Beta Fulltext view is in preview — article structure may vary. Browse all articles
Contents
International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology Research Article 8 min read

Assessment of Avian Diversity in Gudalur Forest Division, the Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu

Veeramani A*, Ramakrishnan B and Mohanakrishnan H
* Corresponding author
ISSN: 2639-216X  10.23880/izab-16000355  Received: February 04, 2022  Published: February 16, 2022
  views
 16 references
 1 figure
 5 tables
PDF
Keywords
Avian Diversity Gudalur Nilgiris Line Transect Diversity Index
Abstract

Avian community is an important component of forest ecosystem. Birds are playing a major role as pollinators, consumers, dispersers of plant seeds and predators of insects. Majority of the studies on bird community were focused on understanding of the structure of a community based on the population. A number of environmental factors are known to influence the population of birds directly. The present survey was made to find out the avian diversity in the lantana dominated area of Gudalur Forest Division. Line transect method was applied for recording birdlife communities. A total of 33 species of birds were recorded during the survey conducted in three phases in Gudalur Forest Division. Among the species identified, 26 are abundant and 7 are very abundant.

Introduction

Declining biodiversity is one of the most dramatic and irreversible aspects of anthropogenic global change and biological invasions are believed to be the second largest cause of current biodiversity loss after habitat destruction [1, 2, 3]. Avian community is an important component of forest ecosystem. Birds are playing a major role as pollinators, consumers, dispersers of plant seeds and predators of insects. Studies on bird community starting from MacArthur, et al. [4] have attracted wide attention. Investigations on the bird communities of the Western Ghats to plan for biodiversity friendly development are gaining significance [5]. The focus of community ecology is the study of the grouping of species, their distribution and the interactions between them and the physical and biological factors of their environment [6]. According to Cody, et al. [7] bird communities have direct relation with the structure of habitat and are indicators of environmental changes. Birds are one of the best indicators of environmental quality of any ecosystem [8]. Many other groups of animals such as [9], tiger beetle [10], birds [11] and mammals as well as plants [12] have been used to assess the habitat quality.

Majority of the studies on bird community were focused on understanding of the structure of a community based on the population [4, 7]. They attempted to explain the diversity, especially with respect to the forest structure or floristic diversity. The presence of a particular species in a type of forest was traditionally explained in terms of the availability of foraging substrates and vegetative layers. In recent years, the trend among community ecologists is to elucidate the function of a community focusing on habitat selection.

A number of environmental factors are known to influence the population of birds directly. Availability of food, detectability and capture, location of nesting sites, availability of nesting materials, presence of predators and competitors are the major factors influencing the foraging and breeding of birds and subsequently their population. One of the key aspects in community structure is the food habits of a species which is critical in understanding the pattern and process of community organization [6]. Population studies have been traditionally used to monitor long term changes in avian population and to assess both habitat quality and the responses of birds to both natural and human caused environmental changes [6].

Eight percent of bird species in India occur in Gudalur and adjacent Mudumalai Tiger Reserve. Among the 227 bird species found in this region, 110 species are insectivores, 62 are carnivores, 23 species are fishwives, 12 species are omnivores and 20 species are gramnivores. These include the unique  near threatened  Black-and-orange Flycatcher. Regional endemics include  Malabar trogon  and  Malabar grey hornbill. Some rare birds of prey like the  Rufous bellied hawk eagle  can occasionally be seen in this area. Other predatory birds include  crested hawk-eagle,  crested serpent eagle, Changeable Hawk Eagle, Black Eagle, Oriental Honey-buzzard,  Jerdon’s Baza,  Bonelli’s Eagle,  Crested Goshawk, Besra sparowhawk, Mottled Wood Owl and Brown Hawk Owl,  Minivet sp. There are also Hornbills, Golden Oriole,  Chloropsis,  Paradise flycatcher,  Golden-backed Woodpecker, Malabar Great Black Woodpecker,  Blue- winged Parakeet, Fairy bluebird, Jungle fowl, Racket-tailed Drongo,  Peacock,  Red Spurfowl,  Grey Francolin,  Painted Spurfowl, Painted Bush Quail, White-bellied Woodpecker, Lesser Yellownape, Golden Woodpecker, Streak- throated Woodpecker, Chestnut-headed Bee-eater, Emerald Dove, Green Imperial Pigeon, Pompadour Green Pigeon, Grey- bellied Cuckoo,  Indian Cuckoo,  Alpine Swift,  Black-hooded Oriole, Greater Racket-tailed Drongo, Black-headed Cuckooshrike, Grey-headed Bulbul, Forest Wagtail, Crimson- backed Sunbird and Loten’s Sunbird. It also holds the isolated southern population of the Striped Tit-babbler. The present survey was made to find out the avian diversity in the lantana dominated area of Gudalur Forest Division with an objective of study the avian diversity in prior to removal of invasive alien species Lantana camara of Gudalur Forest Division.

Methods

Line transect method [13] was applied for recording birdlife communities. Sometimes the transect might even gone beyond our physical target area. The care was taken that transects’ midpoint should cross on the target area. Survey was made to count the number of birds along with the transect. Using binocular bird species were identified from the transect. Grimmett, et al. [14] was referred for the identification of birds in the field. The diversity variables are collected to estimate encounter survey. For each sighting of the bird 1 m radius circle was laid at sighting location in order to record micro habitat utilization of the bird species.

Results and Discussion

A total of 33 species of birds were recorded during the survey conducted in three phases in Gudalur Forest Division (Table 1). Out of these species Red vented bulbul (25%), Malabar Parakeet (12%), Jungle myna (9%), House swift (7%) and Spotted dove (6%) were sighted dominantly, whereas the other species (41%) are sighted very few (Figure 1).

Sl. No.Common NameScientific NameNo. of birds sighted
1Ashy priniaPrinia socialis1
2Black DrongoDicrurus macrocercus3
3Black eagleIctinaetus malayensis5
4Blue winged leaf birdCholoropsis cochinchinensis1
5Common mynaAcridotheres tristis2
6Golden backed Wood peckerDinopium benghalense2
7Greater coucalCentropus sinensis2
8Greater Racket tailed drongoDicrurus paradiseus1
9Grey Jungle FowlGallus sonneratii4
10Grey wagtailMotacilla cinerea3
11House SwiftApus affinis15
12Indian RobinSaxicoloides fulicata4
13Indian scimitar babblerPomatorhinus horsfieldii4
14Indian swiftletCollocalia unicolor2
15Jungle MynaAcridotheres fuscus19
16Long tailed shrikeLanius schach1
17Malabar Grey HornbillOcyceros griseus2
18Malabar ParakeetPsittacula columboides24
19Oriental white-eyeZosterops palpebrosus3
20Purple sunbirdNectarinia asiatica4
21Red Spur fowlGalloperdix spadicea1
22Red-Vended bulbulPycnonotus cafer51
23Red-whiskered BulbulPycnonotus jocosus6
24Scaly breasted muniaLonchura punctulata5
25ShikraAccipiter badius2
26Small Green bee eaterMerops orientalis3
27Small MinivetPericrocotus cinnamomeus7
28Spotted DoveSteptopelia chinensis12
29Streak throated wood peckerPicus xanthopygaeus3
30White browed wagtailMotacilla maderaspatensis4
31White cheeked barbetMegalaima viridis4
32Yellow browed bulbulIole indica1
33Yellow-billed BabblerTurdoides affinis3

Table 1: Bird species sighted during the field survey in Gudalur and Bitherkad regions of Gudalur Forest Division.

Figure 1: Percentage of birds sighted in sample plot area of Gudalur Forest Division.
Click to enlarge
Figure 1: Percentage of birds sighted in sample plot area of Gudalur Forest Division.

The area is highly rich in avifauna. This high diversity may be attributed to the fact that this area supports good vegetation. Among the species identified, 26 are abundant and 7 are very abundant. The value of Simpson’s dominant index is very low (0.006) indicating co-dominance of species structure [15, 16]. The diversity index is rather fair (4.7267) which are almost similar to the bird diversity index of other luxuriant Western Ghat forests. The bird species were more or less evenly distributed in this area as indicated by the evenness value close to one (0.8416) (Table 2). The area is dominated with deciduous habitats provide good forage ground to bird diversity supports increased bird species diversity in this region.

IndicesValue
Richness index26.86826
Hill’s abundant number (N)108.638
Simpson’s dominant index0.006
Shannon’s diversity index4.7267
Pielou’s evenness index0.8416

Table 2: Various alpha diversity indices of bird species at Gudalur Forest Division.

The relative density of different bird species seen during the field work during pre monsoon, monsoon and post monsoon seasons are given in the Tables 3-5. Using birds as an indicator taxon, we assessed the consequence of invasion of lantana camara on the health of the ecosystem of the moist and dry deciduous forests of the division. Bird diversity was lower at high intensities of lantana in both the moist and dry deciduous forests but the species richness did not show a similar pattern. Various diversity parameters (such as species richness, Shannon diversity and abundance) were correlated with the average tree canopy cover and the average  lantana  cover. In the moist deciduous forest, bird species richness was positively correlated with average tree cover, but the Shannon index values were negatively correlated with the  lantana  cover. We stratified the birds into 4 guilds (Canopy, Understorey, Ground and Open Areas) based on their microhabitat preferences and analyzed the impact of lantana on these guilds. There was a decrease in canopy specialists as the density of  lantana  increased in both vegetation types, whereas under-storey species were low at low levels of lantana. The other guilds did not display any patterns over the range of  lantana sampled. We also stratified birds based on feeding habits and analysed their response to lantana. Insectivores and frugivores showed high species richness at moderate levels of lantana intensity in dry deciduous forests. Our results suggest that lantana does not affect the bird community as severely as it is believed to affect other components of the ecosystem.

S.NOCommon NameSpecies NameFREQ-UENCYRDMEANSDSE
1Malabar Grey HornbillOcyceros griseus25.56100
2Red-Vented BulbulPycnonotus cafer411.111.330.470.24
3Yellow-billed BabblerTurdoides affinis38.331.50.50.29
4Grey Jungle FowlGallus sonneratii12.78100
5Red Spur fowlGalloperdix spadicea12.78100
6Red-whiskered BulbulPycnonotus jocosus25.56100
7Spotted DoveSteptopelia chinensis12.78100
8Black DrongoDicrurus macrocercus12.78100
9Jungle MynaAcridotheres fuscus411.11210.5
10Malabar ParakeetPsittacula columboides1130.562.751.090.33
11Small MinivetPericrocotus cinnamomeus12.78100
12Indian RobinSaxicoloides fulicata25.56100

Table 3: Pre-monsoon (overall data).

BitharkaduGudalur
S.NOCommon NameScientific NameFreq-uencyRDMeanSDSEFreq-uencyRDMeanSDSE
1Red-Vended bulbulPycnonotus cafer2125.315.80.960.391129.731.830.690.3
2Malabar parakeetPsittacula
columboides
89.64200
3House SwiftApus affinis22.411001335.141.860.640.2
4Spotted doveSteptopelia chinensis1113.252.20.40.18
5Grey Jungle fowlGallus sonneratii11.2000
6Black eagleIctinaetus malayensis22.4110025.41100
7Golden backed Wood
pecker
Dinopium
benghalense
22.411.50.50.35
8Black drongoDicrurus
macrocercus
22.41100
9Jungle mynaAcridotheres fuscus78.433.50.50.35
10Small MinivetPericrocotus
cinnamomeus
33.611.50.50.3512.7000
11Greater Racket tailed
drongo
Dicrurus paradiseus11.2000
12Greater coucalCentropus sinensis11.2000
13Scaly breasted muniaLonchura punctulata56.022.50.50.35
14White cheeked barbetMegalaima viridis44.821.30.470.27
15Indian swiftletCollocalia unicolor22.41000
16White browed wagtailMotacilla
maderaspatensis
44.8120.40.18
17Indian robinSaxicoloides fulicata22.41000
18Yellow browed bulbulIole indica11.2000
19Small Green bee eaterMerops orientalis11.2000
20Jungle mynaAcridotheres fuscus22.4100025.41000
21Long tailed shrikeLanius schach12.7000
22Blue winged leaf birdCholoropsis
cochinchinensis
12.7000
23Indian scimitar
babbler
Pomatorhinus
horsfieldii
25.41000
24Streak throated wood
pecker
Picus xanthopygaeus12.7000
25Purple sunbirdNectarinia asiatica25.41000
26ShikraAccipiter badius12.7000

Table 4: Monsoon (overall data).

BitharkadGudalur
S.NOCommon NameScientific NameFrequ-encyRDMeanSDSEFrequ-encyRDMeanSDSE
1Red-Vended bulbulPycnonotus cafer723.331.40.430.22827.5920.710.35
2Jungle mynaAcridotheres fuscus413.331.330.50.35
3Greater coucalCentropus sinensis13.33000
4Malabar parakeetPsittacula
columboides
516.672.500
5Grey Jungle fowlGallus sonneratii26.67100
6Small Green bee- eaterMerops orientalis26.67100
7Oriental white-eyeZosterops
palpebrosus
3101.50.50.35
8Ashy priniaPrinia socialis13.33000
9Grey wagtailMotacilla cinerea310100
10Small MinivetPericrocotus
cinnamomeus
26.67000
11Red-whiskered bulbulPycnonotus jocosus413.791.330.470.33
12Spotted doveSteptopelia
chinensis
413.79210.71
13ShikraAccipiter badius13.45200
14Black eagleIctinaetus
malayensis
13.45000
15Purple sunbirdNectarinia asiatica26.9100
16Indian scimitar
babbler
Pomatorhinus
horsfieldii
26.9000
17Streak throated
woodpecker
Picus xanthopygaeus26.9100
18Common mynaAcridotheres tristis517.241.670.470.27

Table 5: Post Monsoon (overall data).

Management Implications

Lantana berries attract frugivorous birds and mammals, which disperse its seed to new areas. Once it reaches an area, Lantana spreads quickly. It forms dense, impenetrable thickets that smother native vegetation. It coppices so well, that efforts to eradicate it have failed. It quickly grows in and colonizes burnt areas. It has become a serious obstacle to the natural regeneration of important native species. Removal of Lantana in heavily infested areas is advised to control of spread of this species through bird communities.

References

  1. Cronk QCB, Fuller JL (1995) Plant Invaders. Chapman and Hall. London.
  2. Usher MB (1991) Biological invasions into tropical nature reserves In: Ramakrishnan PS, et al. (Eds.), Ecology of Biological Invasions in the Tropics pp: 21-34.
  3. Vitousek PM, D’Antonio CM, Loope LL, Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Scientist 84: 468-478.
  4. MacArthur RH, MacArthur JW (1961) On bird species diversity. Ecology 50: 793-801.
  5. Pramod P (1995) Ecological studies of Bird communities of Silent valley and neighbouring forests. Ph. D. Thesis submitted to the University of Calicut, Kerala.
  6. Wiens JA (1989) The ecology of bird communities. Foundations and patterns. Cambridge University Press 1: 539.
  7. Cody ML (1985) An introduction to habitat selection in birds. In: Cody NL, et al. (Eds.), Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press, Orlando pp: 4-56.
  8. Ripley SD (1978) Changes in the bird fauna of a forest area: Similipal Hills, Mayurbhanj District and Dhenkanal District, Orissa. J Bom nat Hist Soc 75: 570-574.
  9. Brown KS (1991) Conservation of neotropical environments: insects as indicators. In: Collins NM, Thomas JA, et al. (Eds.), The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press. New York, USA pp: 349- 404.
  10. Rodriguez JP, Pearson DL, Barrera RR (1998) A Tests for the Adequacy of Bioindicator Taxa: Are Tiger Beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) appropriate Indicators for Monitoring the Degradation of Tropical forests in Venezuela?. Biological Conservation 83(1): 69-76.
  11. Debinski DM, Brussard PF (1994) Using biodiversity data to assess species-habitat relationships in Glacier National Park, Montana. Ecological Applications 4(4): 833-843.
  12. Cronk Q (1988) Biodiversity: The key role of plants. IUCN, WWF pp: 13.
  13. Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Laake JL (1980) Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations. Wildlife Monographs 72(1): 202.
  14. Grimmett R, Inskipp C, Inskipp T (1999) Pocket Guide to the Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. Oxford University Press.
  15. Kremen C (1992) Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecological Applications 2(2): 203-217.
  16. Mittermeier RA (1988) Primate diversity and the tropical forest: Case studies from Brazil and Madagascar, and the importance of the megadiversity countries. In: Wilson EO, et al. (Eds.), Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC pp: 145-154.

Cite this article

BibTeX
APA
RIS
@article{veeramani2022,
  title   = {Assessment of Avian Diversity in Gudalur Forest Division, the
Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu},
  author  = {Veeramani A, Ramakrishnan B and Mohanakrishnan H},
  journal = {International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology},
  year    = {2022},
  volume  = {5},
  number  = {1},
  doi     = {10.23880/izab-16000355}
}
Veeramani A, Ramakrishnan B and Mohanakrishnan H (2022). Assessment of Avian Diversity in Gudalur Forest Division, the
Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.23880/izab-16000355
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Assessment of Avian Diversity in Gudalur Forest Division, the
Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu
AU  - Veeramani A, Ramakrishnan B and Mohanakrishnan H
JO  - International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology
PY  - 2022
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
DO  - 10.23880/izab-16000355
ER  -