) Synthesis and Evaluation of Modified Hydroxyapatite. Journal of Ion Exchange 18(4): 306-309.
  25. Hou H, Zhou R, Wu P, Wu L (2012) Removal of Congo red dye from aqueous solution with hydroxyapatite/ chitosan composite. Chemical Engineering Journal 211- 212: 336-342.
  26. Kusrini E, Sofyan N, Marta D, Santoso S, Tristantini D (2013) Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution by Hydroxyapatite/Chitosan Composite. Advanced Materials Research 789: 176-179.
  27. Ragab A, Ahmed I, Bader D (2019) The Removal of Brilliant Green Dye from Aqueous Solution Using Nano Hydroxyapatite/Chitosan Composite as a Sorbent. Molecules 24(5): 847.
  28. Mobasherpour I, Salahi E, Pazouki M (2011) Removal of nickel (II) from aqueous solutions by using nano- crystalline calcium hydroxyapatite. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society 15(2): 105-112.
  29. Zamani S, Salahi E, Mobasherpour I (2013) Removal of Nickel from Aqueous Solution by Nano Hydroxyapatite Originated from Persian Gulf Corals. Canadian Chemical Transactions 1(3): 173-190.
  30. Lemlikchi W, Drouiche N, Belaicha N, Oubagha N, Baaziz B, et al. (2015) Kinetic study of the adsorption of textile dyes on synthetic hydroxyapatite in aqueous solution. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 32: 233-237.
  31. Harja M, Ciobanu G (2018) Studies on adsorption of oxytetracycline from aqueous solutions onto hydroxyapatite. Science of The Total Environment 628- 629: 36-43.
  32. Prongmanee W, Alam I, Asanithi P (2019) Hydroxyapatite/ Graphene oxide composite for electrochemical detection of L-Tryptophan. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 102: 415-423.
  33. Bharath G, Ponpandian N (2015) Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on dendritic α-Fe2O3 hierarchical architectures for a heterogeneous photocatalyst and adsorption of Pb(ii) ions from industrial wastewater. RSC Advances 5(103): 84685-84693.
  34. Mobasherpour I, Heshajin MS, Kazemzadeh A, Zakeri M (2007) Synthesis of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite by using precipitation method. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 430(1-2): 330-333.
  35. Asri SE, Laghzizil A, Coradin T, Saoiabi A, Alaoui A, et al. (2010) Conversion of natural phosphate rock into mesoporous hydroxyapatite for heavy metals removal from aqueous solution. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 362(1-3): 33- 38.
  36. Choi S, Jeong Y (2008) The removal of heavy metals in aqueous solution by hydroxyapatite/cellulose composite. Fibers and Polymers 9(3): 267-270.
  37. Islam M, Mishra PC, Patel R (2011) Arsenate removal from aqueous solution by cellulose-carbonated hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. Journal of Hazardous Materials 189(3): 755-763.
  38. Guesmi Y, Agougui H, Lafi R, Jabli M, Hafiane A (2018) Synthesis of hydroxyapatite-sodium alginate via a co- precipitation technique for efficient adsorption of Methylene Blue dye. Journal of Molecular Liquids 249: 912-920.
  39. Fernando MS, De Silva RM, De Silva KMN (2015) Synthesis, characterization, and application of nano hydroxyapatite and nanocomposite of hydroxyapatite with granular activated carbon for the removal of Pb2+ from aqueous solutions. Appl Surf Sci 351: 95-103.
  40. Parga JR, Valenzuela JL, Vazquez V, Rodriguez M, Moreno H (2013) Removal of Aqueous Lead and Copper Ions by Using Natural Hydroxyapatite Powder and Sulphide Precipitation in Cyanidation Process. Materials Sciences and Applications 4(4): 231-237.
  41. Park S, Gomez-Flores A, Chung YS, Kim H (2015) Removal of Cadmium and Lead from Aqueous Solution by Hydroxyapatite/Chitosan Hybrid Fibrous Sorbent: Kinetics and Equilibrium Studies. Journal of Chemistry 2015: 1-12.
  42. Safatian F, Doago Z, Torabbeigi M, Rahmani SH, Ahadi N (2019) Lead ion removal from water by hydroxyapatite nanostructures synthesized from egg sells with microwave irradiation. Applied Water Science 9: 108.
  43. Morsy R (2016) Synthesis and physicochemical evaluation of hydroxyapatite gel biosorbent for toxic Pb(II) removal from wastewater. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 41(6): 2185-2191.
  44. Olabiyi OG, Adekola FA (2018) Removal of Iron and Manganese from Aqueous Solution Using Hydroxyapatite Prepared from Cow Bone. Research & Reviews Journal of Material Sciences 6(2): 59-72.
  45. Liu C (2013) Removal of Cobalt (II) Ions from Aqueous Solution on Zinc(II) Ions Doping Chitosan/ Hydroxyapatite Composite. Advanced Composites Letters 22(6): 143-150.
  46. Smičiklas I, Onjia A, Raičević S, Janaćković Đ, Mitrić M (2008) Factors influencing the removal of divalent cations by hydroxyapatite. Journal of Hazardous Materials 152(2): 876-884.
  47. Suzuki Y, Takeuchi Y (1994) Uptake of A Few Divalent Heavy Metal Ionic species by A Fixed Bed of Hydroxyapatite Particles. Journal of chemical engineering of japan 27(5): 571-576.
  48. Babel S, Kurniawan TA (2003) Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials 97(1-3): 219–243.
  49. Mohammad AM, Salah Eldin TA, Hassan MA, El-Anadouli BE (2017) Efficient treatment of lead-containing wastewater by hydroxyapatite/chitosan nanostructures. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 10(5): 683-690.

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{al2020,
  title   = {Hydroxyapatite-Based Materials for Heavy Metal Removal in
Wastewater Treatment},
  author  = {Al Bazedi GA* and Abdel-Fatah MA},
  journal = {Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal},
  year    = {2020},
  volume  = {4},
  number  = {2},
  doi     = {10.23880/ppej-16000227}
}
Al Bazedi GA* and Abdel-Fatah MA (2020). Hydroxyapatite-Based Materials for Heavy Metal Removal in
Wastewater Treatment. Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.23880/ppej-16000227
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Hydroxyapatite-Based Materials for Heavy Metal Removal in
Wastewater Treatment
AU  - Al Bazedi GA* and Abdel-Fatah MA
JO  - Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal
PY  - 2020
VL  - 4
IS  - 2
DO  - 10.23880/ppej-16000227
ER  -